logo
Ransomware, disease and 'ultra low-cost retailers': Why 3 iconic Canadian clothing stores went broke

Ransomware, disease and 'ultra low-cost retailers': Why 3 iconic Canadian clothing stores went broke

Yahoo16-02-2025

For three weeks in November and December 2021, iconic Canadian clothing chains Bootlegger, Cleo and Ricki's found themselves paralyzed — staring down the barrel of the "critical holiday season" but prevented by ransomware from moving inventory.
The attack occurred on Nov. 23, but the businesses weren't able to regain access to their internal systems until Dec. 13 — a lag time that forced the 221 affected stores to mount heavy promotions in order to offload the substantial portion of seasonal clothing caught up in the delay.
According to court documents filed as part of insolvency proceedings by Winnipeg-based Comark Holdings — the company which owns all three retailers — the "brick and mortar stores lost approximately $8.2 million in revenue due to the cyber incident alone."
Headwinds for clothing retailers
Chief executive officer Shamsh Kassam's affidavit provides a detailed window into the array of problems which forced Comark into creditor protection: the ransomware attack, the lingering impact of COVID, conflict in the Middle East and the rise of so-called "ultra-low-cost retailers."
An Ontario Superior Court judge has given the green light in recent weeks to deals that will see Ricki's and Cleo sold to Canadian retail billionaire Doug Putman — owner of Toys R' Us and Northern Reflections — and Bootlegger likely going to Warehouse One clothing.
A ransomware attack which began in November 2021 cost the owner of Ricki's, Cleo and Bootlegger more than $8 million as the stores struggled to overcome problems with inventory and internal systems. (Kacper Pempel/Reuters)
But Canada's retail clothing and accessories industry — which generated $3.6 billion in 2024 — still faces the same headwinds that left Comark $61 million in debt.
"The competitive retail and, in particular, retail apparel industry in Canada has undergone significant changes in the past decade," writes Kassam, who is based in Vancouver.
"As a result of these changes, many Canadian retailers, including apparel retailers ... have filed for protection ... including Reitmans, Aldo, Aeropostale, American Apparel, Mexx, Forever XXI, Target Canada, Express, Sears Canada, Nordstrom Canada and Ted Baker Canada,"
Deep Canadian roots
The court documents spell out the history of all three stores, which have been part of the Canadian retail landscape for decades.
Ricki's was founded in 1939 in Brandon and sells mostly tops, sweaters, pants, dresses. blouses, blazers, outerwear, denim and accessories. Cleo's predecessor, Irene Hill, was founded in 1958.
A Houthi helicopter approaching the cargo ship Galaxy Leader on Nov. 19, 2023. Attacks in the Red Sea were among the many problems that fed into a decision by the owners of Cleo, Bootlegger and Ricky's to seek creditor protection. (Houthi Media Center/The Associated Press)
"The Cleo brand provides work wear and casual clothing for women over the age of 48," Kassam writes. "Cleo is the largest retailer of women's petite merchandise in Canada."
Bootlegger was founded in B.C. in 1971 — "a retailer of denim, other casual apparel and accessories for men and women between the ages of 35 and 55."
Despite the deep Canadian roots, a report filed by Comark's court-appointed monitor says 82 per cent of private label merchandise made for the retailers "is sourced from foreign manufacturers, located primarily in China and Bangladesh."
Those supply chains would also come to play a role in Comark's fortunes.
"Unfortunately, international conflict in the Red Sea, protests at certain of the vendors' factories in Bangladesh, and rail and port strikes in 2024 all caused additional delays and resulted in further strained vendor relationships and lost sales," Kassam writes.
"This, in turn, placed increased financial pressure on the ... businesses."
'Consumer needs have changed'
The latest court proceedings are not Comark's first experience with insolvency. The company was forced into creditor protection in 2020 as a result of COVID lockdowns — re-emerging after a sale to an entity controlled by its principal shareholder "poised for success."
But Kassam writes that even after the sale, further lockdowns in 2020 meant Bootlegger, Cleo and Ricki's lost out on Black Friday and Christmas sales.
According to court documents, ultra-low-cost retailers like Shein and Temu have undermined Canada's brick-and-mortar retail fashion industry. (Wirestock Creators/Shutterstock)
Delays in supply chains caused by the pandemic also factored into the sales schedule, delivering seasonal items "outside of their targeted time frame," which in turn led to product markdowns.
"Consumer needs have also changed as the COVID-19 pandemic led to increased remote work and a decreased need for workwear clothing, which previously made up a sizeable portion of the [companies'] businesses," Kassam writes.
The ransomware attack sent a shockwave through the business — shuttering retail stores and an e-commerce platform for two days and freezing inventory in the weeks that followed.
"The effects of the Cyber Incident extended far beyond this time period," Kassam writes.
"All of the companies' internal processes and systems, including [their] history and critical path, were lost or compromised through the Cyber Incident and, as these systems were not recovered, they had to be rebuilt."
The court documents say the very nature of the competition has also changed drastically in the past four years.
"Namely, a difficult economic environment combined with the introduction and consumer uptake of certain ultra-low-cost fashion retailers, including Shein and Temu, have placed significant financial pressure on traditional fashion retailers," Kassam's affidavit reads.
As of December 2024, Ricki's, Cleo and Bootlegger had approximately 2,056 hourly and salaried employees across Canada. The court proceedings do not say what the future holds for them.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Los Angeles Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Dozens of states have filed a joint lawsuit against the bankrupt DNA-testing company 23andMe to block the company's sale of its customers' genetic data without explicit consent. The suit, filed this week in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Missouri, comes months after 23andMe began a court-supervised sale process of its assets. The South San Francisco-based venture was once valued at $6 billion and has collected DNA samples from more than 15 million customers. The company's bankruptcy has raised questions over privacy standards for genetic data, which experts say is uniquely sensitive, immutable and irreplaceable if stolen. Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia filed the lawsuit, arguing that 23andMe customers have an inherent right to their own genetic information. 'This isn't just data — it's your DNA,' said Oregon Atty. Gen. Dan Rayfield in a statement. 'It's personal, permanent, and deeply private. People did not submit their personal data to 23andMe thinking their genetic blueprint would later be sold off to the highest bidder.' 23andMe announced in May that it would be sold to New York-based drug maker Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, which had agreed to comply with 23andMe's existing privacy policy. However, a competing offer from nonprofit TTAM Research Institute led the bankruptcy judge to reopen the auction last week. TTAM is run by 23andMe co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who has made several failed attempts to take the company private. In a statement, a 23andMe spokesperson said the lawsuit's claims 'are without merit' and that the sale of genetic data does not violate privacy regulations. 'Customers will continue to have the same rights and protections in the hands of the winning bidder,' the spokesperson said. 23andMe customers have the right to delete their genetic information from the company's database at any time, as outlined in the Genetic Information Privacy Act and the California Consumer Privacy Act. During a testimony in Washington earlier this week, 23andMe interim Chief Executive Joseph Selsavage said that 1.9 million customers have requested their data be deleted since the company's bankruptcy filing in March. Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that 23andMe's privacy policy was subject to change and not adequate to protect customers' data. In an interview in March, she stressed the sensitivity of genetic data. 'I would be very concerned if I had given a swab to 23andMe,' she said. 'There is little we can do to control what happens to it.'

Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends
Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends

(Reuters) -U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday said the Trump administration is prepared to "roll the date forward" with trading partners negotiating in good faith if the deadline marking the end of the 90-day pause on President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs is reached with no deal. "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." Bessent's remarks, in response to a question from a Democratic lawmaker, marked the first time a Trump administration official has indicated some flexibility around the expiration date for the pause. That date - July 8 - is now just four weeks away, and so far the White House has struck only one preliminary deal with a major foreign trading partner affected by the pause, Britain. A deal struck on Tuesday in London with China to de-escalate that bilateral trade war is proceeding on a separate track and timeline. The White House did not immediately respond to a question about whether Trump shared Bessent's view. Trump announced the pause on April 9, a week after unveiling "Liberation Day" tariffs against nearly all U.S. trading partners that proved to be so unexpectedly large and sweeping that it sent global financial markets into near panic. The S&P 500 Index plunged more than 12% in four days for its heftiest run of losses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. Investors were so rattled they bailed out of safe-haven U.S. Treasury securities, sending bond yields rocketing higher. The dollar sank. Markets started their recovery on April 9 when Trump unexpectedly announced the pause. A further leg up in the recovery followed in early May when the Trump team reached a preliminary deal to dial back the triple-digit tariff rates it had imposed on goods from China. The events have given rise to what some on Wall Street have parodied as the "TACO" trade - an acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. "The only time the market has reacted positively is when the administration is in retreat from key policy areas," Democratic Representative Don Beyer of Virginia told Bessent before pressing him on what should be expected at the end of the next deadline next month. "As I have said repeatedly there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals with those," Bessent said before going on to signal a willingness to offer extensions to those negotiating in good faith. (Reporting By Dan Burns; Editing by Chris Reese and Daniel Wallis)

AMC makes major theater change that will frustrate customers
AMC makes major theater change that will frustrate customers

Miami Herald

time43 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

AMC makes major theater change that will frustrate customers

AMC Theaters (AMC) had a rough start to 2025. The theater chain suffered a major loss as it struggled to attract moviegoers, despite major releases such as "Captain America: Brave New World," "Snow White," "Wolf Man," and "Dog Man." In its first-quarter earnings report for 2025, AMC revealed that its total revenues fell by about 9% year-over-year, while movie theater attendance in the U.S. dropped by 11%. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter AMC also reported a net loss of $202.1 million during the quarter, which is higher than the $163.5 million net loss it suffered during the same quarter last year. Related: AMC announces generous offer to win back customers "Setting aside those first quarters directly impacted by Covid and its aftermath, the January to March industry box office in 2025 was the lowest it has been since 1996," said AMC CEO Adam Aron in the report. The dip in attendance comes after AMC's average movie ticket price in the U.S. reached $12.31 during the first quarter of this year, which is higher than the $12.19 average it reported for the same quarter in 2024. Movie ticket prices have been rising over the past few years amid inflation. According to recent data from The Numbers, the average movie ticket price in the U.S. was $11.31 in 2024, which is 3% higher than the $10.94 average in 2023. As prices increase, some consumers have been avoiding movie theaters like the flu. A recent survey from the Wall Street Journal found that 65% of consumers said they prefer to watch movies at home, while 35% said they prefer to watch films in theaters. Amid this trend, AMC has made a bold move to dodge further price increases; however, customers may not be thrilled about the decision. The theater chain has reportedly landed a deal with cinema advertising company National CineMedia to run more commercials before movie screenings begin, according to a recent report from The New York Times. AMC claims this deal will allow it to rely less on increasing movie ticket prices to boost its revenue. Related: Paramount makes drastic decision amid shift in customer behavior "For the past five years, AMC has sought out crucial revenue that is not reliant on the increase of base ticket prices," said AMC in a statement to the Times, adding "while AMC was initially reluctant to bring this to our theaters, our competitors have fully participated for more than five years without any direct impact to their attendance." The move from AMC comes after its top rivals, Regal and Cinemark, signed the same deal with National CineMedia in 2019. AMC was also offered the deal that same year; however, it "flatly rejected" it due to its concerns that "U.S. moviegoers would react quite negatively to the concept," according to a press release. The deal is expected to make pre-show advertisements last, on average, 20 to 30 minutes long. It is no surprise that AMC is continuing to dodge increasing its ticket prices as it has recently made several attempts to make moviegoing more affordable for consumers, who are battling inflation and higher costs of living. A few months ago, the theater chain added a new A-List Classic tier subscription to its flagship subscription service AMC Stubs A-List. The new tier offers a lower-price plan for guests who prefer to watch a maximum of one movie per week at AMC Classic locations. It also made several tweaks to AMC Stubs A-List to attract more frugal customers, such as expanding A-List weekly movie access from three titles a week to four, and lowering the age eligibility from 16 to 13 to attract more teens and families into theaters. During an earnings call in May, Aron said these changes are "designed to ease the pain of a healthy price increase." Related: Disney CEO offers unexpected response to tariff concerns The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store