logo
Elections board prepares to revamp R.I.'s aging campaign finance software. It just needs the money.

Elections board prepares to revamp R.I.'s aging campaign finance software. It just needs the money.

Yahoo27-05-2025

The State of Rhode Island debuted its first electronic campaign finance system in 2002. It's been using the same software ever since. (Photo by Janine L. Weisman/Rhode Island Current)
Twenty-three years is young for a person. But for a software system, it's ancient.
That's why Rhode Island election administrators are pushing to rejuvenate the technology used to collect and share information about campaign finance donations and spending.
But the makeover to the Rhode Island Board of Elections' Electronic Reporting and Tracking System — colloquially referred to as 'ERTS' — requires extra money from state lawmakers already fretting over the many demands pulling at the state's purse strings. And how to store the last 23 years of reports from 1,300 candidates and committees in a way that people can still access and search remains in question.
Meanwhile, the clock is ticking. The span between the 2024 presidential election and the 2026 state and local races offers the largest window to upgrade software and train users. If not now, the state would have to wait till 2029.
A three-year delay increases the risk of the collapse of the entire system, said Miguel Nunez, Rhode Island Board of Elections executive director. It also would mean another three years of spending — $70,000 in fiscal 2026 alone —- on an outdated system vulnerable to security threats.
'At this point, I find it a priority to try and enhance the system because it is so old at this point,' Nunez said in an interview Wednesday. 'It is essentially just being, year-to-year, maintained, with no enhancements, no improvements.'
A work order submitted by the board's existing vendor, Civix, could launch the long-awaited upgrade in July and be ready in time for the 2026 state election cycle. The shift to ERTS 2.0 offers better security and a more user-friendly interface for candidates and the public, and complies with updated state reporting requirements, Nunez told the board at its May 16 meeting.
The elections panel postponed a vote authorizing the contract until its June 3 meeting, to give Nunez time to make the case for the $140,000 in fiscal 2026 funding needed for the upgrades. The first-year expense includes the license and costs for Civix to provide training and troubleshooting, according to the proposed work order by the company, based outside of New Orleans. The elections panel in its fiscal 2026 funding request to the state sought $250,000 for software upgrades. But the request did not make it into Gov. Dan McKee's $14 billion spending proposal unveiled in January.
Nunez on Wednesday had yet to talk to McKee or legislative leaders but said he planned to 'in the coming days.'
McKee's office did not immediately respond to inquiries for comment Thursday.
And the final authority on the state's annual final tax-and-spend plan, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi, remains noncommittal.
'This is just one in a continuously growing number of asks in an extremely challenging budget year,' Shekarchi, a Warwick Democrat said in an email Thursday. 'We are reviewing all the requests.'
The $140,000 first-year cost to upgrade campaign finance software is nearly twice the $69,492 needed for Civix provide service on the legacy campaign finance system, according to cost estimates Nunez presented to the elections panel.
Under Civix's proposal, the state would pay nearly $815,000 over five years for the upgrades and continued service. By comparison, it would cost $377,000 over the next five years to maintain the existing system, which includes a 5% increase in the year-to-year contract with Civix.
'We shouldn't be running 20-year-old systems,' Randy Jackvony, an elections board member who works in IT, said in an interview. 'I've seen other cases with other vendors where when something is way past the end-of-life, the price can jack up incredibly high because they just don't have the resources to address technical issues.'
Ric Thornton, state campaign finance director, suspects Rhode Island is the lone state still using Civix's legacy system. Meanwhile, four other jurisdictions — the states of Georgia and Pennsylvania and the cities of Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Aurora, Colorado, already use the upgraded software administered by Civix, Thornton said in an interview.
Many of the Civix engineers who developed and know how to troubleshoot the legacy software are nearing retirement age, or have already retired, Nunez said.
Civix declined to comment on its services or staff, referring questions back to the Rhode Island elections board.
'If the system goes down and no one can fix it, we might be looking at reverting to paper filings, which is in violation of state law,' Nunez told the board during its May 16 meeting. 'And it could not be conducive to efficiency and transparency.'
Since 2002, Rhode Island has required candidates and committees raising or spending more than $10,000 a year, or maintaining a minimum $25,000 account balance, to report quarterly campaign finance activities electronically through its software platform. Candidates and committees not subject to the criteria often opt to use the software to submit their financial reports anyway. Just 15% of finance reports are sent in by email or pen and paper form, Nunez said.
Electronic reporting could be even higher if the state's software was able to accept specialized reports. A 2012 state law passed two years after the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United v. FEC decision requires political action committees to disclose all independent donors and campaign expenses, including on advertising. But the existing ERTS system can't accept such reports, forcing roughly 75 applicable super PACs to file 200 reports each year by email or through a document upload service, Nunez said.
If the system goes down and no one can fix it, we might be looking at reverting to paper filings, which is in violation of state law.
– Miguel Nunez, executive director for the Rhode Island Board of Elections
Another law which took effect in 2024 requires vendors awarded state contracts worth $5,000 or more to file affidavits with the elections board detailing political contributions. But the existing software offers no way to track submissions from vendors affirming they don't make any contributions — their submissions are 'simply not logged,' Nunez said.
Upgrading ERTS also provides much-needed security enhancements, including multi-factor authentication, for candidates and committees that submit reports. Under the existing system, if a user forgets their password, only the state elections staff can reset it — posing potential access problems during critical reporting deadlines if the password snafu happens on a weekend and a staffer doesn't respond right away, Nunez said.
The existing system also leaves the door open to hackers who could, potentially, manipulate the campaign numbers being submitted, said Ken Block, a software engineer who owns Warwick-based data mining company Simpatico Software Systems. Block, who founded the Rhode Island Moderate Party and ran unsuccessfully as an independent gubernatorial candidate in 2014, saw an urgent need for the upgrade.
'Twenty years is a pretty long time in the software world,' Block said. 'It's not unreasonable that the board would find themselves needing to go out and procure a new one.'
The elections board asked Civix, its software vendor since 2002, to propose a better system instead of seeking competing proposals for new software. Nunez cited the short time window to complete the upgrade, as well as the highly specialized nature of the service, as reasons why.
'It's not a whole new purchase, it's a modest upgrade to a newer platform,' Nunez said.
Jackvony wasn't bothered by the lack of a formal request for proposals.
'If you've got a good relationship with a vendor, and feel confident, that's not out of place,' Jackvony said. 'It is somewhat common in IT, at least the private sector.'
Jackvony also said the price Civix quoted seemed reasonable, with hourly rates lower than those he vetted for his day job as chief information officer for Rhode Island Medical Imaging. He said his back-and-forth with the vendor on technical details of its proposal further boosted his confidence in them.
'They were incredibly responsive and detailed,' Jackvony said.
One wrinkle still not totally ironed out: What happens to the last 23 years of campaign reports?
Civix's proposal calls for archiving pre-2023 data as 'static read-only' PDFs — meaning not searchable or incorporated into the more modern data interface. Nunez said in an interview that the staff was working with Civix on how to make the PDFs searchable, though he acknowledged they would not be able to be aggregated with the new system data.
'That's crap,' said Block. 'I don't understand why they can't move all the data into the new system. They should be able to do that no problem.'
Nunez explained it would be too time consuming and expensive to ask Civix to transfer all existing campaign finance data into the new software. However, he acknowledged he never asked the company what it could cost.
John Marion, executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island, shared serious concerns about losing public access to historic campaign finance data under the transition to better software.
'It doesn't appear the board is focused on an important part of transparency, which is access to historic data,' he said. 'Members of the public, and especially members of the media, often need access to older data in order to make comparisons to what is happening now.'
Marion continued, 'It's good the old data will be there but it remains to be seen how easy it will be to access.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five of six potential candidates meet signature requirements for Senate District 4 special election
Five of six potential candidates meet signature requirements for Senate District 4 special election

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Five of six potential candidates meet signature requirements for Senate District 4 special election

A campaign sign in a North Providence front yard supports Stefano Famiglietti in the race to fill the vacant Rhode Island Senate District 4 seat. Famiglietti has the endorsement of the district Democratic committee. (Photo by Janine Weisman/Rhode Island Current) Four Democrats and one Republican are still in the running to fill the open Rhode Island Senate District 4 seat, having met the signature requirements ahead of Tuesday's 4 p.m. deadline, according to the Rhode Island Secretary of State website. A potential sixth contender, and the only independent candidate for the race, Stephen Tocco, withdrew his declaration of candidacy on Monday, Faith Chybowski, a spokesperson for the Secretary of State, confirmed in an email. Tocco, a retired chief of Rhode Island Capitol Police and former Smithfield Town Council member, said he decided to withdraw after seeing the number and quality of other candidates. 'I figured, why become a spoiler and hurt one of the two candidates in the general election,' Tocco said in an interview Tuesday. 'I might have gotten 6-10% and that could have hurt either candidate. I didn't want to do that. We need good people out there in the public arena. The seat spanning parts of North Providence and Providence became vacant after the death of Senate President Dominick Ruggerio on April 21. Ruggerio, a Democrat, had held the seat since 1984. The four Democratic candidates seeking the seat will compete in a primary election on July 8. Candidate Stefano Famiglietti, a North Providence City Councilor, will appear first on the ballot, having secured the endorsement of the Senate District 4 Democratic Committee. The Secretary of State's Elections Division will hold a lottery Wednesday to determine the order in which the remaining candidates will appear on the primary ballot. They are Lenny Cioe, a registered nurse; former state Rep. Marcia Ranglin-Vassell; and Manny Taveras, brother of former Providence Mayor Angel Taveras. The lottery will also decide the order of the Republican or Democratic Party candidates on the general election ballot. As the only Republican candidate, Alexander Asermely, a lawyer, automatically advances to the Aug. 5 general special election. The winner of the election will serve the rest of Ruggerio's two-year term, through 2026. State lawmakers are paid $19,817 a year. The registration deadline for the July primary was Sunday, July 8. Registered voters have until June 17 to apply for a mail ballot. Early voting runs from June 18 to July 7. More information for candidates and voters is available online. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort stalled
Plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort stalled

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Plans for Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort stalled

The Scottish government has stalled plans for a controversial holiday park at Loch Lomond. Ministers had previously been set to give permission for the development, overturning the national park authority which said it did not comply with environmental and nature conservation policies. Theme park operator Flamingo Land believed it would be given the go-ahead to build a £40m resort called Lomond Banks, featuring a waterpark, monorail, hotel and restaurants. The Scottish government's Minister for Public Finance, Ivan McKee, has now said he will recall the plans because "the development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park". He said: "This means that the appeal should be determined at a national level." McKee has previously resisted calls for ministers to intervene in the decision to allow the plans to go forward. Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort set for approval Loch Lomond Flamingo Land resort rejected by park authority What is happening with Flamingo Land at Loch Lomond? The original proposal sparked protests and was initially rejected last September by Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park authority, who said it did not comply with environmental and nature conservation policies. But that was appealed to the Scottish government reporter, who last month said they intended to grant permission - subject to a legal agreement between Flamingo Land and the park. Government reporters consider the vast majority of appeals, appointed by ministers to make a decision on their behalf. However some of these are "recalled" by ministers who will then make the final decision themselves. When the Scottish government reporter announced in May the intention to back the plans, development director for Lomond Banks Jim Paterson said it was a "real milestone moment" which had been "a long time in the making". But Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer, who has been a long-standing critic of the plan, said the development would cause "irreversible damage" and the decision was an "anti-democratic outrage". Following Ivan McKee's 's latest announcement, Greer said it was "the right move". He added: "The evidence of the damage it would do to one of Scotland's most iconic locations is overwhelming. "Once ministers consider the flood risk, loss of ancient woodland, hundreds of additional cars which would be brought onto notoriously congested roads and the litany of other devastating impacts it would have, I am sure they will reject the mega-resort application and finally end this decade-long saga." The decision comes ahead of a vote in the Scottish Parliament on the issue, led by Scottish Labour. The party's deputy leader Jackie Baillie welcomed McKee's decision to recall plan, saying: "It shouldn't have taken the fear of a defeat in Parliament to force them to reach this decision. "The SNP has ignored concerns time and time again – from politicians across the chamber and from local campaigners." The Balloch and Haldane Community Council previously said it was "deeply disappointed" in the decision to approve park plans. The group said this "contradicts the expressed will of the community". A spokesperson added: "This is not just a bad planning decision, it is a fundamental failure of democracy and policy. "This decision rides roughshod over the principles of community empowerment, environmental protection, and democratic accountability. Flamingo Land first submitted plans for the site in 2018, but withdrew them the following year after a wave of negative reaction. It submitted updated plans in 2020, insisting the proposal would be a "major step away" from its other resorts, including a theme park and zoo in Yorkshire. But the Loch Lomond park authority board ruled that the updated scheme still conflicted with both regional and national environmental policies. Stuart Pearce, "director of place" for the park authority, previously said the plans created "unacceptable risk" of flooding of the River Leven. More than 174,000 people signed a petition against the project. The Flamingo Land resort in North Yorkshire has been operating since 1959, initially as a zoo. The name comes from a colony of the brightly coloured birds that were among the first animals on the site at Kirby Misperton. By the 1970s, the zoo was losing money, and the attraction was revamped as a "day out" experience with a growing focus on amusement rides. The Yorkshire site continues to have exotic animals, and there is also a large holiday village with static caravans and lodges.

Push to raise Block Island ferry landing fees moves forward at R.I. State House
Push to raise Block Island ferry landing fees moves forward at R.I. State House

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Push to raise Block Island ferry landing fees moves forward at R.I. State House

Both New Shoreham and Narragansett are asking for a 50-cent increase to passenger landing fees to absorb the costs associated with providing municipal services, including public safety, for tourists, like those seen arriving here at the Port of Galilee in Narragansett. (Photo by Janine L. Weisman/Rhode Island Current) Sailing away on the Block Island Ferry may soon cost more, pending the passage of state legislation that would increase traveler landing fees to and from the island for the first time in nearly 35 years. Two companion proposals in the Rhode Island General Assembly — each with a Senate and House version, for a total of four separate bills — would authorize a 50-cent increase in the landing fees charged to passengers ages 12 and up arriving at both Narragansett's Port of Galilee and Block Island's Old Harbor. That would mean a total increase of $1 per passenger for a round-trip to and from the island. 'For every person that steps off the ferry, there is assessed a landing fee to help the municipalities cover expenses that they are responsible for on both sides of that journey, from police details to garbage pickup to area maintenance and things like that,' Sen. Alana DiMario, a Narragansett Democrat and sponsor of the two Senate bills, said at a May 27 committee hearing. On Tuesday, the House and Senate floors will vote on their respective versions of the bill to up the fee on Block Island's side, and the House Committee on Municipal Government and Housing will hear the bill to raise the fee at Narragansett's port. The Senate passed its version of the Narragansett bill on June 3. The price range of a round trip for riders aged 12 and up is between $16.60 and $20.60 for the traditional speed ferry, which takes about an hour from Galilee. The high-speed ferry takes about half an hour and costs $57 with the landing fee. The traditional ferry runs year round, while the high-speed service runs on a more limited timetable in the off-season. At both ports, those prices add on a 50-cent surcharge for each passenger arriving by boat, which is collected from both private vessels and ferry operators, with the latter redirecting this surcharge into ticket prices. While Narragansett raised its landing fees from 35 cents to 50 cents in 2022, New Shoreham's fee has not budged since 1991. But the town services supported by the fees certainly have, according to Amy Land, New Shoreham's interim town manager, the only municipality on Block Island. 'This includes funding for seasonal police staff, support for the Block Island Medical Center, for fire, for rescue services, recreation, maintenance of public restrooms, improvements to beaches and public access,' Land told the House Committee on Municipal Government and Housing at a May 1 hearing on the New Shoreham bill. 'So all those expenses that are derived from our tourist economy, and clearly the volume and costs of providing those services have increased and escalated in the 35 years since the landing fee was first introduced,' she added. A hot summer's day on Block Island can draw 20,000 to 30,000 tourists on average, Land said. In recent years, the town has typically grossed about $180,000 to $190,000 in landing fees annually. Land said the majority of landing fee revenue — about $135,000 — comes from Interstate Navigation's ferry from Galilee. An additional $35,000 is collected from ferries out of New London, Connecticut, and Orient, New York. Smaller amounts flow from the Montauk ferry, plus passengers on ships that use the town's moorings, anchorages, and dockage. Land said the town is also collaborating with private marinas to have them collect and remit landing fees on the town's behalf. 'That seems like your collection is low, comparatively, because the only way to get there is by boat,' said Charlestown Democratic Rep. Tina Spears, who sponsored the bill on the House side. 'Not necessarily,' Land replied. 'We are confident that our primary channel, Interstate, is remitting fairly and appropriately. You may have people who come and stay for an extended period. You have others that come and go. So the timing of visitors is something we've always been challenged to document.' For every person that steps off the ferry, there is assessed a landing fee to help the municipalities cover expenses that they are responsible for on both sides of that journey, from police details to garbage pickup to area maintenance and things like that. – Sen. Alana DiMario, a Narragansett Democrat Rep. Lauren Carson, a Newport Democrat, suggested New Shoreham should raise landing fees more, then nodded to her own successful legislation last year that saw Newport raise its fees for docked cruise ships from $6 to $20 per passenger. 'We are hoping to come back more frequently over time,' Land said. In the Senate Committee on Housing and Municipal Government, Chair Jake Bissaillon, a Providence Democrat, had only one question for lobbyist Rick McAuliffeof The Mayforth Group, which represents New Shoreham: Why wasn't the bill introduced alongside the previous Narragansett legislation in 2022? 'To be honest with you, we weren't prepared,' McAulliffe said. 'We wanted to make sure that we had a number that would justify the public safety and things that we have.' McAuliffe said there are two State Police troopers who come to the island during the summer, plus additional police detail to handle the summer months' massive crowds. The medical center is 'very full' on a hot summer's day, he added. 'Certainly, tourism dollars are important to the island, but there's a cost to host so many residents, so many tourists,' McAulliffe said. 'I can't say we won't come back in another 35 years.' In March, the New Shoreham Town Council originally considered asking the General Assembly for permission to raise the landing fee from the current 50 cents to $1.75 — a $1.25 increase. Councilors voted on March 27 to seek approval from the General Assembly for the $1.25 landing fee increase. But at the April 2 council meeting, Interstate lawyer Michael McElroy said that such a drastic increase would trigger Narragansett to do the same and ultimately push round-trip landing costs to increase by $3.25 per passenger, according to the Block Island Times. '$1.75 is a big deal and Narragansett will want to match it,' McElroy was quoted in the Times. The New Shoreham Town Council revised its plan on April 9 to reduce the proposed increase to 50 cents, for a $1 landing fee on the island. DiMario's first bill submitted on April 16 had sought the $1.25 increase. A week later, councilors met with DiMario and Spears virtually to align their proposals on Smith Hill with the requested 50-cent increase. McElroy's hunch about Narragansett was confirmed on May 19. On that night, the Narragansett Town Council approved a resolution for a 50-cent increase to match New Shoreham. Interstate Navigation did not immediately respond to requests for comment for this story. Each of the four bills must pass both the House and Senate before the legislation can arrive on the governor's desk. The bills would take effect upon passage. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store