
Doctors' groups sue Kennedy over Covid shot changes for kids, pregnant people
The directive, they wrote, has put doctors 'in the untenable position of telling their patients that the country's top-ranking government health official's advice and recommendations are wrong and that we are right.'
'This erodes trust, which is the foundation of a healthy physician-patient relationship and vital to the success of AAP members' medical practices,' they added.
Kennedy announced the change in a May 27 video posted to X , in which he was flanked by FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, both of whom gained notoriety during the Covid pandemic for their opposition to mask and vaccine mandates.
The three officials said there wasn't sufficient data to show healthy children and healthy pregnant women benefited from Covid vaccination. 'Most countries have stopped recommending it for children,' Makary said in the video.
The administration later distributed a document explaining the decision to lawmakers. The document said studies have shown that women who got the vaccine during pregnancy had higher rates of various complications, but authors of those studies told POLITICO that the administration had misinterpreted their results.
The plaintiffs in the case said Kennedy had unlawfully sidelined the CDC and its independent vaccine panel, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which are the federal bodies responsible for the immunization schedule.
'The statutory scheme that regulates the vaccine infrastructure in this country demonstrates Congress' repeated policy decision to require that ACIP recommendations, made by a fairly balanced ACIP membership, 51 be the basis for what is put on or taken off of the CDC immunization schedules — not the unilateral decision of a single individual,' the plaintiffs wrote.
Public and private insurers are largely obligated to cover ACIP-recommended vaccines with no cost-sharing under the Affordable Care Act, and states often tie their daycare and school vaccine requirements to the panel's recommendations.
While the CDC ultimately didn't pull the recommendation from the childhood schedule, it did downgrade it to one involving 'shared decisionmaking' — a differentiation the physician groups say has made it harder for providers to counsel patients and for practices to assess insurance coverage.
The lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Massachusetts, where a landmark vaccine policy case set national precedent in the early 20th century. The Supreme Court's 1905 Jacobson v. Massachusetts decision upheld states' authority to mandate vaccinations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
New study highlights inconsistencies in defining long COVID
The medical field still lacks a clear answer as to what constitutes long COVID, despite hundreds of published studies and millions of sufferers worldwide, a new study says. File Photo by Shou Sheng/EPA Do you suspect you have long COVID, but aren't sure? The answer you get will largely hinge on whom you ask, a new study says. The medical field still lacks a clear answer as to what constitutes long COVID, despite hundreds of published studies and millions of sufferers worldwide, researchers reported Tuesday in JAMA Network Open. The definition of long COVID varies so widely that the percentage of people identified as having the ailment can differ dramatically, making it harder to properly diagnose and treat patients, researchers said. "The findings highlight the need for a standard definition for long COVID," lead researcher Lauren Wisk, an assistant professor of medicine at UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine, said in a news release. A number of major organizations like the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have advanced their own definitions for long COVID, but none has stuck and all feature some flaws, researchers said in background notes. For example, the National Academies' definition, released in 2024, is extremely broad and does not require lab confirmation that a person actually had an initial COVID-19 infection, researchers said. For the study, researchers applied five published long COVID definitions from previous studies to a group of more than 4,500 COVID patients being tracked as part of an ongoing research project. The prior studies took place in the U.S., U.K., Netherlands, Sweden and Puerto Rico. The five definitions differed by symptom duration, ranging from four weeks to six months, researchers said. The definition also varied by the number of potential symptoms, from nine to as many as 44. The percentage of patients with long COVID varied from 15% to 42%, depending on which definition had been used, results showed. These differences can lead doctors to miss legitimate long COVID cases while misdiagnosing others who actually don't have the syndrome, said senior researcher Dr. Joann Elmore, a professor at David Geffen School of Medicine. "Without a shared definition, we risk mislabeling patients and misguiding care," she said in a news release. "This is more than an academic debate -- it affects real people." These differences are also hampering medicine's ability to figure out long COVID, Wisk said. "If every study on long COVID uses a different definition for identifying who has it, the scientific conclusions become harder to compare across studies and may lead to delays in our understanding of it," she said. "In the absence of an objective measure, like a blood test, or a uniform standard for measuring long COVID, researchers and clinicians will need to decide which definition is best suited for their scientific question and be more transparent about the potential limitations of using a more versus less restrictive definition," Wisk added. More information The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has more on long COVID. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Why these wild rabbits have "horn-like" warts on their heads
Cottontail rabbits in Colorado have been spotted with "wart-like" growths on their faces. But don't worry — they're OK. Why it matters: The viral infection causing the horn-like growth spurts can come from ticks, according to public officials, which is yet another sign of this summer's unusually "out of control" tick season. Driving the news: Residents in Colorado spotted rabbits with black spurts on their head this week, drawing comparisons to zombies and Frankenstein's monster. Some called them " tentacle rabbits." Others deemed them nightmare fuel. Yes, but: The warts and horns aren't uncommon as they are likely the result of the papillomavirus, which has been seen in Colorado before, according to Colorado Parks and Wildlife spokesperson Kara Van Hoose. "The virus is spread through biting insects like fleas or ticks. It causes wart-like growths on the face," she said. Van Hoose said she's received a dozen reports of the rabbits, though it's likely some people are seeing the same bunnies. What to know about the papillomas virus Papillomavirus mainly affects cottontail rabbits, per the National Library of Medicine, and is often seen in those rabbits living the Midwest. Signs of infection include "black nodules on the skin, usually the head," according to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife's website. "Growths can sometimes become elongated, taking on a horn‐like appearance," the website reads. Context: These dark growths don't hurt the rabbits outright, but they could impact their ability to eat or drink, according to Van Hoose. Most cottontail rabbits survive the infection. "The virus is mostly benign in rabbits," Van Hoose said. "The animal can clear the virus from its system on its own." " We would be concerned only if the growths are on the eyes or impede the rabbit's ability to eat," she said. Worth noting: The papillomavirus cannot spread to humans or pets, though there are human strains of it, Van Hoose said. She warned for pets to stay away from the rabbits, though. Tick season impacts "horn-like" rabbits What to know: The spread of the infection for rabbits comes amid a bug boom of ticks and other insects, which is fueled by climate change and invasive species. Tick-related emergency room visits are up nationwide, hitting peak levels not seen since summer 2019, according to CDC data. Humans can contract multiple health issues from ticks, including Lyme Disease. The Northeast, as well as Washington, D.C., have been particularly hit hard for tick bites.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Arizona COVID test positivity tops 11% as new variant spreads
Arizona is among the 12 states seeing higher positivity rates for COVID-19 tests compared to the rest of the country, according to new data from the CDC. Why it matters: Positivity rates are popping off as the "stratus" variant surges throughout the country. Summer outbreaks of COVID aren't surprising, especially as many children head back to school. But this recent wave comes as Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. unilaterally changed federal COVID vaccine recommendations. Driving the news: The CDC updated its regional data for COVID-19 test positivity on Monday — accountin for the week ending Aug. 2. Zoom in: The states with the highest COVID test positivity are New Mexico (12%), Texas (12%), Oklahoma (12%) Arkansas (12%), Louisiana (12%), Nevada (11.3%), Arizona (11.3%), California (11.3%), Alaska (11.1%), Washington (11.1%), Oregon (11.1%) and Idaho (11.1%). Worth noting: The rest of the country's test positivity rate sits between 5% to 9.9%. The big picture: Overall, the CDC reports that the COVID-19 trend is "growing," with 45 states experiencing a case increase. No state experienced a decline in cases as of Aug. 5, per the CDC. Context: The rise in COVID-19 cases amid an uptick in cases of the XFG "stratus" variant.