Green body issues stop-work order to Bambolim project
The
Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
(Goa-SEIAA) has issued an order asking
Worldwide Resorts and Entertainment
to stop work on its project at Bambolim. St Andre MLA Viresh Borkar had protested at the site, alleging a number of illegalities. Several activists have also filed complaints with various authorities like the WRD, alleging that the digging was carried out too deep into the ground, damaging aquifers.
'It has come to the notice of this authority that construction is being undertaken in property bearing survey nos. 14/1, 14/2, 15/1, 16/1, 17/1, 17/2, 17/3, 18/1, 19/1, 19/2, 19/3, 20/1, 20/2, 20/3, 21/1 to 8, 31/1, 35/1, plot no. 358 of Bambolim village, Tiswadi taluka, without obtaining prior environment clearance as prescribed under the ElA Notification 2006,' the Goa-SEIAA has said.
The application for
environmental clearance
is pending before the authority.
'Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, you are hereby directed to stop work with immediate effect. Further, you are directed to ensure that no civil work whatsoever is carried out at the said site. Failure to comply with the directions shall attract action under Section 15 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which includes imprisonment/fine,' the notice to Worldwide Resorts and Entertainment said.
Recently, the Goa State Expert Appraisal Committee (Goa-SEAC) had recommended conversion of the controversial project at Bambolim from residential to commercial. This was despite officials finding during inspections that there appeared to be a rupture of the aquifers and substantial hill-cutting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Sellers for now, FPIs may rethink Indian equities
ET Intelligence Group: Foreign portfolio investors (FPI) increased selling intensity in Indian equities during the first fortnight of August compared with the previous month amid rising uncertainty over the country's global trade after the US imposed 25% import duty on Indian goods from August 7 with an extra penalty tariff of 25% slated to be effective on August 27. However, the latest upgrade in India's credit rating by S&P to BBB from BBB- and a possibility of trade negotiations to avoid high tariffs may prompt FPIs to change stance on Indian equities in the coming weeks. Additionally, the proposed significant overhaul of slab rates under the goods and services tax (GST) Act is expected to reduce the inflationary pressure on consumers thereby supporting demand during the festive season from September. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo This, in turn, may lift sentiment among investors. FPIs sold equities worth ₹20,974.9 crore ($2.4 billion) in the month as of August 14 compared with ₹17,740.6 crore ($2.1 billion) for the whole of July. They were net sellers for eight out of ten trading sessions so far in August. In 2025 so far, they have sold equities worth about ₹1.2 lakh crore ($13.3 billion). This compares with a net purchase of about ₹42,879 crore ($5.2 billion) in the first eight months of 2024. THE ECONOMIC TIMES Live Events In the primary market, which consists of investments in initial public offerings (IPOs) and qualified institutional placement (QIP), FPIs slowed their pace with a purchase of ₹2,579.2 crore ($294.1 million) in the first half of August 2025 compared with ₹4,908.6 crore ($573 million) bought in the corresponding period of the previous month. In the current calendar year so far, they have invested about ₹38,814 core ($4.5 billion) in the primary market compared with ₹54,884 crore ( or $6.6 billion) in the first eight months of the previous year. Domestic mutual funds partially offset the impact of the FPI outflow by increasing their investment four times to ₹33,223 crore till August 11 compared with ₹Rs 8,310 crore invested in the corresponding period of July.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Residents unite, move Rera authority against builder after decade-long wait in Bengaluru
Bengaluru: After a decade-long wait for flats, Rera authority has adjudicated in favour of a group of homebuyers as the builder had failed to hand over possession of their units as promised. The Rera order directed the property developer of a Whitefield project to finish pending works, provide occupancy certificates (OCs), and compensate the home buyers for the delay, incomplete amenities, and broken assurances. The buyers had booked flats under pre-launch offers in 2014-15. The builder promised possession in 36-42 months, with an additional grace period of six months, putting the handover date around mid-2017. However, the deadline was revised multiple times and even then, the project remained incomplete. The buyers alleged that possession was given in phases only after prolonged pressure, and even then, basic infrastructure and promised amenities were missing. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru | Gold Rates Today in Bengaluru | Silver Rates Today in Bengaluru Key facilities such as clubhouse, swimming pool, landscaped gardens, lifts in certain blocks, fire safety systems, and the sewage treatment plant remained incomplete for years. The residents also alleged deviations from the sanctioned plan, including changes in parking layouts and reduction of open spaces. They said some towers still had no OCs, forcing buyers to live in legal uncertainty. By 2022, after repeated verbal and written assurances by the builder failed to yield results, the residents formed an association to collectively fight the case. Pooling funds, they engaged a legal team and filed a complaint before the Rera authority. They supported their complaint with allotment letters, email trails, photographs, builder communications, and site inspection reports. In its defence, the builder denied deliberate delay and attributed setbacks to factors beyond his control, including labour shortages during Covid-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, changes in govt regulations, and cost escalations. He claimed most amenities were "substantially complete" and argued possession was offered in phases in good faith. He also denied any violation of the sanctioned plans. After hearing both sides, the Rera bench noted the builder had failed to meet the contractual possession date and that several key amenities and statutory compliances were still pending. The authority cited buyer testimonies and inspection findings to conclude the delay and incomplete works were attributable to the developer, not to unavoidable circumstances. In its July 21 order, the Rera authority directed the builder to complete all pending works within the fixed time frame specified, obtain and hand over occupancy certificates (OCs) for all towers, and compensate the allottees for the delay period, as calculated under the terms of the agreement and provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. The association has now constituted a monitoring committee to track the builder's compliance with the Rera directions. Quote Ragunathan KC, president, The Greens Buyers Association (TGBA) "I have been burdened with paying both home loan EMIs and rent for the house we are currently living in, while more than Rs 20 lakh of my hard-earned money remains stuck with the builder. Despite sending multiple letters and making repeated follow-ups, there was absolutely no response, leaving us with no choice but to approach the authorities." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
FSSAI suspends AR Dairy's licence for ghee over adulteration and false information
New Delhi: The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has suspended the license of A.R. Dairy Food Pvt. Ltd, based in Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, for manufacturing, transporting, and selling ghee. The suspension, effective from 13 June 2025, follows a detailed investigation into serious violations, according to a person in the know and documents seen byMint. Based on the provisions of the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006, A.R. Dairy and its representatives could face a range of severe penalties like heavy monetary fines, imprisonment, and blacklisting. The company allegedly supplied adulterated ghee to Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), with potential foreign fats action comes after a previous suspension order from 14 February 2025, which was set aside by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, which directed FSSAI to conduct a personal hearing. Multiple tests, such as gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), were performed as per the Food Safety Standards Act to check for ghee adulteration. These tests analyze the ghee's fatty acid profile. The presence of plant-based compounds like β-sitosterol, which are not found in pure milk fat, confirms adulteration. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams trust manages the operations and finances of the Venkateswara Temple in Tirumala, and is one of the most visited religious centres globally. The FSSAI's decision follows a previous suspension order from 14 February 2025, which was set aside by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The court had directed the FSSAI to give the company a personal hearing before issuing a new decision. Following this directive, a hearing was held on 3 June 2025, where A.R. Dairy Food representatives failed to provide satisfactory explanations or documentary evidence to FSSAI's Designated Officer addressing these allegations. The FSSAI cited several serious contraventions. First, the company was found to be selling and distributing ghee to TTD without a proper license for repackaging or relabeling. The company was not licensed for this activity. Second, the dairy provided false information to both FSSAI and TTD, claiming that the ghee was manufactured at their Dindigul facility. In reality, the ghee was procured from another firm, Sri Vyshnavi Dairy Specialties in Andhra Pradesh. During the personal hearing, company representatives admitted there was no written agreement with Sri Vyshnavi Dairy, stating the arrangement was made in "good faith". They also could not provide information about the traceability of four lots of ghee that were rejected by TTD and returned to Sri Vyshnavi Dairy. Queries sent to the Union health secretary, health ministry spokesperson, FSSAI headquarters in New Delhi, FSSAI's Southern Regional Office in Chennai, Central Bureau of Investigation and A.R. Dairy remained unanswered till press time. TTD and Sri Vyshnavi Dairy could not be contacted. The FSSAI noted this was a violation, as the company failed to report the rejection of the supplied ghee to the food authority. The suspension order, seen byMint, stated that the Designated Officer concluded that the company's submissions did not clear them of the violations. The FSSAI stated that the company appeared to have the intention of deceiving consumers and manipulating the process by providing false information. The FSSAI highlighted a major discrepancy between A.R. Dairy's declared production and the quantity supplied to TTD. According to annual returns, the company produced 14.15 MT of ghee in 2021-22 and 155 MT in 2023-24. Yet, the tender agreement required them to supply 850 MT over six months—far exceeding their reported capacity. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is still investigating the matter. 'The case serves as a warning to other food businesses that such violations will not be tolerated, protecting consumers from potentially adulterated products and false information,' the person familiar with the matter said, requesting anonymity. The FSSAI ensures food safety through regular, risk-based inspections and random sampling of food products. Both the central and state food safety departments conduct these checks to ensure compliance with quality and safety standards.
