logo
FDA authorizes Juul to continue selling e-cigarettes

FDA authorizes Juul to continue selling e-cigarettes

Independent17-07-2025
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ruled that vaping brand Juul Labs can continue to sell its e-cigarettes and refill cartridges in the US.
The FDA's decision was based on Juul's studies, which demonstrated that its e-cigarettes are less harmful for adult smokers who switch from traditional cigarettes.
This ruling provides a new lease of life for Juul, which has faced years of intense regulatory scrutiny, numerous lawsuits, and significant financial difficulties due to concerns over teen vaping.
Juul will be one of only two companies permitted to sell menthol-flavored vapes in the US following this decision.
The ruling has drawn criticism from parents and anti-tobacco groups, who argue that Juul was responsible for the surge in youth vaping.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump dubbed himself the ‘father of IVF' on the campaign trail. But his pledge to mandate insurance cover has disappeared
Trump dubbed himself the ‘father of IVF' on the campaign trail. But his pledge to mandate insurance cover has disappeared

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Trump dubbed himself the ‘father of IVF' on the campaign trail. But his pledge to mandate insurance cover has disappeared

Donald Trump's vow to expand in vitro fertilization (IVF) access to millions of Americans is on hold, with White House officials backing away from plans to require Obamacare health plans to include the service as an essential health benefit, the Washington Post reported on Sunday. The Post reported that White House officials have privately moved away from the prospect of pushing for legislation to address the issue despite it being one of Trump's signature campaign promises, citing two persons with knowledge of internal discussions in Trumpworld. A senior administration official also acknowledged to the newspaper that changing Obamacare to force insurers to cover new services would require congressional action, not an executive order. The president has governed largely by executive fiat in his second term as he grapples with a closely-divded Congress and an unruly GOP majority in the House of Representatives. He's used those executive orders to dismantle whole parts of the federal government, including USAID and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The president even tried to take an axe to the Department of Education, though that battle is still being waged in the courts. The Supreme Court recently cleared the way for Trump to cut roughly a quarter of the agency's staff. But many of Trump's campaign promises lie outside of his ability to influence via the hiring or firing of people and redirection of agency resources or agendas. In 2024, he laid out no direct path for his goal to expand IVF access, only telling voters that insurance companies would be forced to cover it. Still, he proclaimed himself the 'father of IVF' at at Fox News town hall, and promised during an NBC News interview: 'We are going to be, under the Trump administration, we are going to be paying for that treatment. We're going to be mandating that the insurance company pay.' At the time, there was little to no acknowledgment of the fact that many if not most conservatives still oppose the Affordable Care Act and the same healthcare exchanges which Trump was now promising to utilize as he sought to use the power of the federal government to expand healthcare coverage. Now, with the passage of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' without any provisions expanding IVF access, and with the prospect of further policy gains before the midterms growing dimmer, it's unclear when the White House would have another chance to press the issue in Congress. In February, the president signed an executive order directing his advisers to 'submit to the President a list of policy recommendations on protecting IVF access and aggressively reducing out-of-pocket and health plan costs for IVF treatment.' It's been crickets on the issue since then. In 2024, many of Trump's critics and the media pointed out that the policy would essentially amount to a reversal or at the very least coming in sharp contrast to the first Trump administration's efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which ended in failure, and a contradiction of the conservative view that government should not exercise that level of control over Americans' health care decisions. The president's promise thrilled his party's natalists, embodied by Vice President JD Vance and an army of right-wing immigration hawks who fear the changing American demographics brought on as a result of falling birth rates and high levels of migration. It also wowed some of his Democratic and left-leaning critics, who see the policy as a means of furthering their goal of expanding access to healthcare for poorer Americans. For Vance, the issue of declining U.S. birth rates predates his MAGA heel-turn. In 2019, he told a gathering of conservatives in Washington: 'Our people aren't having enough children to replace themselves. That should bother us.' 'We want babies not just because they are economically useful. We want more babies because children are good. And we believe children are good, because we are not sociopaths,' the future vice president added at the time. Two years later, he'd tell a right-leaning podcast: 'I think we have to go to war against the anti-child ideology that exists in our country.' During the 2024 campaign, those views emerged again as Vance attacked Democrats as 'childless cat ladies' and leaned heavily into attacking the left for supposedly being anti-family. Progressives fought back, pointing to efforts to expand the child tax credit and other benefits that aid young families under Joe Biden and other Democratic administrations, including the passage of Barack Obama's signature law: the Affordable Care Act.

I'm a relationships expert: these are the commonly missed signs that your female friends are TOXIC (and how to cut them off)
I'm a relationships expert: these are the commonly missed signs that your female friends are TOXIC (and how to cut them off)

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

I'm a relationships expert: these are the commonly missed signs that your female friends are TOXIC (and how to cut them off)

I have gone through more friendship break-ups than I care to admit and, controversially, I believe that makes me a better friend. It might even keep me younger too. A study last week revealed that toxic friendships cause premature biological ageing, comparable to that triggered by smoking. New York University found that social exchanges with so-called frenemies can cause chemical changes to DNA by keeping the body in a state of high stress.

Shoppers see 'big improvement in just two weeks' with this best-selling anti-ageing serum
Shoppers see 'big improvement in just two weeks' with this best-selling anti-ageing serum

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Shoppers see 'big improvement in just two weeks' with this best-selling anti-ageing serum

If you're looking for the solution to banishing discoloration and signs of ageing, look no further, as shoppers are touting this serum for its ability to 'stop the clock' on your skin This award-winning serum is said to "future-proof" your skin against visible signs of ageing, including fine lines and wrinkles, while also working to restore and rejuvinate dull and dry skin. Shoppers have praised it as a "clock-stopping" skincare must-have that promises to deliver results in just two weeks. The best-selling icon from 111 Skin, this Repair Serum NAC Y², has been formulated with surgical precision to help plump and smooth skin, while giving your skin a healthy glow. Two-time award winner of Harper's Bazaar Best Repair Serum, Anti-Aging Skincare Awards 2023, and Modern Luxury Best Serum Beauty Awards 2024, this serum has been clinically proven to show a noticeable difference in your skin in fourteen days. This serum, with its cooling, velvety texture that absorbs effortlessly into skin, is set to leave your complexion feeling immediately nourished, softer, and more hydrated. Over time, the do-it-all serum helps reduce redness, build up your skin's resilience, and accelerate cellular repair by boosting glutathione, the body's master antioxidant. After just a few weeks of regular use, this serum restores healthy skin and reduces the appearance of fine lines, whilst hydrating for a renewed and replenished complexion. 92% of users attested to healthier-looking skin after using this serum for just two weeks, while 92% swore they saw a visible reduction in fine lines after a month. Available in sizes 15ml or 30ml, this serum retails for £135 and currently boasts an impressive 4.9 out of 5-star rating. One satisfied customer beams: "I've struggled with hormonal acne for years and this product has been one of the only things that has worked for my skin, which is acne-prone but also very sensitive. In already 2 weeks I've seen big improvement in redness and overall less inflammation." Further praise comes from this buyer who says: " Love this serum, it immediately makes my skin look plump and glowy and also has helped reduce redness and wrinkles. It's an all-in-one product so if I have to pack light I only need to bring this and know my skin will look great." Another chimes in: " This serum is superb. After one week my skin is more hydrated and there is a definite reduction in fine lines l and skin appears more glowy. I have a history of perioral dermatitis and can still have alot of sensitivity. This serum has not caused any irritation." While a fourth shares the same sentiments, writing: " This serum is a miracle. My skin feels fresh and smooth after. It reduced fine wrinkles and most importantly sun marks on my face in 1 month! its a must product!" That said, not all of the reviews are as glowing, as this customer comments: "The only reason for the 4 stars instead of 5 is because of the price. I'd give this 100 stars if I could. This is absolutely amazing in the way my skin feels. Supple, plump and makeup goes on over it so smoothly. But I am so disappointed in the price. It makes me feel like only wealthy people are allowed to feel and look beautiful. I would pay about $80 for this product and not look twice. It's more than any beauty product I own but it would be worth it. However not for the price it's currently listed at." Though this is less-than-perfect rating is buried among a mass of overwhelmingly positive reviews, as another customer shares their experience: " I couldn't be happier with the results. I have combination skin so needed something to fight signs of ageing, moisturise, and make my skin look and feel good. The 15ml version is my new best friend as it's the perfect size for summer travels!" If you're looking for a more budget-friendly alternative, Medik8's C-Tetra Advanced Serum has been praised for its ability to noticeably reduce fine lines while restoring a healthy glow. This serum sells for a lower £69. The Lancôme Rénergie H.C.F. Triple Serum is kinder on the wallet at £39.75 and promises to deliver Smooth and firm skin while it works to reduce the appearance of dark spots for a youthful glow. Or, head over to Boots, where you can find this No7 Future Renew Serum for £34.15.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store