
BSF Rajasthan IG interview: ‘Nothing unexpected (during Op Sindoor) except sheer volume of drones, missiles launched by Pakistan'
Operation Sindoor significantly unsettled Pakistani security forces as India conducted targeted strikes on terrorist camps across the border. Speaking to Parul Kulshrestha, Inspector General M L Garg of the Border Security Force (Rajasthan Frontier) discussed the evolving situation along the western border and the BSF's strategic response. Garg emphasized that India exercised restraint by not targeting civilian or military infrastructure. In contrast, Pakistan launched drones and missiles aimed at both military installations and civilian populations — many of which were successfully intercepted and neutralized in mid-air.
What were the major challenges during Operation Sindoor? Were there any unexpected hurdles?
There was nothing unexpected, except for the sheer volume of drones and missiles that Pakistan launched toward our border regions. In total, 413 drones were sent targeting military and civilian areas in Rajasthan, particularly in Sri Ganganagar, Bikaner, and Jaisalmer. All of them were successfully intercepted and neutralized. We were fully prepared for such a scenario.
What preparations were made by the BSF before Operation Sindoor was launched?
The Director General of BSF and the central government had instructed us to stay prepared — not for full-scale war but for escalating tensions between the two nations. Anti-drone systems had already been installed by the BSF, Army, and Air Force. We were on high alert, especially after the events of May 7, when Pakistan responded aggressively following our targeted strikes on terrorist camps. Our operations were precise — we avoided civilian and military infrastructure. In contrast, Pakistan responded indiscriminately, targeting civilian areas. India reserves the right to respond to terrorism, and Pakistan's haphazard drone attacks showed a disregard for innocent lives.
You mentioned during the May 26 press conference that India did not evacuate border villages, whereas Pakistan did. Why was that?
India acted with restraint and precision. Our strikes were limited to preventing militant activity. In the event of shelling, we had bunkers ready for civilian protection, but that level of response wasn't necessary. Pakistani drones were intercepted in the air, eliminating the need to move villagers. We prioritized security while maintaining calm.
There have been reports of sleeper cells and espionage in border villages. How is BSF addressing this issue?
Yes, there have been cases of Indian nationals in border villages acting as informants for Pakistan. With modern encrypted messaging apps, such activities are harder to detect. However, we closely monitor communications and behavior. These individuals are eventually identified and apprehended thanks to our surveillance and intelligence capabilities.
Operation Sindoor presented a war-like scenario after decades. Will BSF update its border security strategy following this?
Our long-standing preparedness helped us to manage the situation effectively. This operation has provided invaluable experience about how conflict situations may evolve. While our core strategy remains intact, we are continuously evaluating and implementing enhancements to strengthen our position further.
How does managing the Rajasthan border compare to handling situations in Kashmir or Bengal?
Each border presents unique challenges. The India-Bangladesh border sees more infiltration and narcotics smuggling, which are mostly economic crimes. Recent political changes in Bangladesh have influenced the nature of these issues. In Jammu & Kashmir, particularly along the Line of Control, ceasefire violations demand a more aggressive posture. Punjab and Rajasthan, being international borders, have seen weapon and drug drops aided by elements in Pakistan. Our approach varies by region, and we're constantly upgrading our capabilities to deal with such threats effectively.
Are there plans to strengthen anti-drone systems on the western front to prevent narcotics smuggling?
Yes. The central government is aware of the situation and is actively working on bolstering anti-drone capabilities to curb narcotic drops along the western border.
How was the coordination between BSF, the Army, local police, and civil administration during Operation Sindoor?
The BSF held the front lines, often just 150 meters from the international border. Coordination with the Army and Air Force was seamless. Civil administration and local populations extended full support. This is the beauty of India, we all become united when there is a threat to our nation.
There was a lot of misinformation, including reports of cyberattacks, during Operation Sindoor. What's your take?
Pakistan initially tried to downplay the operation but resorted to misinformation when the situation spiraled out of their control. Several government and civil websites faced cyber attacks. However, our cyber defence systems held firm. We ensured timely and accurate communication through official channels to prevent panic and misinformation.
What message would you like to give to the public?
Unity is our greatest strength. The public must trust the leadership and the armed forces. While some questioned Operation Sindoor, it's important to stand together during national crises. Our forces are dedicated to protecting every citizen, and we urge people to support and believe in the nation's efforts to maintain peace and security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
30 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistans Debt Crisis Explodes: Burden Mounts To 76,007,000,000,000 PKR Exposing Islamabads Vulnerability
Pakistan Economic Crisis: Pakistan is often called the begging bowl of the world, especially among the Islamic nations. Every now and then, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is seen visiting friendly countries seeking assistance, investments and support while its Army keeps spending on building terror infrastructure. Now, a fresh report has revealed a staggering surge in Pakistan's debt. While Pakistan has been facing burgeoning inflation, the country's national debt is soaring to a record high. A new Economic Survey, released this Monday, reveals that Pakistan's debt has soared to an unprecedented high, painting a deeply concerning picture for its economic future. According to the CNN-NEWS18 report, Pakistan's total public debt hit a staggering 76,007 billion Pakistani Rupees (PKR)—that's 76 trillion —by the end of March 2025. This marks the highest debt level in the country's history. To put that into perspective, it translates to approximately INR 23.1 trillion or US $269.344 billion. The rapid escalation of this debt is particularly alarming. Just four years ago, in 2020-21, Pakistan's public debt stood at 39,860 billion PKR, meaning it has nearly doubled in that short span. Looking back a decade, the figure was just 17,380 billion PKR, indicating that the nation's public debt has ballooned by almost five times over the past ten years. This colossal sum of 76,007 billion PKR is made up of 51,518 billion PKR in domestic debt and 24,489 billion PKR in external debt. The Economic Survey itself warns of the dangers, stating that "excessive or poorly managed debt can pose serious vulnerabilities, such as rising interest burdens and can undermine long-term fiscal sustainability and economic security if left unaddressed." Amidst this backdrop, Pakistan recently received a US $1.03 billion aid package from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) under its Extended Fund Facility, an attempt to provide some relief to its strained economy. Notably, Pakistan is planning to increase its defence spending in wake of the Operation Sindoor where it faced a humiliating defeat against India. Pakistan has repeatedly been accused of diverting development funds towards terror and military infrastructure.


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Pakistan's UNSC posts present diplomatic challenge for India's fight against terror
Written by Shivam Shekhawat On June 5, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced Pakistan's appointment as chair and vice chair of two important United Nations Security Council (UNSC) committees: The Taliban Sanctions Committee formed through Resolution 1988 and the Counter-Terrorism Committee, which monitors the implementation of Resolution 1373, formed after 9/11. Islamabad is now also a co-chair of two working groups: One on documentation and procedural issues with Denmark and another, newly formed one with Greece tasked with analysing the effectiveness of UN sanctions. Pakistan is also set to preside over the council next month. In the aftermath of Operation Sindoor and India's efforts to engage with the international community to highlight Pakistan's nefarious role in fomenting terrorism, the appointments have raised concerns about their possible implications for New Delhi. After being elected to the UNSC in June last year, Pakistan started its tenure as a non-permanent member on January 1. Its term will end on December 31, 2026. Marking its eighth stint at the UNSC, Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Asim Iftikar Ahmad, restated the country's commitment to utilise the platform to highlight the Kashmir issue and work towards preventing the adverse impacts of terrorism. There can be no doubt that Islamabad will leverage its membership to further its anti-India agenda. The statement released by the Security Council condemning the Pahalgam terror attack was relatively watered down from previous iterations of support to India. Then, on May 5, the UNSC held a closed-door consultation on the 'India-Pakistan Question', the first time after 2019. Thus, cognisant of the possible role Pakistan can play in the UNSC, India's post-conflict outreach to the world focused on reaching out to permanent and non-permanent members except Pakistan, China and Somalia. Similar to India's outreach, Pakistan also sent its delegation to the UN headquarters in New York, as well as to Washington DC, Moscow, Brussels and London. These delegations, led by senior current and former ministers, are urging for the immediate resumption of the Indus Waters Treaty. While the all-party delegations sent by New Delhi have made a clear case for India's imperative to target terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and the threat it faces from its western neighbor, the road ahead, to win the narrative war, will not be easy. India has been urging a rethink of the financial support offered to Pakistan by the IMF and the World Bank, and its possible utilisation by Rawalpindi to fund activities against India. India has also decided to revamp its push for Pakistan's re-inclusion in the FATF's grey list after it was removed in 2022. For India, this is important to prevent Pakistan from strengthening its terror-military scaffolding further. While ties between Kabul and Islamabad plummeted in the last few months, they have now decided to elevate their relationship to the ambassadorial level, the agreement for which was reached during the informal meeting between the foreign ministers of Pakistan, Afghanistan and China, further changing the dynamics in the region. Both sides have had continued communications, even when the conflict between India and Pakistan broke out. While the Taliban is trying to play both sides, China's close strategic partnership with Pakistan and its openness to engaging with Kabul makes the situation difficult for India. There has been a close synchronisation between Islamabad and Beijing against India at the UNSC and other international platforms. Pakistan will leverage the platform to propagate false claims of India's support for terrorist attacks in the country, particularly the attacks by Baloch outfits. Islamabad has also tried to pin the blame for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan's actions on both Afghanistan and India. While the UNSC posts will not offer Pakistan a lot of leeway directly, it will give it more space to bring up issues that align with its own interests and deflect attention from India's concerns. Pakistan will also vehemently oppose India's permanent membership bid at the UNSC. The writer is a junior fellow with ORF's Strategic Studies Programme
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Complainant against influencer Sharmistha Panoli arrested in Kolkata
Wajahat Khan, the man who filed the police complaint that led to the arrest of social media influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli, was arrested in Kolkata on Monday after allegedly being on the run since 1 June. Panoli was arrested in Gurugram on 30 May in connection with a hate speech case and was granted bail by the Calcutta High Court on 5 June. She was released from Alipore Women's Correctional Home on 6 June. Who is Wajahat Khan? Khan had lodged the initial complaint against Panoli, citing hate speech. Following that, he allegedly went into hiding with his father. On 2 June, a formal complaint was filed against him by the Shree Ram Swabhiman Parishad, accusing him of using derogatory, inflammatory, and sexually explicit language aimed at Hindu deities, religious practices, and the community at large. Who is Sharmistha Panoli? What is the case against Sharmistha Panoli? Panoli had posted a video on social media making communal remarks and referring to Operation Sindoor. The video drew criticism and led to a police complaint on 15 May at the Garden Reach police station in Kolkata. The Kolkata Police classified the content as hate speech and filed a case against her. Later the same day, she deleted the video and issued an unconditional public apology for her remarks. TMC vs BJP in the Panoli case The case has taken on a political dimension in West Bengal. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of appeasement politics, alleging bias in the police action. Leader of the Opposition and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari posted on X, calling Panoli's arrest a case of 'police atrocities'. He wrote, 'This is a case of police atrocities as an innocent young lady, for using her freedom of speech and expression, has been illegally arrested by the Kolkata Police and was sent to judicial custody. This is yet another example of police overzealousness and eagerness to please their political masters.' BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul echoed these sentiments, claiming that the police were shielding Wajahat Khan due to 'Muslim appeasement'. In response, Trinamool Congress (TMC) spokesperson Riju Datta defended the police action, stating that the Kolkata Police was acting on a court warrant. He also issued a warning to young social media users and their families, saying: 'Do not get influenced by the RW cabal run by BJP IT Cell… they will earn their salary hiding behind a cellphone but your children's lives will be spoiled forever.'