New metro cuts through Saudi social divisions
A decade after breaking ground, Riyadh's gleaming new metro opened in December, offering the capital's eight million residents an alternative to roads chronically clogged by its two million cars.
A quicker commute is not the only difference: for the first time, the wealthy are sharing journeys with the less well off, and Saudi nationals are mixing with the large expat population, from white-collar workers to labourers.
"For 40 years, I was confined to my car or restaurants with my father and brothers, then with my wife and children," Ghamdi, a 42-year-old civil servant working in downtown Riyadh, told AFP.
"I didn't mix or talk to anyone except those I knew or who resembled me.
"Now, things have changed. You feel that society, with all its classes, is in one place," he added while speeding along the blue line, which connects working-class areas in the south with the downtown business district and affluent northern neighbourhoods.
With its eye-watering oil riches, intricate tribal networks and large numbers of foreign workers, Saudi society has long been divided by rigid class structures.
But on the metro, those divisions are more porous.
Metro carriages are frequently crowded with labourers, university students, government employees and business executives wearing expensive suits.
"I can now discuss general topics with strangers and even get to know new things and cultures up close," said 56-year-old engineer Nasser Al-Qahtani, pointing to a young Saudi holding a skateboard.
- 'Family and friends only' -
While the metro has done little to clear Riyadh's perennially gridlocked streets, its opening has been "a major social and psychological event", said sociologist Mohammed Al-Hamza.
"The metro has shifted the mindset of Saudi society. It has made people come closer together," he said.
"The culture in Saudi Arabia is one of family and friends only, and there is reluctance to get to know new people."
Along with chipping away at class divisions, the system is saving commuters time and money, to the delight of many.
"I used to get to work in over an hour and a half, exhausted and stressed due to traffic," said Ghamdi, adding that he had hardly used his prized SUV for months.
"Now, I arrive relaxed and without stress," he added.
Prices range from just four riyals ($1) for a limited one-day pass to 140 riyals for a month.
As in other countries in the Middle East and beyond, the metro offers family carriages reserved for women, children and couples.
They afford women a safe and socially acceptable way to use the network to travel to work or study.
For those willing to pay an extra 10 riyals per day, first-class compartments also offer a reprieve from the busy single-male carriages.
For law student Hadeel Waleed, 20, the metro has been a game-changer, cutting her trip from the southern suburbs to Princess Nourah University from three to four hours to one hour or less.
"Now I arrive home with energy for my family and studying," she told AFP.
- 'No one expected this usage' -
The project is one of many major infrastructure initiatives under "Vision 2030" -- the reform programme overseen by the kingdom's de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
With six lines spanning about 176 kilometres (109 miles) of track, the network serves 85 stations, including stops at all terminals of Riyadh international airport.
There had been fears among city officials that the huge project could prove a white elephant, with few Saudis deigning to use it.
A bus network developed by the city struggled to gain traction as Saudis remained committed to their cars, especially during the hot summer months when temperatures hit 50 degrees Celsius (122 degrees Fahrenheit).
"Honestly, for 10 years, the question was: 'Who will use the metro?'" a senior official who helps operate the system told AFP on condition of anonymity.
"No one ever expected the current level of usage or even the financial returns," he added.
The Royal Commission for Riyadh did not respond to AFP's enquiries about daily ridership but the official suggested the figure was likely in the tens of thousands if not more.
Authorities are already hoping to expand the network, with a seventh line under development linking Riyadh to several new projects on the capital's outskirts.
For Muneer, a 28-year-old government employee, the metro is a welcome addition to a city undergoing rapid change.
"It makes life easier," he said.
ht-ds/th/kir/sco
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
43 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Syria's Islamist Regime Is Testing the West's Conscience—and Winning
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A sense of impending doom is growing among Syria's Christians, which comprise less than 10 percent of the country's population before the 2011 war. Despite promises Syrian President Ahmed Hussein al-Sharaa made to President Donald Trump about upholding justice for all and protecting Syria's minorities, they are now becoming targets. This chilling development hit home for me recently when my friend, a Christian doctor from Hama, a city north of Damascus, recently found himself in a tense encounter with a Syrian soldier. During a minor disagreement, the soldier snapped, "Shut up, infidel," invoking a moniker that has deadly implications. Woman cries as Syrian Christians gather in the St. Elias Greek Orthodox Church on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, on June 23, 2025, a day after a suicide bomber, allegedly linked to ISIS, blew up... Woman cries as Syrian Christians gather in the St. Elias Greek Orthodox Church on the outskirts of Damascus, Syria, on June 23, 2025, a day after a suicide bomber, allegedly linked to ISIS, blew up his explosives. More LAURIN STRELE/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images Following this threatening exchange, my friend attempted to escalate the matter within the government and gain the protections al-Sharaa had pledged. Instead, he was referred to a religious authority, one of the many new clerics who now holds power in Syria's parallel Islamist state structure. "Why are you complaining," the sheikh asked him. "You Christians are infidels." This was not an isolated case. It captures the reality of Syria under al-Sharaa, a state increasingly modeled on a hardline theocratic vision, where religious doctrine overrides civil law and where minorities no longer feel safe. Consider the recent massacre in Suwayda, a region with a Druze majority and a considerable Bedouin presence. Violence broke out between the local Druze and Bedouins, as it has in recent years. But, for the first time, the government intervened and took a side in the fight. Al-Sharaa's regime sent Islamist militias, armed with military-grade weapons and accompanied by drones, to join the local Bedouins in attacking the Druze. Similar to Hamas on October 7, the Islamist fighters in Syria uploaded gruesome videos to Telegram that included beheadings of Druze men, sexual assault of women and girls, executions, and torture. Reports from inside Suwayda described scenes of unimaginable horror. From the government's perspective the calculus was clear: The Bedouins are Sunni Muslims and therefore considered "believers." The Druze religion, which grew out of Shiite Islam and has its own unique beliefs and practices, is considered heretical. Among the dead in the Suwayda massacre were not only Druze but more than 20 Christians, including Reverend Khaled Mazhar, an evangelical pastor who had converted from the Druze faith. He was murdered alongside 12 family members. Weeks before the slaughter, a suicide bomber struck St. Elias Church in Damascus. The West largely ignored the attack, distracted by the Israel-Iran escalation. Yet the bombing signaled a terrifying new phase for Christians. For days, mangled bodies of worshipers remained in the church, with stray animals picking at the remains. Still, al-Sharaa remained silent. No words of condolence. No public statement. Instead, his forces confiscated security cameras in the neighborhood, prompting allegations that the attackers were former jihadists now operating under his patronage. This is not just a Syrian crisis. It is a global one. Granting legitimacy or "a chance" to this current Syrian regime is a catastrophic mistake. Doing so will only force the United States and its allies into future, costly interventions to root out terrorist networks emboldened by state power. While the international community is more focused elsewhere, Syria is undergoing a quiet but radical transformation. The formal institutions exist only for show. The real authority lies in the hands of Islamist clerics and militia leaders. The structure resembles ISIS, both in form and function. Israel, unlike many Western observers, understands the stakes. It took direct action to halt the massacre in Suwayda, forcing the Syrian regime's withdrawal. Ahmad al-Sharaa, rather than pursuing de-escalation, praised the Bedouin attackers and fanned the flames of sectarian violence. Some U.S. officials have reportedly expressed concerns over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's "finger always on the trigger." But in light of Suwayda, perhaps the question is not why Netanyahu is so quick to act—but why others are so slow. In a region where unchecked extremism can lead to genocide overnight, hesitation is not wisdom, it is complicity. The moral burden now falls on Washington. Turning a blind eye to what is happening in Syria again would be a stain not just on American foreign policy, but on the conscience of the free world. Hadeel Oueis is a director of Arabic communications at the Center for Peace Communications. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump to meet Putin ‘in coming days' with venue to be announced later, Kremlin says
A meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump has been agreed, a Kremlin official said Thursday, and it could possibly take place next week at a venue that has been decided 'in principle.' 'At the suggestion of the American side, it has been agreed in principle to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov told reporters. Next week is the target date for a summit, Ushakov said, while noting that such events take time to organize and no date is confirmed. The possible venue will be announced 'a little later,' he said. Advertisement 3 Russian President Vladimir Putin (C-L) and US President Donald Trump (C-R) hold a meeting on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Osaka on June 28, 2019. SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images He also played down the possibility of Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky joining the summit meeting to discuss ending Russia's 3-year-old invasion of its neighbor, which the White House said Trump is ready to consider. 'We propose, first of all, to focus on preparing a bilateral meeting with Trump, and we consider it most important that this meeting be successful and productive,' Ushakov said. Advertisement A meeting between Putin and Trump would be their first since the Republican president returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in the war, though there's no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting, since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. Western officials have repeatedly accused Putin of stalling for time in peace negotiations to allow Russian forces time to capture more Ukrainian land. 3 Trump and Putin arrive for a meeting in Helsinki on July 16, 2018. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Putin has in the past offered no concessions and will only accept a settlement on his terms. It was not clear whether Trump's Friday deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing in Ukraine still stood. Support for continuing the fight wanes in Ukraine A new Gallup poll published Thursday found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion. Advertisement The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 — the year the war began — when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. 3 A meeting between Putin and Trump would be their first since the Republican president returned to office this year. Sputnik/AFP via Getty Images On the 620-mile front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of US President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. Advertisement In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart. Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's 'very' or 'somewhat' likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about 7 in 10 think it's 'somewhat' or 'very' unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year.
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Scoop: Dialog, a secretive forum, plans D.C.-area campus
Dialog — a secretive, invite-only network founded two decades ago by Peter Thiel and Auren Hoffman, the star investors and entrepreneurs — is preparing a major expansion, including a real estate purchase to build a campus in the D.C. suburbs, a source familiar with the group's plans tells Axios. Why it matters: Dialog, often compared to a tech-era Bilderberg, has quietly become one of the most elite, and mysterious, gatherings for CEOs, elected officials, and intellectual heavyweights. Dialog leaders are in active discussions to buy a physical venue in Virginia, just outside Washington, to serve as a permanent hub for its off-the-record meetings, the source says. The decision to buy land, then build, within commuting distance of the capital shows the group isn't just kissing President Trump's ring, but plans to be engaged in Washington long after this term. A source invited to participate in Dialog said that amid "rising demand for quieter reflection in an always-on world, Dialog bills itself as offering global elites the chance to talk candidly across ideological lines, away from their phones and the pressures of social media, the news media, and their stakeholders." "Given declining trust in institutions and anti-establishment fervor," this source added, "the group actively keeps its inner workings secretive and hidden from public scrutiny," the source said — adding that the group's "secretive nature allows participants to share controversial and concerning ideas that they would not be comfortable sharing elsewhere." Zoom in: The next flagship Dialog gathering will be in the spring. Smaller retreats are planned sooner, including one in the Middle East this fall. The group is also in talks to acquire at least one smaller, like-minded membership organization "to scale its reach into additional elite circles," the source said. The backstory: Past Dialog participants, who cut across a wide swath of elite influencers, include Elon Musk, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Larry Summers, Chamath Palihapitiya, Henry Kravis, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D), Eric Schmidt, Grover Norquist, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Robert Hur and Sophia Bush. Also, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Jared Kushner, Saudi Ambassador to the U.S. Reema Al-Saud, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, European Commission Vice Chair Kaja Kalla s, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, chess champ and activist Garry Kasparov, pastor and author Rick Warren and CFR president emeritus Richard Haass. The intrigue: Dialog has no public-facing website and avoids media coverage — it has never publicly shared a list of participants The off-the-record events, typically limited to 100 guests, have been held at the Ritz-Carlton Dove Mountain in Arizona and the San Clemente Palace Venice, among other exclusive and secluded sites. Past participants tell Axios the retreats feature small, moderated conversations with assigned seats and absolute confidentiality, "to ensure participants can challenge themselves intellectually and spiritually," as our source put it. A given session could have the likes of Reid Hoffman, Ted Cruz, Jared Polis, Lori Gottlieb, and Eric Schmidt discussing AI's energy demands, the future of health care, and political realignments. Other topics have included caring for aging parents, love, mental health and the afterlife.
