Kennedy's new vaccine advisers meet for first time
ATLANTA (AP) — U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new vaccine advisers began their first meeting Wednesday under intense scrutiny from medical experts worried about Americans' access to lifesaving shots.
First on the agenda is an awkward scenario: Kennedy already announced COVID-19 vaccines will no longer be recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, and his new advisers aren't scheduled to vote on whether they agree. Yet government scientists prepared meeting materials calling vaccination 'the best protection' during pregnancy — and said most children hospitalized for COVID-19 over the past year were unvaccinated.
COVID-19 remains a public health threat, resulting in 32,000 to 51,000 U.S. deaths and more than 250,000 hospitalizations since last fall, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most at risk for hospitalization are seniors and children under 2 — especially infants under 6 months who could have some protection if their mom got vaccinated during pregnancy, according to the CDC's presentation.
It's one signal that this week's two-day meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices isn't business as usual.
Another sign: Shortly before the meeting, a Virginia-based obstetrician and gynecologist stepped down from the committee, bringing the panel's number to just seven. The Trump administration said Dr. Michael Ross withdrew during a customary review of members' financial holdings.
The meeting opened as the American Academy of Pediatrics announced that it will continue publishing its own vaccine schedule for children but now will do so independently of the ACIP, calling it 'no longer a credible process.'
The panel, created more than 60 years ago, helps the CDC determine who should be vaccinated against a long list of diseases, and when. Those recommendations have a big impact on whether insurance covers vaccinations and where they're available, such as at pharmacies.
Earlier this month, Kennedy abruptly dismissed the existing 17-member expert panel and handpicked eight replacements, including several anti-vaccine voices. And a number of the CDC's top vaccine scientists — including some who lead the reporting of data and the vetting of presentations at ACIP meetings — have resigned or been moved out of previous positions.
The highly unusual moves prompted a last-minute plea from a prominent Republican senator to delay this week's meeting. Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a physician who chairs the chamber's health committee, said Monday that many of Kennedy's chosen panelists lack the required expertise and 'may even have a preconceived bias' against new vaccine technologies.
In a House hearing Tuesday, Kennedy defended his purge, saying the old panel had been 'a template for medical malpractice.'
Rep. Kim Schrier, a pediatrician and Democrat from Washington state, told Kennedy: 'I will lay all responsibility for every death from a vaccine-preventable illness at your feet.'
Committee will vote on RSV protections
The two-day meeting's agenda on was abruptly changed last week.
Discussion of COVID-19 shots will open the session on Wednesday. Later in the day, the committee will take up RSV, with votes expected. On Thursday, the committee will vote on fall flu vaccinations and on the use of a preservative in certain flu shots.
RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, is a common cause of cold-like symptoms that can be dangerous for infants.
In 2023, U.S. health officials began recommending two new measures to protect infants — a lab-made antibody for newborns and a vaccine for pregnant women — that experts say likely drove an improvement in infant mortality.
The committee will discuss another company's newly approved antibody shot, but the exact language for the vote was not released prior to the meeting.
'I think there may be a theme of soft-pedaling or withdrawing recommendations for healthy pregnant women and healthy children,' even though they are at risk from vaccine-preventable diseases, said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University who co-authored a recent medical journal commentary criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination decision.
Flu shot recommendations to be debated
At its June meetings, the committee usually refreshes guidance for Americans 6 month and older to get a flu shot, and helps greenlight the annual fall vaccination campaign.
But given the recent changes to the committee and federal public health leadership, it's unclear how routine topics will be treated, said Jason Schwartz, a Yale University health policy researcher who has studied the committee.
Thursday also promises controversy. The advisory panel is set to consider a preservative in a subset of flu shots that Kennedy and some antivaccine groups have falsely contended is tied to autism. In preparation, the CDC posted a new report confirming that research shows no link between the preservative, thimerosal, and autism or any other neurodevelopmental disorders.
Gostin said the agenda appears to be 'a combination of what we would normally expect ACIP to cover along with a mixture of potential conspiracy theories,' he said. 'We clearly are in a new normal that's highly skeptical of vaccine science.'
The committee's recommendations traditionally go to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director. Historically, nearly all are accepted and then used by insurance companies in deciding what vaccines to cover.
But the CDC currently has no director, so the committee's recommendations have been going to Kennedy, and he has yet to act on a couple recommendations ACIP made in April.
The CDC director nominee, Susan Monarez, is slated to go before a Senate committee on Wednesday.
___
Neergaard reported from Washington.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republicans battle over rural hospital relief fund to offset Medicaid cuts
Senate Republicans including Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) say a new proposal to create a $15 billion relief fund for rural hospitals is not adequate to make up for tens of billions of dollars in federal Medicaid funding cuts included in the Senate megabill bill to enact President Trump's agenda. Collins told reporters Wednesday that the $15 billion relief fund floated by the Senate Finance Committee is likely not the final offer from Senate Republicans leaders to address the concerns of several senators who worry the bill's cap on health care provider taxes could put scores of rural hospitals out of business around the country. 'The Finance Committee has not made a final decision. It is accurate that I believe we need $100 billion provider-relief fund. I don't think that solves the entire problem. The Senate cuts in Medicaid are far deeper than the House cuts, and I think that's problematic as well,' she said. 'Obviously any money is helpful but no it is not adequate. But I do not know for certain that that is where the Finance Committee has landed,' she said. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is also skeptical that $15 billion would be enough to offset the Senate bill's impact on small rural hospitals, according to a Senate GOP source familiar with the internal debate. A Republican senator familiar with the Finance Committee's proposal confirmed the panel has offered a $15 billion relief fund for rural hospitals. The senator said that roughly half of the fund would be available to rural hospitals around the country and the other half would be targeted to specific hospitals chosen by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 'That doesn't mean they won't adjust it,' the senator said. 'There will be a fund. Right now it's at $15 billion.' 'Last I checked it's a formula there's a base amount that all states would get for their rural hospitals, like half of it. And the other half of it goes out based on other factors in the states. The whole point is to mitigate the impact on states that would have higher impacts because of health care provider taxes,' the source said. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who has said the Senate bill would have a devastating impact on rural hospitals in his state, said that setting up a health care provider relief fund is a step in the right direction. But he indicated that he would favor putting $100 billion into such a fund, as Collins has suggested, instead of the much smaller amount proposed by the Finance panel. 'That'd be a good number,' he said of the $100 billion proposal. 'I want to understand — unfortunately we did not talk about at lunch today — how the fund would work. I think the fund is important. Getting a fund is good. That's a step forward. How does the fund actually distribute the money?' Senate Majority Leader Thune (R-S.D.), a member of the Finance panel, on Wednesday poured water on the idea of a $100 billion relief fund. 'It won't be that big,' he told reporters. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said $15 billion in targeted funding for rural hospitals is an improvement to the bill. 'Anything for rural health is going to help but there's no way I can measure how much it's going to help,' he said. 'It's a step in the right direction helping out what we're trying to do to reform Medicaid.' Al Weaver contributed.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
7 best magnesium supplements in 2025, tested and reviewed by a dietitian
Constipated? Trouble sleeping? Feeling sore after a workout? Magnesium might help! Half of Americans don't get enough magnesium despite the mineral being found in a wide variety of foods. Finding the best magnesium supplement can help bridge that gap, supporting everything from sleep to muscle function. "Magnesium is responsible for over 300 enzymatic reactions in the body," says Trista Best, MPH, RDN, LD of the Candida Diet. "It is essential for muscle, nerve and heart function, as well as energy production. Magnesium deficiencies can lead to serious health and quality of life issues, including anxiety, poor sleep, muscle spasms, poor bone health and migraines, to name just a few," she says. Fortunately, supplementing with magnesium may help counteract these deficiencies. According to Dr. Raj Dasgupta, chief medical advisor for Garage Gym Reviews, the best magnesium supplements may "help with stress reduction, better sleep and even digestive health. Plus, they're an easy way to ensure you meet your daily needs if your diet falls short." The tricky part is deciphering which product to choose — that's where we come in! Several forms of magnesium are available, each varying in composition and effects on health. For example, magnesium glycinate is often used to help manage stress, whereas magnesium oxide is better suited for people with heartburn or indigestion. To save you the trouble of becoming an armchair expert on the topic, I spoke with actual experts, including a registered dietitian and a medical doctor, to better understand each type and its benefits. As a registered dietitian myself, I combined our experts' insights with my education and years of clinical experience to research more than 20 magnesium supplements. I narrowed these down to 11 top-rated products and worked with a panel of testers to do hands-on reviews. Whether you're looking to prevent migraines or simply boost your magnesium intake, our expert- and tester-approved picks have you covered. Best overall magnesium supplement More magnesium supplements we like Types of magnesium supplements Factors to consider when shopping for magnesium supplements How we chose magnesium supplements Other products we tested FAQs Meet our experts A note on supplements The products included on this list are dietary supplements. Statements about these products have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Dietary supplements are not appropriate for everyone and may interact with other supplements or medications, so talk to your healthcare provider before adding a dietary supplement to your routine. Update, June 25, 2025: We checked all product prices and availability. Our No. 1 pick for best overall magnesium supplement is unchanged. We included additional testing data for Nordic Naturals Magnesium Gummies after several months of daily use. (back to top) (back to top) Magnesium comes in various forms, each offering unique benefits and drawbacks. Choosing the right one depends on your health goals and absorption rate. Here's a quick rundown of five of the most common types of magnesium you'll find in supplements: Magnesium glycinate: This form of magnesium combines magnesium and the amino acid glycine. It is easily absorbed and associated with fewer GI side effects than other types. While more research is needed, magnesium glycinate is thought to have calming properties and may help manage stress, anxiety, depression and insomnia. Magnesium citrate: This highly absorbable form of magnesium comprises magnesium bound to citric acid, a natural compound found in citrus fruits. This combination enhances solubility and bioavailability, making it one of the most common forms of magnesium supplement used for deficiencies. It also has a mild laxative effect, which makes it an option for relieving occasional constipation. At higher doses, it is often used as a short-term treatment for acute constipation, such as before medical procedures like colonoscopies. Magnesium oxide: A salt of magnesium that combines magnesium and oxygen, typically found in powder form. It may help reduce heartburn, stomach upset and chronic constipation. However, because it's less readily absorbed, it isn't the best option for increasing blood magnesium levels. Magnesium L-threonate: An absorbable form of magnesium created by combining magnesium with threonic acid, a compound derived from vitamin C. While research is ongoing, this form is believed to be especially beneficial for brain health. Studies suggest it may play a role in supporting cognitive function, improving memory and potentially aiding in the treatment of depression and age-related cognitive decline. Magnesium malate: A combination of magnesium and malic acid naturally found in fruits. Because it's readily absorbed and less likely to cause diarrhea, it's sometimes recommended instead of magnesium citrate to treat magnesium deficiencies. (back to top) With so many magnesium supplements on the market, choosing the right one for your specific health goals can be difficult. Here's what to keep in mind to select the best magnesium supplements for you: Type of magnesium: Different forms of magnesium serve different purposes. Magnesium glycinate is often used for sleep and anxiety, while magnesium oxide is more effective for relieving constipation. Choosing the right type depends on your specific health needs. Form: Magnesium supplements are available in capsule, liquid, powder and gummy form. While liquid supplements generally absorb faster, choose a form you feel comfortable taking regularly. Bioavailability and absorption rate: Some types of magnesium are more readily absorbed than others. If you have a confirmed magnesium deficiency, select a form that's easier for your body to absorb, like magnesium glycinate. Dosage per serving: The ideal amount of magnesium per serving depends on the type of magnesium, the intended benefit and how much magnesium you're already getting in your diet. A doctor or registered dietitian can help identify the correct dose for you. Additional ingredients and fillers: Whenever possible, choose a supplement with minimal additives, such as artificial colors or fillers. Some products also include extra nutrients, which may be beneficial depending on your diet, but if you're already getting these from other supplements, they may not be necessary. Third-party testing: It's essential to select supplements tested for purity and potency, ideally by a third-party organization such as NSF, UL Solutions or US Pharmacopeia (USP). Potential side effects: Certain forms of magnesium are more likely to cause side effects than others. Magnesium oxide, for example, is known to cause diarrhea, whereas magnesium glycinate is generally well-tolerated. Research each form of magnesium to understand its potential side effects. Value: Good-quality magnesium supplements are available at virtually every price point. Because some products require taking multiple pills or gummies daily, comparing the price per serving is important when deciding which product is best for your budget. (back to top) As a registered dietitian with nearly a decade of experience, I've closely followed the latest in dietary supplements to ensure the most up-to-date recommendations. To provide a well-rounded perspective, I consulted a fellow registered dietitian and a board-certified physician for their insights on magnesium supplements and the various available forms. Our team reviewed over 20 products from over 15 brands, narrowing it down to 11 magnesium supplements for hands-on testing. With the help of family and friends, each product was tested for at least one week and evaluated based on ease of use, taste, cost, effectiveness and overall user experience. (back to top) MegaFood Magnesium 300 mg Capsules: These vegetarian-friendly capsules contain three easily absorbed forms of magnesium: citrate, malate and glycinate. While we liked that the supplement is designed to be gentle on the stomach and can be taken at any time of day, the capsule's large size and rough texture made it harder to swallow. Trace Minerals Mega-Mag Liquid Magnesium Chloride: This liquid option is hard to beat. It's formulated for optimal absorption and third-party tested to ensure purity and potency. The tricky part is the recommended dose of 20 drops per day. While you can spread the dose throughout the day, we struggled to remember to do so. Trace Minerals No Muscle Cramps: This liquid supplement contains a unique blend of magnesium and electrolytes to keep muscle cramps at bay. While it has hundreds of rave reviews online, our tester found it hard to get past the oily texture when mixed with water. Nature Made Magnesium Glycinate: Easily available in stores and online, this option is formulated to be readily absorbed and gentle on the stomach. The biggest downside is the recommended dose of three relatively large capsules daily. Plus, unlike many Nature Made supplements, this one isn't third-party certified. (back to top) Magnesium supplements are a convenient way to ensure you get enough of this essential mineral in your diet. Depending on the form you take, magnesium supplements can also help prevent migraines, ease constipation, improve sleep and lower stress and anxiety levels. According to Dasgupta, "Magnesium glycinate and magnesium L-threonate are among the most bioavailable forms, meaning your body can absorb and use them efficiently." Magnesium citrate is also easily absorbed, though it "has a laxative effect that some may want to avoid," adds Best. The ideal magnesium dosage from supplements depends on your dietary intake and whether you have a confirmed deficiency. The recommended daily intake for adults is 350 mg for women and 420 mg for men, though this can vary based on age, health status and individual needs. "Yes, magnesium can help with sleep because it supports muscle relaxation, calms the nervous system and might lower cortisol levels. It also plays a role in melatonin production, which can help regulate your circadian rhythm. However, its impact isn't guaranteed, so it's best to manage expectations," explains Dasgupta. "Taking too much magnesium can cause diarrhea, nausea or stomach cramps. It can also interact with certain medications, so talk to your doctor first," notes Dasgupta. The best sources of magnesium are typically plant-based foods that are high in fiber, such as nuts, seeds, leafy greens, potatoes, beans and legumes. That said, magnesium can also be found in a variety of animal foods, including salmon, halibut, chicken and beef. (back to top) Trista Best, MPH, RDN, LD, registered dietitian at the Candida Diet Dr. Raj Dasgupta, chief medical advisor for Garage Gym Reviews (back to top) Our health content is for informational purposes only and is not intended as professional medical advice. Consult a medical professional on questions about your health.
The Hill
24 minutes ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr.'s vaccine advisory panel to review shots for children
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s newly remade federal vaccine advisory panel will examine the cumulative effect of the childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule, the panel's chairman said Wednesday. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will also weigh recommendations for vaccines that have long been on the market, including measles and hepatitis B. Martin Kulldorf made the announcement at the start of the first meeting of the ACIP since Kennedy dismissed all 17 previous members less than two weeks ago, accusing them of conflicts of interest. Kennedy appointed a new group of eight members two days later. One withdrew just before Wednesday's meeting during a review of his financial holdings, leaving seven members to vote on vaccine recommendations during the meeting. 'Secretary Kennedy has given this committee a clear mandate to use evidence based medicine. We're making vaccine recommendations and that is what we will do. Vaccines are not all good or bad,' Kulldorf said Wednesday. The health chief, who co-founded the anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense and served as its chairman before being confirmed to lead HHS, has long called for an investigation into the number of childhood shots, saying they have been inadequately studied. The review will be undertaken by two new ACIP work groups, Kulldorff said, though it's not clear if they have been staffed yet. One group will be focused on the childhood and adolescent vaccine schedules and the other will focus on shots that have been approved for seven or more years. He specifically mentioned the recommendation for giving newborns the hepatitis B vaccine as well as the combination measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and chickenpox shots. The panel chair added that the group will also consider religious objections to MMR vaccines derived from fetal cell lines and may look at an MMR vaccine approved in Japan. 'The number of vaccines that our children and adolescents receive today exceed what children in most other developed nations receive, and what most of us in this room received when we were children,' Kulldorf said. He added that it is also important 'to evaluate the cumulative effect of the recommended vaccine schedule. This includes interaction effects between different vaccines, the total number of vaccines, cumulative amounts of vaccine ingredients and the relative timing of different vaccines.' For decades, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) independent advisory panel recommended which shots Americans should get and when. The Affordable Care Act requires all insurance companies to cover, for free, the vaccines recommended by the panel. Those recommendations also help states decide which shots should be mandated for schoolchildren. Kennedy's shakeup is throwing that system into chaos. Outside physician and public health groups have been pressuring insurance companies to continue covering vaccines, no matter what ACIP does. 'Part of the role of ACIP is to look at vaccines across the lifespan,' said Chrissie Juliano, executive director of the Big Cities Health Coalition. 'I think the important thing to note is we need to reevaluate vaccine recommendations based on whether science has changed, not based on whether the people who sit on a committee change, or in administration changes. And I think that's where we start to lose the public's trust.' The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) announced Wednesday that it would no longer take part in ACIP hearings. 'We won't lend our name or our expertise to a system that is being politicized at the expense of children's health,' AAP President Susan Kressly said in a video posted on social platform X. Ahead of the meeting, the insurance industry trade group America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) issued a statement that its plans are 'committed to ongoing coverage of vaccines to ensure access and affordability for this respiratory virus season.' 'We encourage all Americans to talk to their health care provider about vaccines,' the group wrote. As the meeting kicked off, President Trump's nominee to lead the CDC, Susan Monarez, was on Capitol Hill testifying in front of the Senate Health, Education Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee during a confirmation hearing. Monarez said she does not see a causal link between vaccines and autism, and told Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) she hopes experts will step up and volunteer to fill the panel's remaining slots. 'These are not easy positions to fill. It takes a lot of time and commitment from some of these highly trained technical experts to want to participate,' Monarez said. 'They need to have a depth and a breadth of technical experience to be able to understand immunological processes, to understand statistical analysis.' Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), HELP Committee, lamented the 'rushed' meeting with a diminished panel. 'Given that there is no confirmed CDC director, along with an ACIP panel which has very few members, many of whom lack broad vaccine and immunology immunological expertise, there are concerns about the rushed nature of this process,' Cassidy said. The Louisiana Republican also expressed concern that Thursday's ACIP schedule will feature a presentation on thimerosal given by Lyn Redwood, a longtime anti-vaccine activist. Redwood is president emerita of Children's Health Defense. Thimerosal is a preservative used in some influenza vaccines, and anti-vaccine leaders have long linked it to autism in children, a claim that's been debunked. 'I will note that there are people who are critics of thimerosal who've been asked to testify, but no one speaking of the substantial evidence that in the amounts used in vaccines, thimerosal is safe,' the senator said. Prior to the meeting, a document was posted to ACIP's website summarizing that all available evidence shows thimerosal is safe and is not linked to autism or other neurological issues. That document was no longer available on Wednesday. 'I will say going forward, if the ACIP hearing today is being used to sow distrust, I would ask as you go forward that you would make sure that there really was a balanced perspective,' Cassidy said.
