Social Security chief backs down on threat to shut down agency after DOGE ruling
WASHINGTON — Acting Social Security Commissioner Leland Dudek is backing down on a threat to cease operations at the agency after a federal judge blocked staffers at Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency from accessing sensitive data housed at the agency.
Dudek's reversal comes after U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander on Thursday granted a request by several union groups seeking to stop 'DOGE affiliates' from accessing the personal and private data of millions of Americans, including their Social Security numbers, medical records, birth and marriage certificates, bank and credit card information and tax information.
Hollander said DOGE was engaged in a 'fishing expedition' for fraud based on 'little more than suspicion' and said the temporary organization 'never identified or articulated even a single reason for which the DOGE Team needs unlimited access to SSA's entire record systems.'
Dudek, in a series of interviews following the judge's decision, criticized the ruling as being overly broad and threatened to terminate access to sensitive data for every employee at the agency, arguing they could all be considered 'DOGE affiliates.'
'My anti-fraud team would be DOGE affiliates. My IT staff would be DOGE affiliates,' Dudek said in an interview with Bloomberg News on Thursday. 'As it stands, I will follow it exactly and terminate access by all SSA employees to our IT systems.'
'Really, I want to turn it off and let the courts figure out how they want to run a federal agency,' he added.
In a pair of letters Friday, Hollander called Dudek's interpretation of her ruling 'inaccurate,' clarifying that her decision should have 'no bearing on ordinary operations at SSA.'
'Employees of SSA who are not involved with the DOGE Team or in the work of the DOGE Team are not subject to the Order. A DOGE Affiliate is defined in the Order as a person working on or implementing the DOGE agenda,' Hollander wrote.
Dudek hours later walked back his threat.
'The Court issued clarifying guidance about the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) related to DOGE employees and DOGE activities at the Social Security Administration (SSA). Therefore, I am not shutting down the agency,' he said in a statement Friday. 'SSA employees and their work will continue under the TRO.'
Dudek's predecessor, Michelle King, departed the agency last month after refusing to comply with DOGE's bid to access sensitive government records at the agency.
Holland's ruling is one of several concerning attempts by DOGE employees to access private data at multiple federal agencies.
In February, a federal judge temporarily blocked DOGE staffers from accessing sensitive information stored within the Treasury Department after 19 state attorneys general filed a lawsuit claiming the staffers had no authority to access the information.
Another DOGE staffer in February was granted limited access to anonymized taxpayer information housed within the IRS after reaching an agreement with the agency.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gen Z's Debt Is Way Worse Than Other Generations
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Gen Z is facing significant debt, and it's at a level that far extends past the elder generations. In a new report from cash advance app Vola Finance, 63 percent of Gen Z users already had delinquencies on their record. Other generations were only delinquent 37 percent of the time. Why It Matters Young adults may be dealing with heightened financial pressures than their predecessors amid high inflation, a student debt crisis and widespread housing unaffordability. A recent poll by Talker Research for Newsweek showed that Gen Z had the highest average personal debt when compared to older groups. Gen Z's average personal debt was already at $94,101, far above millennials ($59,181) and Gen X ($53,255). A sticker shows that the American Express credit card is accepted at the front of a business on February 11, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. A sticker shows that the American Express credit card is accepted at the front of a business on February 11, 2025 in Chicago, To Know Around 63 percent of Gen Z, which consists of those born between 1997 and 2012, had delinquencies on their record, according to cash advance app Vola Finance. Other generations only had delinquencies 37 percent of the time. Across the board, 73 percent of users had at least one delinquent account, and 40 percent had multiple across different lenders. Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of said Gen Z's financial debt is magnified compared to even millennials, who typically had less debt at the same age. "Millennials had the Great Recession; Gen Z got the pandemic, inflation, and a housing crisis," Ryan told Newsweek. "Plus, Gen Z is more likely to have parents who managed their finances for them, so they're learning money management on the fly. Often the hard way. But the data is clear: when you adjust for inflation, millennials at the same age had lower debt, higher incomes, and more breathing room." Many young Americans are saddled with debt before they even have a chance to build any wealth, said Bryan Driscoll, an HR consultant who specializes in generational differences. "Long-term, it means delayed or never-achieved milestones: fewer homeowners, fewer families, and growing skepticism toward traditional financial structures," Driscoll told Newsweek. "Delinquencies aren't about poor decision-making. They're about a generation trying to survive in an economy that's more hostile, more extractive, and far less forgiving." Financial experts urge those with cash advance debt, whether Gen Z or otherwise, to pay off the charges as soon as possible. "If you find yourself with cash advance debt, the first step, obviously, is to pay it off," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "The second step is to never utilize these apps again. The immediate boost of cash for an easy purchase isn't worth the financial headaches it will produce later." Low-limit cash advance apps have gained popularity as an alternative to the traditional payday or car title loan operations that have come under severe legal scrutiny in the past 20 years, said Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group,. "With their low limits and no credit check requirements, these loans are more popular with people who earn lower incomes and have bad credit or no credit history—the same people who will have the hardest time managing this loan," Powers told Newsweek. "Gen Z being the youngest generation over 18 and have typically lower earnings and limited credit history. Many are learning the hard way how difficult it can be to manage debt." What People Are Saying Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek: "It's not about being less responsible than their parents were at the same age. It's about raw economics: Gen Z is coming of age during soaring living costs, stagnant wages, and relentless inflation. Where previous generations might have leaned on credit for emergencies, Gen Z is using it to survive the month." Bryan Driscoll, an HR consultant who specializes in generational differences, told Newsweek: "Budgeting won't help. The issue isn't that Gen Z is reckless or 'bad with money.' The issue is that they're operating in an economy fundamentally different from previous generations. They're dealing with inflated housing costs, crushing student debt, and wages that don't even keep up with inflation. Meanwhile, older generations had access to stronger social safety nets, and then spent decades voting to dismantle them. Gen Z is paying the price for that." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "One of the troubling economic signs from Gen Z has been their lack of attention to both long-term debt like student loans and short-term debt like small cash advances from apps for quick purchases. Whether it's through forgetfulness or an unwillingness to pay, these debts do add up, can dramatically hurt their credit scores, and make securing future loans for cars, houses, and other large purchases more difficult." Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "The long-term consequences are real. While these cash advance apps do not check your credit before issuing an advance, they are reporting your balance and repayment history to credit bureaus. Missing scheduled repayments, overdrafts on your banking accounts, and accessing credit too often will lower a borrower's credit score. This, in turn, may make it more difficult to obtain an apartment or car lease, and more lead to higher interest rates home or auto loan." What Happens Next Debt levels may continue to rise for younger generations as they face an altered economy, Ryan said. "It's a symptom of an economy that's shifted. Housing is more expensive, student loans are crushing, and the gig economy offers flexibility but little security," Ryan said. "Social media and digital spending make it easy to swipe, but hard to save. And let's not forget: wages for young adults haven't kept up with costs, making credit the only bridge to basic needs." If Gen Z starts adulthood with debt and a low credit score, it could affect their retirement savings and financial stability for years to come, he added. "This isn't just a personal problem, but a looming national crisis. A generation that can't build wealth is a generation that can't drive the economy forward," Ryan said. "The real question isn't whether they'll grow out of it, but whether the economy will ever give them a fair shot."


Boston Globe
22 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Since Oct. 7, perpetrators of antisemitic attacks in US increasingly cite Israel's war in Gaza
In 2024, 58 percent of antisemitic incidents 'contained elements related to Israel or Zionism,' according to the Anti-Defamation League's annual antisemitism report released this year. That has risen since the group began tracking the data with a new definition two years ago. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'For antisemites, the Israel issue has been a convenient tactic to pile onto the Jewish community,' said Oren Segal, ADL's senior vice president of counterextremism and intelligence. Some people intentionally conflate being Jewish with support for the Israeli government, he said. Advertisement The overlap is complicating life for many US Jews and Jewish organizations living with increasing antisemitism and the deep divisions sparked by the war in Gaza. 'People like me made arguments for years about how you should be able to criticize Israel and not be seen as antisemitic. Now that's collapsed, and attacks on Zionism now target Jews. They see no difference, and so here we are,' said Joel Rubin, a deputy assistant secretary of state under former president Barack Obama who also served as Jewish outreach adviser to the 2020 presidential campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont Independent. Advertisement Since Israel's post-Oct. 7 war in Gaza began, polls have shown that more Americans have negative views about Israel, and support for the Palestinian solidarity movement has grown stronger. With antisemitic incidents at historic levels, some American Jews say they feel like a political football, and that it can be agonizing at times to tell the difference between prejudice and criticism of the Israeli government. Jews in the United States 'have a real psychological challenge in this moment,' said Dove Kent, US senior director of the Diaspora Alliance, a progressive group that works to fight the weaponization of antisemitism. 'Whenever there is an increase in Israeli lethal action, there is an increase in antisemitism directed at Jews. But Jews don't cause antisemitism,' she said. 'Conversations about if and when these attacks [in the United States] are antisemitic are only useful to the degree they help us understand how to stop them,' she said. 'Otherwise it's almost just an exercise -- a thing that has the potential to grab people's attention and cause fractures among people who are otherwise completely aligned that we need to stop these attacks.' This trend has become more apparent after a recent series of antisemitic events. In April, the residence of Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, who is Jewish, was set on fire by a man who allegedly blamed him for Middle East violence against Palestinians. A month later, two Israeli Embassy employees were fatally shot as they left a reception at a Jewish museum in Washington, D.C., by a man who yelled 'Free, free Palestine.' And Sunday, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, allegedly used a flamethrower to attack a Jewish event in Colorado. Advertisement All three incidents reflect rising antisemitism, but they also have a common feature: The alleged perpetrators cited their objections to Israel's war in Gaza as part of their motives, say hate crime experts. Soliman 'said this had nothing to do with the Jewish community and was specific [to] the Zionist group,' according to Boulder police. While the war in Gaza has fueled criticism of Israel from some on the left, even among some politically left-leaning Jews, many US Jews have also said the administration of President Trump shares some blame for a more hostile climate. During his last presidential campaign, Trump said Jewish voters would be to blame if he lost -- despite being only 2 percent of the population. Multiple Jewish leaders have been critical of Trump and some administration officials for using antisemitism as a rationale for deporting immigrants and eliminating some diversity initiatives, stoking backlash. 'Since Trump came in they are weaponizing Jewish fear to advance a very specific agenda,' said Kevin Rachlin, Washington director of the Nexus Project, which advocates against antisemitism and for free speech. 'What will you do to protect us?' he said. 'Shutting down and defunding schools, deporting people? That doesn't protect Jews.' Harrison Fields, principal deputy press secretary at the White House, wrote that the president 'received unprecedented support from the Jewish community in his historic reelection, and this support continues to grow as he combats the left's rampant anti-Semitism is exposed daily. The Trump administration is the most pro-Israel and pro-Jewish in our nation's history, and the President's record stands as a testament to this commitment.' Advertisement US Jews are wary equally of both conservatives and liberals, according to a 2024 survey by the American Jewish Committee. Asked 'how much of an antisemitic threat' the 'extreme political right' and the 'extreme political left' represents, the numbers were almost the same: 55 percent said the far right is a very serious or moderate threat, and 57 percent said that of the far left. Jews outside of Israel have long been attacked by people trying to change Mideast policy, Rachlin said. But those attacks have taken on a new dimension in recent years, he said. What's changed is the very high death toll in Israel and Gaza, the growth among young Americans -- compared with older ones -- in sympathy for the Palestinian cause, and, Rachlin said, the internet. 'We see everything that's happening. Nothing is hidden, and no amount of spin can turn away video. You can see bad actors in both camps.'


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Elon Musk warpath against Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' rattles House GOP
Elon Musk's tirade against President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" has forced House Republicans to scramble to respond on Wednesday. GOP lawmakers who had spent months praising Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) efforts are now working to avoid a war of words with the tech billionaire as he calls on them to scrap months of work in favor of a new budget reconciliation bill. "He didn't make it any easier for the bill," Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wis., told Fox News Digital. He noted that the bill also had its opponents in the Senate, where at least three fiscal hawks are calling for deeper cuts than the recent version passed by the House, which rolls back roughly $1.5 trillion in federal spending over 10 years. Fitzgerald questioned, however, what Musk's endgame was. "If it was to truly kill the bill, then – I get it, he's not an elected official – but you never really make such a bold statement without having a Plan B, and clearly, there's no Plan B," he said. House GOP lawmakers have for the most part, however, appeared in agreement on Musk ultimately having little impact on their actions. "I don't think he carries the same kind of gravitas that he did," Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., said. Another House Republican told Fox News Digital, "When he's not standing by the president's side, he doesn't have the same weight." Congressional Republicans are working to pass a mammoth bill advancing Trump's priorities on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt via the budget reconciliation process. Reconciliation allows the party in power to totally sideline opposition – in this case, Democrats – to pass a sweeping piece of fiscal legislation by lowering the Senate's threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51. But there are rules and limitations for what can be included in the budget reconciliation process. House GOP leaders say they will seek to codify spending cuts identified by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) via the annual congressional appropriations process. That has not stopped Musk from unleashing his fury against the bill over the money it could add to the already $36 trillion-and-counting federal debt. "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL," Musk wrote on X, among other posts. The Tesla founder made a veiled threat against lawmakers' seats as well, "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." House GOP leaders and the White House, meanwhile, have closed ranks around the bill. "I want Elon and all my friends to recognize the complexity of what we've accomplished here. This extraordinary piece of legislation – record number of savings, record tax cuts for the American people and all the other benefits in it," Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters in response to Musk. "We worked on the bill for almost 14 months. You can't go back to the drawing board, and we shouldn't. We have a great product to deliver here." But Musk's comments appear to have created a difficult political situation for some fiscal hawks who aired concerns about the bill before ultimately voting for it after GOP leaders made some last-minute changes tightening Medicaid work requirements and green energy subsidy cutbacks. "I wish [Musk] had been cheering from the stands before we had the vote, that would have helped us, but we are where we are," House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., who fought for more conservative changes, told reporters. He side-stepped a question on whether he was worried about election threats from Musk. "I'm going to be – I hope that Elon continues to stay in this fight because I'm philosophically aligned with him, with his effort to try to balance this budget," Burlison said. House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, meanwhile, said he believes Musk is wrong but conceded his opinion mattered to at least part of the GOP base. "The challenge is, he's a he's a credible guy, and he's done, a patriotic service," Arrington said, referring to DOGE. I just think he's just wrong about his comments that mischaracterize the one big, beautiful bill." "So to say that it's a problem or that it has created a bigger challenge for us, is true. Because he's got a big voice, he's got a big audience. And more importantly, it's a credible voice. But he's wrong on this issue." Conservative Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., said, "I would have preferred that he not go the direction that he went…maybe it was to encourage Congress to get on the ball with these rescissions packages that are coming." The White House, meanwhile, has stood by the bill. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.