South Korean conservatives looking for rebirth after election loss
FILE PHOTO: South Korea's ruling People Power Party floor leader Kweon Seong-dong sits during the impeachment vote of a plenary session for South Korean acting President and Prime Minister Han Duck-soo at the National Assembly in Seoul, South Korea, December 27, 2024. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji/File photo
SEOUL - South Korea's right is looking to remake itself after a massive defeat in this week's snap presidential election that left it with little power to challenge the ruling Democratic Party.
New leader Lee Jae-myung and his party now control parliament and the presidency with Tuesday's polls exposing the smouldering resentment in South Korea over former President Yoon Suk Yeol's botched martial law declaration in December.
The attempt at military rule led to Yoon's removal from office and the eventual defeat of the conservative People Power Party, which was unable to overcome divisions within the right and unify around a single candidate.
The defeat has left conservative leaders pointing fingers and trading blame as the party searches for a new direction.
On Thursday the PPP's floor leader, lawmaker Kweon Seong-dong, stepped down and called for the party to wipe the slate clean and rebuild the conservative movement.
"This defeat in the presidential election is not simply a judgment on martial law and the impeachment of the president," he said. "It is a painful reprimand to the divisions of the ruling People Power Party."
The party's presidential candidate Kim Moon-soo was unable to convince Lee Jun-seok, the nominee from the minor conservative Reform Party, to drop out, likely splitting at least some of the vote.
Former labour minister Kim won 41.15% of the vote and Lee Jun-Seok won 8.34%, to winner Lee Jae-myung's 49.42%.
A controversial figure for championing anti-feminist concerns and wielding support among young men, Lee Jun-seok was briefly the leader of the PPP, and had helped Yoon narrowly win the 2022 presidential election.
He later clashed with Yoon and was ousted from the PPP.
Lee told reporters on Tuesday that the PPP should have focused on reform rather than unifying candidates.
"That's the challenge given to pan-conservatives," he said.
Kim blamed infighting during the primary process that led to him filing legal challenges against the PPP after then-acting President Han Duck-soo resigned to contest the elections despite the party selecting Kim as its candidate.
The two men spent a week clashing over efforts to form a unity ticket.
"We picked our candidate in a way that even a small child thinks doesn't make sense... I think we need deep soul-searching and reform," Kim said on Wednesday as he kneeled in apology to party members and the public.
'TEAR DOWN OUR HOUSE'
Others pointed to the PPP's failure to fully separate itself from Yoon's unpopular and unconstitutional martial law.
"They failed to draw in moderate voters," said political commentator Park Sangbyoung. "Instead, Yoon Suk Yeol sided with far-right ideas, and Kim Moon-soo, who has a history of working with far-right groups, was their candidate."
Park said the "complete downfall" of the conservatives could damage Korean politics.
"To be a true opposing force against the Lee administration, they need to be reborn, even resorting to blowing up the party and creating a new one," Park said.
South Korea's conservatives have staged unlikely comebacks before. Yoon is the second conservative president in a row to be removed from office, after Park Geun-hye was impeached and jailed in a corruption scandal in 2017.
Shin Yul, a political science professor at Myongji University, said "until they clear the mess inside" it will be difficult for the right to stand up to Lee.
"Rather than crisis of conservatives, I would call it the falling of People Power Party because of its leadership that runs the party based on self-interests, not fundamental values," he said.
In the wake of Yoon's impeachment, then-PPP leader Han Dong-hoon promised that the president would resign and the party would help lead an interim government.
When Yoon and his backers rejected that plan and fought his removal, it divided the party and led to Han's resignation.
On Wednesday Han, who unsuccessfully ran for the PPP nomination, said the party needs to cooperate with the new liberal administration on economy and security but it must not compromise on challenging any effort by the ruling party to "destroy the judiciary system".
The PPP has accused the Democratic Party of trying to pass bills that they say are meant to shield President Lee, who faces a slew of corruption charges, from any further legal troubles.
"Please do not give up," Han said. "It is the last chance to end the same old politics and to establish politics that put the people first."
Lawmaker Park Jeong-hoon said in a Facebook post that the party must change if it wants to survive.
"We must tear down our house and rebuild it. This is not a matter of factions but a matter of the party's survival." REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
At G-7 summit, S. Korea's President Lee faces delicate balance in US-China rivalry
South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung and his wife Kim Hye-kyung (left) at the Seoul National Cemetery on June 6. PHOTO: REUTERS – As South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung gears up for his international diplomacy debut at the Group of Seven (G-7) summit next week, all eyes are on whether he will be made to pick sides in the Sino-American rivalry. Mr Lee has acknowledged that the South Korea-US alliance remains the foundation of South Korea's diplomacy and security, and has pledged to strengthen the alliance along with the trilateral partnership with Japan. But he has also said South Korea should not be made to choose between the United States and China and 'put all our eggs in one basket'. Mr Lee was elected with a 49.42 per cent mandate in a snap election on June 3 after his predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol's failed martial law bid saw the former leader deposed by the country's Constitutional Court. Mr Lee's win under the liberal flag, which traditionally prioritises relations with China and engagement with North Korea, has Washington watching his foreign policy directions closely, said Dr Lee Seong-hyon, a senior fellow at the Washington-based George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations. The previous conservative administration under Yoon had antagonised Beijing by openly taking sides with the US, and also seeding rife speculation of Chinese espionage and interference in South Korean domestic politics. During his election campaign, Mr Lee had taken a more centrist stance by repeatedly emphasising a non-committal 'pragmatic diplomacy' to maximise South Korea's national interests. Amid growing rivalry between the two superpowers, however, Mr Lee's vision, which requires a delicate balancing act between its biggest security ally, the US, and its largest trading partner, China, will likely be put to the test. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had earlier cautioned allies against playing both sides by 'seeking both economic cooperation with China and defence cooperation with the United States', during his speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual defence and security forum, on May 31 in Singapore. Mr Hegseth had also urged allies to increase their defence spending as regional deterrence against China. Seoul's share of the defence cost-sharing for US troops stationed in South Korea has been a major bugbear of US President Donald Trump, who has said that 'money machine' South Korea can afford to pay much more. Recent leaked plans about the possibility of the US redeploying its forces stationed in South Korea to other parts of the Pacific to exercise 'strategic flexibility' in its plans to contain China, also called into question the commitment of US security in the region. South Korea's participation as an observing country at the G-7 summit on June 15-17 in Vancouver is, thus, seen as important. Issues related to China, Russia and North Korea are expected to feature high on the meeting agenda. Besides the US, other members of the political and economic forum are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom. Seoul is also pushing hard for a face-to-face meeting between Mr Lee and Mr Trump on the sidelines of the meeting to ride on the momentum of the first phone call between the two leaders that took place on June 6. The 20-minute courtesy call had ended with an agreement to meet in person at the earliest possible opportunity for more in-depth talks. The call had taken place later than usual – three days after Mr Lee was elected – causing concern when it had not happened. Past South Korean presidents had traditionally spoken to their biggest ally either on the day of their election or the day after. A cryptic congratulatory message issued by the White House after the election had affirmed the 'ironclad alliance' between the US and South Korea , before going on to express concern over 'Chinese interference and influence in democracies around the world'. That had fuelled speculation that the message was a hint for the new Lee administration to distance itself from Beijing. While Washington does not expect Mr Lee's administration to 'diverge significantly from the established US-South Korea alliance framework', it will, nevertheless, be keenly watching any potential policy reversals, such as weakening ties with Japan while gravitating towards China and resuming inter-Korean engagement, Dr Lee told The Straits Times. Research fellow Lee Dong-gyu, from the Asan Institute for Policy Studies in Seoul, said the broaching of the idea of a US troop drawdown could be a diplomatic signal to South Korea to step up and play 'an augmented role' to contain China. 'But if the new government under Mr Lee pursues a revitalisation of South Korea-China relations, then it may result in the erosion of the US' containment efforts,' he said. While it is clear that President Lee's priority is in forging ties with Mr Trump and to iron out tariff negotiations before the July 9 deadline, rising tensions over Chinese-built structures in the South Korea-China Provisional Maritime Zone in the West Sea will also be an immediate test of his diplomacy tight-rope act, said international politics professor Mason Richey from Hankuk University of Foreign Studies. He added that Seoul needs to be prepared to respond strategically, and 'to be clear with China that even though they are economic partners, South Korea will not be easily bullied'. After his first phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on June 10, Mr Lee has called China an important partner to South Korea 'in all aspects, including economy and security' and that he looks forward to developing relations between Seoul and Beijing. Mr Lee has also asked China to play a constructive role for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula, to which Mr Xi replied that promoting peace and stability on the peninsula was a matter of mutual interest to both South Korea and China. Carnegie Mellon Institute for Strategy and Technology's non-resident fellow, Dr Troy Stangarone, told ST that while the new administration's repairing of relations with China is a priority after the deterioration of ties under the previous Yoon administration, it will need to 'take a realistic view of the relationship'. He believes that Mr Lee would likely have a bit more time before being made to pick sides between the US and China at the G-7 summit, as South Korea is ultimately not a member country but just an observer. However, he warns that 'geostrategic shifts and US-China rivalry may create limits to improving relations with China'. 'The Lee administration should focus its efforts on maintaining good economic ties while also working to bring China back as a constructive partner for dealing with the North Korean nuclear issue,' he said. Wendy Teo is The Straits Times' South Korea correspondent based in Seoul. She covers issues concerning the two Koreas. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
20 hours ago
- Straits Times
South Korea's new President Lee Jae-myung asks citizens to recommend Cabinet members
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung's Cabinet is now in the making. PHOTO: REUTERS SEOUL - South Korean President Lee Jae-myung's Cabinet is now in the making, and his office has introduced a 'public referral system' to take recommendations for the key positions from everyday people. Calling it a move aimed at getting the people involved in the president's personnel nominations, Mr Lee's office said it will be taking recommendations for Cabinet ministers, vice ministers and heads of state-run institutions from June 10 until June 16. Recommendations can be sent to the official website run by the Ministry of Personnel Management, President Lee's official social media accounts or by email. Those interested are to fill in the candidate's area of specialty, the candidate's personal information, such as name, gender, phone number and workplace, the reason to recommend the candidate and one's own information. Self-recommendations are accepted. 'True democracy begins when citizens exercise their sovereignty, get involved and make a change,' Mr Lee said in a Facebook on June 10. No specific restrictions are in place for South Koreans aged 14 or older submitting a recommendation for a nomination, Mr Lee's spokesperson Ms Kang Yu-jung said in a briefing. Mr Lee's office will collect data on candidates submitted to the National Human Resources Database and proceed with a vetting process to form a shortlist of candidates, a stage which will not involve citizen engagement. The presidential secretary for civil service discipline will participate in the vetting process, which would also involve an 'open' review, Ms Kang added. The presidential office has not elaborated on whether the number of recommendations a candidate receives could affect the president's decision-making process in his nominations. Grassroots recommendations for holders of public office was among Mr Lee's presidential campaign pledges unveiled at a press conference in late May. Before the briefing on June 10, Prime Minister nominee Representative Kim Min-seok was Mr Lee's only Cabinet pick. But later on the same day, Mr Lee appointed six more vice ministers of the Finance Ministry, Foreign Ministry and Industry Ministry. According to the presidential office, these vice ministerial appointments were made outside the public recommendation process. Mr Lee is currently working with ministers appointed by disgraced ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol. Mr Kim, the prime minister nominee, said in a news conference on June 10 that the introduction of a system allowing grassroots recommendations for minister posts is a 'very natural process in that democracy is in the process of expanding.' It was the latest move by the liberal president to get ordinary people involved in his decision-making process, as his administration has described itself as 'the government of popular sovereignty.' Earlier on June 8, Mr Lee revealed via posts on social platform X that a recent announcement of plans to broadcast reporters asking questions of officials of the presidential office live during briefings was based on 'a proposal he received through a reply to his social media.' He then added on the X post, 'We always take note of the various opinions of our citizens (online), as they often carry realistic ideas and suggest ways for a practical improvement.' THE KOREA HERALD/ ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
French Senate adopts Bill to regulate fast fashion, targeting China's Shein
PARIS - The French Senate on June 10 adopted a Bill to regulate the fast fashion industry by sanctioning companies and banning advertisements. The Bill is targeted at Chinese-founded e-commerce giant Shein, which has a reputation for selling lower quality clothes at a very low price. Easy to order and to replace, fast fashion items are exported to France on a large scale, causing pollution and saturating markets. The Bill, which had been adopted by the lower house, the National Assembly, in March 2024, was passed by the Senate on the afternoon of June 10, with 337 votes for and only one against. The vote is not the final legislative hurdle: a joint committee of senators and lower house deputies is expected to meet from September to produce a joint text, prior to the final adoption of the law. Before final adoption, the European Commission also has to be notified, to ensure the Bill complies with EU law. The Bill 'is a major step in the fight against the economic and environmental impact of fast fashion, and a strong signal sent to businesses and to consumers,' said the minister for ecological transition, Ms Agnes Pannier-Runacher, after the vote's results were announced. The text plans to 'reduce the environmental impact of the textile industry', said Ms Anne-Cecile Violland, the centre-right member of parliament who proposed the Bill. Fast fashion is a growing market in France, and between 2010 and 2023 the value of advertised products in the sector grew from €2.3 billion (S$3.3 billion) to €3.2 billion. Around 48 clothing items per person are released into the French market each year, and 35 are thrown away every second in the country, according to the state environmental agency Ademe. 'Triple threat' Ms Pannier-Runacher has called fast fashion a 'triple threat' that promoted overconsumption, caused ecological damage and threatened French clothing businesses. The Senate, dominated by the right, modified the Bill to target 'ultra' fast fashion companies, such as Asian websites Shein or Temu. The Senate's amendments plan to leave out French and European brands that may be affected by the Bill, such as Zara, H&M and Kiabi. The fashion giants will still be obliged to notify their customers about the environmental impact of their products, according to the new Bill. 'I have no intention of making French brands that contribute to our country's economic vitality pay a single euro,' said rapporteur Sylvie Valente Le Hir, member of the right-wing The Republicans party. The Bill will impose stricter sanctions on fast fashion companies by scoring their 'environmental communication'. This 'eco-score' will affect all fast fashion companies, Ms Pannier-Runacher said. Those with the lowest scores will be taxed by the government up to €5 per product in 2025 and up to €10 by 2030. This tax cannot go beyond 50 per cent of the price of the original product. Ad ban The Bill would impose sanctions on influencers who promote such products and ban fast fashion advertisements. The regulation of the fast fashion industry will only succeed with a 'collective effort', and not by targeting 'a single actor,' Shein spokesperson Quentin Ruffat told RTL radio on June 9. According to Ruffat, the law would 'impact the purchasing power' of French people. On June 9, France's Textiles Industry Union called the Bill as 'a first step' and hoped for its 'rapid adoption... even if the text does not entirely fit our expectations'. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
