logo
Advocates, legislators still trying to expand expired compensation program for radiation exposure

Advocates, legislators still trying to expand expired compensation program for radiation exposure

Yahoo11-06-2025
Jun. 10—One year ago, Congress let a federal program end that compensated people who grew sick from mining uranium for nuclear weapons or from living downwind of nuclear weapons tests.
In those 12 months, Tina Cordova's cousin died after years of living with a rare brain cancer.
Under a proposed expansion of the program, 61-year-old Danny Cordova likely would have qualified for the $100,000 compensation offered to people with specific cancers who lived in specific areas downwind of aboveground nuclear weapons' tests.
"Instead, he and his mom lived literally paycheck to paycheck trying to pay for all of the medications he needed," Cordova said.
Since the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) program was created in 1990, New Mexican downwinders have been left out, as have uranium mine workers from after 1971.
Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., has led an effort in the Upper Chamber alongside Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., to expand the program so it includes later uranium mine workers, and people harmed by aboveground nuclear tests in more states — including New Mexico. In January, they reintroduced a bill to extend and expand RECA.
"Letting RECA expire is a disgrace to these families and victims," Luján said. "It's an insult to the victims and their families who still struggle to this very day to get help, get the medicine they need, get the treatments for the conditions caused by the negligence of the federal government. For the victims, this story is long from being over. Generational trauma and poor health conditions continue to plague entire families."
Although Hawley and Luján's bill passed the Senate twice in the last session of Congress, and was supported by the entire New Mexico delegation, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., never allowed a vote on the companion House bill, sponsored by Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández, D-N.M.
The expansion would have included an increased pricetag of $50 billion to $60 billion over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office — a cost estimate Luján has disagreed with. Since its inception, RECA has paid out approximately $2.6 billion. There is no accurate estimate of how many New Mexicans would be included if RECA is expanded, according to Luján's office.
"We know we have the votes to get this passed now," said Leger Fernández, who plans to reintroduce the bill in the House. "They keep raising issues with regards to the cost... These are people's lives, and so we need to keep bringing it back to that issue. And in many ways, I think that we are doing this in a bicameral manner, and that the pressure that is being brought from the Senate will help us in the House."
'No apology'
Cordova's cousin was diagnosed in his 20s, and had five brain surgeries to address his cancer.
"He was left with horrendous and devastating consequences of that (first) surgery," Cordova said. "He lost the eyesight in one eye, he lost the part of his brain that controlled all of his hormonal functions, and he lost the part of his brain that also controlled his ability to adapt his body temperature."
Five generations of Cordova's family tree include many cases of cancer. She herself survived thyroid cancer, and as a co-founder of the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, she's long advocated for expanding RECA.
Cordova's kitchen counter is covered in the stories of family trees that mirror her own. For 18 years, she's been collecting health surveys from people who grew up in areas downwind of aboveground nuclear weapon tests, documenting a history of cancer and death for families from Tularosa, Alamogordo and beyond.
Loretta Anderson, a patient advocate and co-founder of the Southwest Uranium Miners Coalition Post-71, works with over 1,000 former uranium miners and their families throughout the Laguna and Acoma pueblos. She knows 10 post-1971 uranium miners, those who would be compensated under a RECA expansion, who have died in the past 12 months.
"They died with no compensation, no apology from the government," Anderson said.
Despite the difficulty in getting RECA extended and expanded, Cordova has faith it will eventually pass through Congress.
"This is not a partisan issue," Cordova said. "Exposure to radiation has affected the young, the old, the male, the female, the Black, the white, the Republican and Democrat alike."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress Travel – All Expenses Paid: Top Destinations and Sponsors
Congress Travel – All Expenses Paid: Top Destinations and Sponsors

Skift

time26 minutes ago

  • Skift

Congress Travel – All Expenses Paid: Top Destinations and Sponsors

They're among the platinum perks members of Congress and their staffers enjoy: expenses-paid trips, often to luxurious destinations in the United States and abroad. And special interest groups are footing the travel bills. Federal lawmakers and their staffers have so far taken more than 1,700 of these trips this year, according to a Skift analysis of congressional records through July. The journeys are generally permitted by U.S. House and Senate rules as long as the itineraries are pre-approved by ethics officials, properly disclosed, and not bankrolled by a registered lobbyist or foreign agent. Most are sponsored by nonprofit or business organizations and designed to educate the official about a particular issue or industry, from global finance to national security to AI. But some government watchdogs say these trips are often little more than junkets, particularly since many of them take place in desirable locations and involve hig

Roy Cooper's Chances of Flipping North Carolina's GOP Senate Seat—New Poll
Roy Cooper's Chances of Flipping North Carolina's GOP Senate Seat—New Poll

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Roy Cooper's Chances of Flipping North Carolina's GOP Senate Seat—New Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former Democratic Governor Roy Cooper held a lead over Republican Michael Whatley in the latest poll of North Carolina's Senate race released on Thursday. Why It Matters Democrats view North Carolina as perhaps their best opportunity to flip a Senate seat in the 2026 midterms, when they are hoping a "blue wave" will give them a chance at winning back a majority despite a challenging map. The decision to run by Cooper, who enjoyed positive approval ratings during his time as governor, has fueled Democratic optimism about their chances. But Republicans believe Whatley, who serves as the RNC chair and is endorsed by President Donald Trump, will be a strong candidate against Cooper—and Democrats have not won a Senate race in the Tar Heel State since 2008 despite several close races. In the 2024 presidential race, North Carolina gave Trump a narrow victory of about three percentage points. The new poll underscores the competitive nature of the critical battleground race. What to Know The Harper Polling survey provided to Newsweek by the John Locke Foundation showed Cooper leading Whatley, but neither candidate had support from a majority of respondents. Cooper received support from 47.3 percent of respondents, while 39.1 percent said they planned to cast their ballot for Whatley in November next year. Forty percent said they would "definitely" support Cooper, while only 24.7 percent said they would "definitely" support Whatley. The poll surveyed 600 likely voters from August 11 to August 12, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.98 percentage points. Former Governor Roy Cooper speaks during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 22, 2024. Former Governor Roy Cooper speaks during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 22, found that 47 percent of respondents view Cooper favorably, while 40 percent view him unfavorably. Whatley was more unknown among North Carolina voters, with 51 percent saying they had never heard of him. Fifteen percent viewed him favorably, while 11 percent viewed him unfavorably. Voters were split about who they would support on the generic ballot for Congress—46 percent said they would support a Republican candidate, while 46.1 percent said they would support the Democratic candidate, according to the poll. Donald Bryson, CEO and president of the John Locke Foundation and publisher of the Carolina Journal, told Newsweek the poll findings are not surprising but provided a "great baseline" of the state of the race. "Roy Cooper has vast name ID having been attorney general for 16 years, governor for 8. He's been in elected office in North Carolina since 1986. With all of that resume, it would be strange if he had a lower name ID that Michael Whatley," he said. Whatley having lower name recognition is also not surprising as he has never held elected office in the state, Bryson said. He said that is not "necessarily a negative for Whatley," who will need to drive up Cooper's negative numbers and his own name ID over the coming year. What is more concerning for Whatley is the poll's findings that 62 percent of North Carolinians believe tariffs will make prices higher for everyday North Carolinians, Bryson said. "That is something that if I was working on his campaign as a consultant or a campaign manager, how do we answer this question on when the price of goods goes up due to the tariff regime put in place by the Trump administration—how do we spin this as good for the state of North Carolina?" he said. Whatley's fate and criticism will likely be "tied to Trump," Bryson said. Roy Cooper Leads Earliest Polls of North Carolina Senate Race The poll is in line with the other early surveys of the Senate race. An Emerson College poll released last month similarly showed Cooper with a lead over Whatley. Forty-seven percent of respondents said they would cast their ballots for Cooper, while 41 percent said they would support Whatley next November. The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters from July 28 to July 30, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. A Victory Insights poll showed a closer race, with Cooper winning 43 percent of respondents and Whatley winning 40 percent of respondents. It surveyed 600 likely voters from July 20 to July 30, 2025. While Cooper is not expected to face a competitive primary, as Democrats have cleared the field for him, it's unclear whether other high-profile Republicans will challenge Whatley, who has the support of Trump. Trump-backed candidates typically fare well in GOP primaries, giving Whatley an early advantage against other potential challengers. North Carolina—An Elusive Battleground for Democrats Democrats have made recent Senate races competitive in North Carolina but have struggled to prevail against Republicans in a state that has proven elusive for Democrats at the federal level in recent years. In 2022, Republican Tedd Bud, then a member of Congress, defeated Democrat Cheri Beasley by about three points. GOP Senator Thom Tillis narrowly defeated Democrat Cal Cunningham by less than two points in 2020. In 2016, former GOP Senator Richard Burr defeated Democrat Deborah Ross, now a member of Congress, by nearly six percentage points. At the same time, Democrats have held a grip on the governor mansion. Democrat Josh Stein, who succeeded Cooper, won November's gubernatorial race by nearly 15 points after Republican Mark Robinson faced a series of scandals on the campaign trail. Candidate quality is a key factor here, Bryson said, adding that the Republican base "tends to be more affected by national politics." What People Are Saying Bryson told Newsweek: "I think [Cooper is] in a really comfortable position now. I think it would be easy for the Cooper camp to feel like they're in a comfortable position and can coast for a little while. But I think what comes with that name ID and people being comfortable enough to say they would vote for him in this poll also comes with a long record." Roy Cooper in a video announcing his candidacy: "I never really wanted to go to Washington. I just wanted to serve the people of North Carolina right here, where I've lived all my life. But these are not ordinary times." Whatley wrote in a post to X: "President Trump asked me to run for Senate because North Carolina needs a strong, consistent conservative leader in the Senate. Someone who will fight to create jobs, protect our farmers, and make America the strongest country on the face of the Earth." What Happens Next The Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball both classify the North Carolina Senate race as a pure toss-up.

How to achieve the balanced immigration policy Americans want
How to achieve the balanced immigration policy Americans want

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

How to achieve the balanced immigration policy Americans want

Terrified employees are not showing up to work. Children who are American citizens are being deported without due process. Crops are being left to rot because farms can't find workers to pick them. The Trump administration has claimed this is the price of a secure border. But Americans are no longer buying it. A record-high 79 percent of Americans now say immigration is a good thing for the country — a growing majority clearly believes U.S. policy should address immigration's benefits, as well as its risks. A balanced policy is possible. By the end of its time in office, the Biden administration had brought order to the border. In our new research paper, we examine the successes and shortcomings of Biden's term, offering lessons for a more pragmatic migration policy — one that advances America's broad range of economic, security and humanitarian interests. We would be the first to acknowledge that the Biden administration's response to record migration flows was imperfect. The administration was slow to support cities struggling with unprecedented migrant arrivals, ceded the narrative to its critics by playing defense on communications and waited too long to ramp up its enforcement efforts. But by the end of 2024, total monthly encounters at the Southern border fell from a high of 300,000 to fewer than 100,000. In fact, the number of authorized encounters at ports of entry via programs, such as CBP One and the special program for for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, exceeded the number of unauthorized encounters. Put another way, more than 80 percent of the current reduction we see in unauthorized border encounters occurred during the Biden administration. The Trump administration has reduced encounters from their prior levels by an additional 17 percent through costly and draconian measures. The immigration lessons from Biden's term are not always intuitive. First, enforcement and lawful pathways are not opposing strategies — they are interdependent. We have often heard the refrain of needing to crack down first, and only then consider expanding lawful pathways. But the data tells a different story. When the U.S. paired increased enforcement with credible legal alternatives, irregular crossings plummeted. It was this mix — not enforcement alone — that brought numbers down. Second, emergency parole programs were a key, if imperfect, tool. Humanitarian parole, including the CHNV process, allowed people to apply from where they were, enabling vetted migrants to join the U.S. labor force quickly, helping avoid a post-pandemic recession. That said, parole programs are not a durable solution. Congress must finally revisit decades-old visa caps and instead build a flexible and demand-driven approach that better matches migrants with labor needs across the skill spectrum. Third, regional cooperation mattered more than most Americans realize. Countries such as Colombia, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru gave legal status to over 4.5 million displaced Venezuelans, preventing an even larger surge north. The U.S. backed those efforts with foreign assistance and diplomacy. It paid off, as fewer people were forced to keep moving. It was far cheaper, too. Integration costs were estimated at $600 per migrant in Colombia, for instance, compared to the over $17,000 price tag to apprehend, detain and deport someone at the U.S. border. Western Hemisphere countries also worked together to increase migrant screening and vetting, coordinate on transit visa policies and investigate traffickers. Migration diplomacy under the Biden administration was a two-way street, with the U.S. encouraging countries to do more but also providing foreign assistance and political cover. When we recognize that migration is a hemispheric challenge, not just a U.S. one, we get better results. Finally, if we want to avoid the next migration surge, we need to understand what drove the last one. Yes, the Biden administration's shift in tone influenced flows at the border. But the deeper drivers were structural: a post-pandemic labor market desperate for workers; Title 42 expulsions that perversely encouraged repeated crossings; and the largest displacement crisis in the hemisphere's history, fueled mainly by Venezuela's economic collapse. Migration pressure doesn't simply disappear — it builds up. By slashing foreign aid, abandoning multilateralism and pouring resources almost exclusively into border security and internal enforcement, the Trump administration has bet everything on deterrence. If these tactics merely delay rather than prevent a future crisis, the administration may wish it had more tools available to respond. We share these lessons not to fight old battles but to shape a smarter way forward. Last month, a bipartisan group of House members reintroduced the Dignity Act, coupling a pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants in the U.S. with stronger enforcement. There's a growing recognition in Congress that waiting for a 'grand bargain' has become an excuse for doing nothing. Narrow, targeted reforms — expediting work permits, closing asylum loopholes, expanding permanent and temporary lawful visas, creating a path to legal status for those who have lived here for many years, and promoting talent retention — are all achievable, necessary and in our national interest. Three decades of stalemate have made clear that inaction on immigration carries immense costs. Those who believe in a better way must seize the opportunity to pursue pragmatic policies, whenever it emerges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store