Closing of the first edition of Beirut Arbitration Days: Professor Najib Hage-Chahine's Ten Recommendations to Cement Beirut as the Regional Capital of Arbitration
In the presence of the President of the Beirut Bar Association, Mr. Fadi Masri, and at the initiative of the event's creator, Professor Najib Hage-Chahine, the first edition of 'Beirut Arbitration Days' concluded on 22 May 2025 after attracting more than 1,000 participants from 40 countries, 60 international speakers and 40 supporting organizations.
Prime Minister Judge Nawaf Salam opened the conference, confirming Lebanon's ability 'to regain its regional and international role in arbitration.' Both Minister of Justice Judge Adel Nassar and Minister of Information Dr. Paul Morcos affirmed the government's support for spreading the culture of arbitration, while the President of the Bar Association stressed the Bar's commitment to consolidating this course.
The Ten Recommendations of Professor Najib Hage-Chahine
In the closing session, Professor Najib Hage-Chahine presented ten practical recommendations:
Lawyers: Insert an arbitration clause in contracts and choose Beirut as the seat. Judiciary: Support the independence of arbitrators and accelerate annulment and enforcement proceedings. Legislators: Update the Arbitration Law to align with the New York Convention and international standards. Government: Integrate arbitration into investment-attraction policies and develop specialized digital infrastructure. Arbitrators: Commit to the highest levels of transparency, ethics, and continuous training. Experts: Adopt precise scientific models in the assessment of damages and act as support to arbitral tribunals, not as a party in the dispute. Arbitration centers: Strengthen regional cooperation and embrace technology and diversity. Universities: Integrate arbitration into curricula and provide practical training for students. Students and youth: Engage in moot courts and fellowship programs. Bar Association: Entrench LIAC-BBA as a strategic arm for independent arbitration.
The event concluded with Professor Hage-Chahine affirming that 'Beirut has returned as the capital of Arab arbitration' and inviting participants to the next edition, 'Beirut Arbitration Days 2026,' under the slogan Beirut Nutrix Legum.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
What can go wrong when diplomats are above the law?
Diplomatic immunity is a fundamental principle of international law that allows diplomats to perform their duties without fear of coercion or harassment from their host state. This principle was notably highlighted during the Tehran hostage crisis that began in 1979, when the International Court of Justice reaffirmed that the law of diplomatic relations is essential for maintaining peaceful interstate connections and the stability of the global legal order. Although diplomatic immunity is crucial, its application often raises concerns because it can shield envoys from accountability for serious misconduct. With roots going back more than 6,000 years, the concept of diplomatic immunity serves as both a vital safeguard and a source of public frustration, prompting calls for reform to align it with the realities of the 21st century. The origins of diplomatic immunity can be traced back to ancient Mesopotamian civilisations, where messengers played a pivotal role in communication and governance. The Code of Hammurabi, established around 1754 BCE, imposed severe penalties for harming messengers, underscoring their importance in maintaining order across vast empires such as Assyria and Babylonia – modern-day Iraq. These envoys, often appointed by kings and carrying royal seals, enjoyed immunity from arrest during official missions and local authorities were required to help them deliver their messages promptly. This historical precedent laid the groundwork for modern diplomatic protections. By the 18th century, countries such as Great Britain formalised these principles through laws such as the Diplomatic Privileges Act of 1708, recognising that safeguarding the both the dignity and independence of foreign envoys were essential for effective diplomacy. Today, the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations codifies these protections, ensuring that diplomats can operate free from undue interference. Historically, three main theories have justified diplomatic immunity. The first, known as representative theory, viewed diplomats as extensions of their sovereign, deriving their dignity and immunity from the ruler. This theory faced criticism for placing diplomats above the law and has largely been abandoned due to its potential for abuse. The second, the extraterritoriality theory, emerged in the 17th century and treated diplomatic premises as extensions of the sending state's territory, exempting diplomats from the host state's jurisdiction. However, its reliance on legal fiction and tendency to grant unlimited privileges led to its decline. The prevailing modern justification is the functional necessity theory, which posits that immunity is essential for diplomats to perform their duties independently, free from political or legal pressures. This theory underpins the Vienna Convention, balancing privileges with obligations to respect the host state's laws. The Vienna Convention's Article 41 outlines diplomats' rights and responsibilities, requiring them to respect local laws, avoid interfering in the host state's affairs and use mission premises appropriately. Diplomats and their families are also prohibited from engaging in profit-making activities. While most diplomats adhere to these rules, the convention's broad immunities have enabled abuses, including criminal offences, civil violations and administrative misconduct. High-profile cases – such as diplomats evading traffic fines, tax obligations or even serious crimes like assault – have fuelled public outrage, as victims are often left without recourse. The convention provides remedies such as expelling diplomats, waiving their immunity, exercising the sending state's jurisdiction or even cutting diplomatic ties. However, these measures are underutilised owing to political considerations and the reciprocal nature of immunity, which discourages states from taking action for fear of retaliation. This creates a cycle in which diplomatic convenience often trumps accountability, undermining public trust in the system. Diplomatic immunity is a double-edged sword. Without it, diplomats face risks of harassment, fabricated charges or even being taken hostage, particularly when relations between states are strained. The Tehran hostage crisis vividly demonstrated the chaos that ensues when diplomatic protections are violated. Yet, unchecked immunity can lead to impunity, allowing diplomats to evade justice for serious crimes. This tension between protecting diplomats and ensuring accountability lies at the heart of the debate over diplomatic immunity. For ordinary citizens, the inability to hold diplomats accountable – whether for civil claims like unpaid debts or criminal acts like violence – creates a sense of injustice. Article 41's requirement to respect local laws is often overshadowed by the broad protections afforded to diplomats, leading to perceptions that they operate above the law. This imbalance has sparked calls for reform to better align diplomatic immunity with principles of fairness and public security. Technological advancements have transformed diplomatic communication, reducing reliance on traditional methods like diplomatic bags and couriers. Satellite communication, mobile phones, emails and video conferencing have enabled direct negotiations between government ministers, non-diplomatic officials and private sector actors. The inability of host states to prosecute diplomats for criminal acts or compensate victims of civil offences undermines public confidence in the justice system Public diplomacy is increasingly conducted through mass media, the internet and public-private initiatives, even in developing nations. These changes have diminished the exclusive role of diplomats as envisioned in Article 3 of the Vienna Convention, which outlines their functions as representing the sending state and fostering friendly relations. Despite these shifts, a physical diplomatic presence remains indispensable. Face-to-face interactions allow diplomats to assess public sentiment, gather first-hand information and maintain confidential channels that technology cannot fully replicate. For example, nuanced negotiations or crisis management often require the personal touch and formality of traditional diplomacy. Although technology has streamlined communication, it cannot replace the practical utility of in-person liaison between diplomats and the host state. The Vienna Convention, rooted in customary practices from a pre-digital era, is increasingly misaligned with modern realities. Absolute immunity, as the adage 'absolute power corrupts absolutely' suggests, risks fostering impunity for serious diplomatic misconduct. The inability of host states to prosecute diplomats for criminal acts or compensate victims of civil offences undermines public confidence in the justice system. To remain relevant, the convention must evolve to reflect technological advancements and changing diplomatic roles. Reform should focus on striking a balance between functional necessity and accountability. Key proposals include restricting immunity to acts directly related to diplomatic duties, with clearer mechanisms to address criminal and civil violations. For instance, serious crimes like assault or trafficking could be excluded from immunity protections. States should more readily utilise remedies like expulsion or the waiving of immunity. Sending states could also exercise jurisdiction over their diplomats' misconduct, ensuring accountability without disrupting diplomatic relations. The convention should acknowledge the role of modern communication technologies, potentially reducing the need for blanket immunities. For instance, secure digital channels could replace some traditional diplomatic functions, narrowing the scope of required protections. A more robust framework for reciprocal accountability could deter abuses while maintaining diplomatic protections. States could agree to standardised responses to misconduct, reducing the political barriers to action. In conclusion, while diplomatic immunity is essential for fostering peaceful interstate relations, its current form leans too heavily towards protecting diplomats at the expense of public security and justice. The public's growing intolerance for diplomatic impunity, coupled with technological advancements, underscores the need for reform. A modernised Vienna Convention should prioritise functional necessity while ensuring accountability for abuses, protecting both diplomats and the citizens of host states. Achieving this balance requires political will to overcome the inertia of reciprocity and a commitment to adapting diplomatic law to the 21st century. By limiting immunity to essential functions, strengthening accountability mechanisms and integrating technological realities, the international community can preserve the integrity of diplomatic relations while addressing legitimate public concerns.
Al Etihad
12 hours ago
- Al Etihad
UAE an inspiring model in improving government performance: Arab Investors Union
18 Aug 2025 23:19 CAIRO (WAM)Gamal Bayoumi, Secretary-General of the Arab Investors Union, affirmed that the remarkable progress achieved by the United Arab Emirates in the Government Support Index 2025 reflects the forward-looking vision of President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and continues the legacy of the UAE's Founding Father, the late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al remarks came in response to the UAE's recent achievement of advancing to 16th place globally in the Government Support Index 2025, one of the indicators listed in the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, where the UAE rose 27 places from its 43rd ranking in told the Emirates News Agency (WAM) that the UAE has presented an inspiring model for the region in strategically leveraging government support to enhance economic competitiveness, attract investments, and balance economic growth with environmental preservation. He noted that the country has consistently kept pace with global progress and implemented best added that Egyptians and Arabs take pride in the UAE's prioritisation of investment in people, innovation, and sustainable infrastructure, stressing that it is a young Arab nation in every pointed out that the UAE's accomplishment underscores its commitment to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, making it a key partner in shaping a more prosperous and sustainable future for the Arab region and the to the IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2025, the UAE also ranked first globally in venture capital and personal income tax collected, second in corporate profit tax rate, and third in government budget surplus/deficit measured in billions of secured fourth place in the decline of indirect tax revenue collected and the reduction of consumption tax rate, while ranking fifth in taxes collected on capital and property. The UAE also came sixth in public finance, seventh globally and first regionally in the ratio of total government expenditure, and ninth worldwide in real growth of government consumption expenditure.
Arabian Business
12 hours ago
- Arabian Business
GCC national income hits $2.14tn in 2023 as exports fall 7 per cent
The value of gross national income (GNI) across Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries stood at $2.143tn in 2023, according to the Statistical Centre for the Cooperation Council for the Arab Countries of the Gulf (GCC-Stat). This represents a 2.7 per cent decrease from $2.203tn in 2022. The region's disposable national income, available for consumption and savings after taxes and transfers, reached $1.989tn, down 3 per cent from $2.515tn the previous year. Meanwhile, the non-oil sector's value-added rose to $513bn, while the oil sector contributed $603.5bn at current prices. The non-oil sector's contribution to GCC GDP climbed to 71.5 per cent by the end of 2023, compared with 65 per cent in 2022, reflecting an annual growth rate of 6.4 per cent. GCC economy sector performance Mining and quarrying remained the largest contributor to the GCC economy over the past five years, averaging 28.3 per cent of GDP Manufacturing was the leading activity within the non-oil sector, averaging 11.7 per cent In 2023, financial and insurance activities posted the highest growth at 11.7 per cent, followed by transport and storage (11.6 per cent), real estate (8.1 per cent), public administration and defense (7.9 per cent), wholesale and retail trade (7.6 per cent), and education (5.5 per cent) Mining and quarrying contracted by 18.8 per cent, while manufacturing slipped 0.7 per cent GCC economy expenditure breakdown Exports of goods and services were valued at $1.259tn, making up 59.5 per cent of GDP, though declining 7.1 per cent year-on-year Final consumption expenditure — by households, non-profits, and government — rose 7.5 per cent to $1.245tn Total capital formation reached $601.8bn, up 5.5 per cent The data underscores the GCC's growing reliance on non-oil sectors to drive economic growth, even as global market conditions weigh on hydrocarbons.
