
Letters to the Editor: I hope the 'Irish Examiner' continues to ask the hard questions
'The whole world should be reporting what they have learned up to this point. The whole world owes the journalists and people that documented and appealed to stop a war mongering regime.'
Those were the words of US-born Palestinian writer Mariam Barghouti in Elaine Loughlin's searing analysis on where the world now stands on Gaza ('Do you ever wonder why you're not seeing as many reports from Gaza?').
Whether it is Louis Theroux's shocking BBC documentary, The Settlers, on the treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank or last year's Oscar-winning film No Other Land, Israel is unquestionably a pariah state.
The Irish Examiner rightly asks: What more can be done by Ireland and the international community to try and bring a stop to the murderous campaign of vengeance on defenceless people in the ever dwindling Gaza strip?
Why not doorstep Bono or even Bob Geldof, who have been noticeably silent on the massacre unfolding before our eyes?
Or the Tipperary brothers, the multi-billionaire Collinsons — one of whom posted on social media recently: 'Great to be back in Tel Aviv.'
I hope the Irish Examiner continues to ask the hard questions — not just of our politicians, but also the celebrities and industrialists who are complicit in the horrors of Gaza and the West Bank through their silence and inactions.
Tom McElligott, Listowel, Co Kerry
Shame on the hypocrites
We sadly live in a world of twisted values where, on one hand, we can rightly celebrate and recognise the sacrifice of those who fought to liberate Europe 80 years ago from the Nazis and, at the same time, we witness the hypocrisy of the US, Britain, the EU, and Nato as they continue to shamelessly arm, finance, and collaborate with the belligerent Israeli occupiers of Palestine.
Shame on them all with their entitled mindset and their double speak on freedom and democracy, as they deny life and liberty to the Palestinians while giving political cover to Israel — which continues to control and deny access to the free press who would expose their ghastly lies and war crimes.
In every country, all free peoples must act to liberate the Palestinians by righteous actions — including:
Challenge the narrative which portrays an apartheid Israeli state as a normal democracy and allows them to promote their lies and propaganda;
Seek the truth from reliable sources such as the UN, Amnesty International, Israeli human rights groups, and independent news media;
Demand a referendum on sanctions if our political leaders do not act to cut all political, economic, and travel links with the Israeli regime;
The UN should remove Israel from the assembly and proscribe their military as a brutal terrorist organisation;
Boycott Israeli goods;
Support the banning of all Israeli football and sporting fixtures at international events in freedom-loving nations;
Remove Israel from the Eurovision Song Contest until they respect international laws;
Church leaders of all dominations should use their moral authority to challenge the active support of members of their congregations for the extremes of Israel's ultra-nationalists;
Provide financial support to NGOs and the UN — who supply humanitarian aid to the suffering, trapped, and starving people of Palestine.
Michael Hagan, Dunmurry, Co Antrim
Challenge to ban
The New Zealand government is looking to ban social media access for people under the age of 16 by 2026.
This will come as a great surprise for them as they probably don't read newspapers and social media sites might not publicise their own partial demise.
A number of countries are working on restricting access to social media, but with little success so far.
Banning anything is difficult given the freedoms most countries promote and protect.
Banning social media will be more difficult given some — probably most — will lie or cheat to maintain their youthful drug of addition, likes, and followers.
Social media has broadened to include dangerous Instagram challenges and videos of the consequences.
Any technological bypass will be sent around the world before their parents can finish a nice cup of tea.
Social media, once the realm of cat videos and family photos, has broadened to include dangerous Instagram challenges and videos of the consequences.
It has great potential — as did nuclear power, although the ex-citizens of Chernobyl might see a different future.
Rather than ban, Governments should monitor, clean, and promote the positive while punishing the negative.
Dennis Fitzgerald, Melbourne, Australia
Dying at home
End-of-life care can make a huge difference to those in their last months of life.
Recent research from the Irish Hospice Foundation tells us that more than seven out of 10 Irish people would wish to die in their own home.
However, we learn that getting access to palliative care at home or to hospice care can sometimes be difficult .
I was emboldened to glean that the Irish Hospice Foundation is now hoping to address the gaps in home care in their strategy, Dying well at home, over the next five years.
We have a growing population in Ireland and, over the next two decades, we will see an increase in Irish deaths.
It would be true to say that not everybody will require specialist palliative care.
This is where the role of other healthcare and social care professionals will kick in.
I applaud the Irish Hospice Foundation in highlighting this emotive subject.
John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary
Leo's teachings
The election of a relatively unknown cardinal, Robert F Prevost, to the papacy has catapulted another Augustinian to world fame.
History will judge if his pontificate is to be as influential as the actions of two other Augustinian friars: Martin Luther — much influenced by St Augustine, who spearheaded the Reformation — and Gregor Mendel — who in his monastic garden, experimenting on peas, laid the foundation for the science of genetics.
It may also be noteworthy that Leo XIII (died 1903) lived into his 94th year — successor to Pius IX (died 1878), who reigned for 32 years — the record to date.
Of further interest is that this Leo, in 1892, appointed the first apostolic delegate to the US.
Pope Leo XIV. Picture: Alessandra Tarantino/AP
This was followed in 1899, however, by his censuring of 'Americanism' — which sought to adapt Catholicism to contemporary ideas and practices.
When, on May 8, cardinal Prevost accepted his nomination as pope, he was doubtless aware of these considerations — in addition to having probably anticipated the somewhat exaggerated plaudits now directed at his predecessor's most famous encyclical (he devoted 11 to the Virgin Mary), Rerum novarum.
Leo XIII also supported the study of the natural sciences and said that Catholic historians should write objectively about topics.
These initiatives continue to be relevant in a world plagued by 'alternative realities', as the new pope will surely appreciate.
Peter Keenan, Kinsale, Co Cork
Pledge to reform
The new Pope, Leo XIV, promises to follow in the reforming steps of the late Pope Francis.
It is reliably reported that at a pre-conclave meeting of the assembled cardinals in Rome, it was agreed that clerical sex abuse must be one of the first challenges to be faced by of the incoming pope.
From his time as Bishop of Sufar and apostolic administrator of Chiclayo, Peru, and as a Peruvian citizen he must be painfully aware of the controversy of clerical abuse and its fallout that continues unabated in Peru.
Indeed the scandal of sexual abuse followed him to Rome in the person of Cardinal Cipriani, former Archbishop of Lima, and a member of the traditionalist Opus Dei organisation who has been accused of sexual abuse — a crime of which he declares he is innocent.
Francis accepted his resignation as Archbishop of Lima, but imposed several penal restrictions on him — which he has largely ignored —including the wearing of the distinctive red robes and the associated regalia of a cardinal.
In spite of this prohibition, he attended pre-conclave meetings and public events in the Vatican in his cardinal attire.
This is just one example of the serious challenges that Pope Leo faces.
Hopefully, he will confront them with courage and tenacity.
Brendan Butler, Drumcondra, Dublin 9
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
20 minutes ago
- The Journal
Father of soldier killed in Lebanon in 1989 appeals to government to update Army Pensions Act
THE FATHER OF Private Michael McNeela, an Irish peacekeeper who was shot dead by Israeli-backed militia in Lebanon in 1989, has said that he feels 'let down' by the government's stance that they cannot transfer his late wife's bereavement payment to him. Michael McNeela was 21-years-old when he was shot dead on his second tour in South Lebanon in February 1989. His mother Kathleen was supplied with a bereavement payment following his death. Following Kathleen's death last year, her husband John reached out to have the payment transferred to his name. 'They sent me a letter saying that it wasn't transferable to me,' John told Justin McCarthy on RTÉ Radio today. 'I feel very let down, to be honest with you. The act that says this now is 80 years old, 1946, and it was never updated, because there's not many cases like mine come up, and that's why it was never brought out in the open.' In the Army Pensions Act 1946 , Part IV states that only the six people set out are entitled to be deemed a dependent of a deceased soldier: his mother, his grandmother, his grandfather, his permanently invalided brother, his permanently invalided and unmarried sister, and his father – if over 60 years of age or incapacitated by ill health. As John was neither over 60 nor in ill health when his son was killed, he is not entitled to the payment, despite his wife's death. Advertisement John, who is now 84-years-old, said that the payment would make the world of difference to him. 'It means I can run a car, and I need a car because I'm not very good at walking, and if I hadn't a car, I'd be a prisoner in my own home.' He appealed to the Tánaiste and Defence Minister Simon Harris to reexamine the current act to allow bereavement payments for relatives of Irish soldiers killed in active duty to be transferred. 'It's very rare, but Ireland will always be sending peacekeepers to maybe different countries, and the thing can happen like it happened, Michael, the way one or two might get killed, which I hope not,' John said. 'I am very hopeful [for change], and I would ask the Minister to do all he can. He's the only man that can change it.' Louth TD Ruairí Ó Murchú said that he has been engaging with the Tánaiste on John's behalf. 'They stated that there would be an engagement at General Secretary level, but in fairness, I think John McNeela has said it, made the most cogent point, which is the Act needs to be updated. 'Everyone would accept that we should be looking after those families of people, of soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice, and a very small number of people. There may never be another case like this again,' Ó Murchú said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Gerry Adams' comments about 'putting manners' on BBC described as 'chilling' by NUJ secretary
GERRY ADAMS' COMMENTS following his successful libel case against the BBC have been described as 'chilling' by Séamus Dooley, the Irish secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ). The former Sinn Féin president was awarded €100,000 in damages after winning his case at the High Court in Dublin on Friday. Adams said that a BBC Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. A jury found in his favour after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and that it had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. Adams said from his perspective, the case was about 'putting manners' on the BBC. Adams also said: 'The British Broadcasting Corporation upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland, and in my view it's out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement.' The NUJ's Séamus Dooley told RTÉ Radio this afternoon that Friday was 'a day which gives us pause for reflection'. While stressing that Adams was entitled to take his case, 'it does have profound implications for the practice of journalism'. 'And I think it has implications both in terms of defamation law, but also for me, in terms of journalism in Northern Ireland, and the relationship between Sinn Féin and journalists in Northern Ireland.' Asked for his reaction to Adams saying he was 'putting manners' on the BBC, Dooley said: 'Well, I found that a chilling comment, actually. Putting manners on the BBC to me means putting them back in their box.' It was put to Dooley that the verdict could have a chilling effect in newsrooms in Ireland. 'That is precisely what Mr Adams meant when he said putting matters on the BBC,' Dooley replied. Advertisement 'That's extremely worrying. It doesn't matter whether Gerry Adams was in the IRA or not, as far as I'm concerned. 'He is a figure of huge significance to journalists, to historians, to academics, and there is no doubt that he had an influence on the shape of history of Northern Ireland. 'And on that basis, any journalist has a right, any academic, to question and probe. 'The issue here, I think under defamation is the issue of fair opinion and how you square that circle.' Given the length of the case and the huge costs associated with it, Dooley said it would be 'very dangerous if journalists who carry out an investigation and have open to them, under legislation, the defence of honest opinion, then were put in the position where they had to settle because of costs'. He said the case raises the need for a review of Ireland's defamation law. 'We need to look at the defence of honest opinion, and how you square that circle in the context of journalists' right to protect sources is a real difficulty.' Dooley said that the NUJ's position in the past had been in favour of juries in defamation cases, but that has since changed. 'I've now reached the conclusion that in defamation cases, that juries are not appropriate, and one of the reasons is we will never know why the jury reached this decision,' he said, adding that if the case had been taken in Northern Ireland, it would have been decided by judges and a written explanation would have been published. Dooley said that reforming defamation law 'has never been a priority' in Ireland. 'I also think we have to look at, both from Mr Adams' point of view and from the BBC point of view, the notion that this case has been running since 2016. 'Does anyone believe that that is fair or reasonable?' He also said asked if the costs involved in taking such a case can be seen as reasonable when it comes to ordinary citizens. The BBC is expected to be landed with legal costs from the case amounting to more than €4m. With reporting from Press Association Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Gerry Adams' ‘putting manners on BBC' remark ‘chilling'
Seamus Dooley, the Irish secretary of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), also said the high profile case showed the need for reform of Ireland's defamation laws, saying the public would never know why the jury made its decision. Former Sinn Féin leader Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. A jury at the High Court in Dublin awarded him €100,000 (£84,000) when it found in his favour on Friday, after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. It also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way. Mr Adams' legal team said the verdict of the jury was a 'full vindication' for their client while the BBC said it was 'disappointed' with the outcome. Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. Mr Dooley told RTÉ's This Week programme that it was a verdict which would make journalists 'pause for reflection'. He said: 'The first thing we should say is Gerry Adams was entitled to take his case. 'But it does have profound implications for the practise of journalism and I think it has implications both in terms of defamation law but also for me in terms of journalism in Northern Ireland and the relationship between Sinn Fein and journalists in Northern Ireland.' Speaking outside court on Friday, Mr Adams said taking the case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation'. ADVERTISEMENT He added: 'The British Broadcasting Corporation upholds the ethos of the British state in Ireland, and in my view it's out of sync in many, many fronts with the Good Friday Agreement.' Mr Dooley said: 'I found that a chilling comment actually. He referred to putting manners on the BBC, to me that means putting them back in their box. 'The reality is that Spotlight has, for over 40 years, done some of the most amazing investigative journalism. 'Margaret Thatcher tried to ban Spotlight because of their coverage of Gibraltar Three, they exposed Kincora at the heart of the British establishment, recently they did work on Stakeknife, and in fact the Sinn Féin mayor of Derry led the campaign to save BBC Radio Foyle news service. 'I found the attitude quite chilling but also unfair and unreasonable in the circumstances.' Mr Dooley said that Mr Adams was a figure of 'huge significance' to journalists, historians and academics and had 'influenced the shape of history of Northern Ireland'. He added: 'On that basis, any journalist has a right, any academic, to question and probe.' He said the case underpinned the need for a review of defamation laws in Ireland He said: 'First of all we need to look at the defence of honest opinion and how you square that circle in the context of journalists' right to protect sources, it is a real difficulty. 'For many years the NUJ was in favour of retaining juries. I have now reached the conclusion in defamation cases that juries are not appropriate. 'One of the reasons is we will never know why the jury reached this decision. 'If, as in Northern Ireland, had Mr Adams taken his case in Northern Ireland, the case is heard before judges, you have the benefit of a written judgment, you have the benefit of a detailed explanation of the reason why a verdict is given. 'That provides an insight and a guide. 'Here we don't know.' Mr Dooley also pointed out that proceedings in the case had been running since 2016. Former Sinn Fein member Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years. In the Spotlight programme broadcast in September 2016, an anonymous source given the pseudonym Martin claimed the shooting was sanctioned by the political and military leadership of the IRA and that Mr Adams gave 'the final say'. In 2009, the dissident republican group the Real IRA claimed responsibility for the killing and a Garda investigation into the matter remains ongoing. Mr Adams had described the allegation as a 'grievous smear'. Mr Adams has at all times denied sanctioning the murder.