Michael B. Jordan: 5 roles beyond 'Sinners'
July 3 (UPI) -- Michael B. Jordan stars in Sinners, a supernatural horror film and his fourth collaboration with director Ryan Coogler.
The movie starts streaming Friday on Max and will also be available in a Black American Sign Language version.
Jordan, 38, is known for other blockbuster hits, including Creed and Black Panther.
Here are five of the actor's works beyond Sinners.
'Fruitvale Station'
Fruitvale Station, now streaming on Hulu, opened in 2013 and marked Jordan's first collaboration with Ryan Coogler.
The actor portrays 22-year-old Oscar Grant III in the film, which follows the chaotic events that unfold on New Year's Eve in 2008, according to an official description.
Melonie Diaz and Octavia Spencer also star in the film.
'Fantastic Four'
Jordan portrayed Johnny Storm in the 2015 film Fantastic Four. The movie, based on the Marvel Comics superhero team, is co-written by Simon Kinberg and directed by Josh Trank.
In Fantastic Four, chaos ensues when a portal to another dimension is opened, and Johnny Storm is among those "with unusual powers" who must face off against "a megalomaniacal conqueror," an official synopsis states.
Miles Teller, Kate Mara, Jamie Bell, Toby Kebbell and Reg E. Cathey also star.
Fantastic Four is available to stream on Disney+.
Marvel is rebooting the franchise as The Fantastic Four: First Steps, starring Pedro Pascal and Vanessa Kirby.
'Creed'
In the 2015 feature Creed, Jordan portrays Adonis Johnson, the son of late boxing champion Apollo Creed. The movie, directed and co-written by Coogler, is a spinoff of the Rocky franchise.
Creed sees Adonis seek out his father's former rival Rocky Balboa (Sylvester Stallone) to be his trainer. The film is available to stream on Prime Video.
Two sequels followed: Creed II in 2018 and Creed III in 2023.
'Black Panther'
The 2018 film, directed and co-written by Coogler, is based on the Marvel Comics superhero.
Jordan stars as villain Erik Killmonger, who poses a threat to all of Wakanda, including the new king T'Challa (portrayed by late actor Chadwick Boseman).
The film also stars Lupita Nyong'o, Danai Gurira, Martin Freeman and Daniel Kaluuya, and is now streaming on Disney+. A sequel, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, was released in 2022 following Boseman's death.
Black Panther is now streaming on Disney+.
'Just Mercy'
Jordan portrays Alabama attorney Bryan Stevenson in the 2019 feature Just Mercy, inspired by the real-life Stevenson and his memoir. Stevenson (Jordan) agrees to represent Walter McMillian (Jamie Foxx), an inmate facing the death sentence for murder despite being innocent.
The film also stars Tim Blake Nelson, Rob Morgan, O'Shea Jackson Jr. and Brie Larson, and is available to rent or buy on Prime Video.
Jordan also produced Just Mercy, following producing credits on such titles as Creed II and David Makes Man.
Michael B. Jordan, Hailee Steinfeld attend 'Sinners' premiere
Cast member Michael B. Jordan arrives on the red carpet at the premiere of "Sinners" in New York City on April 3, 2025. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Movie review: 'Splitsville' finds humor in polyamory complications
LOS ANGELES, Aug. 20 (UPI) -- Heartbreak and confusion will always be universal subjects for relationship stories. Splitsville, in theaters Friday, applies the lenses of polyamory and the filmmakers' unique comic sensibilities to bring new humor and insights to those subjects. The movie opens with Carey's (Kyle Marvin) wife Ashley (Adria Arjona) asking him for a divorce after 14 months of marriage. He goes to his friends Julie (Dakota Johnson) and Paul (Michael Angelo Covino) for comfort and is surprised when they inform him they are in an open relationship but don't discuss their extramarital encounters with each other. Julie and Paul's arrangement prompts Carey to suggest to Ashley that they try opening their marriage, in a desperate attempt to not lose her. The two couples' interactions are further complicated after Julie sleeps with Carey when he's staying with them. The script to Splitsville, written by Marvin and Covino, is hardly an endorsement of polyamory. It's about the potential for comic misadventures, which may offend people practicing ethical nonmonogamy successfully. Any relationship can only be as successful as the people involved, and Splitsville, which Covino also directed, portrays four characters exploring polyamory to avoid dealing with deeper emotional issues. Perhaps committed polyamorists could relate to the frustration of such characters dabbling in their lifestyle for the wrong reasons. The first scene of Splitsville shows how writers Marvin and Covino plan to twist Hollywood romantic-comedy conventions. Carey and Ashley are singing along to a song, an obnoxious movie shorthand for letting loose. The joke is not so much their lousy singing, but rather how the road trip escalates to witnessing a legitimate roadside death, which prompts Ashley's divorce request. Later, she will sing into a hairbrush, which also won't go as well as most rom-com impromptu musical numbers. The whole movie is off-kilter, with slapstick during crises and shocking escalations handled with matter-of-fact frankness. For example, Julie and Paul's son, Russ (Simon Webster), gets into trouble as kids do but he vandalizes property, which makes the owner understandably upset. Then that angry party takes his reaction way too far. In addition, Paul and Carey fight when Paul finds out his friend slept with Julie. Their fight is goofy but they really hurt each other and break things. This scene is a good cinematic demonstration that Paul was obviously not as cool with the open relationship paradigm as he claimed, instead of giving it verbal exposition. Paul and Carey demolish the house and each other, and it takes way longer than most mainstream movies would devote to such a scene. Of course, the longer and more uncomfortable it goes, the funnier it gets. Marvin and Covino set up some scenarios that can only go badly, such as a scene with loose articles on a roller coaster. There, the comedy comes from the inevitable occurring despite Carey fighting an uphill battle to prevent it. While separated from Ashley, Carey makes friends with Ashley's subsequent ex-lovers. The larger this entourage of exes grows, the funnier it becomes. It is also tragicomedy because Carey is obviously refusing to let go of someone who is moving on. But then, so are the exes who hang out with Ashley's ex-husband, bitterly watching her invite new studs into her home and specifically her bedroom. Ashley may not be ready for monogamy, but her partners were clearly hoping for it. Every character in the movie is unclear about their own needs, which is sympathetic to the human condition. It's their poor decisions that make them self-destructive. Ashley was asking Carey for new experiences, to which Carey responded by booking them weekend activities, a common but clueless attempt to superficially fix a partner's dissatisfaction. Carey also keeps pushing for a baby only a year into marriage. Ashley's firm denial suggests having children is a conversation they should have had before saying "I do." They probably did discuss kids but Carey thought Ashley would change her mind. The fact that he continues the very same pattern in relationships later in the movie suggests he's missing the real lessons he should be learning through this heartbreaking turmoil. When discussing her open marriage with Carey, Julie says she agrees to it so neither Julie nor Paul have to feel guilty, the implication being that removing guilt is easier than being faithful. That is a superficial observation that ignores the root causes of infidelity. So does Julie really want multiple partners, or just not to feel like the bad guy when Paul desires other women? Paul is introduced while lying and exaggerating, so he is probably the type doing the most harm to the legitimate ethical nonmonogamy movement, using it as a Get Out of Jail Free card. Paul claims he told Ashley off when he only wishes he had. He increases the value of a piece of furniture or decoration within the same conversation, suggesting that he was already inflating it in the first place. The story of how Paul and Julie met is already based on a form of not respecting boundaries, if not outright unfaithfulness. Paul was dating Julie's roommate when he asked her out, and Julie said no at first until he kept coming around. One could say that's a shaky foundation for a marriage. Indeed, one of the themes of Splitsville is that deceptive people will be deceptive about everything, not just relationships. If Paul was honest, it would improve all his relationships. If Carey were more secure being independent and alone, he'd be a stronger partner. Julie and Ashley both appear to have entered lifestyles with a considerable amount of uncertainty in order to please their partners. They each put those relationships to the test. Nobody's perfect and these characters are as flawed and vulnerable as real human beings. Fortunately, these four are funny about it. Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment. Solve the daily Crossword
Business Insider
35 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Why ESPN chief Jimmy Pitaro held back on streaming — until now
A decade ago, HBO broke from cable and started letting people subscribe to the service online. Most of the industry followed suit —just as the cable industry started to collapse. But Disney's ESPN has been the most important holdout. Up until this week, if you wanted to watch the country's most popular sports network — one stocked with must-see sports — you needed some kind of pay TV subscription. Now that is changing. On Thursday, you'll be able to stream ESPN and its related channels for $30 a month without paying for anything else. What took so long? It's pretty simple, says Jimmy Pitaro, who has been running ESPN since 2018: ESPN and its owner, Disney, wanted to keep its pay TV business intact as long as it could. Now, Pitaro is trying to do two things at once: attract new, cable-less sports fans to his streaming service while keeping the people who are still watching ESPN via a cable TV bundle in place. (Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch is trying to do the same thing with his new streamer, too.) I talked to Pitaro about the challenges facing the new service — which is launching with a revamped app and promising all kinds of interactive bells and whistles — at Disney's new Manhattan headquarters this week. I was also curious about ESPN's embrace of sports betting and how the company is thinking about diversity in the Trump 2.0 era. You can hear our entire conversation, which also gets pretty deep in the weeds on topics like his new NFL deal, as well as moves to import programming from the likes of Pat McAfee, over on my Channels podcast. Here's an edited excerpt: Peter Kafka: This week you're launching your new streaming service, so people can subscribe to ESPN without paying for other cable channels. But you'd also like people who are still paying for cable to keep doing that, instead of dropping it and getting ESPN directly from you. How do you navigate that? Jimmy Pitaro: The cable and satellite TV business has been very good to us. It's been very good to The Walt Disney Company. And when we went into this and ultimately decided we were going to go direct to consumer a few years ago, we recognized internally that it would not serve us to incentivize people to cut the cord. Why not? Because it's a great business model. Do you make more money selling ESPN through a cable bundle than you would selling to me directly? Let me back up here. There are pros and cons to having a subscriber access ESPN through the traditional ecosystem and having a subscriber access ESPN directly. If you access us directly, the biggest problem we are going to have is churn. If you go back to the [traditional TV] ecosystem, you don't have as much of a churn problem. It's really easy for me to turn a streaming service on or off. It's much harder for me to do it with cable. Correct. So while we are charging $29.99 for a subscription to ESPN, standalone, and that's a high price point, we still think there's value there. Significant value. But the concern is the churn will be greater than what we're seeing in the traditional ecosystem. So you weigh the pros and cons. And where we net out is we're actually somewhat agnostic in terms of how Peter Kafka is accessing ESPN, whether it's through DirecTV or Charter, or through Hulu Live or YouTube TV or directly [from ESPN]. You've been talking about doing this internally for years. Ten years ago, Disney CEO Bob Iger freaked everyone out by acknowledging that ESPN was losing subscribers, and people have been asking you to go direct since then. What prompted you to do it now? It was really a few years ago, when we saw [cable TV] declines being in the neighborhood of eight or 9%. And not stopping. Yeah. Our research did not indicate it was going to slow down anytime soon. You've been doing a lot of deals to add more sports, like the NFL deal you announced last week. But you can't have all the sports. How is a consumer supposed to navigate a world where some NFL games are on one app and others are on different ones? So this is fascinating. We have a really talented research department, and one of the things that we've seen is that younger sports fans do not have any issue with having multiple apps. They know how to switch apps. That's how they grew up, bouncing from app to app. So the issues that you and I might have, they don't seem to be present with my teenagers, for example. Disney historically wanted nothing to do with gambling. Now you've embraced it. You guys have a branded ESPN sportsbook. But there's also pushback against the sports betting boom from people who say it's poorly regulated, and that we're starting to see harm from it, especially with young men. Is there anything that gives you pause or makes you consider tapping the brakes — maybe you'll allow it, but make it harder to do, add more friction to it? If you look at our research, what you'll see is that sports fans today see sports betting as a part of the fan experience. Our mission is to serve the sports fan. And it would be very hard for ESPN today to serve the sports fan without providing substantial, meaningful betting content and a frictionless — or somewhat frictionless — experience around placing a bet. We are not a book. We do not take people's money. But we partnered with Penn Entertainment to create ESPN Bet, and we get paid an annual license fee for our brand. We obviously promote it significantly and we integrate it into our programming. [Our new app] will have a significant sports betting tab that we're excited about, that we think is needle-moving. We have not really received any negative feedback on our offering. You have kids. Do they bet on sports? My kids do not. But I'm on college campuses all the time, and it's everywhere. You're surrounded by it. Does that concern you? Look. What I've experienced — and I don't want to be naive here — but from my limited experience, what I see is people making small bets. Obviously, I understand that there are many problem cases. We partner with an enterprise that is making this a priority — offers thoughtful PSAs; has the technology to identify problem bettors and cut them off; makes help available to them. The Penn deal seems like it's not working for them, based on what they've said in their public commentary. You guys have an out next year. The real leaders in sports betting remain DraftKings and FanDuel. Do you imagine that you'll look for a different provider next year? The opt-out you mentioned is mutual. So they have it, we have it. It's next summer. The good news here is that we're launching an enhanced app that includes significant betting integration, and we believe ESPN BET is going to benefit from that. So let's see if we can improve market share with this launch. And we will evaluate things at the end of football season. I was looking at an interview I did with you in 2019. I was asking about a change in programming from your predecessor, and you made a point of saying, "Diversity is very important for us," which was a sort of standard thing to say then. It wasn't considered controversial. In 2025, with the Trump administration, saying you're for diversity can be a trigger. The FCC held up the Paramount/Skydance deal, in part, because it wanted Paramount to get rid of its DEI program. Are you considering making changes within ESPN to accommodate the new political reality? When we talk about our priorities, we talk about direct-to-consumer quality, storytelling, innovation, and audience expansion. And if you were to walk the halls of any of our offices and ask our employees what our priorities are, I believe they would be able to rattle those four off. I also believe that most, if not all, of our employees would start with audience expansion. It's one of the things that has kept me up at night in this job, from the day I got it. I know that ESPN resonates with someone like me, someone my age, someone who's a hardcore sports fan. How do we make ESPN resonate with, for example, younger people, with the casual sports fan, with women? That's the opportunity for ESPN to expand and grow. And as a part of that, I believe that we need a workforce that reflects the audiences that we're trying to reach. Is "diversity" a word you guys can use in Bristol [Connecticut, where ESPN is headquartered]? I would say the words that we're using are "audience expansion."
Hypebeast
an hour ago
- Hypebeast
Carnival Unveils Exclusive Nike Folding Chair
Summary Carnivalhas unveiled an exclusiveNikefolding chair that's available for a limited time only. Propped up by a sturdy aluminum frame in black, the chair is crafted with durable 600D polyester that arrives in the orange hue that's distinctively Nike. Soft cushioning makes its way on to the arm rest while stitching adds a textured rectangular look around the Carnival and Nike logos. The Carnival x Nike folding chair is not for sale, but can be gifted to Carnival customers who purchase Nike or Jordan sneakers worth ฿7,000 THB (approximately $215 USD). If the total amount is below ฿7,000 THB, other Nike, Jordan and Carnival items can be added to hit the minimum spend.
