US Congress battle over state AI regulations heats up ahead of Senate vote
WASHINGTON :The fight over a proposed 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence heated up on Wednesday, with Republican and Democratic Senate leaders differing on whether such a measure would be tied to billions of dollars in funding to give rural communities access to broadband.
The proposed moratorium, part of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, faces mounting pressure from critics ahead of crucial votes by the U.S. Senate expected this week.
A previous version would have blocked states that regulate AI from the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program, known as BEAD. Republican Senator Ted Cruz released an updated version on Wednesday, which he said would only restrict states that tap a new $500 million fund to support AI infrastructure.
Senator Maria Cantwell, senior Democrat on the Commerce committee, however, said the measure "continues to hold $42 billion in BEAD funding hostage, forcing states to choose between protecting consumers and expanding critical broadband infrastructure to rural communities."
Proponents say the measure is necessary to lift the burden on companies of complying with laws that differ from state to state and boost U.S. dominance in AI. Critics say the measure erodes states' rights and would erase state protections for creative workers and children online.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick voiced his support for the measure in a post on social media site X, saying it would end "the chaos of 50 different state laws and makes sure American companies can develop cutting-edge tech for our military, infrastructure, and critical industries-without interference from anti-innovation politicians."
A Commerce Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Earlier on Wednesday, the president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters had called the measure "a disaster for communities and working people."
Teamsters President Sean O'Brien, who spoke at the Republican National Convention last year, said in a letter posted on social media site X that the measure "denies citizens the ability to make choices at the local or state level."
"Pure and simple, it is a giveaway to Big Tech companies who reap economic value by continuing to operate in an unregulated void where their decisions and behavior are accountable to no one," he said.
The letter from the head of the Teamsters, a union representing more than 1.3 million workers, many of them in blue-collar jobs such as trucking, was the latest instance of criticism. Unions, state lawmakers and attorneys general, faith leaders and the conservative Heritage Foundation have all opposed the measure, as have at least three Senate Republicans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Commentary: Israel's 1981 attack on Iraqi nuclear reactor only fuelled Saddam Hussein's desire for nukes
LOS ANGELES: Israel, with the assistance of US military hardware, bombs an adversary's nuclear facility to set back the perceived pursuit of the ultimate weapon. We have been here before, about 44 years ago. In 1981, Israeli fighter jets supplied by Washington attacked an Iraqi nuclear research reactor being built near Baghdad by the French government. The reactor, which the French called Osirak and Iraqis called Tammuz, was destroyed. Much of the international community initially condemned the attack. But Israel claimed the raid set Iraqi nuclear ambitions back at least a decade. In time, many Western observers and government officials, too, chalked up the attack as a win for nonproliferation, hailing the strike as an audacious but necessary step to prevent Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from building a nuclear arsenal. But the reality is more complicated. As nuclear proliferation experts assess the extent of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities following the recent US and Israeli raids, it is worth reassessing the longer-term implications of that earlier Iraqi strike. THE OSIRAK REACTOR Iraq joined the landmark Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1970, committing the country to refrain from the pursuit of nuclear weapons. But in exchange, signatories are entitled to engage in civilian nuclear activities, including having research or power reactors and access to the enriched uranium that drives them. The International Atomic Energy Agency is responsible through safeguard agreements for monitoring countries' civilian use of nuclear technology, with on-the-ground inspections to ensure that civilian nuclear programmes do not divert materials for nuclear weapons. But to Israel, the Iraqi reactor was provocative and an escalation in the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel believed that Iraq would use the French reactor – Iraq said it was for research purposes – to generate plutonium for a nuclear weapon. After diplomacy with France and the United States failed to persuade the two countries to halt construction of the reactor, then Prime Minister Menachem Begin concluded that attacking the reactor was Israel's best option. That decision gave birth to the Begin Doctrine, which has committed Israel to preventing its regional adversaries from becoming nuclear powers ever since. In spring 1979, Israel attempted to sabotage the project, bombing the reactor core destined for Iraq while it sat awaiting shipment in the French town of La Seyne-sur-Mer. The mission was only a partial success, damaging but not destroying the reactor. France and Iraq persisted with the project, and in July 1980 – with the reactor having been delivered – Iraq received the first shipment of highly enriched uranium fuel at the Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center near Baghdad. Then in September 1980, during the initial days of the Iran-Iraq war, Iranian jets struck the nuclear research center. The raid also targeted a power station, knocking out electricity in Baghdad for several days. But a CIA situation report assessed that 'only secondary buildings' were hit at the nuclear site itself. It was then Israel's turn. The reactor was still unfinished and not in operation when on Jun 7, 1981, eight US-supplied F-16s flew over Jordanian and Saudi airspace and bombed the reactor in Iraq. The attack killed 10 Iraqi soldiers and a French civilian. REVISITING THE "SUCCESS" OF ISRAELI RAID Many years later, former US President Bill Clinton commented: 'Everybody talks about what the Israelis did at Osirak in 1981, which I think, in retrospect, was a really good thing. You know, it kept Saddam from developing nuclear power.' But nonproliferation experts have contended for years that while Saddam may have had nuclear weapons ambitions, the French-built research reactor would not have been the route to go. Iraq would either have had to divert the reactor's highly enriched uranium fuel for a few weapons or shut the reactor down to extract plutonium from the fuel rods – all while hiding these operations from the International Atomic Energy Agency. As an additional safeguard, the French government, too, had pledged to shut down the reactor if it detected efforts to use the reactor for weapons purposes. In any event, Iraq's desire for a nuclear weapon was more aspirational than operational. A 2011 article in the journal International Security included interviews with several scientists who worked on Iraq's nuclear programme and characterised the country's pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability as 'both directionless and disorganised' before the attack. IRAQ'S PROGRAMME BEGINS IN EARNEST So what happened after the strike? Many analysts have argued that the Israeli attack, rather than diminish Iraqi desire for a nuclear weapon, actually catalysed it. Nuclear proliferation expert Malfrid Braut-Hegghammer, the author of the 2011 study, concluded that the Israeli attack 'triggered a nuclear weapons program where one did not previously exist'. In the aftermath of the attack, Saddam decided to formally, if secretively, establish a nuclear weapons programme, with scientists deciding that a uranium-based weapon was the best route. He tasked his scientists with pursuing multiple methods to enrich uranium to weapons grade to ensure success, much the way the Manhattan Project scientists approached the same problem in the US. In other words, the Israeli attack, rather than set back an existing nuclear weapons programme, turned an incoherent and exploratory nuclear endeavour into a drive to get the bomb personally overseen by Saddam and sparing little expense even as Iraq's war with Iran substantially taxed Iraqi resources. From 1981 to 1987, the nuclear programme progressed fitfully, facing both organisational and scientific challenges. As those challenges were beginning to be addressed, Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, provoking a military response from the United States. In the aftermath of what would become Operation Desert Storm, United Nations weapons inspectors discovered and dismantled the clandestine Iraqi nuclear weapons programme. Had Saddam not invaded Kuwait over a matter not related to security, it is very possible that Baghdad would have had a nuclear weapon capability by the mid-to-late 1990s. Similarly to Iraq in 1980, Iran today is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. At the time President Donald Trump withdrew US support in 2018 for the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, colloquially known as the Iran nuclear deal, the International Atomic Energy Agency certified that Tehran was complying with the requirements of the agreement. In the case of Iraq, military action on its nascent nuclear programme merely pushed it underground – to Saddam, the Israeli strikes made acquiring the ultimate weapon more rather than less attractive as a deterrent. Almost a half-century on, some analysts and observers are warning the same about Iran.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump-backed crypto firm is planning stablecoin audit, new app
Zak Folkman, the co-founder of U.S. President Donald Trump's cryptocurrency platform World Liberty Financial, said on Wednesday that the company will issue an audit of its stablecoin "within days" and that it planned a new app. Folkman also hinted that WLF's governance token, known as WLFI, could soon become tradable in an interview at the Permissionless conference on Wednesday, organized by crypto media company Blockworks in Brooklyn, New York. WLFI, which was launched two months before the U.S. presidential election in November by Trump and his business partners, has yielded hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for the Republican president's family business. The business, along with other forays into crypto, has drawn a barrage of criticism from Democratic lawmakers, as well as government ethics watchdogs. Critics say it creates conflicts of interest as it is happening at the same time as the president is pulling back enforcement and easing regulations on the industry. The Trump Organization said in January that the president's investments, assets and business interests would be held in a trust managed by his children. The White House and the Trump Organization did not immediately respond to requests for comment. World Liberty has raised the money by selling so-called governance tokens, which give holders the right to vote on changes to the project's underlying code and to signal their opinion on its direction and plans. They cannot be traded. During the interview on Wednesday, when Blockworks co-founder Jason Yanowitz asked whether the token would become tradable, Folkman said, "I don't want to give away too much, but if you pay attention over the next couple of weeks, I think everyone ... is going to be very, very happy." Folkman said WLF would also be launching an app that would make crypto seamless for everyday investors to use. He said the company's stablecoin recently just got its first attestation report from an accounting firm and that it would be posted on its website "within the next few days." "We're going to have very transparent auditing from a financial level," he said.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Kalshi valued at $2 billion in latest funding round, CEO says
Kalshi has raised $185 million in a funding round that values the prediction marketplace at $2 billion, its CEO Tarek Mansour said in a post on X on Wednesday. The round was led by crypto-focused investor Paradigm, Mansour said. Investment firms Sequoia, Multicoin, Neo and Bond Capital, and Citadel Securities CEO Peng Zhao also participated. Kalshi offers its users opportunities to profit from predictions on everything from sports and entertainment to politics and the economy. Such event contracts have exploded in popularity since the U.S. presidential election last year. Event contracts have stirred intense debate in financial markets in recent months. Proponents say they offer a more accurate way to predict real-world outcomes than traditional polls as they rely on traders with money at stake. Critics, however, argue that these contracts amount to a "backdoor to gambling," a claim that Kalshi and its peers strongly dispute. Kalshi was founded in 2018 by Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara, who met while studying at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Following a successful court challenge against the Commodity Futures Trading Commission last year, the company gained approval to list contracts related to the White House race. The ruling also encouraged others waiting to dip their toes into the sector. Robinhood, best known for its stock trading app, launched a prediction markets hub in March.
