logo
Big tobacco urges government action to curb illicit trade and promote safer products

Big tobacco urges government action to curb illicit trade and promote safer products

IOL News14-07-2025
The South African tobacco industry appears to be pulling in the same direction in demanding a conducive regulatory and policy framework, including favourable and separate taxation for new tobacco cigarettes.
Image: File photo
Tawanda Karombo
Big tobacco industry players in South Africa believe the government can speed up transition towards less harmful products and effectively end trade in illicit cigarettes with better regulatory and policy attention to bad practices across the sector.
Tobacco cigarette manufacturers Britis American Tobacco South Africa (Batsa) and Polaris Manufacturing (formerly Gold Leaf Tobacco Corporation) last week traded accusations of fueling trade in illicit tobacco cigarettes through under-pricing and imports.
This comes despite the industry touting new tobacco products such as pouches and e-cigarettes as key in reducing the harm caused by combustion cigarettes.
The South African tobacco industry appears to be pulling in the same direction in demanding a conducive regulatory and policy framework, including favourable and separate taxation for new tobacco cigarettes.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
They say this will unlock fresh investments into the new tobacco products and encourage transition from combustible cigarettes that experts say are harmful.
This comes against the backdrop of growing adoption for the new products, according to Tommaso Di Giovanni, vice president for international engagements at Philip Morris International, who on Monday said uptake in South African cities such as Cape Town was picking up.
'We do see some product adoption in Cape Town. Some of these products like vapors are being adopted in Cape Town,' he said in an interview.
Di Giovanni feels though that the adoption of less harmful tobacco products in South Africa can be sped up with the adoption and implementation of the right policies.
'I think the progress could be much faster with the right regulation, with policies that encourage adoption,' he said.
Johny Moloto, the head of corporate and regulatory affairs at rival tobacco manufacturer Batsa, also emphasised that the harm from these new products was significantly reduced.
Moloto said that the harm in tobacco cigarettes comes 'from the act of combusting the cigarette and the smoke it emits, which contains all those toxins that can impact the consumer's health' as well as that of passive smokers.
However, other stakeholders such as health experts and the World Health Organisation are opposed to this. They argue that the harm emanates from tobacco and from the nicotine that is also present in pouches and e-cigarettes and vapors.
Nonetheless, Batsa reckons that proper regulation of less harmful tobacco products can help accelerate the transition to a smoke free South Africa.
Moloto said the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill being pushed by South Africa was adopting an 'almost prohibitive approach' as it was punitive than being an enabling policy.
'We hear that it will be self-enforcing [but] there's no enforcement instrument in that view.They want to put as part of that proposal, a ministerial Commission... if you give so much power to ministerial overreaching, the consequences could be very dire,' he said.
Both Batsa and Philipp Morris International say they are working on replacing traditional cigarettes with smoke-free products. Di Giovanni said the tobacco industry in South Africa was now shifting towards smokeless products.
Although Philip Morris International has a target of having two-thirds of its revenues coming from smoke-free products by 2030, it believes "it's important to expand the availability of the product" while countries such as South Africa had to ensure that investment friendly conditions for the industry were in place.
'Once the conditions are there, we will invest in commercial efforts, we will invest in communications, we will invest eventually in manufacturing where appropriate to make sure that people have access to the product. But again, the conditions needs to be there first,' Di Giovanni explained.
The South African Tobacco Transformation Alliance (SATTA) also fees that the South African government is putting the future of the entire tobacco industry at risk if it does not take swift action to end illicit trade in cigarettes.
Francois van der Merwe, spokesperson for SATTA, said expansion of the illicit sector was endangering the last remaining jobs in the industry and causing the government to lose out on potential tax revenue of approximately R28 billion annually.
'The solutions lie in greater cross-authority collaboration, a beefed-up SA Revenue Service presence in all cigarette factories, revoking licenses of those avoiding taxes and introducing a Minimum Retail Price of R37 for a pack of 20, which will make enforcement much easier for all law enforcement agencies,' said Van der Merwe.
BUSINESS REPORT
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Africa unperturbed by US visa policies affecting Zimbabwe
South Africa unperturbed by US visa policies affecting Zimbabwe

IOL News

time9 minutes ago

  • IOL News

South Africa unperturbed by US visa policies affecting Zimbabwe

US President Donald Trump continues to disrupt global diplomacy after a recent visa ban imposed on Zimbabwe. Image: Peter Zay / AFP The South African government appears unmoved by the recent visa ban imposed by the US embassy in Harare, Zimbabwe, even as US President Donald Trump continues to disrupt global diplomacy with tariff increases and immigration policies seven months into his second term. The US has suspended all routine immigrant and non-immigrant visa services to Zimbabwe due to concerns about misuse and overstays. However, the issuance of other visa types remains unaffected. Although South Africa was exempt from new Trump visa restrictions on SADC countries, a new policy has been implemented for Malawi and Zambia. Citizens of these nations are now required to pay a bond of $5,000 (R88,656) to $15,000 (R265,967) to travel to the United States. Additionally, the citizens are required to use one of three airports—Boston's Logan International, New York's JFK International, or Dulles International near Washington D.C.—for both arrival and departure. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ When asked whether South African citizens should be worried, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri gave a brief response: "We do not provide commentary on other countries' visa regimes, and this is our general position, it's not specific to the US." A senior government official, however, downplayed the likelihood of South Africans being affected by the US visa restrictions. "Remember Trump is only in our case because of the International Court of Justice case against Israel and our involvement in BRICS. Nothing more and nothing less," the official said. "South Africans visiting the US are mostly professionals who either go for business or a holiday. We seldom have citizens wanting to immigrate to the should have nothing to worry about,' he said. The US embassy explained that the reasons for the restrictions was because the administration was working to prevent visa overstay and misuse as part of national security. "The Trump administration is protecting our nation and citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process," the embassy said. "We are always working to prevent visa overstay and misuse." In June, the US imposed travel bans on citizens from 12 countries, with seven of them located in Africa. Additionally, heightened restrictions were applied to seven other nations, three of which are African. The US has issued a demand to 36 countries, predominantly in Africa, to enhance their traveler vetting procedures. Failure to comply could result in a ban on their citizens visiting the US. International Relations analyst Rejoice Ngwenya said it was unfortunate that the US had an obsession with immigration issues. "All democratic countries must encourage international country movements. However it is incumbent upon citizens that they don't abuse regulations. But one thing to acknowledge in terms of implementation of immigration laws globally is not to interfere and dissuade inter country movements of students because knowledge sharing and education is a universal right,' Ngwenya said.

Here's why employers can't use NDAs to hide harassment in the workplace
Here's why employers can't use NDAs to hide harassment in the workplace

The Citizen

time39 minutes ago

  • The Citizen

Here's why employers can't use NDAs to hide harassment in the workplace

NDAs are generally enforceable under South African contract law, provided they are reasonable in scope and duration, and do not violate public policy. Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) have been criticised for silencing victims of workplace harassment in several jurisdictions. However, unlike most countries, South Africa's legal framework provides protection against workplace harassment. If an NDA is found to be used to cover harassment, the employer could remain liable, regardless of the existence of the agreement. An NDA is a legally binding contract that ensures confidential information shared between parties remains private. This agreement is important for protecting trade secrets, business plans and other confidential data. Dhevarsha Ramjettan, partner at Webber Wentzel law firm, says NDAs are generally enforceable under South African contract law, provided they are reasonable in scope and duration, and do not violate public policy. ALSO READ: Can you get fired for being racist? Here is what employers and employees need to know Acts protecting employees The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA), the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA), and the Protected Disclosures Act 26 of 2000 (PDA) offer protections to employees who report harassment or discrimination. 'While the EEA does not expressly prohibit NDAs, any agreement that silences victims of harassment or discrimination arguably undermines the purpose of the EEA,' says Ramjettan. 'Section 6 of the EEA prohibits unfair discrimination and harassment. Victims may not be prevented from reporting such conduct to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), Labour Court or Equity Court.' Harassment in a workplace She says the Code of Good Practice on the Prevention and Elimination of Harassment in the Workplace (Harassment Code), issued under the EEA, aims to eradicate all forms of workplace harassment. It provides a formal mechanism for reporting discrimination or harassment. 'The Harassment Code also holds employers vicariously liable for employees' conduct unless they can demonstrate that reasonable steps were taken to prevent and address such behaviour. 'These provisions arguably prohibit the use of NDAs to silence complainants or avoid accountability.' ALSO READ: Corporate Mental Health Week: Is your boss a narcissist or a psychopath? Act that overrides NDAs Kanyiso Kezile, trainee attorney at Webber Wentzel, says section 2 of the PDA provides that any clause in a contract of employment or other agreement that seeks to exclude or waive rights under the PDA is void. This includes agreements preventing the institution or continuation of proceedings under the PDA. This statutory override invalidates any NDA (or other contractual term) that seeks to silence whistleblowers. 'Notably, the PDA defines disclosure broadly as any disclosure of information about the conduct of an employer or employee, made by a person who reasonably believes that the information shows, among other things, unfair discrimination as contemplated in the EEA or the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA).' Mental health of employees He adds that under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 (OHSA), employers are obligated to provide a working environment that is safe and without risk to employees' health, which includes the mental health of employees. 'If employers rely on NDAs to conceal harassment rather than address the underlying issues, they may fail to meet this obligation. As a result, contracts attempting to circumvent these responsibilities may be rendered unenforceable.' It is advisable that employers carefully review settlement agreements to ensure compliance with statutory obligations under the relevant legislation. 'Any clauses that prevent employees from reporting harassment or discrimination to regulatory bodies such as the CCMA, Labour Court, or Equity Court should be avoided, as these are likely to be deemed unenforceable and contrary to public policy.' NOW READ: Can a company to be held liable for employee's suicide?

Tau confirms revised trade offer made to US
Tau confirms revised trade offer made to US

Eyewitness News

time40 minutes ago

  • Eyewitness News

Tau confirms revised trade offer made to US

JOHANNESBURG - Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau said that a revised trade offer has been tabled to the US, as South African officials make concessions to Washington's calls to balance trade. The resolution was made at a Cabinet meeting last week. Tau said the new offer substantively responds to the issues the US has raised in the 2025 national trade estimates report. In a shake-up to address trade deficits, the US imposed 30% tariffs on imports from South Africa, the highest duty charged on goods from any sub-Saharan nation. The new offer submitted to US trade officials on Tuesday builds on the previous offer submitted in May.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store