Flying on Southwest or United? These new baggage and check-in rule changes come into effect soon
Those changes are happening at two of America's most well-known airlines—Southwest and United—and include alterations to the airlines' free baggage and check-in policies, respectively. Here's what to know about the changes and when they go into effect.
Southwest's signature 'Bags Fly Free' policy changes on May 28
On Wednesday, May 28, Southwest's signature 'Bags Fly Free' policy is changing. The policy has been a defining feature of the airline for decades, which lets Southwest fliers check up to two bags for free on any flight.
However, come May 28, that policy will end for many Southwest passengers. As Fast Company previously reported, many passengers who book flights on Southwest from May 28 will now need to pay for checked baggage, although some will still be able to check bags for free.
Here's how the new checked baggage policies work, according to Southwest:
If you are a Rapid Rewards A-List Preferred Member or traveling on Business Select fares, you'll still be able to check up to two bags for free on your flight.
If you are an A-List Member or a Rapid Rewards Credit Cardmember, you'll get one checked bag for free on each flight.
But if you don't fall into the categories above, you'll now be charged to check your first and second bags on each flight.
It's important to note that these new baggage-check rules and fees only apply to flights booked on or after May 28, 2025. If you booked your flight before that date, you'll still be able to take advantage of Southwest's old 'Bags Fly Free' policy even if the flight takes place after May 28.
United's check-in policy changes on June 3
On June 3, anyone flying on United will need to check in for their flight at least 45 minutes before departure, the airline confirmed with Fast Company. Previously, some passengers could check in as little as 30 minutes before their flight.
Those who do not check in at least 45 minutes before their flight is scheduled to depart will be denied boarding starting June 3.
Historically, United has allowed those flying without checked bags to check in by as little as 30 minutes before a domestic flight. Those on domestic flights with checked bags had a 45-minute check-in cutoff.
In order to simplify things for gate staff and provide uniformity for passengers, United will now require anyone on a domestic flight with or without checked bags to check in at least 45 minutes before departure.
'The change brings greater consistency for our customers by aligning with our current checked baggage deadline and the check-in policies followed by most other airlines,' a United spokesperson told Fast Company via email.
It should be noted that the new 45-minute check-in rule only applies to domestic flights. For international flights, United requires passengers to check in at least 60 minutes before the scheduled departure. United's check-in time limits can be found here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Gas Prices Poised To Fall Below $3 A Gallon This Summer
Long-suffering U.S. motorists are set to finally enjoy some reprieve at the pump, with indications that gas prices could decline to multi-year lows. U.S. gasoline prices appear poised to fall below $3 a gallon this summer, a level they last sank to more than four years ago, thanks to surging imports filling inventories at a time when bad weather events are dampening fuel demand. According to AAA data, the national average price of gasoline fell to 3.15 per gallon, the lowest level recorded during summer months over the past four years. Average gas prices across the country last fell below $3 a gallon in May 2021. However, many U.S. motorists are already enjoying gas prices below $3 per gallon, with GasBuddy reporting that most are paying $2.99 per gallon, with some paying as low as $2.79. Indeed, the median U.S. gas price currently stands at $2.97 per gallon. However, not everyone is smiling at the pump, with motorists in California ($4.49), Hawaii ($4.47), and Washington ($4.41) paying the highest prices for their gas. According to GasBuddy, the top 10% of stations in the country are selling a gallon of gasoline at $4.34, nearly $2 higher than the bottom 10% at $2.54 per gallon. Meanwhile, most U.S. motorists are paying $3.49 for a gallon of diesel, with the median at $3.59 per gallon. The top 10% of stations in the country are selling their diesel at $4.63 per gallon compared to an average of $3.07 per gallon for the bottom 10%.According to the latest Consumer Price Index, gasoline prices declined 8.3% Y/Y over the 52-week period ended June, with oil prices falling more than 20% amid concerns over lackluster demand and potential oversupply by OPEC+. Fuel demand fell 2.5% Y/Y in the week ended July 4, an ominous sign of waning demand in a high-demand season. Gasoline products supplied, a metric used as a proxy for fuel demand by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), averaged 9.2 million barrels a day over the past four weeks, good for a 1% Y/Y decline. Extreme heat has been blamed for the lackluster demand, with the experts saying high temperatures have discouraged driving. Summer is typically the peak driving season in the United States. But inclement weather is not solely to blame here. Improving fuel efficiency coupled with changes in driving patterns in the post-pandemic period--especially remote working--appear to have permanently depressed U.S. gasoline consumption, which is yet to eclipse its all-time high of more than 9.3 million bpd in 2018. "As we head toward August, I think gasoline will see additional weakness. The national average has a good chance of falling below $3 per gallon in September," said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. Another growing problem for the oil bulls–electric vehicles. Electric vehicles (EVs) are estimated to currently displace around 3.5 million barrels of oil per day globally, with a significant portion of this displacement occurring in the United States. This displacement is driven by the increasing adoption of EVs, particularly in China, Europe, and the U.S., where they are replacing traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. While the percentage of EVs on the road in the U.S. is still relatively small compared to the overall vehicle fleet, the impact on gasoline demand is growing as EV adoption accelerates. The IEA recently published its Global EV Outlook 2025 wherein it predicted that the global EV fleet will displace more than 5 mb/d of crude by 2030, with China accounting for half of that impact. Last year, the global EV fleet hit 58 million EVs, more than triple the tally just four years ago, making up 4% of the global passenger car fleet. The EV revolution is strongest in China, where roughly 1 in 10 cars is electric. However, oil demand destruction is most rampant in Europe, where EV adoption is most aggressive. Norway has been leading the continent in EV adoption, with 88% of new cars sold in 2024 fully electric, while 3% were plug-in hybrids. Not surprisingly, Norway's oil demand fell 12% from 2021 to 2024. Norway is a major supplier of natural gas to Europe, consistently ranking as one of the top, if not the top, suppliers of gas to the European Union. According to the European Commission, Norway supplied 52.6% of the EU's natural gas imports in the first quarter of 2025. By Alex Kimani for More Top Reads From this article on
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Eric Adams vetoes controversial grocery bills, citing affordability crisis for New Yorkers
Mayor Eric Adams vetoed a pair of controversial grocery bills that would have forced delivery companies in NYC to pay drivers more, which critics said would result in higher costs at the supermarket. Adams said Wednesday he issued the vetoes because he feared the increase in prices would burden struggling New Yorkers already facing an affordability crisis. 'Grocery prices are already too high, so now is not the right time to do anything to drive these prices even higher,' the mayor said. 4 Adams used his veto power to swat down a pair of bills he said would make grocery deliveries more expensive. James Messerschmidt Progressive City Council members who supported the legislation said the new laws would increase wages to more than $21 per hour for delivery drivers. But Adams argued the app delivery companies would pass the cost of the increased wages onto 'vulnerable' customers. 4 The mayor said New Yorkers can't afford higher grocery prices. Xinhua/Shutterstock 'Grocery delivery is fundamental for many New Yorkers, including some of our most vulnerable residents,' Adams said. 'We must always work to strike the right balance between delivering fair wages and making our city affordable for everyone and for that reason, I am vetoing both of these bills at this time.' Two-thirds of council members could vote to override Adams' vetoes. Council member Sandy Nurse, who sponsored Intro 1135-A and leads the council's progressive caucus, did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment. When her bill was passed in July it received 36 votes, two more than a veto-proof majority. Intro 1133-A, the other bill Adams vetoed Wednesday, was also passed with a veto-proof majority, with 38 council members voting 'aye' in July. Council member Jennifer Gutiérrez, who sponsored 1133-A did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment. A spokesperson for city council, Julia Agos, said the mayor was being hypocritical and the council was 'considering next steps.' 'Mayor Adams is once again displaying hypocrisy – this time, by opposing common-sense minimum pay standards and protections for grocery delivery workers that his own administration negotiated with us to match existing ones for food delivery workers,' Agos said. 'This veto demonstrates that the mayor's claims to care about working-class New Yorkers and a sustainable delivery industry for New York City are hollow, because he is undermining the workers who make the sector possible,' she added. 4 Progressive city council members argued struggling food delivery workers are underpaid. Stephen Yang The mayor was swayed in part by an op-ed written by Rev. Al Sharpton and published in AMNY, according to a source in City Hall. Sharpton argued food insecure New Yorkers, who are already facing cuts from the Trump administration to federal food programs, such as SNAP, couldn't stomach higher grocery prices. 4 A majority of council members could still vote to override the mayor's veto. Matthew McDermott The mayor's decision was also affected by a petition signed by 11,000 grocery delivery customers asking for the bills to be vetoed, according to a source. 'We cannot risk making groceries even more expensive for the families who can least afford them. Our administration will always fight for a fairer, more affordable future for all New Yorkers, full stop,' Adams said.
Fast Company
11 hours ago
- Fast Company
Is inspiration or influence more powerful? 20 leaders reflect
At their core, both inspiration and influence aim to move people—but how they do so, and what follows, can vary dramatically. For leaders, choosing between (or balancing) the two can shape not only how others respond, but also how trust, motivation and lasting impact are built. Some see inspiration as the deeper force, igniting internal purpose, while others view influence as the practical key to decision-making and action. Below, 20 members of Fast Company Executive Board share how they view the distinction between inspiration and influence, and which they believe carries more weight in effective leadership. 1. MOTIVATION DRIVES LASTING SUCCESS. Ninety percent of great leadership is about inspiring your team and helping them move in the right direction. I've learned that forcing people to go where they don't want to be rarely works. Real success comes from tapping into what motivates them. That's why I'll always choose inspiration over influence as my leadership approach. – Andy MacMillan, Alteryx 2. EMOTIONAL CONNECTION LEADS TO MEANINGFUL ACTION. Order of operations is important. In my organization, we influence people to take action on climate change. We start with inspiration, typically the beauty of nature and the joy of time skiing, biking, and hiking outside. That emotional spark influences action. The win isn't in how we move people. It's the progress we make on big challenges. – Erin Sprague, Protect Our Winters 3. INSPIRATION MOVES PEOPLE FORWARD WITH PURPOSE. I believe inspiring others is more meaningful than merely influencing them. Influence can shift behavior, but inspiration stirs the soul. It plants something lasting. Influence may win attention, but inspiration earns trust, action, and belief. The difference: Influence moves people. Inspiration moves them forward. One is power. The other is purpose. – Sudhir Gupta, FACTICERIE 4. INFLUENCE DRIVES SCALABLE OUTCOMES. Inspiration gets applause. Influence gets outcomes. One moves sentiment. The other moves decisions. At scale, leadership isn't only about lighting a spark. It's about aligning people to act with clarity and accountability. Inspiration matters, but without influence, it doesn't stick. Influence is what scales. – Mike Capone, Qlik 5. INFLUENCE AND INSPIRATION FUEL EACH OTHER. In my experience, it is not a question of one being more meaningful than the other. Instead, I see it as a symbiotic relationship, with one fueling the other. I believe true influence often starts with inspiration. People who feel moved by a vision and see a clear path to achieve it don't just follow—they help lead the way. And that drives action and results. – Jeffrey Whitford, MilliporeSigma 6. INSPIRATION SPARKS OTHERS TO GROW. For me, it's about inspiring others. Influence feels transactional—changing perceptions through action. Inspiration comes from authentic leadership that sparks others to grow on their own. Influence drives compliance; inspiration builds lasting commitment by helping people find their own path. – Barry Lowenthal, Inuvo, Inc. 7. TRUE INSPIRATION DRIVES LASTING COMMITMENT. Inspiring people is more meaningful—it lights a spark and taps intrinsic motivation. Influence can change behavior short-term, but inspiration drives lasting growth. They overlap, but true inspiration builds enduring commitment. – Stephanie Harris, PartnerCentric 8. INSPIRATION FUELS CREATIVITY AND COLLABORATION. Inspiring others is more meaningful because it fuels lasting engagement and creativity. While influence can guide actions, inspiration empowers people to contribute fully, embrace diverse ideas, and collaborate more effectively. It's the difference between directing a team and truly motivating one to grow, experiment, and innovate together. – Dominick Passanante Panasonic Connect 9. LEADING BY EXAMPLE CREATES GENUINE IMPACT. Leading by example is the most effective way to inspire others. When you demonstrate the behaviors and actions you expect from others, you create a powerful model for them to follow. This approach fosters genuine inspiration, which is more impactful than simply trying to convince someone, which can feel like a tactic. – Ruchir Nath, Dell Technologies 10. INSPIRATION GIVES TEAMS MORE FREEDOM. I prefer inspiring others, but I combine this with influencing when I sense that the team needs clearer direction setting. In my view, inspiring is a higher-leverage behavior than influencing, since it gives more freedom and responsibility to my team to choose problems to work on, and in turn, find the best solutions. – Max Azarov, Novakid Inc. 11. ADVOCATES EMERGE FROM INSPIRED TEAMS. Inspiring others is more meaningful long-term because it builds trust, fosters intrinsic motivation, and creates sustainable change. Inspiration allows individuals to operate with a sense of ownership, creativity, and resilience. There is a difference: inspiration fuels purpose, while influence drives action. And while they can overlap, inspiring others builds advocates, not just followers. – Justin Rende, Rhymetec 12. EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP BALANCES BOTH IN CONTEXT. Great leaders know that both inspiration and influence matter, and they skillfully apply each based on the situation. Inspiration fuels culture and empowers people to do extraordinary things, while influence focuses on alignment and decision-making. It's not necessarily either-or but depends on the goals and context, focusing on driving business outcomes. – Jani Hirvonen, Google 13. BELIEF SPARKS MEANINGFUL CHANGE. In my opinion, inspiration is more meaningful because it's rooted in belief, not persuasion. It sparks ownership and purpose. Influence can shape decisions, but inspiration helps others move forward with conviction. Being able to positively inspire someone is a privilege—and one of the most fulfilling aspects of leadership. – Eddy Azad, Parsec Automation Corp. 14. INTERNAL MOTIVATION DRIVES INNOVATION. Inspiration creates lasting change by motivating people from within. Influence can be temporary, so when you can get people to choose to act rather than being persuaded, you're building authentic commitment. I've seen teams transform when connecting emotionally to our mission of creating meaningful experiences. That internal motivation drives innovation far beyond what external influence achieves. – Jaime Bettencourt, Mood Media 15. TRUE LEADERSHIP ENABLES FREE THOUGHT. The direct answer to this question is inspiring and enabling. Inspiring people, to me, enables free thought and critical thinking. Influencing people, to me, is my imposition of my thought process on others. I look to have an open forum of thought which allows for understanding and learning, not an influencing approach allowing for just my thoughts. – Richard McWhorter, SRM Private Wealth 16. INFLUENCE BUILDS COMPLIANCE; INSPIRATION BUILDS MOMENTUM. Inspiration sparks that intrinsic action where people move because they actually have the desire to do so. Influencing shapes behavior, often without belief. One builds momentum, the other compliance. Both matter, but inspiration ultimately scales better. Especially with agentic AI, we need systems and people that opt in with intention and don't just follow by default. – Unnat Bak, Revscale™ 17. MEANINGFUL INFLUENCE CAN POSITIVELY SHIFT SOMEONE'S PROFESSIONAL PATH. Mentorship is very important to me, so I would lean toward influencing because it implies helping someone change direction. It's important to me to encourage and positively shift people's professional paths through workforce development, training, and mentoring, shifting their trajectory positively through meaningful influence. – Larry Brinker Jr., BRINKER 18. INSPIRATION CONNECTS PEOPLE TO THEIR INNER COMPASS. Inspiring someone drives a deeper, more impactful, and sustained impact. It awakens an inner knowing or compass that is more enduring. (Influence pushes from outside or external reference points.) True leadership happens when people connect to their own wisdom, not your agenda. Answers aren't in more external strategies, but often in accessing what's available and beneath the noise. – Dr. Camille Preston, AIM Leadership, LLC 19. INSPIRATION FOSTERS A CULTURE OF AUTHENTIC ENGAGEMENT. Inspiration elevates people—it makes them feel seen, capable, and connected to something bigger than themselves. When people are inspired, they own the outcome. They don't just follow; they lead, grow, and pass that spark on to others. It fosters a culture of authentic engagement, which is vital in modern, decentralized, and hybrid workplaces. – Britton Bloch, Navy Federal Credit Union 20. DURING PERIODS OF CHANGE, PEOPLE NEED INSPIRATION TO COME ON THE JOURNEY. Inspiring others is more meaningful, especially during periods of great change or disruption, when people need to be inspired to come along on the journey. Influence gets things done, but inspiration taps into hope and purpose. It's the difference between moving someone and truly motivating them. Influence is practical; inspiration is higher order. Great leaders know when and how to do both. – Dan Priest, PwC
