logo
Dunwoody announces proposed increase to property taxes, millage rate to remain unchanged

Dunwoody announces proposed increase to property taxes, millage rate to remain unchanged

Yahooa day ago

In a pair of announcements, the City of Dunwoody announced they planned to increase their property tax rates but will not increase the millage rate.
According to the city, the dueling notices are due to millage rates compared to rollback millage rates.
For Dunwoody, the property taxes will be 3.61% over the rollback millage rate, even though the rate itself for 2025 will be unchanged.
In terms of why the city released two different statements on the property tax, officials said it was 'to give context that the state one does not allow.'
More specifically, Dunwoody officials said the rate was set based on a yearly assessment by the board of tax assessors, who review the value of property in DeKalb County for tax purposes.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
"When the trend of prices on properties that have recently sold in the county indicate there has been an increase in the fair market value of any specific property, the board of tax assessors is required by law to re-determine the value of such property and adjust the assessment," Dunwoody said in a statement. 'This is called a reassessment."
A rollback millage rate must be computed to produce the same total revenue on the year's tax digest, according to state law, but is calculated without factoring in the reassessments.
TRENDING STORIES:
Explosion rocks Villa Rica after outbuilding at ammo supply shop catches fire
17-year-old missing after boat found circling on Allatoona Lake
'That's problematic:' Woman accused of taking money from homeowners instead of cutting down trees
'The budget tentatively adopted by the City of Dunwoody requires a millage rate higher than the rollback millage rate; therefore, before the City of Dunwoody may finalize the tentative budget and set a final millage rate,' according to the city.
For taxpayers, more specifically homeowners, Dunwoody officials are trying to keep the millage rate at 3.040 mills for 2025, as well as include a one-mill reduction for homestead properties, which would make those homeowners have a rate of 2.040.
'The city will continue to freeze assessed values for those same properties,' Dunwoody officials said. 'These combined exemptions mean that no homestead property will see a city tax bill increase this year.'
However, the city did confirm there will be tax increases for commercial properties and non-homesteaded residential properties such as rental units, which have higher assessed values.
By state law, changes to property taxes require public meetings, so the city will hold hearings on the tax increases at city hall on the following dates and times:
Monday June 16 at 8 a.m.
Monday June 16 at 6 p.m.
Monday June 30 at 6 p.m.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple to pay $95 million in Siri eavesdropping settlement; Here's how to file your claim
Apple to pay $95 million in Siri eavesdropping settlement; Here's how to file your claim

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Apple to pay $95 million in Siri eavesdropping settlement; Here's how to file your claim

Those who own Siri-enabled devices, including iPhones, MacBooks, and iPads, may be eligible to file a claim in Apple's $95 million settlement over allegations that Siri has been eavesdropping on consumers. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] As reported by CBS News, California resident Fumiko Lopez filed a lawsuit in 2021 claiming that several types of Apple devices have been eavesdropping on Apple consumers. The lawsuit claims that the private and confidential discussions Siri had allegedly listened to were being shared with third-party businesses that then targeted consumers with ads in Apple search and Safari, according to CBS News. 'Apple denies all of the allegations made in the lawsuit and denies that Apple did anything improper or unlawful,' the settlement website states. Apple agreed to the settlement earlier this year, and now consumers can file claims to get a piece of the $95 million agreement. TRENDING STORIES: Deputies: Wood thrown at officers in high-speed chase; ends in wrong-way crash on I-75 Injuries reported after car slams into Miami County home Child, adult dead after being pulled from SUV that went into pond Consumers who owned Siri-enabled iPhones and other Apple devices between Sept. 17, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2024, and 'experienced an unintended Siri activation during a confidential or private communication,' are eligible to file a claim, according to the settlement website. Consumers who owned iPhones, iPads, an iPod Touch, an iMac, a MacBook, an Apple Watch, an AppleTV, and/or a HomePod could all be eligible for payment. The amount consumers could earn ultimately depends on how many people file claims, but CBS News reported there's a cap of $20 per Siri-enabled device that a person owns. Apple consumers can file a claim for as many as five Siri-enabled devices, for a maximum payout of $100, according to the settlement site. To submit a claim, visit the settlement website here. The settlement's final approval hearing is scheduled for August 1, 2025, at 9 a.m., but there could be an appeal that would delay the payout, as reported by CBS News. The settlement payment will not come until later this year at the earliest. There is no confirmed date. Settlement payments, if you receive them, will be sent via physical check, e-check, or direct deposit. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

SCOTUS allows DOGE access to Social Security systems with personal data on millions of Americans
SCOTUS allows DOGE access to Social Security systems with personal data on millions of Americans

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

SCOTUS allows DOGE access to Social Security systems with personal data on millions of Americans

The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the Department of Government Efficiency to access Social Security systems containing personal data on millions of Americans. The court majority sided with the Trump administration in its first Supreme Court appeal involving DOGE, the team once led by billionaire Elon Musk. The three liberal justices dissented. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The high court halted an order from a judge in Maryland restricting the team's access to the Social Security Administration under federal privacy laws. The agency holds sensitive data on nearly everyone in the country, including school records, salary details and medical information. The Trump administration says DOGE needs access to carry out its mission of targeting waste and fraud in the federal government. Musk had been focused on Social Security as an alleged hotbed of fraud. The billionaire entrepreneur, who has stepped back from his work with DOGE, has described it as a " Ponzi scheme " and insisted that reducing waste in the program is an important way to cut government spending. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland found that DOGE's efforts at Social Security amounted to a 'fishing expedition' based on 'little more than suspicion' of fraud, and allowing unfettered access puts Americans' private information at risk. Her ruling did allow access to anonymous data for staffers who have undergone training and background checks, or wider access for those who have detailed a specific need. The Trump administration has said DOGE can't work effectively with those restrictions. Solicitor General John Sauer also argued that the ruling is an example of federal judges overstepping their authority and trying to micromanage executive branch agencies. The plaintiffs say it's a narrow order that's urgently needed to protect personal information. An appeals court previously refused to immediately to lift the block on DOGE access, though it split along ideological lines. Conservative judges in the minority said there's no evidence that the team has done any 'targeted snooping' or exposed personal information. The lawsuit was originally filed by a group of labor unions and retirees represented by the group Democracy Forward. It's one of more than two dozen lawsuits filed over DOGE's work, which has included deep cuts at federal agencies and large-scale layoffs. The nation's court system has been ground zero for pushback to President Donald Trump's sweeping conservative agenda, with about 200 lawsuits filed challenging policies on everything from immigration to education to mass layoffs of federal workers. TRENDING STORIES: 17-year-old missing after boat found circling on Allatoona Lake Family of twins found dead on Bell Mountain dispute findings, say they were killed GA ringleader of fraud scheme sentenced for creating fake recruiting websites to steal identities [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

We want to hear from you; Live, work, or play downtown?
We want to hear from you; Live, work, or play downtown?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

We want to hear from you; Live, work, or play downtown?

Downtown Jacksonville leaders have launched a survey to get stakeholders' opinion about the future. CLICK HERE to take the survey. Survey respondents could win $250 in DTJax e-gift cards redeemable at dozens of downtown locations. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store