Victoria's Secret faces fresh activist fight from Barington Capital
See catwalk
The New York-based hedge fund, which owns more than 1% of the company, said Victoria's Secret has underperformed its competitors and lost over $2.4 billion in shareholder value since its spin-off in 2021 from former parent company L Brands.
On Sunday, Reuters reported, citing sources, that Barington wants the company to replace most or all of its board and end the "poison pill" plan that it adopted in May to protect the company from hostile takeovers.
"Barington has not sought to engage with us, but we look forward to discussing their views with them," a Victoria's Secret spokesperson said.
"We are confident that executing our strategy under the new and experienced leadership team will continue to unlock value for our shareholders," the spokesperson added.
Its shares, which have lost more than half of their value so far this year amid waning demand, were up about 3% in morning trade.
Victoria's Secret requires a reconstituted board comprising directors with "proven experience in brand revitalization, operational execution, international expansion, and shareholder value creation," James Mitarotonda, Barington's founder and CEO, said in the letter.
The investment firm said the retailer should focus on core categories and initiatives, like bras and the Angels campaign, and accelerate growth in digital and international markets.
Barington highlighted concerns about the company's leadership, and said Chief Executive Hillary Super, who took over in September 2024, has limited public company experience, and that the rest of the board lacks the necessary experience to revitalize the iconic brand.
Victoria's Secret, with a market capitalization of about $1.45 billion currently, adopted the poison pill plan to fend off Brett Blundy's investment firm, which increased its stake in the company to around 13%.
Barington's pressure puts Victoria's Secret in a "precarious position" as it tries to fend off other activist investors and restore confidence in CEO's turnaround plan, eMarketer analyst Rachel Wolff said, adding that investors' growing dissatisfaction with leadership could force a change at the company's management level.
Barington previously pushed for changes at L Brands, which split into Victoria's Secret and Bath & Body Works.
Earlier this year, Barington mounted its first full-blown board room challenge since 2015 when it tried to put three directors on the board of casket maker Matthews International but ended up losing the vote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
19 hours ago
- LeMonde
Japan's SoftBank to invest $2 billion in Intel
Japan-based tech investor SoftBank Group said on Tuesday, August 19, that it will invest $2 billion in Intel, as the US government reportedly considers taking a 10% stake in the troubled US chip giant. The move is the latest in SoftBank's succession of investments and business deals in the United States as its charismatic founder, Masayoshi Son, aggressively courts US President Donald Trump. "This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role," Son said in a joint press release with Intel announcing the deal. SoftBank will pay $23 per share of Intel common stock. SoftBank's move came as the Trump administration discussed taking a stake of about 10% in Intel to boost the chipmaker and the American semiconductor sector, according to US media, including Bloomberg News and the Wall Street Journal. Since Trump's return to the White House, Son has already announced other investment plans in the United States, including its leading role in the $500-billion Stargate project to build AI infrastructure there along with cloud giant Oracle and ChatGPT-maker OpenAI. Son stood beside the US president and fellow investors to announce the Stargate project at the White House in January. Lip-Bu Tan, Intel chief executive officer, said in the statement that the latest deal demonstrates its close ties with SoftBank. It is "a company that's at the forefront of so many areas of emerging technology and innovation and shares our commitment to advancing US technology and manufacturing leadership," he said. Trump had pressed Tan, a Malaysian-born tech veteran, to resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. But during a meeting last week, Trump praised Tan, saying in a social media post that "his success and rise is an amazing story." Trump also wrote that members of his cabinet would work with Tan and come up with "suggestions." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business.
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
Pro-Trump channel Newsmax agrees to pay $67M in defamation case over 2020 election claims
The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about US President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday, August 18. The settlement comes after Fox News Channel paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax in a new filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. "Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020," the company said in a statement. "We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism." A spokesperson for Dominion said the company was pleased to have settled the lawsuit. The disclosure of the settlement came as Trump, who lost his 2020 reelection bid to Democrat Joe Biden, vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the Republican president could achieve that. The same judge also handled the Dominion-Fox News case and made a similar ruling that the network repeated numerous lies by Trump's allies about his 2020 loss despite internal communications showing Fox officials knew the claims were bogus. At the time, Davis found it was "crystal clear" that none of the allegations was true. Internal correspondence from Newsmax officials likewise shows they knew the claims were baseless. "How long are we going to play along with election fraud?" Newsmax host Bob Sellers said two days after the 2020 election was called for Biden, according to internal documents revealed as part of the case. Though Trump has insisted his fraud claims are real, there is no evidence they were, and the lawsuits in the Fox and Newsmax cases show how some of the president's biggest supporters knew they were false at the time. Trump's then-attorney general, William Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Trump and his backers lost dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud, some before Trump-appointed judges. Numerous recounts, reviews and audits of the election results, including some run by Republicans, turned up no signs of significant wrongdoing or error and affirmed Biden's win.
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Google to pay €30M fine for anti-competition deals in Australia
Google has agreed to pay a 55 million Australian dollar (€30.1m) fine for signing anticompetitive deals with Australia's two largest telcos that banned the installation of competing search engines on some smartphones, the US tech giant and Australia's competition watchdog said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement it had commenced proceedings in the Australian Federal Court on Monday against the Singapore-based Google Asia Pacific division. The court will decide whether the AU$50 million (€27.9m) penalty is appropriate. Restricting competition is illegal in Australia Under the anticompetitive agreements, which were in place for 15 months until March 2021, Telstra and Optus only pre-installed Google Search on Android phones sold to customers. Other search engines were excluded. In return, the telcos received a share of the advertisement revenue Google generated from those customers. Google accepted that the agreements were likely to have the effect of 'substantially lessening competition,' the commission said. Google has also signed a court-enforceable undertaking that commits the company to removing certain pre-installation and default search engine restrictions from its contracts with Android phone manufacturers and telcos, the commission said. The tech company said in a statement: 'We're pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns, which involved provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time.' Commissioner chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said: "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers.' 'Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition,' Cass-Gottlieb added. Last year, Telstra, Optus and their smaller rival TPG agreed to court-enforceable undertakings with the commission that they would not renew or make similar deals with Google to limit search options.
