
Young people in England's coastal towns three times more likely to have a mental health condition
This 'coastal mental health gap' means that young people in these towns, which include areas of Tendring on the east coast and Blackpool and Liverpool to the west, are suffering disproportionately, often alone and with no help, said the researchers who conducted the study.
Over the next year, the Against the Tide project from the Guardian's Seascape team will be reporting on the lives of young people in coastal communities across England and Wales.
Young people in many of England's coastal towns are disproportionately likely to face poverty, poor housing, lower educational attainment and employment opportunities than their peers in equivalent inland areas. In the most deprived coastal towns they can be left to struggle with crumbling and stripped back public services and transport systems that limit their life choices.
For the next 12 months, accompanied by documentary photographer Polly Braden, we will travel up and down the country to port towns, seaside resorts and former fishing villages to ask 16- to 25-year-olds to tell us about their lives and how they feel about the places they live.
By putting their voices at the front and centre of our reporting, we want to examine what kind of changes they need to build the futures they want for themselves.
'We don't yet know why these young people are being left out but one reason might be that they are not demanding the help in the way the older generation is, or if they are, they are not having their voices heard,' said Emily Murray, director of Essex University's centre for coastal communities. The study found that the opposite is true for older people living in the same communities, who were a third less likely to have undiagnosed mental health problems than people the same age living inland in similar areas of deprivation.
The Essex researchers, led by Claire Wicks, studied data from 28,000 adults across the UK to see how different generations experience life in Britain. They looked at the responses from adults living in coastal communities and inland in England between 2018 and 2023 who scored highly against a widely accepted measure of mental distress but where they had not had a diagnosis. Deprivation was determined using the official indices from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
Four years ago, a report by England's chief medical officer, Chris Whitty, found that diagnosed mental health problems were disproportionately higher among young people in coastal areas.
Separate work by the University of Essex and University College London (UCL), also seen by the Guardian, found a range of factors at play. These included higher levels of poverty but also lower rates of progression to higher education and higher crime levels in the places they live.
The primary explanation for the disproportionate levels of mental health is the economic and social challenges that people face who live in these communities, said Murray. Household incomes and private renting are key factors.
'Young people on the coast are more likely to be living in areas where incomes are lower and more families are renting from private landlords,' she said. 'On top of that they often live in areas that are geographically isolated, making it harder to reach places where there are more economic and healthcare opportunities.'
Ceilidh Bardsley, 21, who lives in Weston-super-Mare, described living in a town where it feels as if tourists are given priority. 'A lot of emphasis is put into the main seafront for things to look nice' she said. 'But then you look around the estates, and there are potholes everywhere, shop fronts are falling down and there's mould in many of the houses.'
Twenty-year-old Levi, who has lived in Southend all his life, said that it was an 'amazing' place. 'But growing up, seeing how many places have closed down, it feels like Southend is getting worse, not better. I couldn't imagine wanting to bring up children here.'
Separately, the UCL researchers went round the country talking to dozens of policymakers and local practitioners about what could drive change in coastal areas. Many said that what was needed was to champion young people's voices and focus on what local people need and want.
'I think letting people make decisions is massive, is so important in our town,' said one practitioner in Barrow, in the north-west. 'Don't bring consultants in to tell our communities what they need. Come and talk to us.'
Others talked about the need for long-term, sustainable public-sector funding to run youth services and community projects, and to train and retain staff, as well as for money to be targeted specifically towards young people in coastal places.
Prof Sheena Asthana, co-director of the Centre for Coastal Communities at the University of Plymouth, said: 'The Essex research confirms our own analysis that signals of poor mental health among young people, such as hospital admissions for self-harm, are disproportionately higher on the coast.
'The very high rates of undiagnosed mental health in deprived coastal areas suggest that the government might want to explore whether long waiting times for children and young people's mental health services are to blame.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Nurses ‘essential' but we ‘won't miss' GPs: readers react to NHS strikes
Reaction to the threat of new strike action by nurses and GPs has sparked passionate debate among Independent readers, with many expressing sympathy for NHS workers but differing on whether walkouts are the right approach. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) has warned its members feel 'deeply undervalued' and will ballot for industrial action after 91 per cent rejected the government's 3.6 per cent pay offer. GPs have also told minister Stephen Kinnock that the government must act on their demands to 'avoid a future dispute,' escalating tensions across the NHS. These fresh threats follow a five-day walkout by resident doctors over the government's refusal to grant a 29 per cent pay rise. Several commenters said nurses are 'doing the work of doctors' for far less pay, and pointed to years of below-inflation increases, rising living costs, and poor career progression as valid reasons for industrial action. Mental health professionals were singled out as particularly undervalued. Others criticised GPs for high salaries and part-time hours, arguing patient access has worsened even without strikes. Some readers said they 'won't miss' GPs if they walk out, though most agreed that nurses are essential. While a few readers questioned the effectiveness of striking, most called for urgent reform and investment to retain skilled staff and protect patient safety. Here's what you had to say: I won't miss them if they go on strike It's almost impossible to get an appointment with a GP, so I for one won't miss them if they go on strike. I accept I would miss nurses, as they are the medics I see if I ask for a GP appointment. My daughter is a mental health nurse — she has two degrees and is undervalued by the NHS and not valued by others in the medical profession. Pay is dreadful for nurses and even worse for mental health professionals. However, I don't believe striking will solve the problems of pay and conditions. The way to make the point is to vote with their feet and move abroad, into the private sector, or out of the medical profession. Some will say there are too many vacancies already — agreed — but even more will put on permanent pressure, whereas a strike causes only temporary disruption. HOSS Nurses doing the work of doctors Pay the nurses properly, as they now regularly carry out roles once in the purview of doctors. As has been said many times, it's difficult to see your GP face-to-face. Seeing a nurse practitioner is now the norm, and only if necessary are you referred to the GP. So why do GPs expect higher pay when nurses or trained practitioners are doing more? How many GPs work full-time, compared with part-timers? Chuckiethebrave We should all be out behind them I'm 100 per cent behind them. The money that's been taken out of the economy and given to shareholders — and not a word is said. We should all be out behind them. It wasn't long ago that people were banging pots and pans, supporting them — rightly so. The government is hell-bent on driving down wages and pensions. It's about time we stood up to this lot. LesMisrables The NHS is priceless It is very clear that most workers in the NHS feel undervalued and underpaid. For 14 years, a cynical Tory government has undermined their standard of living for ideological reasons — i.e. full privatisation. Our NHS is priceless. The electorate should kick out every government that doesn't fund it properly — because it's our lives at stake. Nomoneyinthebank All workers will strike eventually All workers will strike, eventually, if their salaries are reduced over a fifteen-year period and their standard of living is reduced. It is naïve to think otherwise. Cyclone8 If the NHS fails, get ready to pay I admit that it's difficult to get a doctor's appointment. We're having to wait longer for an ambulance and within A&E, together with there still being quite a hefty backlog on the waiting list — but it is coming down, albeit slowly. Despite the access issues, once you get NHS treatment, it remains exceptional. Since 2010, our doctors and nurses have effectively had a pay freeze, and, with inflation booming in recent years, our energy bills doubling, our groceries virtually doubling, and many nurses resorting to food banks, it's no wonder they're leaving for Australia in droves. I understand the current government were handed a skeletal economy, fractured public services, the highest taxes since WW2 and almost tripled national debt — but like any business, if you don't invest in your workers, they will leave. For those attacking unions, they are simply workers fighting for the equality, fair pay, working conditions and T&Cs that they deserve. Our NHS is a healthcare system to be proud of. It deserves proper investment — and that includes its workers. For the Brits who are against investing in our NHS workers — I hope you're rich enough to afford private healthcare. If the NHS fails, you'll need to start saving now for the hundreds of pounds it'll cost you each month in insurance. Amy Nothing for GPs I fully understand the nurses — they deserve better. My GP has notified me that they can't tell me the results of a scan for four weeks. That is just a telephone call. They deserve nothing, as far as I'm concerned. They can't handle what they have now, let alone more. Martyn Is £150,000 not enough? My local health centre has four full-time GPs. They have an average salary of over £150,000. Is that not enough? And it is still almost impossible to get an appointment. PeterLoud1 Shame on you NHS workers Shame on you NHS workers. Just as Starmer and Streeting were starting to sort out the NHS — I can confirm this, as my doctors' surgery appointments have got much, much better — and I've just had two cataract operations with a minimum wait of one week for the first eye and four weeks for the second. You got a good increase last year, and now you're starting to destroy the NHS. Jol Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day's top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click 'log in' or 'register' in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Cases of the world's most infectious disease keep climbing in the UK - with two major areas most at risk
Parents have been urged to vaccinate their children during the summer holidays amid a resurgence in potentially deadly measles cases. British health chiefs already sounded the alarm over a spike in cases earlier this year; last year saw the highest number of infections recorded annually since 2012. But experts are now concerned that travel during the summer holidays could lead to another surge in England when the new school term begins. A rise in measles infections, dubbed 'the world's most infectious disease', in recent weeks has already forced some nurseries to instate Covid-era infection control policies. One child in Liverpool also died last month —it is understood they were they were severely ill with measles as well as other serious health problems. Two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine offers up to 99 per cent protection against the illnesses, which can lead to hearing loss and problems during pregnancy. Without it, just one measles infection can spread the virus to 9 out of 10 unvaccinated people nearby. Yet, as few as just over half of children have had both MMR jabs in parts of London. Similarly low levels are also seen in Liverpool, Manchester and Birmingham. According to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), there have been 145 cases since the last report on 3 July, bringing the total since 1 January to 674 cases. London and the North West are driving the current increase, with the majority of infections in children aged under 10. Almost half (48 per cent) of the 674 cases for the year so far have been in London, with 16 per cent in the North West and 10 per cent in the east of England. The borough of Hackney in east London, has recorded the highest number of cases in the country at 79, the UKHSA said, accounting for more than one in ten infections. Dr Ben Kasstan-Dabush, Assistant Professor of Global Health & Development at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), said: 'It is no surprise that Hackney has seen the highest number of measles cases over the past four weeks. In 2023-2024, MMR coverage in Hackney was lowest by local authority in England and just 60.8 per cent had received both MMR doses by the age of five, compared with 83.9 per cent of children on average across England. 'Without this vital vaccine coverage, children have been left as sitting ducks for a measles outbreak. 'Hackney's population is unique and a "one-size fits all" approach will not solve the problem. Health experts have begged parents to check their child's immunisation status, warning that the public had 'forgotten about measles' and that it was still a 'catastrophic' illness 'The borough's population is diverse and younger, with almost one in three residents aged under 24. 'Local clinics and teams are working incredibly hard to protect children and prevent another child death from measles in the UK. 'But it is extremely difficult to sustain positive results when funding to commission vaccination projects and new professionals roles are short-term and unpredictable.' Dr Vanessa Saliba, UKHSA Consultant Epidemiologist, also said: 'The summer months offer parents an important opportunity to ensure their children's vaccinations are up to date, giving them the best possible protection when the new school term begins. 'It is never too late to catch up. Don't put it off and regret it later. 'Two doses of the MMR vaccine is the best way to protect yourself and your family from measles. 'Babies under the age of 1 and some people who have weakened immune systems can't have the vaccine and are at risk of more serious complications if they get measles. 'They rely on the rest of us getting the vaccine to protect them.' Measles, which mostly produces flu-like symptoms and the tell-tale rash, can cause very serious and even fatal health complications if it spreads to the lungs or the brain. One in five children who get infected will be hospitalised, according to estimates, with one in 15 developing serious complications like meningitis or sepsis. The MMR jab has been offered to children in Britain since the late 80s. But uptake collapsed in the late 1990s and early 2000s in the wake of a 1998 discredited study by Andrew Wakefield, which falsely linked the vaccine with autism. Tens of thousands of parents refused to let medics jab their children due to the bogus paper, published in medical journal The Lancet. Donald Trump's Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr earlier this year vowed to 'look at vaccines', to determine what was behind spiralling autism rates.


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Former NHS HQ in Sheffield should be demolished due to safety risk
A former NHS headquarters should be demolished because it is at risk of collapse following two fires, a report has latest blaze at Fulwood House, the former head office of Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, resulted in catastrophic damage including "a full collapse of the roof and a severely compromised first floor".The report to the trust recommended full demolition of the building due to it being an "ongoing safety hazard".A meeting was told the house had been empty since 2023 after staff and services were relocated and had remained unoccupied since. The trust's board of directors was told that the buildings on the site were highly accessible, which had created "persistent challenges" in securing it from recent months there had been escalating incidents of anti-social behaviour, including break-ins, vandalism and fire-related activity, it report added: "These concerns have culminated in two significant fire events affecting the derelict buildings in late May and early July 2025, with the second incident severely damaging the original Fulwood House structure." Housing plans The meeting heard how an independent structural survey of the building had found it was "deemed at risk of imminent and progressive collapse."Board members were told the site had been earmarked for housing by a property developer and the trust was now looking at the most cost-effective way to demolish the would include an assessment of any asbestos present in the building, although perimeter air monitoring found no detectable airborne fibres, the report added: "The trust continues to monitor and adapt security arrangements and is actively reviewing alternative measures and providers to ensure effective risk management at the site." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.