Reeves faces welfare revolt after Labour rebels rejected an 'olive branch' designed to head off a Commons mutiny over benefit cuts
was on collision course with Labour welfare rebels last night after they rejected an 'olive branch' designed to head off a Commons mutiny over benefit cuts.
The Chancellor is facing a ferocious backlash from her own MPs over plans to trim £5 billion from the benefits bill. More than 100 Labour MPs have warned party whips they could vote against the plan to restrict eligibility to disability benefits.
Ministers are trying to contain the rebellion by suggesting possible concessions. Under one proposal, those affected would continue to receive their benefits for a further 13 weeks to give them more time to find a job.
The compromise is set to be included when the legislation needed to push through the cuts is published next week.
But leading rebels dismissed the idea.
Poole MP Neil Duncan-Jordan said the proposal was 'not a concession' as it was already included in a government consultation on the cuts.
Mr Duncan-Jordan, a long-time anti-poverty campaigner, said the cuts would 'make disabled poorer'. He added: 'No amount of warm words mask the reality - cuts don't create jobs they create austerity. I'm voting No.'
Fellow rebel Rachel Maskell said: 'I'll have to vote against something which will cause such harm to my constituents - too many lives will be put at risk if they press ahead.'
Ms Reeves used the £5 billion package of benefit cuts to help balance the books when she gave her spring statement on the economy in March. Without them she would have been at risk of breaking her own fiscal rules set just five months earlier.
Economists say the cuts will hit 1.2 million people, with those affected losing an average of around £4,500 per year each.
The government's own impact assessment suggested the changes would drive 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children.
But Ms Reeves signalled she will not back down further, despite her recent U-turn on cuts to the winter fuel allowance.
Ruling out a climb down, she said reform was needed to prevent the welfare system becoming unsustainable.
'It is important we reform the way the welfare state works so there is a welfare state there for people,' she said.
'We are the only developed country where the number of people in the labour market is lower than it was before Covid. The number of economically inactive people of working age is rising.'
The Chancellor said sickness benefits are forecast to rise sharply despite the cuts, with official estimates suggesting they will reach almost £100 billion a year by the end of the decade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
'We sit in the dark to save money on electricity in Guernsey'
More than 100 protestors have demonstrated outside the head office of Guernsey Electricity Limited (GEL) againstabove-inflation price island's government-owned electricity company is raising its prices from the start of July, with some customers now paying more than they would in the Katina Jones, 70, said she already sat "in the dark" with the lights out to save money on her bill and only used electricity in off-peak hours, when "it's cheap electric - otherwise we can't afford it".A GEL spokesperson said the utility "absolutely understands the strength of feeling amongst some islanders" and the "impact on customers already struggling with the cost of living". The company, which is the island's only electricity provider, said it had "worked hard to keep this year's electricity tariff increase as low as possible". Mrs Jones said: "I live in an area where there are lots of elderly people."She said many of her friends "stay in bed all day or with a blanket over them because they can't afford their heating on"."That's just not on," she added. Jayne Lesbirel, 65, retired recently but used to work for GEL's predecessor, the States Electricity Board, doing data said: "We're on a pension, so we have to budget quite strictly. "And we also look after our grandchildren, so we are at home a lot more than we were before when we were working."In the winter months, we can't say: 'Oh no. Sorry, we can't afford to put the heating on for you, so you'll have to go cold.'"She said she felt the reasons Guernsey Electricity gave for the price rises, such as historic underinvestment, were "just an excuse"."It's because they have a monopoly," she said. Mandy Moriarty, 68, said it was unfair that the standing charge - which is rising to more than £85 - was the same for everyone regardless of how big their home said: "You can't cut down on that. I think the fairer way would be to put a little bit more on the units that you use.""I live in a very old Guernsey cottage, which is stone and it's freezing in there in the winter, and I only run one radiator."She said she feared that, if prices rose at the same rate in future, she would have to turn the heating off altogether, adding: "Then you get damp, so that's not the answer.""You shouldn't be sitting there freezing cold in this day and age because of greed." GEL decided a few years ago to change the way its tariffs were structured, so people paid a higher fixed cost, known as the standing rose more than 380% between 2021 and July 2025 - from just under £18 to £86.75 a is nearly £40 a quarter more expensive than the highest standing charge allowed on the British mainland. So, why is it rising?Before 2022, GEL said 96% of its income came from charging people for using electricity - the unit as more people install renewable energy - such as solar panels - in their homes, this would mean the amount of money the company made in turn, has meant increasing the prices for people without renewables, so it could afford "the fixed costs of maintaining and upgrading the electricity network", the company said.A GEL spokesperson told the BBC the company planned to review how it charged for electricity to make it "sustainable" - including for customers "who place a lower strain on the island's electricity network".They said "there will not be further large standing charge increases" until the review had been completed. Protest organiser Myles Duquemin said it was unfair the increased standing charge was "the same whether you're in a five-bedroom mansion or live in a one-bedroom flat"."Electricity is not a luxury, it's a basic human right," he added he hoped "the rates come down and it's reviewed by the new deputies".Mr Duquemin said he had received many messages thanking him for organising the said many were from cancer suffers and survivors, as well as pensioners, adding: "They either couldn't speak up or felt too afraid to." GEL said it respected "our customers' right to raise their concerns and to attend the protest".A spokesperson for the company thanked Mr Duquemin for "his commitment to ensure the safety and security of our staff and premises on the day".The company took the decision to close its retail shop at its St Sampson headquarters on Saturday, as the protest was due to begin outside said: "Where a customer is concerned about their electricity bill, our advice is always to contact us as soon as possible if they are worried about falling into difficulty.""We also share information on our website about our tariffs, the reasons for recent increases, how we spend revenue and ways which consumers can save money on their bills."
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Scarborough homes plan rejected over 'manipulation of rules'
Plans to build 23 homes on a plot of land in Scarborough have been rejected over concerns about the "manipulation" of affordable housing Winter's application for five dwellings on Scalby Road as well as a separate outline plan for up to 18 homes was blocked at a council Yorkshire Council planners said the site had been artificially subdivided, resulting in the number of dwellings proposed "being lower than the threshold for affordable housing".A report to the planning committee said the applicant had indicated the "whole quota of affordable housing" would be provided on the site for 18 dwellings but "there was no guarantee any permission would be implemented". The site formerly housed a single detached dwelling with a large garden area, but had since been cleared of all structures, according to the Local Democracy Reporting at the Scarborough and Whitby Area Planning Committee, councillor Derek Bastiman said: "We're not going to get the best deal out of it regarding affordable housing."The committee report stated it was the opinion of the planning authority that the subdivision of the site was "manipulation to place the burden of affordable housing on a more speculative part of the development site, where approval and affordable housing viability is uncertain".Planning officers added that during conversations with the agent for the application, it had been "indicated that the outline permission is speculative and will likely be sold to another developer as land with extant planning permission".The development was unanimously refused by councillors. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How the fate of endangered swifts has become a political battleground
As thorny issues go, the plight of the humble swift may seem an unlikely controversy to split political thinking. But, a proposed new law to make including a single 'swift brick' – a block with a cavity for a bird's nest – compulsory for all new homes is now at the heart of a pitched Westminster battle. Reform UK is hoping the environmental cause celebre for the 50 million-year-old species – backed by unlikely allies Jeremy Clarkson and Chris Packham – will help garner them support within the countryside's traditional Tory heartlands. Richard Tice recently posed holding a sign calling for the bricks to be used to help endangered cavity-nesting birds, such as swifts, house martins, sparrows and starlings. The Reform deputy leader, who was once a housing developer, used social media to declare his support for the scheme and asked: 'why won't the Government act?' He wrote: 'The Conservatives rejected swift bricks in government, and now Labour is backtracking despite supporting them in opposition. 'Swifts – one of Britain's most iconic birds – are in steep decline, along with other cavity-nesting species. All they need is a brick with a hole. It's simple, low-cost, and essential.' The party's five MPs are now backing an amendment to the Government's planning Bill in a bid to make the £35 bricks compulsory. The amendment, tabled by Barry Gardiner, the Labour rebel, and backed by the Green party, Liberal Democrats and some Tory MPs, was revised to incorporate the bricks into building regulations, said to be the only way to ensure developers fit them to new dwellings. Although Labour supported the swift brick amendment when it was tabled in Conservative government legislation which failed in 2023, it has now reversed its position. Instead of legislation, Matthew Pennycook, the Housing Minister, wants guidelines to encourage, rather than compel, developers to fit the bricks. Hannah Bourne-Taylor, a 38-year-old former model and now environmentalist who has campaigned tirelessly on the issue – as well as walk nearly naked to Whitehall to promote the cause – believes her campaign has split the Right. She said: 'The swift bricks issue has become an unlikely political battleground. It is now a dividing line between Reform, who have declared their unequivocal support, and the Conservatives, who repeatedly failed while in Government to introduce a law to make them mandatory. 'The Tories are traditionally the party of the countryside. It remains to be seen whether they will pass it through the House of Lords where they have a majority. 'If they don't, the Tories will have killed off this amendment and have turned their backs on an issue that should be their domain. 'As for any fears Sir Keir Starmer may have that this scheme could scupper their plans to 'build baby build'; it seems remarkable that a brick used to do just that – build – could be seen to block developments.' The issue is to be debated in the Commons again during the report stage of the planning and infrastructure bill. The Conservatives failed to respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'We've always been clear that our ambition to get Britain building and deliver the 1.5 million homes should create a win-win for nature recovery and development. 'Swift bricks are a simple and effective way to prevent the decline of an important bird species, without impacting building delivery ambitions.'
