
Submarine exam resits ‘put Britain's nuclear deterrent credibility at risk'
The Royal Navy's Perisher course, which tests whether officers are made of the right stuff to take charge of a nuclear submarine, is revered by navies around the world because students only have one chance to pass its gruelling final test.
Yet the Navy has now admitted that students are being allowed to retake Perisher's final sea phase.
Former submariners expressed concern to The Telegraph about the change in policy, warning that the watering down of the course risked jeopardising the credibility of those in charge of Britain's nuclear deterrent.
There is growing public concern over the state of the Navy, with unprecedented numbers of ships and submarines unable to put to sea through a combination of mechanical defects and crew shortages.
Rob Forsyth, a former Teacher, or chief instructor, of Perisher in the 1970s explained that the course's famous pass-or-leave ethos had bred the best of submarine captains among Western navies.
'The commanding officer is akin to God and must not be thought to have a weakness,' said Mr Forsyth. 'My view then, and still is, that there were some who could, some who never could and a very few who could but lacked the confidence at first to know this and needed a push to show them they could be safe and competent COs [commanding officers].
'Some of these got there fine, always viewed as my success stories, but some remained marginal and had to be failed. To give them a second go would have been to weaken the whole concept of Perisher and undermine the relationship of trust between crew and captain who would know that he was a 'round again' qualifier.'
His sentiments were echoed by another former Teacher from the early 2010s, Ryan Ramsey, who said: 'I have two issues with reruns. First, if you've already seen the sea phase, you know the scenarios. That short-term familiarity can hide the true weaknesses the course is designed to expose.
'Second, this isn't a driving test. Passing Perisher means you're trusted to take a nuclear submarine and its crew into harm's way. If you fail, fail again, then pass, you may carry a credibility problem into command, and credibility is everything when the stakes are military, political and potentially catastrophic.'
Student evades four 'enemy' warships'
During Perisher, would-be captains are put in charge of a submarine under the watchful eye of a qualified Teacher. Students are put through a gruelling four-phase course lasting up to five months.
The final phase of Perisher is a practical exam with the student evading up to four 'enemy' warships trying to hunt down and sink the trainee's boat.
A naval insider said that if Perisher staff feel a student needs more experience, he can be sent back to sea and retake the course again later in his career.
'This normally only happens during Phases 1-3. It would be exceptional to happen on Phase Four but is not excluded,' said the insider. It is not known whether any current submarine commanders have passed after resitting Phase 4.
A Royal Navy spokesman said that 'unsuccessful candidates on the Submarine Command Course have been able to reapply since 2013' and said 'the high standards required to pass have not changed'.
'Candidates who are initially unsuccessful may go on to be reselected, but only once they have demonstrated their potential while gaining additional experience in the fleet,' the spokesman said.
Mr Ramsey said: 'In 2013, I became the first Perisher Teacher to take a rerun student – someone removed from the Submarine Command Course before the sea phase,' he said.
'I didn't ask why at the time; I wanted my assessment to be entirely objective. He was the lead student in the simulator phase, but when we went to sea, I failed him. Later, I learnt my predecessor had removed him for the exact same reason. We agreed as an organisation not to try that again.'
When asked if his statement claiming that students have been able to resit the Perisher course since 2013 was accurate, the Navy spokesman said he had nothing to add.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
Two men trapped in 60m Peak District cave rescued
Two men have been rescued from a 60m (197 ft) deep cave in the Peak working for Derbyshire Cave Rescue Organisation said they were called at 21:40 BST on Saturday to assist a group of four who had descended Eldon Hole, near Chapel-en-le-Frith, earlier in the rescue organisation said two adventurers had managed to climb out, but the other two men were unable to escape without from the team attended, with two cavers going underground while the others set up for a haul. The rescue team said the two trapped men were hauled smoothly up to the surface and everyone was out of the cave by 03:00 BST on Sunday.


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
If we have time to stream Netflix piffle, we have time to steam a pudding
In skittish mood during his tour of the Hebrides, Samuel Johnson devised a satirical meditation on a pudding in the style of a popular volume of religious homilies: 'Let us seriously reflect what a pudding is composed of.' The ingredients, he mused, are elemental: 'flour, that… once drank the dews of the morning; milk, pressed from the swelling udder by the gentle hand of the beauteous milk-maid… an egg, that miracle of nature'. And so on. Satire aside, puddings have been for centuries the foundation and ornament of our national culinary heritage. Even the French, swift to belittle the cuisine of these islands, are keen on them. 'Ah, what an excellent thing is an English pudding!' wrote François Maximilien Misson, visiting England in the 1690s. Several centuries later, Simon Hopkinson recalled with satisfaction an occasion when the Michelin rosette-laden chef Alain Ducasse dined at Bibendum, where he was so taken with Hopkinson's steamed ginger sponge pudding that he asked for the recipe. (A homely affair of breadcrumbs, flour, stem ginger, treacle and egg, the method is given in Hopkinson's recipe book, The Good Cook.) But have our historic puddings become an endangered species? A poll by YouGov for English Heritage finds melancholy evidence of popular decline, at least where homemade puddings (defined by the survey as a cooked sweet course, including pies and crumbles) are concerned. Two thirds of households in England, Scotland and Wales make a pudding once a month or less, while the remaining third never make one at all. By way of encouraging us to rediscover our traditional confections, English Heritage is offering a couple of pudding-inspired ice-cream flavours at its sites: sticky toffee, and apple crumble and custard. Ice cream now seems in danger of joining pizza toppings as a repository for random and essentially ill-advised flavour combinations: a summer pudding ice cream might have proved more appetising. Jane Grigson observed in her book English Food that puddings were 'some of the first victims of mass catering and manufacture'. Making them takes time (Hopkinson's ginger sponge needs to be steamed for two hours – about as long as it takes to watch My Oxford Year, the preposterous rom-com currently streaming on Netflix.) And time is the essential ingredient that many of us now lack. But there is also the question of the effort-to-enjoyment ratio. Hopkinson's ginger sponge is delectable, but some of the sturdier puddings belong to a less sedentary era. In Patrick O'Brian's Aubrey-Maturin novels, spotted dog, figgy dowdy and drowned baby are popular delicacies of Captain Jack Aubrey's wardroom. But Lobscouse and Spotted Dog, a recipe-book based on the food described in the novels, suggests that they might lie heavy on the insides of anyone not in the habit of running up the ratlines. The original purpose of many puddings, to provide as many calories as possible, as cheaply as possible, has now been overtaken by fast food. And the generations are dwindling for whom a steamed pud with custard was the nostalgic equivalent of Proust's madeleine. So perhaps the proper place for most puddings is a dignified retirement to volumes such as the forthcoming English Heritage Baking Book – to be revived, occasionally, by those of us with a yearning for a suet-based culinary hug with custard on top, and a two-hour film to watch.


The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Better design could make new homes cooler
There are two main issues driving the problem of overheating in modern housing (Overheated homes: why UK housing is dangerously unprepared for impact of climate crisis, 10 August). First, in order to maximise profit, developers often do the bare minimum required by legislation, without any consideration of the building's performance in use over its lifespan. This desire for economy also often leads to the reduction of natural elements (such as tree planting in urban areas), which may otherwise assist in tempering heat buildup. Second, too often we seek to solve fundamental flaws in the building design with bolt-on solutions, when instead we should design for climate resilience from the outset. The move towards air conditioning as a response to overheating problems illustrates this. Even the new Part O building regulations – which cover ensuring that homes do not overheat – allow the use of machinery rather than requiring an adequately responsive building fabric. Design expertise from environmentally minded professionals such as chartered architectural technologists can help to overcome these problems without using energy-hungry machinery. Considering the orientation of the building, incorporating a natural ventilation strategy and utilising materials in the building's fabric that mitigate heat gain can greatly reduce the risk of overheating. But such principles are often disregarded in order to cut costs. The climatic situation we find ourselves in requires a shift in the very basics of building design. The knowledge is available. It just needs to be HalliganChartered Institute of Architectural Technologists