Treasury chief returns to US as China trade talks ongoing
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday, June 10, described closely watched trade talks with Chinese officials as productive, as scheduling conflicts prompted his departure from London with negotiations ongoing. Top officials from the world's two biggest economies held a second day of trade talks Tuesday at the UK's historic Lancaster House, with meetings stretching into the night.
All eyes are on the outcomes as both sides try to overcome an impasse over export restrictions, with US officials earlier accusing Beijing of slow-walking approvals for shipments of rare earths. Bessent left the meetings early to return to Washington for testimony before Congress, a US official told AFP. But US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and trade envoy Jamieson Greer, who were also part of the delegation, would further talks as needed with Chinese counterparts, the offical said.
Earlier Tuesday, Lutnick told Bloomberg Television that the negotiations were "going well." Global stock markets were on edge, although Wall Street's major indexes climbed on hopes for progress. With meetings dragging on, "the lack of positive headlines weighed on stocks," said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB trading platform.
US President Donald Trump told reporters Monday: "We are doing well with China. China's not easy."
The London negotiations follow talks in Geneva last month, which saw a temporary agreement to lower tariffs. This time, China's exports of rare earth minerals – used in a range of things including smartphones, electric vehicle batteries and green technology – are expected to dominate the agenda.
"In Geneva, we had agreed to lower tariffs on them, and they had agreed to release the magnets and rare earths that we need throughout the economy," Trump's top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, told CNBC on Monday.
Even though Beijing was releasing some supplies, "it was going a lot slower than some companies believed was optimal," he added. "Our expectation is that after the handshake, any export controls from the US will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume."
'Mirror arsenal'
Both countries "have developed almost a mirror arsenal of trade and investment weapons that they can aim at each other," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures. As they tap economic tools to try and shift global power structures, she told AFP, it may not be reasonable to expect a typical trade and investment deal from talks.
Partner service
Learn French with Gymglish
Thanks to a daily lesson, an original story and a personalized correction, in 15 minutes per day.
But both sides could find ways to level off a downward spiral. Tensions between Washington and Beijing have heightened since Trump took office in January, with the countries engaging in a tariffs war. The Geneva pact temporarily brought new US tariffs on Chinese goods down from 145 percent to 30 % and Chinese countermeasures from 125% to 10%. But Trump later said China had "totally violated" the deal.
A dialing down of temperatures could involve Chinese efforts to shore up some export control licenses caught in their system, Benson said. She noted Beijing appeared understaffed given the volume of requests. On the US side, this could look like a relaxation of certain export curbs in the high-tech domain, she added. But observers remain cautious.
Since returning to office, Trump has slapped a 10% levy on friends and foes, threatening steeper rates on dozens of economies. His tariffs have dented trade, with Beijing data showing Chinese exports to the United States plunged in May. The World Bank on Tuesday joined other international organizations to slash its 2025 global growth forecast amid trade uncertainty.
Meanwhile, China is in talks with partners including Japan and South Korea to try to build a united front countering Trump's tariffs. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng is heading the team in London, which includes Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and China International Trade Representative Li Chenggang. Bessent, Lutnick and Greer are leading the American delegation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Israel-Iran conflict: what we know
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned that "Tehran will burn" if Iran fires more missiles at Israel. In a televised address Friday night, Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed to bring Israel "to ruin". International calls for restraint are multiplying, as fears grow the Middle East could be on the threshold of a broader conflict. Here is what we know: Targeting air defences On Saturday, Israel's military said it was striking dozens of missile launchers in Iran after announcing it had targeted air defences with a wave of strikes in the Tehran area. The Israeli air force "continues striking dozens of surface-to-surface missile launchers in Iran", the military said in a statement. It said that overnight the air force "struck dozens of targets, including surface-to-air missile infrastructure, as part of the effort to damage the Iranian regime's aerial defence capabilities in the area of Tehran". Iran's response Israel said dozens of missiles -- some intercepted -- had been fired in the latest salvos from Iran, with AFP images of the city of Ramat Gan near Tel Aviv showing blown-out buildings, destroyed vehicles and streets strewn with debris. Israeli rescuers said two people were killed and 19 wounded on Saturday by rocket fire on a residential area in the coastal plain. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had attacked dozens of targets in Israel. Nuclear talks? The fiercest exchange of fire between arch foes Iran and Israel came amid ongoing talks between Tehran and Washington seeking to reach a deal on Iran's nuclear programme. Before the Israeli strikes, they were set to hold a sixth round of negotiations in Oman on Sunday, but Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said: "It is still unclear what decision we will make for Sunday." Tehran has consistently denied seeking to develop a nuclear weapon but had been enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far above the 3.67-percent limit set by a largely obsolete 2015 agreement with major powers. However, Iran's 60-percent enrichment level is still short of the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. More Iranian generals killed Iranian state media reported on Saturday that General Gholamreza Mehrabi, deputy head of intelligence of the armed forces general staff, and General Mehdi Rabbani, deputy head of operations, "were martyred". On Friday, top brass killed included the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Hossein Salami, and armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, with replacements swiftly named by supreme leader Ali Khamenei. The Revolutionary Guards said its aerospace commander Amirali Hajizadeh was also killed. He was in charge of Iran's ballistic missile arsenal. Iranian media said on Saturday that three more nuclear scientists were killed, bringing the total to nine -- a toll that Israel also reported. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said 78 people had been killed and 320 wounded in the first wave of strikes by Israel. Nuclear sites hit Israel's attacks started in the early hours of Friday, a day of rest and prayer in Iran, and continued through the day, at various sites. A key target was a vast underground uranium enrichment facility in Natanz, which Israel hit several times, according to Iranian state television. Israel said another strike later Friday on Iran's uranium conversion plant in Isfahan damaged infrastructure for reconverting enriched uranium. But Iran said the damage was limited, both in Isfahan and at another uranium enrichment facility at Fordo. burs-jsa/kir © 2025 AFP


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Europe left on diplomatic ‘sidelines' in Israel Iran conflict
European leaders voiced alarm over the military attacks and called for a diplomatic solution to avoid an all-out war that could spiral across the Middle East and beyond, but security expert Claude Moniquet told Euronews that Europe has been left 'sitting on the sidelines'. This was already true of negotiations taking place between the Americans and the Iranians. US President Donald Trump's attempt to reach an agreement with Iran to halt uranium enrichment was scheduled to run to a sixth round of talks in Oman on Sunday. Those talks may now be in doubt, but 'the Europeans were excluded' from them anyway, Moniquet pointed out. 'Europeans have been pretty much excluded from all major diplomatic manoeuvres around the war in Gaza or the war in Lebanon,' the former French intelligence officer and author said. 'Diplomatic efforts are crucial to preventing further escalation,' European Commission President posted on X late on Friday after speaking to Israel's President Isaac Herzog concerning the escalating situation. Moniquet said that the European Union has lost influence in the region and has no say in diplomacy over the future of the Middle East, however. Europe's ambivalent support for Israel's attacks likely meant its governments were not forewarned of the details, in sharp contrast with the US. French President Emmanuel Macron's press conference on Friday neatly encapsulated the tightrope walk of strictly conditional support for Israel that Europe's leaders are offering. "We support Israel's security and if Israel were to be attacked, France would take part in operations to defend Israel if it is in a position to do so," Macron said, though he made clear that France wouldn't participate "in any offensive operation". "We have always favoured the diplomatic route [on the issue of Iranian nuclear and ballistic missiles] rather than military intervention, so France did not recommend attacks by Israel," he said, underlining that France "didn't plan this decision with Israel". Macron also addressed the situation in Gaza, saying: "These attacks must not distract us from the need to establish a ceasefire there," the President added, describing the humanitarian blockade imposed in the Palestinian enclave as "unjustifiable". Similarly UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Friday that 'now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' But the UK's failure to be informed about Israel's attack on Iran before it happened, and failure to support the mission, highlights 'the deteriorating relationship between the two countries,' the Times of London reported today. Diplomats told the newspaper it appeared Israel no longer considered the UK to be a 'reliable partner' after Starmer placed sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers. 'Military planners inside the Ministry of Defence were braced for the strikes on Thursday night. However, the UK appeared to have been cut out of the loop on the operation, despite being involved in previous strikes,' the paper reported. Von der Leyen similarly reiterated Israel's right to defend itself and protect its people, adding: 'At the same time, preserving regional stability is vital. I urge all parties to act with maximum restraint and work to de-escalate the situation.' By contrast, after months of urging Israel not to strike Iran while he worked toward a nuclear deal, President Donald Trump told Reuters in a phone interview on Friday that he and his team knew the attacks were coming, and proffered no call for restraint. "We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out," Trump said, adding: "They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late." 'We've been very close to Israel. We're their number one ally by far," Trump told Reuters, adding, "We'll see what happens." The main reason behind Europe's loss of influence, Moniquet believes, is to be found in Europe's dwindling military power. If true, the situation builds on the existential questions about its security future that have faced Europe and the EU in the wake of the Oval office blow-up in February between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Trump. Since then, Europe has wrestled with and begun to take on board the need to take more responsibility for its own security. It has also found itself left on the side-lines of Trump's attempted ceasefire brokering between Zelenskyy and Putin. Being left on the side-lines now might carry more risk however. Moniquet told Euronews Iran could respond with attempted terrorism on the continent. "They may well ask a Hezbollah cell or an Iranian cell like the one that was dismantled in London a few weeks ago to strike somewhere in Europe,' he said, adding: 'This is an important possibility, and it means that Jewish communities, Israeli diplomatic and commercial interests, Israeli boats, Israeli planes, but probably also American interests, are now in a position of risk in Europe and could be hit."

LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump torn between support to Israel and opposition to military intervention abroad
Donald Trump had promised to end the war in Ukraine, yet fighting continued. The disaster in Gaza persisted, far from the real estate magnate's fanciful dreams of turning the Palestinian territory into a Riviera. Now, the US president finds himself – contrary to his professed pacifism and rejection of military interventions – on the brink of a new Middle East war involving the US in support of Israel. The massive attack carried out by Israel against Iran has put the White House in an uncomfortable position, where it seems to be both reacting to events and initiating them. With peace elusive and confrontation seeming inevitable, Trump acknowledged the attack, calling it "successful" without openly praising it. When around 100 Iranian missiles were launched in retaliation on the evening of Friday, June 13, the US military participated in Israel's defense, just as it had twice during President Joe Biden's term in 2024. For Trump, the priority remains the safety of American civilian and military personnel deployed in the Middle East, a potential target for Iran. Israel, for its part, tried to involve Washington, stressing prior intelligence exchange. "It seems Trump had prior knowledge of the Israeli strikes, and that he gave a signal somewhere between green and yellow," said Dan Shapiro, former ambassador to Israel and now an expert at the Atlantic Council think tank. "He would have preferred more time for diplomacy, but he wasn't going to prevent Israel from acting after the 60-day window he set for Tehran, with all the evidence indicating how close they were to acquiring a bomb."