Ukrainian refugees can apply to stay longer in Peterborough
Ukrainians are now able to sign up for a scheme which allows them to remain in Peterborough for a further 18 months.The Ukraine Permission Extension scheme (UPE) has been made available to those already granted permission to stay in the UK under other schemes, including Homes for Ukraine, the Ukraine Family Scheme or Ukraine Extension Scheme.At a full meeting in March, Peterborough City Council revealed it had only spent half of its £3m funding for supporting Ukrainians in the city since 2022, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.Alison Jones, Labour cabinet member for housing and communities, explained the money was ring-fenced and likely to be unused for the three-year period.
She noted the council would not receive any more government funding to support Ukrainian refugees, but the authority could use the remaining unspent ring-fenced funding, understood to be about £1.6m.The council's Help scheme also offered support for Ukrainians in Peterborough. Applications can only be made by those whose current permission has 28 days or fewer remaining until it expires.The council warned that early applications for the scheme may not be accepted and late applications may lead to permissions being denied.The UPE extends the offer of temporary sanctuary for Ukrainians and their eligible family members following expiration of their three-year visa.As well as allowing the refugees to stay for another 18 months, it provides them with the same entitlements to work, study, rent and receive benefits.After applying on the government website, as well as providing proof of identity and relevant documents, the Home Office will consider applications and make a decision within eight weeks.
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Richard Hermer backs down after comparing Tories and Reform to Nazis
Richard Hermer KC, who is Attorney General is the UK Government's top legal officer, made the comparisons during a speech at the Royal United Services Institute on Thursday. Speaking about the 'role of the law and the international rules-based order', Hermer said Labour's approach was the 'rejection of the siren song, that can sadly, now be heard in the Palace of Westminster, and in some spectrums of the media, that Britain abandons the constraints of international law in favour of raw power'. READ MORE: Gerry Adams wins €100k in libel trial as jury finds BBC 'did not act in good faith' He went on: 'This is not a new song. The claim that international law is fine as far as it goes, but can be put aside when conditions change, is a claim that was made in the early 1930s by 'realist' jurists in Germany most notably Carl Schmitt, whose central thesis was in essence the claim that state power is all that counts, not law. 'Because of the experience of what followed in 1933, far-sighted individuals rebuilt and transformed the institutions of international law, as well as internal constitutional law.' Schmitt was a prominent Nazi theorist and supported the rise of Adolf Hitler during the 1930s. Hermer's words have been widely read as an attack on Nigel Farage and Reform UK, although prominent Conservatives have also openly called for the UK to retreat from international legal agreements such as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Tory leader Kemi BadenochThe current Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, has herself stopped short of calling for the UK to leave the ECHR. However, she suggested the UK would have to leave the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'. Farage has said he would get rid of the ECHR, and told ITV in April that 'we have to get back the ability to decide, can we really control our borders'. Right-wing UK newspapers and media outlets have also supported calls to leave the ECHR. READ MORE: 'Unacceptable': SNP call out BBC over by-election programme On Friday, Hermer's spokesperson said the Labour minister regretted making the comparison to Nazi Germany. 'The Attorney General gave a speech defending international law, which underpins our security, protects against threats from aggressive states like Russia and helps tackle organised immigration crime,' they said. 'He rejects the characterisation of his speech by the Conservatives. He acknowledges, though, that his choice of words was clumsy and regrets having used this reference.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Denmark's state pension age hits 70: Will the UK be next?
Denmark's move to hike its retirement age to 70 by 2040 has got people asking the obvious question - could the same happen here? As things stand now, men and women's state pension age is 66, and between 2026 and 2028 it will rise to 67. Officially, the next rise to 68 is not scheduled until the mid 2040s, which would affect those born on or after April 1977. The Government is required by law to review the state pension age periodically. However, the last two reports in 2017 and 2023 recommended speeding up the increase to 68 - and then went ignored. The next review isn't due until spring 2029, but Labour might take as little notice of any findings as the Tories. It's not as if raising the state pension age is going to become any less of a political hot potato, as money experts pointed out when we asked for their views on Denmark's decision. Meanwhile, it's worth noting that the minimum pension age for accessing workplace and other private retirement savings will rise from 55 to 57 from April 2028, Governments have in the past tended to keep the state pension and private pension ages roughly 10 years apart, so any future increases could well continue to happen in tandem. Labour might stick with 'no change' policy 'Pension ages have been rising around the developed world in the face of a combination of rising life expectancies and falling birth rates,' says former Pensions Minister Steve Webb. The UK faces major challenges in meeting the state pension, NHS and care costs of an ageing population, he says. But regarding the politics of raising the state pension age, he adds: 'Currently policy is to give at least 10 years' notice of changes, which means that increased pension ages will generate no extra revenue for at least two parliaments but will generate negative publicity straight away.' Webb, who is a partner at LCP and This is Money's retirement columnist, goes on: 'It is no coincidence that the last two independent reviews, both of which recommended speeding up the move to age 68, have so far been ignored. It is quite possible that the next review, due during this parliament, will again lead to no change in the legal timetable for increases in state pension age.' Many people don't know their own state pension age - so check 'Each government has to review the state pension age during their term in parliament,' points out Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell. 'For those looking forward to retirement that may feel like the sword of Damocles hanging over their future pension plans. However, government aren't obliged to accept the recommendations of the review and any further increases in the state pension age are likely to be gradual and a long way in the future.' AJ Bell research shows almost half of all adults under state pension age don't know when they will start receiving it, so Selby suggests checking this and using the knowledge to plan ahead. 'Once you've figured out when you might expect to receive your state pension, you can start working backwards to think about when it might be possible to retire on your private pension savings,' he says. 'If things do change and your state pension age increases by a year, then you're at least starting from an informed position and hopefully won't need to make too many adjustments to your retirement plans.' What are the options? Raise age, moderate payments, hike taxes or means-test state pension 'When is good news, bad news? When it's about living longer and the state pension,' says Stephen Lowe, director at retirement specialist Just Group. 'The good news is that as a nation we're living longer – figures for 2023 from the Office for National Statistics show the number of people aged 90-plus has doubled over the last 30 years. But the fertility rate in the UK is dropping.' Lowe says by 2050 it's projected one in four people in the UK will be aged 65 years and over, up from almost one in five in 2018. 'Here's the bad news – it means that with more people of state pension age and fewer working people, the burden of funding the state pension becomes heavier on those paying taxes. If we don't want to increase taxes, or introduce a means-tested state pension, then there are two main ways to lighten the load – either increase the age at which people receive the state pension or moderate the amount paid. Neither is a political vote winner but the problem isn't going away anytime soon so some changes seem almost inevitable.' State pension age rise will hit people who depend most on it hardest Other developed nations face similar challenges to Denmark on how to balance longer lives with a squeezed public purse, says Standard Life's retirement savings director Mike Ambery. 'The state pension age is subject to constant review and quicker, higher increases remain possibilities alongside other options like removing the triple lock or even means testing – all of which would prove hugely controversial and politically challenging. Raising the state pension age further risks hitting those most dependent on it the hardest. Lower income groups without other sources of retirement income often have shorter life expectancies and might find it harder to work into later life. Any future changes must be taken with great care, and come with plenty of notice to help people plan ahead.'
Edinburgh Live
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Live
Fiona Bruce forced to intervene as BBC guest yells 'do something'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Question Time's Fiona Bruce was compelled to interrupt the BBC programme when an audience member persistently implored: "Do something!" The show witnessed a fiery exchange on Thursday evening as Labour's transport secretary Heidi Alexander encountered a tough question on the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict from a woman in the audience. The tension mounted when the woman, starting off composed, accused the Labour Party of betrayal: "I feel such a sense of betrayal from the Labour Party. I would never vote Tory, I would never vote UKIP [Reform UK] and I used to vote Labour. "Why are you still friends with Israel, an apartheid state, and why are you still- why is the Labour Party still sending components of F-35 weapons to Israel that are killing and targeting babies, children, hospitals, schools? Enough of this rhetoric about being anti-Semitic if you support Palestinian babies and children." The scenario intensified, prompting Fiona to intervene, saying: "Okay, okay, let's let Heidi answer." However, the audience member pressed on: "Wait! I just want to ask Tim [Montgomerie] something as well." Fiona had to cut in: "Well hang on, because I've only got about 30 seconds left, so I'm going to let Heidi answer, forgive me." Despite the interruption, the woman continued: "And then please-" but Fiona relented, "If I have time, but I must let Heidi answer that." Attempting to refute the claim, Heidi started: "We're not sending F-35 components-" (Image: BBC) Yet she was sharply interrupted by the insistent audience member, reports the Express. They asserted: "You are still sending components of F-35 weapons, yes you are." Fiona interjected with: "Let her answer," amid uproar, but the disgruntled audience member continued, vociferously proclaiming: "You have reduced weapons by only 8% to Israel! By 8%!" which led Fiona to concede: "I hear your passion, I must let her answer." Heidi managed to voice her view amidst the clamour: "I find it as sickening and as harrowing as every single person in this audience seeing those images on television of children wandering around rubble who are never going to find their parents and who are being starved to death. That is why we have got to find a way-" but was swiftly interrupted again as the passionate spectator interjected: "Do something!" (Image: BBC) Nevertheless, Heidi continued: "-of finding a sustainable solution to the region and lasting peace, and getting significant humanitarian aid in. Because none of us want to wake up tomorrow and see those scenes on our television screens, and I think every single one of us on that panel would agree with that sentiment." Concluding the discussion, Fiona remarked: "Listen, we will come back to the subject of Gaza, there is no question about that. "We've covered it many times and we will cover it again, and I hear your passion about this subject and everyone on the panel understands that you feel very strongly about it." Question Time is available to watch on BBC iPlayer.
