Rujo Boots Named Official Boot Partner of OK Wildcatters
OKLAHOMA CITY & DALLAS, May 29, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Oklahoma Wildcatters, one of the premier teams in the Professional Bull Riders (PBR) league, and Rujo Boots are pleased to announce that they have entered into a partnership where Rujo Boots will be the team's Official Boot Partner.
The partnership commences as the Wildcatters enter their second PBR Camping World Team Series season. The PBR team series kicks off in Oklahoma with Wildcatters Days taking place from July 11-13 at Paycom Center. Prior to the homestand events, Wildcatters' Head Coach and two-time PBR World Champion J.B. Mauney will be receiving the coveted Ring of Honor at PBR's 2025 Heroes & Legends Ceremony on July 10.
"Our partnership with the Wildcatters kicks off at a momentous time, celebrating the extraordinary achievements of J.B. Mauney," said George Baker, Operating Partner of Rujo Boots. "As a digital-first Western wear brand, it is a boon to affiliate with such an iconic figure in bull riding while working strategically with Wildcatters CEO Brandon Bates to drive greater value for our organizations."
Founded in 2021, Rujo quickly established itself as a leading purveyor of exotic leather boots, luxury accessories, and refined Western apparel. Designed in Dallas and handmade in Léon, Mexico—the Cowboy Boot Capital of the World—Rujo's men's and women's boots seamlessly merge artisanal craftsmanship with modern comfort. The product range continues to grow with the additions of crisp bamboo-cotton pearl snap shirts, premium leather wallets and bags, belt buckles, and trucker hats.
As part of the Rujo PBR Series, Rujo and the Oklahoma Wildcatters also plan to launch co-branded apparel and accessories for fans, which will be available throughout the season.
"Rujo is a perfect fit for our team," commented Bates. "The brand fearlessly entered the Western wear space and readily gained recognition for the quality, comfort, and value of their products. We are confident that through our partnership with Rujo, we will pique the interest of the PBR audience, heighten the experience for fans, and accelerate growth for both parties."
PBR's team format, introduced in 2022, has transformed bull riding into a high-octane team competition with home events, fan bases, and season-long standings. Each athlete represents not only their personal brand but their team's identity. Led by Mauney, the Wildcatters enter the 2025 series with a legendary coach, avid followers, and championship aspirations. With Rujo Boots behind them, the team can take to the dirt with the confidence of looking and feeling great.
Shop the Rujo collection at rujoboots.com and subscribe to Rujo's emails and SMS to find out about upcoming products, promotions, and Wildcatters ticket giveaways.
About Rujo Boots:
Rujo Boots crafts premium and exotic leather boots, quality accessories, and refined Western apparel for the modern consumer. Designed in Dallas, Texas, and handmade in León, Mexico (the Cowboy Boot Capital of the World), Rujo's products are delivered directly to customer's doorsteps across the United States, providing high-value goods at a better price. Committed to quality and craftsmanship through production to customer communication, Rujo celebrates its community of enthusiasts who share their passion for Western wear and the confidence and comfort they discover in their purchases. Find out more at rujoboots.com.
About Oklahoma Wildcatters:
The Oklahoma Wildcatters, a PBR (Professional Bull Riders) team based at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, are owned by FJS Ventures—a sports and entertainment holding company founded by Talor Gooch and Preston Lyon.
Talor Gooch, a seasoned professional golfer and the 2023 LIV Golf Player of the Year, hails from Midwest City, Oklahoma, and is an alumnus of Oklahoma State University. Beyond his athletic achievements, Gooch is dedicated to philanthropy, focusing on uplifting and empowering children in Oklahoma through the Talor Gooch Foundation.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250529308300/en/
Contacts
Kate ValbrachtHead of Revenue, Rujo Bootskate@rujoboots.com 515.306.8965
Savannah NugentSocial Media Manager, Intrepid XXIIsavannah.nugent@intrepidxxii.com 714.305.7170
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pattern of defiance: Israel expands settlements in face of Western pressure
Israel's international allies are growing louder in their condemnation of its war on Gaza and its continued construction of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. United Nations experts, human rights groups and legal scholars have all previously told Al Jazeera that Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza and committing abuses that may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity in the West Bank. And yet less than two weeks after receiving a stern warning from its Western allies, Israel approved 22 illegal settlements in the West Bank, amounting to what has been described as the largest land grab since Israeli and Palestinian leaders inked the Oslo Peace Accords in 1993. 'Israel is all about showing [the world] who calls the shots. They are saying … you can condemn us all you want, but in the end, you will bow down to us and not the other way around,' said Diana Buttu, a legal scholar and political analyst focused on Israel and Palestine. The Oslo Accords were ostensibly aimed at creating a Palestinian state, including the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, with occupied East Jerusalem as its capital. However, in practice, Israel has continued to expand illegal settlements and render the two-state solution impossible, analysts told Al has often announced the building of new illegal settlements in response to signals of support for Palestinian statehood from the UN or its allies. In 2012, Israel went so far as to approve 3,000 new settler homes in the occupied West Bank after the Palestinian Authority (PA) – the entity created out of the Oslo Accords to govern swaths of the West Bank – was granted non-member observer status in the UN General Assembly. Last year, Israel's far-right Finance Minister, Bezalel Smotrich, warned that a new illegal settlement would be built for every country that recognises a Palestinian state. The announcement came after Spain, Norway, and Ireland took the symbolic step in May 2024. 'I certainly think there is a pattern where Israel responds to pressure regarding its occupation – or anything else – by announcing settler expansion,' said Omar Rahman, an expert focused on Israel and Palestine for the Middle East Council for Global Affairs. 'We see that pattern repeated over and over again,' he told Al Jazeera. As global pressure mounts against Israel's war on Gaza, Israel has continued to test the patience of its allies. On May 21, Israeli troops fired warning shots at a group of European, Asian and Arab diplomats who were on an official mission to assess the humanitarian crisis in Jenin refugee camp, which has been subjected to a months-long attack and siege by the Israeli army since the start of the year. 'I don't know where the red line is. It is clear that there is no red line,' said Zionist militias ethnically cleansed some 750,000 Palestinians to make way for the state of Israel in 1948 – an event referred to as the 'Nakba' or catastrophe – Israel has increasingly annexed and occupied the little that remains of Palestinian land. Annexation of the occupied West Bank has accelerated in recent years thanks to far-right settlers who occupy positions in the Israeli government, said Khaled Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. He believes Israel was always planning to approve the 22 illegal settlements irrespective of the joint statement issued by France, the UK and Canada, as it fit in with the state's ultimate goal of expanding Jewish settlement of the occupied West Bank. 'Nobody can really think that if those countries didn't issue an announcement that [further] annexation wasn't going to happen. Of course, it was going to happen,' he told Al Jazeera. Rahman, from the Middle East Council, believes Israel's tactic of announcing pre-planned settlement expansion in the face of Western pressure simply aims to dissuade its allies from taking concrete action. He suspects Canada, the UK and France will likely not slap on targeted sanctions against Israeli officials, as they have threatened to do, instead using the argument that any moves against Israel will lead to a backlash against Palestinians.'[Canada, UK and France] may say they are acting for the preservation of the two-state solution by not doing anything to save the two-state solution,' Rahman told Al Jazeera. Analysts believe that sanctions on Israel would be the only way to rescue the two-state solution and end Israel's war on Gaza, but accept that comprehensive sanctions against the Israeli state would still be unlikely at this stage. Instead, Western countries like Canada, France and the UK may target sanctions at the far-right ministers most associated with pro-settler policies, Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. 'These men … are trying to jam in everything they can do now because they know there is no guarantee they will maintain their positions of power indefinitely,' Elgindy told Al Jazeera. Buttu fears that European countries will merely resort to more symbolic measures such as 'recognising Palestine', which will have little impact on the ground. 'By the time everyone gets around to recognising Palestine, there won't be any land [for Palestinians] left,' she told Al Jazeera.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - What globalists get wrong about free trade
Since at least the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, major media outlets have decried the impending end of globalization. These lamentations have only accelerated since the Trump administration declared April 2 'Liberation Day,' with our trading counterparties' unfair practices to be summarily addressed through increased and partially reciprocal duties (along with a minimum tariff level). To hear the media tell it, such tariffs are the death knell for a beneficial global trading order and will immiserate billions. But such valedictories for the end of globalization advance a straw-man fiction about what is now supposedly lost: namely, that President Trump's policies contravene an agreed framework whereby goods, capital and labor move across national boundaries in a mostly unencumbered manner. If one believes in the merits of free trade and cross-border capital flows, it is essential not to confuse the ideal with the real. In truth, there have always been (often significant) friction and costs associated with such movements. Today's so-called free trade regime recalls Western support for Soviet communism, snarling 'real communism has never been tried' in defense of its myriad failures. Love it or hate it, what exists today is hardly real free trade. If what we have today isn't it, what does free trade closer to its Platonic ideal look like? This notion, that trade conditions are rarely wholly free or unfree, also confuses the media. The reality is that trading conditions sit uneasily along a continuum, and relatively free trade only occurs under certain conditions. These include (among others): Mutually agreed-upon rules for international commerce, consistently applied or at least generally observed, allowing for relatively open and reciprocal market access; Exemptions for strategic industries, a form of insurance for nations, insulating them from being caught short in a subsequent conflict with trading partners; Reliable cross-border supply chains, allowing for the disaggregation of production into its constituent parts (trading resource control for cost efficiency) and An ideologically unipolar historical moment, or a multi-polar world in which international trade largely occurs within the poles. These and other trade-friendly conditions were largely obtained in the decades leading up to the First World War, and in the 20 or so years following the end of the Cold War. While a world war is an obvious culprit ending an earlier era of globalization, what explains its current travails? A rules-based trading order can withstand certain restrictions (tariffs, regulations, quotas) — in fact, protecting strategic sectors demands some of them. But excessive use, along with outright cheating — subsidies, intellectual property theft and currency manipulation, as in the case of China — gives rise to a prisoner's dilemma with suboptimal outcomes. Similarly, the extended supply chains that proliferated over the last 30 years assumed the only national interest that mattered was economic advancement. Consider the terms made fashionable over the last three decades: 'a borderless world,' 'global citizens,' 'the end of history' and 'soft power.' The disaggregation of business models previously housed under a single corporate roof never anticipated revisionist challenges to Pax Americana, such as the retrograde gunboat diplomacy of China's Belt and Road Initiative, much less the rise of transnational terrorist organizations disrupting commerce and producing failed states. Moreover, the unipolar moment has ended. As China, under the rule of the Communist Party, displaced the Soviet Union as our primary geopolitical adversary, its admission to the World Trade Organization in 2001 conferred upon it a degree of economic leverage over the United States that Joseph Stalin could only have dreamed of. The return of history, with not only China but Russia, Turkey and others asserting spheres of influence and advancing parochial interests while embedded within a global economic system and multilateral institutions, further vitiates unfettered trade and capital movements. Failing to understand that globalization — the mutually beneficial interdependence and integration among nations, entailing a largely unrestricted flow of goods, capital, information and people — only flourishes under certain conditions, is only half of what the media and establishment elites get wrong. The other is the fetishization of globalism as an ideology. One can support globalization without being a globalist. Free trade and capital flows do not themselves comprise a belief system, but are rather a means to an end: actualizing individuals' aspirations and the nations that represent them. Free trade is the handmaiden of liberty, not vice versa. Reifying trade at the expense of other liberal values risks perverse outcomes; offshoring a nation's pharmaceutical production capacity to potentially belligerent nations is but one example. Another danger in globalism as an ideology is that of falling prey to historical determinism. Seeing deepening global integration as inevitable presents several risks. Believing it impervious threatens underinvestment in its sustenance (see the collapse of the WTO's Doha Round); competing objectives such as national self-determination and defense of borders may also be subordinated to globalism's tenets, destabilizing the very nations seeking to benefit from globalization. The proposed Trump tariff regime is not the full-throated attack on a functioning trading order critics make it out to be. To acknowledge this is not to defend blindly the administration's policies. Tariffs have their place as leverage against trading counterparties with onerous trade restrictions of their own. They are also useful to support strategic sectors in an increasingly dangerous world. What tariffs won't do is revive a rust-belt economy, which isn't coming back. Comparative advantage, alas, remains undefeated. Nor should tariffs be sold to the public as a governmental revenue-generator while incumbent income, sales and other tax regimes remain firmly in place. Globalization improves lives and should be promoted. Free trade and capital movements have consistently shown themselves, when the requisite conditions are present, to be mutually beneficial. How these benefits are distributed and whether the unchecked movement of people across borders is similarly beneficial are more complex matters. But the promotion of globalism as an inviolate creed, either for its own sake or as a counterpoint to 'America First' policies, fails to appreciate that globalization cannot be summoned by magical thinking and that it is the servant of liberty, not its master. Richard J. Shinder is the founder and managing partner of Theatine Partners, a financial consultancy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Geely won't build plants in U.S., Europe amid excess global capacity, founder Li Shufu says
Geely Holding Group will not build assembly plants in Europe or the United States as the auto industry's globalization push stalls and the world faces a surplus of factories, founder and chairman Li Shufu said. The company instead should further enhance coordination with Volvo and other partners, including Renault and several other automotive companies, in the U.S. and Europe, Li said during a recent internal meeting at the company. He didn't elaborate on what he meant by coordination, according to a video of the meeting released by Geely on May 28. Sign up for the weekly Automotive News China newsletter, including commentary by journalist Yang Jian and highlights from top manufacturers and supplier news from China and Asia. Geely and other automakers face increased competition in China from legacy automakers and startups such as Xiaomi. BYD has launched a bruising price war that sparked a recent sales surge but is also undercutting profits across the industry as other automakers are forced to match the discounts. Li's comments come amid a trade war between the U.S. and China that has effectively locked Chinese automakers out of the American market because of high tariffs on electric vehicles. BYD, Chery and other Chinese automakers are also making a push to expand sales overseas with foreign plants or through exports, adding more competition in key markets including Brazil. In Europe, Chinese automakers also face steep tariffs on EVs, prompting them to localize output. Globalization has come to an end after expanding for more than 40 years, and it is time for Geely to adjust its global strategy, Li said. 'We should avoid constructing production facilities, which involves purchasing land, building factories, buying equipment and hiring employees, as this is not an optimal approach given the global surplus in auto production capacity,' he said. RELATED ARTICLE: Geely, in leadership shakeup, appoints Zeekr head as new group CEO; Q1 profits jump In South Korea and other markets, Geely 'should do what it can to cooperate with Renault and other Western automakers on [utilizing their] production capacity,' Li added. Geely is still seeking what he called 'breakthroughs' in some 'key' markets, Li told staffers at the internal meeting. 'For example, in Southeast Asia, particularly in Malaysia, we must accelerate localization efforts, including the localization of components and talent,' he said. 'This is an urgent priority that requires immediate action,' he added. Geely Holding Group, based in Hangzhou, the capital of east China's Zhejiang province, builds and markets gasoline and electrified cars and light trucks under Geely and other brands. The private Chinese conglomerate owns Swedish carmaker Volvo Car Corp. and British taxi manufacturer London EV Co., previously known as London Taxi Co. It also holds shares in German luxury carmaker Mercedes-Benz and British sports car brands Aston Martin and Lotus, as well as Malaysian car brand Proton. Geely Holding Group assembles and distributes battery-electric vehicles for Smart and Lotus brands in China. Outside China, the Chinese group produces vehicles under the Geely brand in Belarus. It also produces and markets vehicles under Proton in Malaysia. In October 2022, Geely Holding Group acquired a 32 percent stake in Renault Group's Korean subsidiary to produce hybrid vehicles and internal combustion engine models for the local market. The two sides created a joint venture in London in May 2024 to develop hybrid and combustion powertrain systems including engines, transmissions, hybrid systems and batteries for their own brands and other global automakers including Nissan Motor Co. and Mitsubishi Motors Corp. On Feb. 18, Geely Holding Group signed a preliminary deal with Renault allowing it to use the French automaker's plants and distribution network in Brazil to build and sell vehicles locally. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
