Greens strike conciliatory tone on super tax changes
The Greens are "absolutely ready" to work with Labor to make proposed changes to superannuation, acknowledging the mandate voters gave the Albanese government at the election.
Labor is looking to double the tax rate of super balances above $3 million to 30 per cent, in a bid to limit the number of wealthy people using their balances for tax deductions rather than their retirements.
The coalition has vowed to oppose the changes, labelling them unfair.
With the government lacking a majority in the Senate, it needs the Greens or the coalition to pass legislation through the parliament.
Greens treasury spokesman Nick McKim said he expected to begin negotiations with Treasurer Jim Chalmers before the new parliament returns at the end of July.
"We are absolutely ready to work with with the treasurer and with Labor to try and move the superannuation system a little bit back towards what its original intent was when it was set up," he told ABC's RN on Monday.
"We want the system to be as fair and as strong as it can be in terms of providing for a dignified retirement for working Australians, and that'll be our aim."
Senator McKim said Dr Chalmers was a "re-elected treasurer in a re-elected government" which had taken the proposal to the May poll.
Striking a more conciliatory tone, the Greens have previously been criticised for delaying Labor's housing bills during a crisis.
The minor party lost three of its four lower house seats to Labor in a near wipe-out in the House of Representatives.
Former Greens leader Adam Bandt also lost his seat after 15 years in parliament.
The vast majority of Australians are unlikely to feel the impact of Labor's proposal, with the median super balance for 60 to 64-year-olds sitting at about $200,000 for men and $150,000 for women.
Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said the coalition remained strongly opposed to taxing unrealised gains.
"I don't know of many examples around the world that do that, and it's very damaging," he told ABC's RN.
"The non indexation of that makes an exceptionally penalising policy as well."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
9 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Qld opposition teams up against youth justice minister in fiery question time
Queensland Youth Justice Minister Laura Gerber has responded to sustained Labor pressure during question time by accusing former ministers of throwing staplers at staff and locking them in cupboards. The heated outburst came as Gerber dodged Labor's questions about staff turnover in her office. Opposition Leader Steven Miles had the first question for Gerber – how many prisoners had escaped on her watch? Her answer: 'Half what it was under Labor this time last year.' This marked the first in a series of questions aimed at the Gold Coast-based minister. The most pointed came from Labor backbencher Jonty Bush. 'How many of the minister's staff have been fired, resigned, sent to another office, or requested a transfer since [Gerber] becoming a minister?' the Cooper MP asked. That prompted a fiery response from a visibly angry Gerber. 'What an absolutely disgraceful question when those opposite have form when it comes to treating staff [badly],' she said. 'Ministers on that side of the house – Labor ministers – locked staff members in cupboards, Mr Speaker, they locked them in cupboards, Mr Speaker.
The Age
9 minutes ago
- The Age
Qld opposition teams up against youth justice minister in fiery question time
Queensland Youth Justice Minister Laura Gerber has responded to sustained Labor pressure during question time by accusing former ministers of throwing staplers at staff and locking them in cupboards. The heated outburst came as Gerber dodged Labor's questions about staff turnover in her office. Opposition Leader Steven Miles had the first question for Gerber – how many prisoners had escaped on her watch? Her answer: 'Half what it was under Labor this time last year.' This marked the first in a series of questions aimed at the Gold Coast-based minister. The most pointed came from Labor backbencher Jonty Bush. 'How many of the minister's staff have been fired, resigned, sent to another office, or requested a transfer since [Gerber] becoming a minister?' the Cooper MP asked. That prompted a fiery response from a visibly angry Gerber. 'What an absolutely disgraceful question when those opposite have form when it comes to treating staff [badly],' she said. 'Ministers on that side of the house – Labor ministers – locked staff members in cupboards, Mr Speaker, they locked them in cupboards, Mr Speaker.
Sky News AU
9 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese Government's accused of 'huge inconsistency' over ‘unprecedented' decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli government ministers
The Albanese Government is facing questions over its 'unprecedented' decision to impose sanctions on members of a democratically elected government. Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed on Tuesday that Australia was one of five Western countries imposing sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. The Albanese Government is joining the governments of Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Norway in using Magnitsky-style laws to freeze the assets of the two MPs, who are accused of encouraging settler violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich represent hardline, pro-settler parties on the fringe of Israeli politics, but they have gained prominent positions in the current coalition government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Speaking to Sky News Australia on Wednesday, veteran press gallery journalist Chris Uhlmann said the use of the sanctions was 'unprecedented'. Uhlmann said support for Israel's right to defend itself did not mean people had to agree with everything the Netanyahu government does, particularly not the 'most extreme voices' in the government, but that Smotrich and Ben-Gvir were still part of a 'democratically elected government'. 'I don't think that we have ever imposed sanctions on a democratic government's ministers before,' Uhlmann said. 'And it does open this particular problem for our government, which is consistency. 'If this is to be the approach, where are the sanctions against the Chinese ministers who are responsible for the treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang province, where a UN committee decided that that constituted crimes against humanity… people working in slave labour.' 'If you're going to open this door and sanction governments for their treatment, particularly of Muslim populations, where's the consistency and where is the Australian Government's statement on Chinese ministers and sanctions against them? 'There's a huge inconsistency here.' The veteran journalist said the decision also raised questions about how the government could separate the actions of members of Netanyahu's government from Netanyahu himself. 'These ministers support his government - his government would be extremely fragile without them,' he said. 'So how can you separate the leader of the government from his ministers on this and just say, 'Well, no, we're just targeting this part and not the rest'. 'You're opening a very, very wide door now, and it does have consequences.' In announcing the sanctions, Foreign Minister Wong said the two Israeli ministers had 'incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights'. 'Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous. These actions are not acceptable,' Minister Wong said. The sanctions have been condemned by the United States, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio stating that the sanctions 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war.' Magnitsky-style laws – which allow the government to target individual members of foreign governments – were introduced by the previous Coalition government in 2021.
