Vladimir Putin to skip BRICS summit in Brazil over ICC arrest warrant, Kremlin says
Jun 25, 2025 11:25 PM IST
Vladimir Putin will not travel to Brazil for next month's BRICS summit due to the outstanding International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant on the Russian president, the Kremlin said Wednesday. Putin routinely hails the BRICS club as a counterweight to what he blasts as Western hegemony on the world stage.(Reuters)
Putin is wanted by the Hague-based ICC for the alleged illegal deportation of Ukrainian children since he ordered his troops into the country in 2022.
Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters Putin would participate in the July 6-7 BRICS heads of state summit in Rio de Janeiro via video link.
"This is due to certain difficulties in the context of the ICC's requirements," he added.
Putin routinely hails the BRICS club as a counterweight to what he blasts as Western hegemony on the world stage.
A loose grouping of countries named after founding members Brazil, Russia, India and China, its members pledge to boost trade and cooperation, though it is not a trade pact and has few institutional ties.
Brazil is a member of the ICC and would therefore be obligated to execute the arrest warrant on Putin, should he have travelled to the summit.
The Kremlin chief last year made a high-profile trip to Mongolia, in a show of defiance against the order to detain him -- his first trip to an ICC member since the Hague-based court issued its warrant in 2023.
Ulaanbaatar came in for criticism from the court and the European Union for letting Putin travel there.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India backs Brics position against strikes on Iran
A little more than a week after disassociating itself from a statement by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) condemning Israel's attacks on Iran, India joined other members of Brics in expressing grave concern at the military strikes on Iran and the escalation of the security situation in the Middle East. People walk next to a mural with a picture of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on a street, early hours of ceasefire, in Tehran, Iran, on June 24. (Reuters) The Brics — which includes Brasil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Iran — issued the statement on Tuesday to say that the military strikes amounted to a violation of international law and the UN Charter. Unlike the statement issued by SCO on June 14, which directly named Israel, the Brics statement made no mention of either the US or Israel while referring to the military strikes against Iran. This made it possible for the Indian side to sign on to the statement, people familiar with the matter said. 'We express grave concern over the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East,' the Brics statement said. The Brics member states emphasised the 'urgent need to break the cycle of violence and restore peace' amid rising tensions with unpredictable consequences for global peace and security and the world economy. 'We call on all parties to engage through existing channels of dialogue and diplomacy, with a view to de-escalating the situation and resolving their differences through peaceful means,' the statement said. Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday after 12 days of hostilities during which the US joined the Israeli military in targeting Iranian nuclear sites. Both sides have claimed victory, with Iran saying it forced the end of the war by penetrating Israeli defences with its missiles, and Israel claiming to have achieved its goal of destroying Iranian nuclear sites. The Brics statement, however, expressed 'serious concern over any attacks against peaceful nuclear installations that are carried out in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the International Atomic Energy Agency'. It added: 'Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm. In this context, we reiterate our support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at addressing regional challenges.' The statement called for protecting and safeguarding civilian lives and civilian infrastructure in compliance with international humanitarian law. 'Guided by the principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter, BRICS remains committed to promoting international peace and security and to fostering diplomacy and peaceful dialogue as the only sustainable path toward long-term stability in the region,' it said. The Brics member states also called for establishing a 'zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, in line with relevant international resolutions'. While disassociating itself from the earlier SCO statement, India had said it had communicated its overall position to other members of the grouping and it did not participate in the discussions on the statement.
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tharoor visits Russia, meets foreign minister Sergey Lavrov
New Delhi Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, currently at the centre of a row within the party, is on a private visit to Russia to promote a documentary series based on his book 'Inglorious Empire' and has had meetings with key members of the Russian leadership such as foreign minister Sergey Lavrov. Congress leader Shashi Tharoor during a meeting with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, on the sidelines of the Primakov Readings, in Moscow. (PTI) Tharoor is in Russia at the invitation of Russia's state-run television network RT, which produced the 10-part series based on his 2017 book, which itself was based on a speech he made at the 2015 Oxford Union debate on the theme 'Does Britain owe reparations to its former colonies?'. He arrived in Russia on June 21 and participated in the St Petersburg Economic Forum before travelling to Moscow, where he met Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the committee on international affairs of the State Duma or lower house of Parliament, on June 23. On the same day, Tharoor also met the Indian diaspora at the Indian embassy. Tharoor met foreign minister Lavrov on the margins of the Primakov Readings, an annual international meeting focused on international relations and the world economy, on June 24. On Wednesday, Tharoor met Konstantin Kosachev, chair of the foreign affairs committee of the upper house of Parliament, and members of the Malayalee diaspora in Russia. While much of the focus has been on the documentary series, set to be aired by RT sometime in the third quarter of the year, Tharoor has briefed the senior Russian officials he met on India's fight against terrorism against the backdrop of Operation Sindoor and discussed issues such as the Iran-Isreal conflict, the situation in Gaza and India-Russia relations, people familiar with the matter said. Tharoor recently played a similar role when he led one of seven all-party delegations sent by the government to 33 countries to brief interlocutors about India's new approach to fighting terrorism as exemplified by Operation Sindoor, which was launched on May 7 to target terrorist infrastructure in territories controlled by Pakistan in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack in April. The 10-part series based on Tharoor's book will cover British colonialism, its impact on India, and the way the colonialism unfolded and ended. During Tharoor's meeting with Slutsky on June 23, the two sides discussed 'pressing international issues, including ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, the crisis in Ukraine, and the recent escalation in tensions between India and Pakistan', RT said on social media. 'India is a key member of BRICS. It is essential that we begin serious discussions about developing a parliamentary dimension within BRICS in the near future,' Slutsky said. 'Good to renew my acquaintance with my Russian counterpart, Mr Slutsky, who had visited Parliament in New Delhi a few months ago with a Russian delegation. We exchanged views on regional peace, #OperationSindoor and possible avenues of future parliamentary cooperation,' Tharoor said on social media. Tharoor's visit to Russia coincided with a controversy within the Congress party triggered by his praise for Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a recent newspaper article on the lessons from the Indian government's global outreach on Operation Sindoor. The article was reposted on social media by the official handle of the Prime Minister's Office, drawing criticism from Congress circles. In his first response to the controversy, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, without directly referring to Tharoor, said for the party, it is 'country first', but for some individuals, it is 'Modi first'. Soon after, Tharoor appeared to respond to Kharge's comments with a social media post that said: 'Don't ask permission to fly. The wings are yours. And the sky belongs to no one…'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC grants Centre time to file affidavit in misuse of national emblem
1 2 3 Cuttack: Orissa high court granted the Centre time till July 22, 2025 to submit a more detailed affidavit in response to a PIL alleging widespread misuse of the national emblem of India. Adopted on Jan 26, 1950, the national emblem is based on the Lion Capital of Ashoka at Sarnath, with the words Satyameva Jayate inscribed below in Devanagari script. A two-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice M S Raman on Tuesday, granted the time following a request by deputy solicitor general P K Parhi to file the improved affidavit. The PIL, filed by Ganjam-based Alone Trust on Dec 27, 2024, seeks strict action against unauthorised and incorrect usage of the national emblem. The petition highlighted several instances where the emblem is misrepresented, including omission of key elements like the animals and the motto Satyameva Jayate. Advocate Pabitra Kumar Dutta represented the petitioner. The court had earlier expressed dissatisfaction with the Centre's counter affidavit filed on March 12, following its directives dated Jan 22 and Feb 19. "There has to be verification, action taken and report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Counter will be accepted on adjourned date upon advance copy served," the court stated, setting the next hearing on March 26. I n its Feb 19 order, the HC criticised repeated adjournments sought by the Centre and emphasised the seriousness of the allegations regarding the emblem's misuse. "We do not appreciate prayer for adjournment, earlier obtained for verification and rectification," the bench had observed. The PIL also calls for the inclusion of the national emblem of India in school curricula and campaigns to promote public awareness about its legal, cultural, and symbolic significance. It argues that a lack of awareness is contributing to its misuse across the country. Interestingly, the PIL was filed on Dec 27, 2024, just two days after the Centre proposed stricter regulations, including a fine of up to Rs 5 lakh and jail terms, to curb unauthorised use of national symbols, as well as names and photographs of the President and Prime Minister. Currently, the emblem's usage is governed by two separate laws — the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005, overseen by the ministry of home affairs, and the emblems and names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, enforced by the consumer affairs department. The Centre is reportedly considering merging the two laws under a single administrative authority for better enforcement.
