logo
Cash discovery row: Three-member panel seeks Justice Varma's impeachment

Cash discovery row: Three-member panel seeks Justice Varma's impeachment

The Supreme Court-appointed three-member panel has recommended the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma, a former Delhi High Court judge, in connection with the ongoing cash discovery row, NDTV reported.
The panel submitted a 64-page report to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, based on an inquiry involving 55 witnesses and a statement by Justice Varma. The committee made two key observations that led to its recommendation for impeachment.
The report stated, 'The three-member committee holds the money/cash, which was found in the storeroom located within the premises of 30 Tughlaq Crescent, the former residence of Justice Varma.'
It added that access to the storeroom — where the half-burnt cash was discovered — was restricted to Justice Varma and his family, and the area was well monitored.
The fire, which broke out late on March 14, exposed a stash of partially charred currency notes. A witness recalled the scene, saying, 'As I entered, I noticed on the right-hand side and in front, there was a large pile of cash of Rs 500 notes lying on the floor. I was shocked and surprised at such large amounts of cash strewn on the floor... I saw this for the first time in my life.'
Panel names Diya Varma, Rajinder Karki
The committee also looked into the actions of Diya Varma, daughter of Justice Varma, and his private secretary Rajinder Karki. According to witness accounts, both allegedly advised firefighters not to mention the discovery of the cash.
In light of these findings, the panel concluded that there was sufficient evidence to initiate impeachment proceedings against Justice Varma, who is now serving at the Allahabad High Court following his transfer after the incident.
Justice Varma has denied any wrongdoing. He maintained that neither he nor his family had knowledge of the money and claimed that the room where the cash was found — located separately from the main house — was accessible to anyone already present on the property.
Kapil Sibal questions Centre's motives
On Tuesday, Rajya Sabha MP and senior advocate Kapil Sibal criticised the government's decision to move ahead with impeachment. He suggested that the broader intent was to weaken the Collegium system and assert greater executive control over judicial appointments.
Sibal also pointed to an apparent double standard, contrasting the treatment of Justice Varma with that of Justice Shekhar Yadav, who faces an impeachment motion in the Rajya Sabha filed by Opposition MPs over allegedly communal remarks made in 2023.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mumbai EOW arrests IPS officer's husband in Rs 7.2 crore cheating case
Mumbai EOW arrests IPS officer's husband in Rs 7.2 crore cheating case

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Mumbai EOW arrests IPS officer's husband in Rs 7.2 crore cheating case

Mumbai: The city's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) on Wednesday arrested Purushottam Chavan, the husband of IPS officer Rashmi Karandikar, for his alleged role in a Rs 7.4-crore cheating case. EOW officers took custody of Chavan from the Arthur Road Jail and produced him before the Esplanade Court, which sent him to police custody till June 24. In Jan, two cases were registered against Chavan and others and transferred to the EOW. Chavan is currently being questioned in the second case, where he and two others are accused of allegedly cheating a Gujarat-based businessman of Rs 7.4 crore by promising him help in obtaining development rights certificates from Thane and Pune municipal corporations to get govt land at a cheaper rate. The alleged cheating took place between 2015 and 2024.

State govt to confiscate properties of 52 criminals
State govt to confiscate properties of 52 criminals

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

State govt to confiscate properties of 52 criminals

Patna: In a sweeping crackdown on organised crime, the state govt has begun the process of seizing properties worth crores from 52 major criminals across the state. The Economic Offences Unit (EOU) has sent detailed dossiers to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for action under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The list includes liquor smugglers, sand mafia, land mafias, cybercriminals and fraudsters. According to officials, 18 liquor smugglers alone own properties worth Rs 18 crore while 10 sand mafia members and 10 others accused of murder, extortion and related crimes are linked to assets worth ₹23 crore. ADG (EOU) Nayyar Hasnain Khan said, "Notable cases include four Maoist activists with properties of Rs 2.17 crore, two illegal mill operators with Rs 2.69 crore and three land mafia members holding assets worth Rs 4.93 crore. A cybercriminal's property worth Rs 86 lakh and one fraudster's assets worth Rs 2.03 crore are also under scrutiny." Prominent names include MLA Arun Yadav, accused of serious crimes including murder and rape; liquor smuggler Dhirendra Kumar Singh of Bhojpur; and vehicle-passing mafia kingpin Gulam Mustafa of Kishanganj. "This is one of the largest coordinated operations against black money in Bihar," Khan said.

Why a Calcutta court ordered the Centre to release MGNREGA funds
Why a Calcutta court ordered the Centre to release MGNREGA funds

India Today

time43 minutes ago

  • India Today

Why a Calcutta court ordered the Centre to release MGNREGA funds

After nearly three years of political standoff and administrative impasse, the Calcutta High Court on June 18 directed that the 100-day rural employment guarantee scheme (MGNREGA) be resumed in West Bengal from August 1. The verdict comes as a significant breakthrough in a long-running dispute between the Centre and the state, marked by allegations of corruption, political bias and denial of rights to millions of rural conflict began in the wake of corruption allegations in the implementation of MGNREGA in Bengal, prompting the Narendra Modi government to halt all funding to the state under the scheme. Since then, not a single rupee has been released, effectively suspending the programme and impacting the livelihoods of lakhs of rural families dependent on it. While the Centre justified its actions citing misuse of funds, the state government led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, and even political rivals like the Left, have accused the Union government of engaging in selective non-cooperation and politically motivated high court's intervention may mark a turning point. During the hearing on June 18, Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam offered a stern yet nuanced observation: 'From the beginning, I've said one thing— out of 10 apples, a few may be rotten, but the rest are still fresh.' Acknowledging the past issues but refusing to let them justify continued inaction, he added, 'What has happened is in the past. But the scheme has remained shut for nearly three years. Now it must be restarted. The Centre cannot indefinitely suspend this programme.' He further instructed that the possibility of resuming the scheme from July or August be seriously judgment also clarified that while the Centre has the authority to impose supervisory mechanisms to curb corruption—including conditions or monitoring arrangements—it cannot use such powers to indefinitely stall an entire welfare programme that affects millions. This assertion directly challenges the Union government's prolonged withholding of funds, despite similar corruption charges having emerged in several other states, including in the Hindi belt and even in Gujarat, without those states facing such drastic punitive Reacting strongly to the court's ruling, CM Mamata launched a fierce critique of the Centre's stance. Addressing the media from Nabanna—the state secretariat—she said, 'We will review the petition, but first, they must release the money. It's been four years. Not a single rupee has been given. This is the people's money.' She accused the Centre of inflicting deliberate harm on Bengal's rural poor and declared that the state government had to pay the pending wages of workers from its own funds in the absence of central support. Since 2022, the state government has paid Rs 16,637.03 crore as wages from its own coffers, besides clearing pending wages of Rs 3,732 crore under demanded reimbursement of these expenditures, stating, 'From the day the scheme was stopped, the Centre must calculate and pay the dues. Why was our money diverted to other states? That is a crime.' She also referred to the state's 'Karmashree' initiative, launched to provide employment using state funds as a substitute for its submission to the court, the Union government maintained that it had no intent to punish genuine workers, but raised the issue of verification—questioning who would confirm whether work was indeed carried out. It also insisted that the funds allegedly misused by the state be returned and called for the appointment of a central nodal officer to oversee the programme's implementation in the this argument appeared unconvincing to many observers and legal analysts. The primary question raised was: if the Centre was serious about ensuring oversight and integrity, why did it take nearly three years to propose such mechanisms? Moreover, who bears responsibility for the economic hardship endured by the rural poor during this extended suspension?The state, for its part, argued that no nodal officer was needed, as the entire scheme was administered through centralised digital portals, making discrepancies immediately visible and rectifiable. While this stance underscores the growing role of technology in welfare governance, it does not fully absolve the state government of blame. Repeated allegations of corruption in Bengal's MGNREGA implementation have surfaced over the years, and critics argue the state failed to act with adequate urgency to stem malpractices before the situation escalated into a full-blown intergovernmental despite these mutual shortcomings, the court's directive is being viewed by many as a positive development—a long-awaited reprieve for lakhs of marginalised workers and families in West Bengal's villages. The court has reasserted a crucial democratic principle: even amid allegations and administrative friction, the rights of the people to livelihood and public welfare cannot be indefinitely held its heart, the impasse over MGNREGA funding is not merely a matter of financial disbursement or administrative oversight—it is a microcosm of the increasingly fraught relationship between the Centre and opposition-ruled states. It reflects how welfare, accountability and political rivalry intersect in contemporary India, and how institutional checks—such as the judiciary—remain vital in upholding constitutional guarantees when executive action fails to do August approaches, much will depend on how both governments respond—not only in terms of implementing the court's order, but also in restoring the dignity and stability of a social security scheme that was never meant to be a political to India Today Magazine

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store