UK launches probe into alleged solar fraud that brought down English council
LONDON, June 3 (Reuters) - Britain's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) said on Tuesday it had launched an investigation into a company that sold a bond investment scheme linked to solar farms that led to an English council being effectively declared bankrupt in 2022.
Between 2016 and 2020, Thurrock Council, a local authority in the eastern England county of Essex, invested millions into solar farms via a bond scheme sold by UK-based Rockfire Investment Finance and other firms operating within the Rockfire Group.
Thurrock accumulated huge debts of more than one billion pounds ($1.35 billion) in the process and was effectively declared bankrupt in December 2022 as it ran out of cash, forcing the council to seek central government support, hike local taxes and cut services for residents.
Rockfire has since entered administration.
The council said in a statement it welcomed the SFO's probe and would ensure the agency had access to all the information it required.
"It represents a vital step toward securing justice and ensuring accountability on behalf of our communities," Victoria Holloway, Thurrock Cabinet Member for Place and the Environment, said.
The council said that it had recouped more than 650 million pounds of public money from the investments. Last year it launched a lawsuit against Rockfire to recover funds.
As part of the probe, the SFO said it would compel financial institutions to provide information for the investigation.
($1 = 0.7404 pounds)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Police action on Bude properties at centre of crime issues
Closure orders have been secured for two Cornish properties at the centre of alleged drug crimes and anti-social and Cornwall Police said the orders for the buildings on Berries Avenue in Bude had been granted after officers received reports of suspected drug dealing, drug-related violence and anti-social force said reports included people visiting the properties at all hours of the day including some who had taken drugs, which led to further orders make it an offence for anyone to enter either address for three months. PC Nina Sargent said the issues involving the two properties had a "significant detrimental impact" on the local added: "Everyone deserves to live in peace and without fear of crime. "This type of criminal behaviour will not be tolerated and we will continue to take action against those responsible."A police spokesperson said the tenants of the properties had been signposted to necessary support services and officers would work with them while the orders are active to ensure future crime prevention.
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Police dogs ‘should get pensions'
Police dogs should be given pensions in recognition of their service to the country, ministers have been told. The Thin Blue Paw Foundation (TBPF), a charity for retired police dogs, said ministers had an 'ethical and moral obligation' to the animals which often cost more to care for in retirement because of injuries and health problems derived from their years in police service. The charity said it has provided grants of £380,000 to owners since it was set up in August 2020, to cover vet bills and care for them after they retire. It is estimated it costs as much as £250 more a month to look after former police dogs than other dogs. Kieran Stanbridge, chairman of TBPF said: ' Police dogs give the best years of their lives to the job. 'They throw themselves into dangerous situations without a second thought, they show unwavering loyalty to their handler and their job, and they give so much to help fight crime and keep the public safe. 'During their careers they receive the very best care and support from the force they serve with but, as soon as they hang up their harness, they're on their own, and the responsibility for their often-expensive care falls to their ex-handler or new owner. 'We believe that the Home Office, who allocate funding to police forces nationally, have an ethical and moral obligation to these dogs and shouldn't turn their backs on them when it's time to pay them back for everything they've done.' Bills can reach £2,400 a year There are around 1,700 serving police dogs in the UK, according to the foundation, and roughly 100 retire each year. The charity has launched a petition to push the Government for a ring-fenced budget to provide support for the owners of retired police dogs. Conditions such as arthritis can mean bills of up to £2,400 per year for pain medication, the charity said, and because these are pre-existing medical complaints they would not be covered by pet insurance. Mr Stanbridge said: 'Police dogs lead physically demanding lives and, when they retire – whether due to injury or age – they often have health problems as a result of their career, which can require expensive medication, therapy and management throughout their retirement. 'Taking on any dog is a responsibility, but taking on an older retired police dog with health problems is a huge commitment, particularly during the current cost-of-living crisis. 'We need to ensure that there is support in place for these heroic police dogs so that people aren't put off the idea of rehoming them when they retire and so that owners are never faced with the heartbreaking decision of having them put to sleep because they can't afford their treatment.' 'These dogs deserve our ongoing support' Julie Roy, a Police Scotland dog handler, was faced with large vet bills caring for retired German shepherd Keach, who worked for West Midlands Police before moving north of the border. Keach has arthritis in her spin and knee, and the Thin Blue Paw Foundation pays for her pain medication. Ms Roy said: 'Vet bills are expensive and our dogs have worked hard in their working life, putting extra strain on the joints and the body. 'These dogs deserve to have ongoing support when they retire, so they can access the medication and treatment they need having served their communities for so long.' Claire Bird, a fellow dog handler from West Sussex, adopted Fiji, a Belgian Malinois who worked for Surrey Police. She has required two operations, one for an infection of the uterus and a gastric procedure, and needs regular medication for allergies. So far the foundation has paid £10,000 for her care. Ms Bird said: 'I've kept all of my working dogs when they retire and, as any dog owner knows, taking care of them is expensive. But I couldn't turn my back on them after everything they've given. 'I believe that there should be more support in place for these incredible heroes when they retire. 'They do so much for us while they're serving and yet when they retire, the Government and the police turn their backs on them.'
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Model is hauled to court after being attacked by mother and daughter in furious nightclub toilets catfight
A model who was attacked by a mother and daughter in a furious nightclub toilets catfight has been hauled to court. Bethany Brown left 23-year-old Amelia Begg with a bloody nose after attacking her when she was slapped by Amelia's mother, Heather, 40. Violence flared in the ladies' toilet at the venue PJs in Warrington, Cheshire, after the trio were said to have got into an 'exchange of words' on February 2. The argument escalated after Heather slapped 23-year-old Brown in the face, prompting the hairdresser to grab Amelia's hair and punch her in the face as Heather tried to separate them. Amelia then punched at Brown and her mother joined in the assault. During the brawl, Amelia threw a further slew of punches at Brown until she was pulled away by another woman in the bathroom. But it did not end there, as Brown then responded again by repeatedly punching Amelia to the head before he was also pulled off by another woman. The whole incident was said to have lasted around 45 seconds. At Warrington Magistrates' Court, CCTV footage was played of the incident as the women pleaded guilty to using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause fear of or provoke unlawful violence. Elizabeth Browne, for the prosecution, said: 'The matter dates back to February 2 of this year. 'This incident arises from an altercation in the communal area of a public bathroom. There is CCTV of the incident. 'I suggest showing it to you rather than describing it as it speaks for itself. There was substantial use of force. 'Miss Brown grabbed the other lady's hair and punched her on several occasions.' CCTV shown to the court showed the inside the busy communal area of the nightclub's ladies' bathroom Women can be seen at the washbasins, while Brown, wearing a backless top and trousers, is standing at the door looking out into the club with her back to the camera. During the brawl, Amelia Begg, pictured, threw a further slew of punches at Brown until she was pulled away by another woman in the bathroom She turns around briefly before going back to the door when she becomes involved in a confrontation with the Begg women who are standing outside of the bathroom. One of the women, said to be Heather Begg, slaps Brown to the left side of the face. The women move out of the bathroom briefly after which Brown can be seen holding Amelia's hair and punching her whilst Heather tries to pull her off and separate the women. The fight moves into the bathroom area and Amelia punches Brown. Heather also punches Brown. Amelia then rains down a series of punches on Brown. Another woman pulls her away. Brown hits back and she repeatedly punches Amelia in the face. Another woman pulls her back. Peter Green, defending the model, said his client is the lady who is initially assaulted, adding: 'What is clear is that perhaps initially she was acting in self-defence, but then it goes beyond self-defence. 'However, she did not start the incident at all - it is the other two ladies who started the incident. They were the initial aggressors. 'My client's involvement was not sustained. It was for a limited period that she was committing this offence. At the start of the violence, she was the person being assaulted.' For the Beggs, Simon Dunn said in mitigation: 'Heather Begg was the person who precipitated the incident. There had been some interaction between the two parties. 'It was based on a situation Bethany Brown took exception to and challenged Heather Begg and you can see the exchange in the doorway. 'Heather Begg accepts she should not have slapped Bethany Brown, but Bethany Brown reacted to that, grabbed hold of Heather, and Amelia came to her mother's rescue. 'From Heather Begg's point of view, she was trying to separate the two parties. 'The officer in their summary says that there is an opportunity for all in the party to disengage at various points but that did not happen. 'It lasted about 45 seconds and certainly other women are involved. Punches were thrown towards Heather and Amelia. 'Amelia did end up with a bloody nose and bruising to the face and was in shock by the whole set of circumstances. She wished she had not been involved. 'This happened in February of this year, and there have been no issues whatsoever since then. There is significant remorse for what happened and what occurred.' JP Alf Bean said: 'That does not make good viewing, does it? 'Watching it was not pleasant, and I am sure that you are quite ashamed of yourselves for behaving like that.' He told Brown: ' We have heard representations on your behalf that you were initially the victim and we tend to agree with that. 'That is how it started. But you moved from a position of self-defence, you grabbed Amelia against the wall and were punching her. 'It was not a good situation to be involved in, and your copybook has not been blotted. 'We have taken into account that you have never appeared before the court before - make sure that you do not come back again.' Brown from Birchwood, Warrington who was fined £546 with £303 in costs, was dealt with separately from the Beggs from Great Sankey area of the town, who were each fined £615 with £331 in costs and surcharge.
