Goodbye, blue screen of death. I won't miss you
Microsoft
announcing the decision last month, in a catchily titled blog post 'The Windows Resiliency Initiative: Building resilience for a future-ready enterprise'.
It is the end of an era. Everyone has a horror story about Microsoft's error screen appearing at the worst possibly moment, taking hours of work with it. I don't remember the first time I saw Microsoft's blue screen of death on my computer. But I do remember the worst time.
Back in college, when I was working on my thesis, I lost a good chunk of a critical chapter when the machine had a critical error and crashed, taking my work with it. I'd like to say it was my best work, but we will never know. With a deadline looming, I had to spend several more hours piecing it back together.
Yes, I should have been saving as I went. I realised that as soon as the screen flashed up, but hindsight is 20/20. It served as one of those important lessons we learn after the fact, alongside daily backups for your phone and why you should turn on 'Find My' for your important devices, after you lose them. After that, auto save was set to the shortest possible interval. We live and learn.
READ MORE
But Microsoft's error screen is a well-known spectre in the tech world, and has been for more than 30 years. Caused by hardware errors, driver conflicts, overheating components – anything your system didn't like – the error screen was an ever present threat.
The blue error messages have been around since the early days of Windows in the 1980s, when they more 'mild annoyance' than 'death'. But the screens we have become so familiar with were introduced to Windows in the early 1990s, as part of Windows NT 3.1.
At some point, it picked up the 'blue Screen of death' nickname. And since then it has been annoying the hell out of people just trying to get on with their day.
The blue screen of death evolved over the years from a list of code and errors to include a brief explanation of the problem and eventually a QR code and a frowny face, which felt suspiciously like it was mocking me. 'Lost your work? What did you do? Sad for you.'
It has been a while since it has reared its ugly head, on my machine at least. Maybe it was the advent of the always-on internet connection and auto updates for software. Maybe it was that companies got a bit more of a handle of more critical bugs and flaws in their software. Either way, critical errors are more of an exception than I remember.
[
We are gradually becoming inured to technological messes
Opens in new window
]
For most of us, the blue screen of death is a small annoyance that can be fixed with a reboot or a software update. But when the
CrowdStrike
bug caused an outage on Microsoft's virtual machines a year ago, it wasn't just a minor inconvenience. The chaos was widespread.
The cause? A faulty update from security company CrowdStrike that forced virtual machines to shut down and get stuck in a loop. It affected an estimated 8.5 million Windows computers around the world, less than 1 per cent of Microsoft's install base. But it wasn't about the quantity, but rather the industries that it hit. Healthcare, transport, government agencies; all were impacted by the bug.
Flights were delayed as check-in systems went down, then grounded as operations halted. The blue screen of death was seen at baggage carousels in airports, on departures boards. Doctors in the UK were left unable to access medical records in GP surgeries.
In some cases, it took weeks to fix the problem, leaving a lot of people in limbo in the meantime.
It was a wake-up call for all of us about our dependence on technology. If less than 1 per cent of Microsoft's machines were affected, and the fallout was this chaotic, imagine if the problem has been more widespread? And what if the issue had been a malicious move rather than a simple error?
After all that chaos, you imagine that even a hint of a blue screen would trigger a visceral reaction in some people, not least among Microsoft executives.
[
CrowdStrike tech outage: How can we stop the next catastrophe?
Opens in new window
]
So perhaps it is sensible for Microsoft to retire it. But never fear: much like Clippy has been replaced by CoPilot, the crash screen isn't really going away. While the blue screen is being retired, it is being replaced by a black restart screen that echoes the days of Windows 3.1.
This time it has a simplified message: Your device ran into a problem and needs to restart. Along with a code for the technically minded who need it, and a progress indicator for the rest of us who just want to get on with our work.
So goodbye, blue screen of death. I can't say I'll miss you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
14 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Nanoleaf Pegboard review: declutters desk, charges devices and colours your life
Nanoleaf's range of lights include decorative wall panels and bulbs along with the likes of the stunning Umbra Cup Smart Lamp that I previously reviewed. The firm's new Pegboard Desk Dock is a clever three-in-one device that offers personalised lighting effects, handy storage hooks for keeping your desk organised along with useful charging ports. It's pitched as a customisable lamp accessory for gaming desks. It works with both Mac and Windows computers and is compatible with the Nanoleaf Desktop app. READ MORE: I tested Xgimi MoGo 4 to see can a portable projector deliver enough entertainment on the go READ MORE: Nothing Phone 3a review: is this the best smartphone you can buy for less than €400? One side of the unit is a pegboard that provides somewhere to hang accessories like headsets and gaming console controllers, not to mention your smartphone. You need to assemble this side yourself but it only takes a few minutes. The opposite side houses 64 colour LEDs with screen-mirroring support for those moments when you just want a decent ambient lighting show. Pegboard Desk Dock is a robustly made device that doesn't take up much room on my desk. The base is only 107mm x 107mm x 18mm in size, while the pegboard is 23mm x 91mm x 274mm. It helps keep my desk clutter free when I am working while enabling me to have some accessories within easy reach whenever I need to use them. Both sides of the Nanoleaf Pegboard Desk Dock (Image: Nanoleaf) And when I'm not working I can rotate the Pegboard Desk Dock to the LED lighting side for immersive visuals to brighten up the room. You can easily flip between the two modes thanks to its rotating mechanism. You can have full control over the colours and the lighting if you wish, or you can use handy presets such as Lava Lamp or Waterfall. If you are listening to music, you can sync the lighting show to the beat easily. It all works smoothly. I'm always in need of more charging ports when I'm working and I love that this clever device includes one USB-A and two USB-C ports along with a USB-C Power Delivery input port. Charging is capped at 15W but that's acceptable for such a versatile device. Nanoleaf Pegboard Desk Dock verdict Overall, I'm super pleased with this fun Nanoleaf accessory which has brightened up my working environment and proved a great addition to my desktop set-up. Nanoleaf pricing and availability Nanoleaf Pegboard Desk Dock costs €69.99 from Nanoleaf. There is also €10 off the twin pack which costs €129.99. You can also buy the Pegboard Desk Dock on Amazon. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
The Irish Sun
2 days ago
- The Irish Sun
Last chance before millions of passwords are forgotten FOREVER from popular app feature
PASSWORDS will no longer be accessible from a popular mobile app in days as a handy feature is discontinued by Microsoft. within the Microsoft Authenticator app is closing down. 1 Warning has appeared in the app for several months now Credit: The Sun / Jamie Harris Users have Then in July the ability to autofill with Microsoft Authenticator was disabled. But August marks the biggest change of all, with passwords no longer accessible at all in the app. Microsoft hasn't given an exact date but said "from August", so it could end as soon as this week. Read more about passwords Passwords won't be lost entirely, instead you'll have to get them via Microsoft Edge. However, the firm says "any generated passwords not saved will be deleted". An alert in the app currently warns: "To keep autofilling your info, please take action now." Despite the move, Microsoft Authenticator isn't closing down. Most read in Tech It will still function as its main purpose for two-factor authentication and passkeys. The decision comes as tech giants shift away from the aged password which are easily hacked, due to common mistakes like re-used passwords or easily guessed terms. By comparison, Huge Global Data Breach: 16 Billion Accounts at Risk SHOULD I SWITCH TO PASSKEYS? Here's what security expert Chris Hauk, Consumer Privacy Advocate at Pixel Privacy, told The Sun... 'Passwords are both hard to remember and in most cases, easy to guess. "I would venture to say that most users (especially older users) will reuse passwords, simply because of all of the websites and apps that require sign-ins. "While password managers do help, they are at best, a stopgap measure and do not offer full-ranging security for your login information. "Passkeys offer the advantage of eliminating the need to enter an email address and password to log in. "This is especially handy when users are logging in on an iPhone or Android device. "Passkeys have multiple advantages over passwords. Passkeys cannot be shared or guessed. "Passkeys are unique to the website or app they are created for, so they cannot be used to login elsewhere like a reused password can. "Plus, passkeys cannot be stolen in a data breach, as the passkeys are not stored on the company's servers. "But are instead are a private key stored only on your device, where biometric authentication (like face ID or Touch ID) is required to use the passkey.' Image credit: Getty
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
How Substack is upending media: ‘It is seriously challenging the old-guard message that people won't pay for writing'
Elon Musk wanted to buy Substack not long after he bought Twitter in 2022. But the newsletter and podcast platform wasn't for sale. This month Substack raised a further $100 million (€85.44 million) in investment. The deal put a reported $1.1 billion valuation on the business. For now, Substack remains privately owned. Even though it's been around for eight years, it's only in the last couple of years that Substack has become more visible and popular. Part of the reason is that several big-name writers have started using the platform. Margaret Atwood , George Saunders, Miranda July , Salman Rushdie , Chuck Palahniuk and many others have Substacks. [ A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: A masterclass in how to write by George Saunders Opens in new window ] Maybe it's the ethos of Substack that draws writers of such renown. As the app states, 'with full editorial content and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in'. At this starry juncture of the careers of Atwood et al, it's difficult to imagine any book editor savaging new manuscripts they submit, but maybe it's the freedom to play around with random content and ideas that is the attraction. Other well-known people on the platform are the Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown and singer-songwriter Patti Smith . READ MORE So how did Substack evolve? Back in the analogue day, we hand-wrote letters to each other when we had something to say. That lasted for centuries. The most exposure those letters received were overwhelmingly to an audience of one. That's unless the recipients and/or senders were famous, and had the foresight to keep their correspondence; a correspondence that some day in the future ended up being published as Collected Letters. Then came the Internet and mobile phones for all, and the new reality of your thoughts, images and live experiences reaching huge digital audiences. On the writing side of this in the early days were blogs, usually on the platform Word Press. Plenty of ordinary people blogged about their lives, children, travels, social experiments, interests and an inexhaustible range of other subjects. In the democracy of the online world, some blogs were good, some were terrible. They were free to read, or at least any I came across were, although, as ever, donations were welcome. Some that became widely read went on to have another life, one example being Julie Powell 's 2002 blog Julie & Julia, 365 days, 524 Recipes, 1 Tiny Apartment. Powell blogged for a year about cooking her way through Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking. It later became a bestselling book, then a hit movie starring Meryl Streep as Child. After the long and enduring life of the blog came newsletters. These differed from blogs in that they were less frequrntusually once a fortnight or once a month. You could sign up to be added to the mailing list. I subscribed for a time to author Dolly Alderton's newsletter, which was, as I recall, short, newsy and funny. Maybe it's the ethos of Substack that draws writers of such renown. Photograph: Gabby Jones/Bloomberg Substack is essentially the 3.0 sophisticated incarnation of the blog-stroke-newsletter, its aim to secure a subscription fee for access to at least some of the writer's content. Substack was founded in San Francisco by Hamish McKenzie, Chris Best and Jairaj Sethi. It was funded by various venture capitalist investors. The mission statement on the app reads: 'Building a new economic engine for culture. Do your best work, supported by your subscribers. Substack lets independent writers and podcasters publish directly to their audience and get paid through subscriptions.' There aren't any ads on Substack, and it is free to use the platform. The idea was that writers – in an era when freelance assignments have become ever rarer and ever more poorly paid – could have some autonomy over monetising their own content. Readers pay writers directly, rather than the traditional arrangement of editors commissioning copy, and organisations then waiting to pay contributors after weeks or even months. Writers posting on Substack have an individualised website for their archive content, in addition to whatever way they wish to personalise the page. New articles on Substack get emailed to subscribers. The author owns their content and their mailing list. Traditional media outlets frequently retained copyright over content written by writers. Writers can make their content free, or subscriber-only. Substack's business model takes a 10 per cent cut on paid subscriptions. The company doesn't release profit figures, so if it's difficult to know how much it makes. However, Substack said earlier this year that it now has five million paid subscribers. That came just four months after the company claimed four million paid subscribers, so this number appears to be advancing rapidly. To talk about media or publishing at this moment, you have to talk about Substack or look out of touch There is usually some free, or 'unlocked', content on a Substack, so potential subscribers can get a flavour of what's being offered. When writers are starting out, they can choose to make all their content free, while also offering a 'pledge' option. This means that if and when content becomes subscriber only, the pledge automatically transforms into a subscription. Freelance journalist Laura Kennedy , a contributor to The Irish Times who is now based in Australia, has had a Substack called Peak Notions since 2022. It has 14,000 subscribers, though she prefers not to reveal how many of those pay for her content. 'For a writer or freelancer, steady income and consistent work – the reliability of it, the editorial control and ownership of your own content and platform – is legitimately life-changing,' she says. 'A small, regular income that can't be pulled from under you at no notice is more than most writers can expect. 'Substack has sort of upended media in the best sense – it is seriously challenging the old-guard message that people won't pay for writing, that it is the platform and not the writer they value, that they only want to read particular kinds of work, or that local news is not something people will fund directly. Kennedy points out that some writers have secured book deals through their Substacks. [ Demystifying the path to publication, for free Opens in new window ] In May of this year, the New Yorker published an essay by Peter C Barker titled Is the Next Great American Novel Being Published on Substack? As Kennedy says: 'To talk about media or publishing at this moment, you have to talk about Substack or look out of touch. That's a profound change and a good one. There is no reason writers and journalists can't be in both worlds – they enrich one another. They're the same world.'
