logo
Trump administration cuts to NOAA threaten efforts to save sea lions from toxic plankton

Trump administration cuts to NOAA threaten efforts to save sea lions from toxic plankton

Yahoo26-03-2025
The Trump administration's targeting of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will jeopardize efforts to save sea lions, dolphins, sea birds and other wildlife stricken by poisons lurking offshore, say marine scientists, public health officials and animal rescuers.
Federal research and funding plays a crucial role in enabling scientists to monitor ocean conditions — including the domoic acid outbreak that is now killing hundreds of marine mammals up and down the California coast.
The data provided by NOAA, and other federally supported efforts, help scientists figure out when and how these outbreaks happen; provide help and aid to the sickened animals that are seizing and convulsing on area beaches; and test and examine their bodies once they have died to see if it was the toxin that killed them, and how it killed them.
State and local public health officials also use the data gathered by NOAA and its funded partners to determine algal outbreaks that could affect human health — such as a current advisory urging people to avoid consuming oysters, mussels and clams off the Santa Barbara coast for another toxin, paralytic shellfish poisoning.
"Everything we do — all that data we collect — it couldn't be done without the federal government," said Clarissa Anderson, the director of the Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System at UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography. "We wouldn't have any of that information without them."
NOAA didn't respond to a request for comment. A NOAA spokesperson previously said the agency "remains dedicated to its mission, providing timely information, research and resources that serve the American public."
Although how much of the agency's budget will be slashed, and how many researchers will be axed, is still not clear. Researchers that work with the agency have been told to expect at least a 20% reduction in the agency's workforce and a 30% reduction in the budget.
The domoic acid outbreak currently hitting the Southern and Central coast of California, from San Diego to Monterey, has led to hundreds of animals washing up on the shore dead. Sea lions and dolphins have been observed rigid with seizures, acting dazed and confused. Many of the sea lions show aggression, or swivel their heads and necks in wild and disorienting circles.
A Times reporter this week witnessed a sea lion pulling itself out of the surf and onto the beach just south of the Hermosa Beach pier.
Its head bobbed up and down and side to side, its snub nose tracing arcs in the morning sky. Over and over, its head arched up as if to take in the sun, and then flopped backward as if its bones had liquified.
A few feet from the animal, a dead western grebe — a sea bird — lay motionless in the sand, its head resting on a gnarl of wood. Just a few yards away, another bird, possibly another grebe, its belly and head obscured by the sand, also lay still. Near it lay the body of a dead sea lion.
The animals may have been poisoned by ingesting fish contaminated by domoic acid, a toxin released by the common coastal phytoplankton Pseudo-nitzschia. The fish eat the toxic plankton, and the marine mammals and birds eat the poisonous fish, say experts.
Scientists know there's a domoic acid event happening offshore because they have been able to detect blooms of Pseudo-nitzschia via NOAA and National Aeronautic and Space Agency satellites, and have sampled the plankton directly through technology, tests and protocols designed or funded by NOAA.
They use robotic gliders that can go far offshore and sample below the water's surface. They also use shore stations up and down the coast, where they can monitor whats happening right offshore. And they use robotic microscopes that can sample and see the plankton, algae and other microscopic creatures spinning, floating and swimming in the water column (California has the largest network of these "flow cytobots," said Anderson).
They also piggyback on NOAA research vessels — or the vessels of NOAA research partners, such as Los Angeles Waterkeeper — or coordinate with NOAA scientists who can collect and test samples, to get even further out to sea.
And as the frequency and severity of these events increase, the need for these services also grows.
In the last four years, at least four domoic acid events have occurred along the Central and Southern California coasts. In the past, such events were sporadic, occurring once every four or five years. The most publicly obvious impacts are the animals on the beaches, but they affect coastal shellfish farms and other aquaculture entities too.
Daniele Bianchi, an assistant professor in UCLA's Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, has been studying what causes this normally benign plankton species to start secreting lethal toxins.
Bianchi said he and the graduate students in his laboratory — many of whom get funding from NOAA — still don't understand all the factors. But their work shows a correlation between increased levels of nitrogen in the water (a byproduct of storm and wastewater runoff) and domoic acid production.
"Understanding to what extent these might become more frequent in the future, or is there anything that we can do to better manage coastal waters? These are the questions that NOAA was supporting," said Bianchi.
Researchers have also learned that the plankton blooms — both poisonous and benign — tend to coincide with upwelling events, when deep, cold water is churned up toward the surface, providing an infusion of nutrients and energy to the plants, algae and invertebrates hanging around in the water column.
When these upwelling events occur and plankton and algae start appearing in large numbers, other creatures — such as anchovies and sardines — move in to feed, which then brings the sea lions, sea birds and dolphins.
And as those animals feed and become sick, such as the sea lion observed on Hermosa Beach, a network of stranding organizations rush in to care for the sick and dying animals.
These organizations, which include the Sausalito-based Marine Mammal Center, and the Santa Barbara-based Channel Islands Marine and Wildlife Institute, are mostly funded by foundations and private donations, but many also receive some federal funding. And as these events become more frequent and increase in severity, so too do these organizations' financial needs.
For instance, Sam Dover, the director of the Channel Islands rescue organization, said that he typically buys one 40,000 pound load of frozen fish per year to feed the sickened and injured animals he and his team rescue and rehabilitate. This year? "We already had to refill it. Oh my god. So, it's things like that."
These organizations also rely on NOAA's scientists and researchers who are stationed up and down the Pacific coast, from San Diego to Alaska, who help the stranding network understand what's happening in the wider ocean to fish stocks, ocean temperatures, seasonal feeding sites, etc. This knowledge enables these rescue organizations to prepare for crisis events, such as domoic acid outbreaks, and coordinate their responses.
"Whether it be consulting with their scientists around what approach to use when there is an unusual presentation of an animal in waters that we're not expecting — be it a whale, often, or a seal or a sea lion — or a decision on how or whether and where to release an animal that's been in our care, or whether to place satellite tags on animals that may warrant long term monitoring," said Jeffrey Boehm, the director of the Marine Mammal Center. "A lot of practical decisions are made week in, week out, day in, day out."
"So when you ask what it would look like without NOAA? You remove any one of the many vital services they provide, and it's like that child's game — that one where you start removing the pieces, and you know eventually it's going to fall," he said.
And for the animals who die? It's NOAA scientists and laboratories that perform necropsies to determine the cause of death — Was it domoic acid poisoning? Or did they ingest a hard piece of plastic? — and what organs the toxins targeted.
The role the agency plays in the well-being of Californians, its wild ocean creatures and its economy are undersold, said Anderson.
"We all know the importance of the agency when it comes to forecasting the weather," she said. "But it's the same for their work in the ocean — we cannot have any future knowledge of any earth system without these kinds of data and models."
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. on wearing jeans during workouts: ‘Now I'm used to it'
RFK Jr. on wearing jeans during workouts: ‘Now I'm used to it'

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

RFK Jr. on wearing jeans during workouts: ‘Now I'm used to it'

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Tuesday explained why he's often caught wearing jeans during workouts. 'Well, I just started doing that a long time ago because I would go hiking in the morning and then I'd go straight to the gym, and I found it was convenient,' he said during an appearance on Fox News's 'Jesse Watters Primetime.' He added, 'Now I'm used to it, so I just do it.' Kennedy recent posts online showcase him hiking in Colorado, fishing in Idaho and swimming at Rock Creek Park — all in a pair of jeans. His most recent viral post enlists a new workout drill for Americans entitled the ' Bobby Challenge.' The health secretary, who has spearheaded the Trump administration's ' Make America Healthy Again ' (MAHA) agenda, is encouraging people to do 50 pull-ups, 100 push-ups in under five minutes. Kennedy could be seen doing the challenge alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday, also in a pair of jeans. 'This is the beginning of our tour challenging Americans to get back in shape,' he said in a clip of the their workout. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy also shared his interest in joining the challenge. ' @SecKennedy and @SecDef — sorry for the late reply, I was busy working double shifts at @USDOT and @NASA. I'm up for the challenge! And I happen to be in Texas with my buddy @WillCain,' he wrote Tuesday on social platform X. 'Let's MAHA.' The initiative also comes after President Trump signed an executive order last month to reestablish the Presidential Fitness Test at public middle and high schools across the U.S. The test is designed to reward students for achievements in physical education.

Repealing EPA's endangerment finding will cause a public health nightmare
Repealing EPA's endangerment finding will cause a public health nightmare

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Repealing EPA's endangerment finding will cause a public health nightmare

As America faces increasing health threats from wildfire smoke, summer heat waves and rising cases of asthma and other respiratory illnesses, the last thing we need is to reverse laws that protect U.S. air quality. Yet, that's precisely what the Trump administration intends to do by proposing a repeal of a central scientific finding that serves as the basis for the Clean Air Act — legislation that has saved millions of American lives and been responsible for monumental advancements both to our environment and public health. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced last month the agency plans to end a long-held 'endangerment finding' that asserts carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases present a risk to human health. If that happens, it will neutralize the federal government's ability to combat climate change and enforce laws intended to protect America's wellbeing. One of those laws is the Clean Air Act. Enacted in 1970, it has been one of the most successful public health policies in U.S. history. It's credited with reducing six of the most common air pollutants in the U.S. by nearly 80 percent while saving over 230,000 early deaths and avoiding over 120,000 emergency room visits every year. It has reduced chronic bronchitis, infant mortality and prevented millions of cases of asthma exacerbation as well. These statistics aren't conjecture: They're sourced directly from the EPA's own website, the same agency now leading the charge to turn the clock back on these remarkable achievements. Zeldin's announcement claims that the reversal of the endangerment finding will 'undo the underpinning of $1 trillion in costly regulations.' But the positive U.S. economic impact from the Clean Air Act alone far exceeds this figure. By reducing hospital visits, sick days and treatment of costly respiratory-related disease, the EPA estimates the Clean Air Act has created $2 trillion in U.S. economic benefit as of 2020 — twice the amount Zeldin asserts the endangerment finding's repeal would create. Further, clean energy has proven itself to be a source of strong job creation. The Department of Energy found that jobs in renewable energy grew more than twice as fast as the vibrant 2023 U.S labor market. And the science couldn't be clearer: Clean air is critical to public health. 'Decades of research have shown that air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter increase the amount and seriousness of lung and heart disease and other health problems,' the EPA states. Worse, those pollutants are disproportionately burdened by communities of color. A 2024 Milken Institute of Public Health study found that marginalized communities have eight times the number of pediatric asthma cases and a 30 percent higher chance of dying early from pollution exposure. That same study attributed this inequality to the close proximity many minority communities share with industrial manufacturing facilities. Imagine what those numbers would be if the endangerment finding is reversed and the U.S. can no longer enforce Clean Air Act provisions. Zeldin referred to the EPA action as 'driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion,' and that it would be 'the largest deregulatory action in the history of America.' But doing so will only cause greater sickness in America and inundate an already stressed U.S. health care system. Increased exposure to air pollution will result in higher numbers of emergency room visits, increased rates of chronic illness and heightened health care costs. The medical and environmental advocacy community agree greater exposure to carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas is a bad idea. Groups such as the American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, American Thoracic Society, World Wildlife Fund, along with nursing organizations and medical societies all stand in strong opposition to the EPA's proposed action. Zeldin's proposal follows another questionable deregulatory move by the EPA in recent weeks to reintroduce dicamba, a weed killer used on soybeans and cotton. Use of the pesticide was halted by a federal court last year. A 2020 study in the International Journal of Epidemiology found that exposure to dicamba was reportedly 'linked to some cancers, including liver cancer and a type of leukemia affecting the blood and bone marrow.' But the EPA has argued it 'has not identified any human health or dietary risks of concern.' The U.S. government's job is to protect America's citizens. The Clean Air Act has saved millions of lives, safeguarded our skies and proven that environmental laws and economic progress can peacefully coexist. Repealing the endangerment finding will set America on a dangerous path and put the health and welfare of every American at risk.

Pet Owners Issued Drinking Water Warning
Pet Owners Issued Drinking Water Warning

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Pet Owners Issued Drinking Water Warning

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Dogs could be the first to show signs of dangerous water contamination in American homes relying on private wells, a veterinary professor has told Newsweek. "We tested the drinking water from the homes of dog owners who rely on private wells and found that every sample contained detectable minerals or metals—some at levels above health-based guidelines set by the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]," veterinary informatics professor at Virginia Tech, Audrey Ruple, told Newsweek. "Since dogs often drink from the same water sources as their human families, they may be the first to show signs of long-term exposure to contaminants like lead or arsenic," she continued. "This makes them important early warning systems—or sentinels—for environmental risks that people are also exposed to." Ruple recently co-authored a study with other researchers from Virginia Tech and the University of Washington, which found that the majority of sampled well water contained excessive levels of heavy metals, raising health concerns for both pets and their human families. Why It Matters Roughly 15 million U.S. households rely on private wells, which fall outside of EPA oversight and are not subject to federal testing regulations. The study highlights that these homeowners may be unaware of health risks lurking in their drinking water, especially for pets that often consume more water per pound of body weight than humans. What To Know Marc Edwards, a distinguished professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech, said in an interview with Newsweek: "The lead and copper source is almost always the plumbing infrastructure, whereas arsenic and other constituents are often naturally occurring in the ground water. Consumers can often have their water tested through college extension programs, or by contacting local water testing laboratories. There are filters or treatment devices that can remove every type of contaminant." Published in PLOS Water and conducted across 10 U.S. states, the research found elevated levels of toxic metals in two-thirds of homes tested. According to SciTechDaily, 13 of the homes exceeded EPA health guidance levels for arsenic, lead, or copper. The findings suggest that dogs are exposed to similar environmental hazards as humans, yet their quicker metabolisms and shorter life spans may reveal symptoms earlier. Environmental conditions influenced contamination levels. Researchers noted that homes near fracking sites showed higher sodium and sulfur levels, while proximity to railroads correlated with increased manganese. According to DVM360, water treated using reverse osmosis showed the lowest health risks to dogs. The study analyzed water samples from 178 dogs enrolled in the Dog Aging Project, a national health study. Researchers discovered that 64 percent of private well samples exceeded health guidelines for at least one heavy metal, including arsenic, lead, or copper. All 178 samples contained detectable levels of at least some of 28 different metals tested. Co-author Leigh-Anne Krometis, associate professor of biological systems engineering at Virginia Tech, stressed to Newsweek that "this study examined private well water samples." "These are all maintained by individual homeowners and not subject to federal regulations on testing, treatment, etc. So these were not 'city' water samples," he said. File photo of a dog drinking water, taken in Saxony-Anhalt, Wernigerode, taken in August 2022. File photo of a dog drinking water, taken in Saxony-Anhalt, Wernigerode, taken in August 2022. AP What People Are Saying Co-author Leigh-Anne Krometis said: "In this small study, 59 percent of the samples returned had more than 20 ppm sodium... Salt sometimes is actually high in well water because of the presence of a treatment system that relies on ion exchange to remove nuisance elements like iron and manganese. So it's not that the groundwater is 'polluted' per se, it's actually a management decision to make water more palatable." Co-author Audrey Ruple said: "If their household uses a private well, a practical action they can take is to have their water tested through a certified lab that can check for metals like lead, arsenic, and copper. Testing is relatively inexpensive and easy to do. If contaminants are detected, installing a treatment or filtration system can reduce the risk of negative health impacts." What Happens Next The researchers plan to expand their work by analyzing the long-term health outcomes in dogs exposed to heavy metals. They believe that identifying links between environmental contamination and chronic conditions could improve both veterinary care and public health guidance. Until then, they stress annual water testing as a simple but essential step for well owners. Krometis told Newsweek: "Water is a utility we often take for granted, and many (if not most) private well owners do not realize that it is their sole responsibility to manage their system. Testing is the first step to understand whether there are things in the water that might pose a risk to themselves and their family members, furry or otherwise."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store