logo
Hostility against churches a 'growing trend,' as study finds hundreds of attacks on U.S. churches in 2024

Hostility against churches a 'growing trend,' as study finds hundreds of attacks on U.S. churches in 2024

Fox Newsa day ago
Hostility toward churches across the U.S. remains alarmingly high, according to a new study from a Christian organization that has tracked such incidents since 2018.
In its annual "Hostility Against Churches" report released Monday, the Family Research Council documented at least 415 hostile acts targeting 383 churches across 43 states in 2024.
While that figure reflects a decline from the 485 incidents tracked in 2023, it is still more than double the number of attacks reported in 2022, and nearly equal to the 420 total incidents the group discovered in its first report, which spanned a 57-month period.
The report relied on publicly available data and found a cumulative total of 1,384 acts of hostility against churches from January 2018 through December 2024. The group acknowledged that this figure is likely higher due to cases unreported to law enforcement or by the media.
Vandalism was the leading offense against churches (284), followed by arson (55), gun-related incidents (28), bomb threats (14), and other incidents of assault, threats or disruptions (47). On average, there were 35 attacks against U.S. churches each month in 2024.
The report highlighted several instances where churches were targeted by repeated vandalism or acts of arson that caused devastating financial losses. In southern Ohio, four churches in two adjacent counties were targeted by arson and completely destroyed.
Gun-related incidents were the only category to see a notable increase in 2024, more than doubling compared to the prior year. Pro-abortion-motivated incidents fell from 59 in 2022 — when some churches faced attacks due to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade — to just two in 2024.
Anti-LGBTQ-related acts also declined but remained relatively high at 33 cases, most commonly involving the theft of Pride flags.
The report's authors clarified that anti-Christian hostility wasn't always the motivating factor behind violence. But the report suggested that declining church attendance and cultural shifts away from Christianity may be contributing to an environment where attacks on churches are more tolerated.
U.S. church attendance fell from 42% to 30% over the past two decades, according to Gallup. Additionally, about 80 percent of adults in the U.S. think religion is losing its influence on American life.
"With Christianity seemingly losing influence and respect in American life and fewer people feeling emotionally or spiritually connected to churches, there may be less societal pressure to discourage would-be criminals from targeting churches," the FRC report said.
In February, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias" that created a task force to investigate and halt discrimination against Christians by the federal government.
"The existence of such an order shows that even the federal government has taken notice of the growing trend of hostility against U.S. churches," the FRC report said.
The Trump administration's Office of Personnel Management also sent a memo to federal agencies in July enforcing religious protections for federal workers in the workplace.
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, who served as chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom during President Trump's first term, said in a statement to Fox News Digital:
"Religious freedom is seldom handed to the passive; it is claimed by those who exercise it even when a hostile culture says they may not. This report clearly shows religious freedom faces substantial threats here at home. The American woke Left has been intentional in spreading its hostility toward the Christian faith throughout every corner of America. We applaud the efforts of the Trump administration, but efforts must be taken at every level of government to protect and promote this fundamental human right. Christians must expect and demand more from their government leaders when it comes to prosecuting and preventing criminal acts targeting religious freedom."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent rips Pelosi, calls for single-stock trading ban in Congress
Bessent rips Pelosi, calls for single-stock trading ban in Congress

The Hill

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bessent rips Pelosi, calls for single-stock trading ban in Congress

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called for a ban on lawmakers trading individual stocks, taking a shot at former Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) in the process. 'I am going to start pushing for a single-stock trading ban, because it is the credibility of the House and the Senate,' Bessent said on Bloomberg TV on Wednesday. 'You look at some of these eye-popping returns — whether it is Rep. Pelosi, Sen. Wyden — every hedge fund would be jealous of them. And the American people deserve better than this,' Bessent added. His comments come as momentum for a ban on members of Congress trading individual stocks has ramped up amid increasing public scrutiny of stock trades. Current law prohibits insider trading by lawmakers and requires more disclosures, but critics say the law does not go far enough. 'People shouldn't come to Washington to get rich, they should come to serve the American people, and it brings down trust in the system because I can tell you that if any private citizen traded this way, the [Securities and Exchange Commission] would be knocking on their door,' Bessent said. Pelosi has come under arguably the most scrutiny for highly successful trades made by her husband Paul Pelosi, which she is required to report in financial disclosures. Pelosi spokesperson Ian Krager told The Hill in response to Bessent: 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions.' She has also endorsed a bill that advanced in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee last month that would bar not only members, their spouses, and their dependent children from buying and trading stocks, but also the president and vice president. Since the requirement would not apply until the start of the elected officials' next terms, it would exempt President Trump if enacted. Trump has said he would support a stock trade ban, but he attacked Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) for his support of the bill. Hawley later said Trump was under the mistaken impression it would apply to him. Over in the House, members of both parties have called for stock trade bans, with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) pledging to start a discharge petition to force a vote on another stock trade ban bill. Wyden's stock portfolio, meanwhile, saw a stunning 123.8 percent gain in 2024, according to data from the financial analysis platform Unusual Whales reported in the Salem Business Journal. Wyden's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It's not only Democrats who have come under scrutiny for stock trading, though. A report from the House Ethics Committee last month found that Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) violated the lower chamber's code of conduct when his wife traded stocks for a company in Kelly's district after the congressman learned nonpublic information about the firm. And Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.) has caught heat for continuing to trade stocks despite saying he wants to ban member stock trading. Bresnahan has introduced a stock trading ban bill and says that he has no involvement with the trades that his financial advisers have made on his behalf. While he has said he wants to keep his current financial advisers and create a blind trust that would put a more stringent firewall between him and those trades, he has found problems in crafting that plan with the House Ethics Committee.

Trump orders review of Smithsonian museums to ensure ‘alignment with American ideals' ahead of 250th anniversary
Trump orders review of Smithsonian museums to ensure ‘alignment with American ideals' ahead of 250th anniversary

New York Post

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump orders review of Smithsonian museums to ensure ‘alignment with American ideals' ahead of 250th anniversary

President Trump has ordered a 'comprehensive internal review' of exhibitions and materials at several Smithsonian museums to ensure the 178-year-old institution is putting America's best foot forward as its 250th birthday draws near. 'As we prepare to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our Nation's founding, it is more important than ever that our national museums reflect the unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story,' reads the Aug. 12 letter from the White House to Smithsonian Institution secretary Dr. Lonnie G. Bunch III. The Trump administration is ordering a 'comprehensive internal review' of a number of the Smithsonian's museums and exhibits ahead of America's 250th anniversary. AP Advertisement Citing one of Trump's executive orders from March, 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' the missive explains its goals and assures the Institution it has no intention of interfering with the day-to-day work of curators and other staff. Rather, it says the review is to help the administration 'support a broader vision of excellence that highlights historically accurate, uplifting, and inclusive portrayals of America's heritage.' The letter says the review will focus on several areas of interest, including an audit of exhibition text, wall signage, educational materials and social media content 'to assess tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals.' Advertisement The initiative 'aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.' Phase I of the review process will encompass eight of the Smithsonian's 21 museums, with additional museums to be reviewed in Phase II, the letter states. Included in Phase I is the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. The process will see curators and senior staff interviewed to help the administration better understand how works are selected and approved for display, and what 'frameworks' guide those choices, the letter reads. Advertisement Eight of the Smithsonian's 21 museums will be included in Phase I of the review process. Getty Images The administration plans to look over current and future exhibitions, particularly those planned for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. They'll also evaluate how existing materials and collections could potentially be put to better use 'to highlight American achievement and progress,' which could include them being sent to other museums. Each of the museums is being asked to provide 10 different types of materials to the review team, including all planned 250th anniversary programming, internal guidelines and governance, external partnerships, 'grant-related documentation' and more. 'We view this process as a collaborative and forward-looking opportunity — one that empowers museum staff to embrace a revitalized curatorial vision rooted in the strength, breadth, and achievements of the American story,' the letter concludes. Advertisement 'By focusing on Americanism-the people, principles, and progress that define our nation-we can work together to renew the Smithsonian's role as the world's leading museum institution.' The White House says it plans on completing its report early next year, which will include assessments, institutional trends and 'constructive recommendations for future exhibition strategy.' An email to the Smithsonian sent by The Post seeking comment was not immediately returned. Earlier this month, the Smithsonian was forced to issue a statement that it was not coerced by the administration into removing a placard from a National Museum of American History exhibit detailing Trump's two impeachments. 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the museum said in a press release, further explaining 'the placard … did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation.' The statement came after the Washington Post published an article claiming the takedown was the result of pressure from the White House, citing a person familiar with the exhibit plans. The Smithsonian said it plans to restore the exhibition — which is intended 'to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history' — in the coming weeks.

Trump Should 'Demand' Land Back From Russia, Ex-Appointee Says
Trump Should 'Demand' Land Back From Russia, Ex-Appointee Says

Newsweek

time13 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Should 'Demand' Land Back From Russia, Ex-Appointee Says

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump should "demand" key pieces of land located in the Arctic back from Russia during his meeting with Vladimir Putin on Friday, former U.S. Arctic Research Commission member Tom Dans says. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment. Why It Matters Dans's remarks come as Trump prepares for a summit with the Russian president in Alaska amid continuing diplomatic debate in Washington and among United States allies over whether territorial concessions or "land swaps" could figure in an end to the war in Ukraine. The summit has drawn international scrutiny because of concerns that U.S. diplomatic engagement might produce negotiated territorial changes in Ukraine—outcomes that European and Ukrainian leaders warned should not be imposed. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier," President Volodymyr Zelensky said in part, according to the Associated Press. What To Know In an op-ed published by The Hill on Wednesday, Dans, who was appointed by Trump to the U.S. Arctic Research Commission in December 2020, wrote that "If President Trump is going to be talking land swaps with Vladimir Putin later this week, maybe he can get some American land back, too?" The former Trump appointee says that both Wrangel Island and the De Long Islands matter, and "If we do not secure our periphery, we put our homeland at risk." Dans says that Wrangel Island "is the 'Gibraltar' of the Northern Sea Route, providing a key choke point on its eastern entry and hosting a modern naval base from which Russia projects force over the Arctic and American interests." Wrangel Island and surrounding areas are administered by the Russian Federation and host protected areas, including Wrangel Island National Park. Wrangel Island was first noted in U.S. documents in 1881. "Today, however, a recovery through negotiation and dialog may yet be possible. Finding a peaceful solution to Wrangel and the De Long Islands would be a very positive step in establishing a new relationship between the Russian Federation and the U.S.," Dans said. President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) shake hands during a bilateral meeting at the G20 Osaka Summit 2019 on June 28, 2019. President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) shake hands during a bilateral meeting at the G20 Osaka Summit 2019 on June 28, People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Truth Social on Wednesday: "Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin. Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, 'Putin has already won.' What's that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING. The Fake News is working overtime (No tax on overtime!). If I got Moscow and Leningrad free, as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal!" Trump continued, "But now they've been caught. Look at all of the real news that's coming out about their CORRUPTION. They are sick and dishonest people, who probably hate our Country. But it doesn't matter because we are winning on everything!!! MAGA" What Happens Next Trump and Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday. It is unknown if a ceasefire deal will be made that satisfies all parties.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store