YouTube, Meta, TikTok reveal misinformation tidal wave
Thousands of misleading videos, scam ads and fake profiles made in Australia have been wiped from online platforms over the past year to address a growing wave of misinformation.
More than 25,000 videos deemed to feature "harmful" fake claims were removed from TikTok and YouTube, reports showed, while unverified and misleading election ads ranked among the most commonly removed content by Meta and Google.
Eight technology companies outlined their actions in transparency reports published on Thursday in accordance with the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on Disinformation and Misinformation.
Several tech firms declined to detail their efforts to tackle fraudulent content in Australia, including social media platforms X and Snapchat.
The statistics follow heightened concern about misinformation online after the emergence of generative artificial intelligence tools, and warnings they may be used to create convincing deepfakes and political ads.
US firms including Google, Meta, Twitch, Apple and Microsoft released transparency reports under the industry code, and addressed issues including the identification of misleading claims, safeguards for users, and content removal.
TikTok revealed it removed more than 8.4 million videos from its Australian platform during 2024, including more than 148,000 videos deemed to be inauthentic.
Almost 21,000 of the videos violated the company's "harmful misinformation policies" during the year, the report said, and 80 per cent, on average, were removed before users could view them.
Google removed more than 5100 YouTube videos from Australia identified as misleading, its report said, out of more than 748,000 misleading videos removed worldwide.
Election advertising also raised red flags for tech platforms in Australia, with Google rejecting more than 42,000 political ads from unverified advertisers and Meta removing more than 95,000 ads for failing to comply with its social issues, elections and politics policies.
Meta purged more than 14,000 ads in Australia for violating misinformation rules, took down 350 posts on Facebook and Instagram for misinformation, and showed warnings on 6.9 million posts based on articles from fact-checking partners.
In January, the tech giant announced plans to end fact-checking in the US and its report said it would "continue to evaluate the applicability of these practices" in Australia.
Striking a balance between allowing content to be shared online and ensuring it would not harm others was a "difficult job," Digital Industry Group code reviewer Shaun Davies said, and the reports showed some companies were using AI tools to flag potential violations.
"I was struck in this year's reports by examples of how generative AI is being leveraged for both the creation and detection of (misinformation) and disinformation," he said.
"I'm also heartened that multiple initiatives that make the provenance of AI-generated content more visible to users are starting to bear fruit."
In its report, Microsoft also revealed it had removed more than 1200 users from LinkedIn for sharing misinformation, while Apple identified 2700 valid complaints against 1300 news articles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Israeli-American speaker Hillel Fuld responds after Albanese government revokes his visa claiming islamophobia
Israeli-American speaker Hillel Fuld has responded after Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke revoked his visa citing 'islamophobia rhetoric' which risked inciting discord against Muslim Australians. Israeli speaker and technology expert Hillel Fuld, born in New York, US, has responded after Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke revoked his visa citing 'islamophobia rhetoric' which risked inciting discord against Australia's Muslim population. Fuld, who was set to speak at fundraising events in Sydney and Melbourne hosted by Magen David Adom, an Israeli national emergency service, later in June, confirmed he had been barred from Australia 'because of my tweets'. The Jewish American entrepreneur has more than 176,000 followers on X where he has posted extensively on the conflict between Israel and Hamas. In one post on X, Fuld claimed up to 15 per cent of Muslims were 'radicalised' , that Islam was a 'global plague' and compared Gazans to Nazi-era Germans and should be 'treated as such'. In another post, Fuld said liberal western values can 'never coexist next to radical Islamic values'. In the report on the decision, the Home Affairs Minister said Fuld had used social media to deny 'documented atrocities' and had the potential to use the speaking events to make more 'inflammatory statements'. According to The Australian, the visa cancellation decision cited one Instagram post, made in a March 2024, in which Fuld dismissed as 'propaganda' reports by international media outlets that Israeli troops had opened fire on Palestinians seeking aid as 'propaganda'. 'This consideration is based on the fact that the visa holder has posted on social media and has made statements denying documented atrocities and Islamophobia rhetoric which has been received by members of the Australian community as inflammatory and concerning,' the decision paper read. 'The visa holder has the potential to use speaking events and other platforms while in Australia to continue making inflammatory statements which have the potential to incite discord. 'I consider there is a risk that those views will be adopted by members of the community and potentially increase the level of hatred against particular segments of the community, namely the Islamic population.' — Hillel Fuld (@HilzFuld) May 16, 2025 Fuld wrote on X following the decision and said he had returned from Jewish holidays to find it had become public information Australia had revoked his visa. 'Many people are working diplomatic channels so I kept it under wraps for now, but yes, it's true, Australia has banned my entry to the country because of my tweets,' he wrote. In his social media bio, Fuld defines himself as a 'proud Zionist', a tech columnist, advisor to Google and Microsoft, as well as a father of five. In his latest post to X, Fuld joked about whether he should add 'persona non grata' to his list of labels. The Australian Jewish Association released a statement on Saturday calling the decision an 'outrage' and 'attack' on Jewish Australians and the free speech rights of US citizens. 'Australia's Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, who represents the electorate with the most Muslims cancelled the visa of Hillel Fuld, a Jewish man with American citizenship,' the AJA said. 'The Minister waited until late Friday afternoon once the Jewish Shabbat holiday had set in and over a public holiday long weekend. Hillel was supposed to arrive early next week. This same minister is responsible for importing thousands of Gazans to Australia without adequate security checks.' The AJA also called for the Trump administration to intervene to overturn the decision.
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Albanese need not shy away from his Catholic roots
Australian historian Manning Clark described the Australian attitude to spirituality as 'a shy hope in the heart'. We are uncomfortable with overt displays of religiosity or, indeed, strident atheism. For most Australians, to be asked by a stranger (as happens in the US) if they know Jesus as saviour would be cringe-making. This is the cultural context in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who visited the newly installed Pope Leo XIV last month, claimed a strong Catholic heritage, then almost immediately repudiated that by telling journalists his faith played no role in his politics. It seems that Albo's faith is not so much shy as painfully introverted. It scarcely figures in his discourse compared with, say, his struggles growing up with a single mother in a council house. This is not to doubt his personal faith, but to suggest that he is constrained in the public arena. His papal visit and later counter-balancing remarks were carefully calibrated to please – or, at least, appease – both sides of the divide. Catholics are a quarter of the population, and agnostics probably more than half. Many people believe that for a politician to express faith is to betray the separation of church and state. Former PM Tony Abbott particularly suffered this because of his strong public Catholic identity, with one commentator calling him 'Pell's puppet' (a reference to the late Cardinal George Pell, Archbishop of Sydney at the time). Loading This is a terrible misunderstanding. Politicians who are believers cannot help but bring their faith to their work because it shapes their values and convictions. They should and they must. This doesn't mean seeking to advance the cause of religion, but that denying their core convictions would be hypocritical and inauthentic. Further, importantly, this is true not only of Christian politicians. Atheists, agnostics and people of other faiths are equally shaped by their values and convictions, and they owe it to their conscience and constituents to honour these. Those who don't risk becoming venal or corrupt. Philosopher Willard Quine provided a helpful analogy with his web of belief, in which the outer strands are contingent but the innermost and strongest are foundational, first principles that may never even be examined. This applies to all of us.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese need not shy away from his Catholic roots
Australian historian Manning Clark described the Australian attitude to spirituality as 'a shy hope in the heart'. We are uncomfortable with overt displays of religiosity or, indeed, strident atheism. For most Australians, to be asked by a stranger (as happens in the US) if they know Jesus as saviour would be cringe-making. This is the cultural context in which Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who visited the newly installed Pope Leo XIV last month, claimed a strong Catholic heritage, then almost immediately repudiated that by telling journalists his faith played no role in his politics. It seems that Albo's faith is not so much shy as painfully introverted. It scarcely figures in his discourse compared with, say, his struggles growing up with a single mother in a council house. This is not to doubt his personal faith, but to suggest that he is constrained in the public arena. His papal visit and later counter-balancing remarks were carefully calibrated to please – or, at least, appease – both sides of the divide. Catholics are a quarter of the population, and agnostics probably more than half. Many people believe that for a politician to express faith is to betray the separation of church and state. Former PM Tony Abbott particularly suffered this because of his strong public Catholic identity, with one commentator calling him 'Pell's puppet' (a reference to the late Cardinal George Pell, Archbishop of Sydney at the time). Loading This is a terrible misunderstanding. Politicians who are believers cannot help but bring their faith to their work because it shapes their values and convictions. They should and they must. This doesn't mean seeking to advance the cause of religion, but that denying their core convictions would be hypocritical and inauthentic. Further, importantly, this is true not only of Christian politicians. Atheists, agnostics and people of other faiths are equally shaped by their values and convictions, and they owe it to their conscience and constituents to honour these. Those who don't risk becoming venal or corrupt. Philosopher Willard Quine provided a helpful analogy with his web of belief, in which the outer strands are contingent but the innermost and strongest are foundational, first principles that may never even be examined. This applies to all of us.
