Early election looms as state leaders trade blame
A state election is inching closer as an embattled premier refuses to stand down to spare voters the pain of returning to the polls.
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is preparing to call an early election as soon as Tuesday after narrowly losing a no-confidence motion in state parliament.
But he is forging ahead with plans to recall parliament on Tuesday to pass a bill to ensure government workers can keep getting paid, before asking Governor Barbara Baker to call an election.
She could approve his request or ask another Liberal MP or Labor leader Dean Winter to try to form minority government.
Mr Rockliff said an election date would likely be set this week and confirmed he would lead the party to the poll.
"Dean Winter's guaranteed the election," he told reporters on Sunday.
Tasmanians were sent to the ballot box for a state election as recently as March 2024 and another would mark the fourth in seven years.
The unofficial election campaign has already kicked off, with Mr Rockliff revealing former federal MP Bridget Archer will run for Liberal preselection in the state seat of Bass.
Mr Rockliff also confirmed the Liberals would not pull a previous pledge to introduce a five per cent levy on short-stay rentals, including Airbnb listings.
The levy would partially offset the cost of waiving stamp duty for first-time buyers purchasing homes worth up to $750,000.
Mr Winter is sticking to his guns in ruling out forming government with the Greens, without whom Labor doesn't have the numbers.
He has defended bringing forward the no-confidence motion over the state budget, privatisation concerns and the Spirit of Tasmania ferry debacle, and doubled down on calls for Mr Rockliff to resign.
"He's carrying on at the moment like a spoiled child that's been given out in a game of cricket," Mr Winter said.
"And then instead of just accepting the umpire's decision he's picking up his bat and ball and going home."
A state election is inching closer as an embattled premier refuses to stand down to spare voters the pain of returning to the polls.
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is preparing to call an early election as soon as Tuesday after narrowly losing a no-confidence motion in state parliament.
But he is forging ahead with plans to recall parliament on Tuesday to pass a bill to ensure government workers can keep getting paid, before asking Governor Barbara Baker to call an election.
She could approve his request or ask another Liberal MP or Labor leader Dean Winter to try to form minority government.
Mr Rockliff said an election date would likely be set this week and confirmed he would lead the party to the poll.
"Dean Winter's guaranteed the election," he told reporters on Sunday.
Tasmanians were sent to the ballot box for a state election as recently as March 2024 and another would mark the fourth in seven years.
The unofficial election campaign has already kicked off, with Mr Rockliff revealing former federal MP Bridget Archer will run for Liberal preselection in the state seat of Bass.
Mr Rockliff also confirmed the Liberals would not pull a previous pledge to introduce a five per cent levy on short-stay rentals, including Airbnb listings.
The levy would partially offset the cost of waiving stamp duty for first-time buyers purchasing homes worth up to $750,000.
Mr Winter is sticking to his guns in ruling out forming government with the Greens, without whom Labor doesn't have the numbers.
He has defended bringing forward the no-confidence motion over the state budget, privatisation concerns and the Spirit of Tasmania ferry debacle, and doubled down on calls for Mr Rockliff to resign.
"He's carrying on at the moment like a spoiled child that's been given out in a game of cricket," Mr Winter said.
"And then instead of just accepting the umpire's decision he's picking up his bat and ball and going home."
A state election is inching closer as an embattled premier refuses to stand down to spare voters the pain of returning to the polls.
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is preparing to call an early election as soon as Tuesday after narrowly losing a no-confidence motion in state parliament.
But he is forging ahead with plans to recall parliament on Tuesday to pass a bill to ensure government workers can keep getting paid, before asking Governor Barbara Baker to call an election.
She could approve his request or ask another Liberal MP or Labor leader Dean Winter to try to form minority government.
Mr Rockliff said an election date would likely be set this week and confirmed he would lead the party to the poll.
"Dean Winter's guaranteed the election," he told reporters on Sunday.
Tasmanians were sent to the ballot box for a state election as recently as March 2024 and another would mark the fourth in seven years.
The unofficial election campaign has already kicked off, with Mr Rockliff revealing former federal MP Bridget Archer will run for Liberal preselection in the state seat of Bass.
Mr Rockliff also confirmed the Liberals would not pull a previous pledge to introduce a five per cent levy on short-stay rentals, including Airbnb listings.
The levy would partially offset the cost of waiving stamp duty for first-time buyers purchasing homes worth up to $750,000.
Mr Winter is sticking to his guns in ruling out forming government with the Greens, without whom Labor doesn't have the numbers.
He has defended bringing forward the no-confidence motion over the state budget, privatisation concerns and the Spirit of Tasmania ferry debacle, and doubled down on calls for Mr Rockliff to resign.
"He's carrying on at the moment like a spoiled child that's been given out in a game of cricket," Mr Winter said.
"And then instead of just accepting the umpire's decision he's picking up his bat and ball and going home."
A state election is inching closer as an embattled premier refuses to stand down to spare voters the pain of returning to the polls.
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is preparing to call an early election as soon as Tuesday after narrowly losing a no-confidence motion in state parliament.
But he is forging ahead with plans to recall parliament on Tuesday to pass a bill to ensure government workers can keep getting paid, before asking Governor Barbara Baker to call an election.
She could approve his request or ask another Liberal MP or Labor leader Dean Winter to try to form minority government.
Mr Rockliff said an election date would likely be set this week and confirmed he would lead the party to the poll.
"Dean Winter's guaranteed the election," he told reporters on Sunday.
Tasmanians were sent to the ballot box for a state election as recently as March 2024 and another would mark the fourth in seven years.
The unofficial election campaign has already kicked off, with Mr Rockliff revealing former federal MP Bridget Archer will run for Liberal preselection in the state seat of Bass.
Mr Rockliff also confirmed the Liberals would not pull a previous pledge to introduce a five per cent levy on short-stay rentals, including Airbnb listings.
The levy would partially offset the cost of waiving stamp duty for first-time buyers purchasing homes worth up to $750,000.
Mr Winter is sticking to his guns in ruling out forming government with the Greens, without whom Labor doesn't have the numbers.
He has defended bringing forward the no-confidence motion over the state budget, privatisation concerns and the Spirit of Tasmania ferry debacle, and doubled down on calls for Mr Rockliff to resign.
"He's carrying on at the moment like a spoiled child that's been given out in a game of cricket," Mr Winter said.
"And then instead of just accepting the umpire's decision he's picking up his bat and ball and going home."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
35 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Greens strike conciliatory tone on super tax changes
The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well." The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well." The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well." The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well."
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Greens strike conciliatory tone on super tax changes
The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election. Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements. The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair. With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament. Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July. "We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday. "We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim." Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll. Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis. The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives. Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament. The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women. Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains. "I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN. "The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well."
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
How much more will the superannuation tax cost you?
The Nationals have vowed to 'fight to the death' to stop Labor's plans to increase tax on big superannuation accounts. The Liberals have claimed the plan delivers special treatment to politicians such as the prime minister who have older defined benefit superannuation. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has trashed those criticisms, saying it's a 'modest' change aimed at making super more sustainable. The legislation to double the tax rate on earnings from super balances over $3 million from 15 per cent to 30 per cent will be among the first on Labor's agenda when parliament returns in July, but if you're still a bit confused, you're not alone. Below, we show what will happen for Australians who will be hit by the tax – and how much more they'll pay, drawing on calculations by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. With the Coalition set against the change, and Labor needing to secure the support of the Greens to get its bill through, the exact form of the tax is yet to be confirmed. Loading Earnings on all superannuation accounts will continue to be taxed at 15 per cent, but we do not include this in our examples because they require their own set of calculations with changes based on personal circumstances. Our examples just show the extra 15 per cent that will be levied on earnings from accounts over $3 million. But what does all this look like in practice? And how would the tax change affect you? Using four examples, we step through the way the new, additional tax bill would be calculated for a range of people in different occupations and life stages. We only examine the effect of the tax over the first year, and do not look into the number of Australians affected over time.
