30 companies penalised in three years over non-compliance with CSR rules
The government has taken action against 30 companies in the last three fiscal years, up to FY25, for failing to comply with corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending regulations. According to Minister of State for Corporate Affairs Harsh Malhotra, the penalties were initiated after examining records, receiving complaints, and following due legal processes as per the Companies Act.
ANI Representational image The Centre has penalised 30 companies over the past three years through FY25 for non-compliance of rules governing the corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending, minister of state for corporate affairs Harsh Malhotra told the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday. In a written reply, he said: "Penal action is initiated as per provisions of the (Companies) Act, following due process of law after examination of records and / or receipt of complaint against the companies and officers-in-default."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC upholds ITAT order granting 80G approval to Raipur-based society
Raipur: In a significant judgment, the Chhattisgarh High Court upheld a decision by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that allowed a Raipur-based society to receive tax exemption benefits under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The court ruled that since the society already had a valid registration under Section 12AA—which confirms its charitable status—the Income Tax Department could not deny 80G approval by questioning its activities. The court dismissed the department's appeal, stating that the ITAT followed legal precedent and committed no error in granting the relief. The High Court ruled that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was correct in directing that a society should be granted approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as long as its registration under Section 12AA of the Act is in existence. The court dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department, stating that no illegality or irregularity was committed by the ITAT in setting aside an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT). Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides tax deductions to individuals and companies who donate to charitable institutions and funds in India, while Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the registration of trusts and other charitable or religious institutions to avail tax exemptions on their income. The case involves a society that applied for approval under Section 80G of the Act on 28 Feb 2014. The CIT, Raipur, rejected the application on 25 Aug 2014, finding that the society was engaged in commercial activities and could not be considered a charitable organisation. The CIT noted that the society was running institutes on commercial lines, took large bank loans for infrastructure, and rented out its buildings for commercial purposes. The society filed an appeal with the ITAT, Raipur Bench, which allowed the appeal on 15 Jan 2019. The ITAT set aside the CIT's order and directed that the society be granted approval under Section 80G. The Income Tax Department, challenging the ITAT's decision, argued that the tribunal failed to appreciate that the society was providing vocational education for a fee, which it said did not qualify as "education" under Section 2(15) of the Act. The department contended that the society's work was commercial and not charitable. Counsels for the society, Sumesh Bajaj and Rishabh Bajaj, supported the ITAT's order. They argued that benefits under Section 80G of the Act cannot be denied if registration under Section 12AA is valid and has not been cancelled. They stated that the society's registration was renewed until Assessment Year 2026-27. The counsel cited judgments from the Supreme Court and the High Courts of Gujarat and Punjab and Haryana to support their arguments. After hearing both sides and reviewing the orders, Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru ruled in favour of the society. The court noted that the ITAT's decision was based on a precedent from the Gujarat High Court, which held that once registration under Section 12AA of the Act is granted, the benefits cannot be denied. The court observed that the department had not presented any material to show that the decision relied upon by the ITAT was set aside by a higher judicial forum. It held that the ITAT had not committed any illegality or irregularity. The High Court answered the substantial question of law in favour of the respondent and against the appellant. It upheld the ITAT's decision, ruling that as long as the registration under Section 12AA of the Act is in existence, the Income Tax Department cannot make a further enquiry into the genuineness of the society's activities and whether they are charitable. The appeal filed by the Income Tax Department was dismissed. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC dismisses plea challenging validity of CG's school fee regulation
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the state's school fee regulation law and the rules framed under it. After considering the arguments, a Division Bench comprising Justice Sanjay K Agrawal and Justice Sachin Singh Rajput observed that the constitutional validity of a law cannot be questioned merely on the grounds of hardship caused to individuals, particularly when the rules are framed in the public interest. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The petitions were filed by an association of private schools contesting the Chhattisgarh Non-Governmental Schools Fee Regulation Act, 2020, and the corresponding rules. The petitioners claimed the legislation violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. According to the association, fee regulation under the Act would pose serious financial challenges for unaided private schools that receive no govt aid. They argued that CBSE-affiliated member schools rely entirely on fees collected from parents to cover salaries of teaching and non-teaching staff, infrastructure maintenance, and other statutory obligations. However, the court cited the precedent set in R.N. Goyal v. Ashwani Kumar Gupta and Others, reiterating that a rule serving the general public good cannot be invalidated solely because it causes inconvenience to a particular group or individual. The court held that the 2020 Act and its rules are constitutionally sound and do not suffer from unreasonableness. "Consequently, we find no justification to strike down the Act or the rules, as they are neither unconstitutional nor violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution," the bench stated. Further, the court noted that the petitioner societies and associations cannot invoke Article 19, as its protections extend only to citizens. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Since the petitioners are not individuals but legal entities, they are not entitled to claim rights under Article 19(1). This, too, constituted a ground for dismissal. The court emphasised once again that individual hardship does not warrant invalidation of legislation enacted in the wider public interest. It reiterated that where rules framed under Article 309 serve the general good, their impact on specific individuals or institutions cannot form a basis for declaring them unconstitutional. In conclusion, the court found no merit in the challenge to the 2020 Act and rules. The writ petitions were accordingly dismissed, with parties directed to bear their own costs. However, the judgment clarified that members of the petitioner associations are not barred from seeking relief through the appellate mechanism available under Section 13 of the 2020 Act, should they feel aggrieved.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
ED arrests MD of city co in fake bank guarantee case
Bhubaneswar: Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Sunday arrested Partha Sarathi Biswal, managing director of a Bhubaneswar-based private company, in connection with an alleged fake bank guarantee case. The ED probe stemmed from a case registered by the economic offences wing of Delhi Police against the company and its directors for allegedly providing a fake bank guarantee submitted to a central PSU. "The company fraudulently arranged and submitted fake bank guarantees of Rs 68.2 crore along with forged SBI endorsements and fabricated confirmations for a tender of the PSU. For providing this bank guarantee, Rs 5.40 crore was received by the company from Reliance Power Ltd," an ED statement said. The investigating agency confirmed counterfeit documents were used under names of various banks and false email addresses created under SBI's name. Investigation revealed the private company, established in 2019, operated several undeclared bank accounts and conducted transactions inconsistent with its stated turnover. Investigation also uncovered breaches of the Companies Act. "No statutory records are found at registered address — such as books of accounts, shareholders' registers, etc. Dummy directors are found to be used just to sign the documents. At least seven undisclosed bank account of the company are found," the ED stated. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
