Student fees to revert to previous levels 'as things stand', says Lawless
Minister for Further and Higher Education James Lawless has said that "as things stand" third level students will have to pay €1,000 extra in fees this year compared to last year.
Mr Lawless said last year's €1,000 reduction in undergraduate fees was part of a cost of living package which included other supports such as energy.
Fees will have to be reset, as will energy, Mr Lawless said, and this means fees will revert to the same level they have been at for the last several years.
"All of us in any walk of life have to play the hands were dealt," he said.
"If I don't have a cost-of-living package. I can't do those kind of measures that were done last year."
"I do intend to wind down the student contribution fee over the lifetime of the Government," he added.
He said there are a number of measures that begin this September to help students with grants and an increased threshold for qualification.
"We have increased thresholds, and for the first time ever, a household income up to €115,000 would receive at least some form of support," he said.
He added: "That's higher than it's ever been, and we also have a number of different ranges of support so you can get."
Mr Lawless said he has spoken to Minister for Housing James Browne to see how student specific accommodation can be carved out from newly-implemented Rent Pressure Zone rules.
"Although it is fairly straight forward to work out rules for student specific accommodation on campus, it is more difficult to quantify the situation for students living in private accommodation," Mr Lawless said.
He said that they will have to work out a formula.
"Is it that the accommodation is always only rented to students, and does that mean it matches minimum standards," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
37 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Women TDs less likely to retain seats than male counterparts, study shows
Sitting TDs who are women are significantly less likely to retain their seats when they seek re-election than their male counterparts, according to the findings of new research on Irish election results. Gender emerged as strongly influencing the chances of an outgoing TD being returned to Dáil Éireann in a study which established a number of important factors in determining the re-election success of politicians. Most notably, being a woman reduced a sitting TD's chances of re-election by 10 percentage points even after controlling for a wide range of other potentially important factors. 'The gender gap in re-election rates appears to be consistent with Ireland's historic underrepresentation of women in politics,' the study noted. Before last year's general election, females had never accounted for more than 25% of all TDs. Although legislation was introduced in 2016 which required 30% of a party's candidates running for election to be female which was increased to 40% since 2023, the study said the effectiveness of gender quotas may be limited if there exists 'an inherent disadvantage for women facing re-election.' The study also found that being a senior Government minister will significantly boost an incumbent's re-election prospects. However, being a junior minister appears to have no impact on the likelihood of a TD retaining their seat. The research also offers little comfort for Government backbenchers as it found that TDs who are members of a ruling party but who are not in the Cabinet have a lower probability of re-election success. It is estimated their reduced likelihood of retaining their seat at being approximately 18 percentage points. The authors of the study explained that, unlike ministers of state, senior ministers appear to benefit from a re-election boost that is more than sufficient to offset a general anti-government vote. They calculated that being a senior minister is associated with a 24 percentage point increase in the probability of getting re-elected. The research – whose findings are published in the latest edition of The Economic and Social Review – examined the performance of incumbent TDs in seven general elections between 1992 and 2020 – a total of 1,140 sitting TDs over the timeframe. It found that 85% of sitting TDs contested the following general election over the period with 75% being successfully re-elected. Female TDs only accounted for 15% of incumbents, while just under 10% of sitting TDs held a senior ministerial position. The average age of sitting TDs was 53 years and the average number of previous terms served in Dáil Éireann was 3.7. It also found that a sitting TD's ranking in the previous election, in terms of the order in which they were elected, is also an important predictor of future success. The analysis established that an incumbent member of Dáil Éireann who was elected first in a five-seater constituency is 14 percentage points more likely to be re-elected than a TD elected last in a similar size constituency. When it comes to the age of a sitting TD seeking re-election, it has a positive effect on the probability of running and winning re-election for each extra year up to the age of 65, after which the effect changes and age becomes a negative factor. The research found that more competitive elections – in terms of the number of candidates – also reduces an outgoing TD's chance of being returned to the Dáil. For example, an incumbent in a five-seater constituency with 10 candidates has an 8 percentage points greater chance of being re-elected than one in a constituency with the same number of seats but with 15 candidates. The results also revealed that incumbents are less likely to run for re-election in more competitive constituencies. One of the report's authors, Paul Redmond, of the Economic and Social Research Institute and Trinity College Dublin, acknowledged that there were other variables that could be relevant to the success of re-election that were not included in the study such as campaign spending and the quality of non-incumbent candidates. The study also analysed the impact of voter turnout but found only weak evidence to suggest that an increase in turnout (due to greater participation by peripheral voters) had a negative impact on the re-election prospect of sitting TDs.
The Irish Sun
7 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Budget blow for thousands of Irish as €1k boost & one-off cash payments CUT in ‘roll back clock' move amid tariff fear
COLLEGE students are set for a €1,000 blow later this year when college fees return to their original level, Higher Education Minister James Lawless has confirmed. As part of a 3 Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe confirmed there will be no cost of living package in the upcoming budget Credit: Getty 3 Higher Education Minister James Lawless confirmed college fees will revert to €3,000 Credit: PA While fees vary from college to However, The Government are planning to Higher Education Minister James Lawless today confirmed that college fees will revert to €3,000 without a cost of living package in the budget. Read more in Money However, the Speaking on 'Things like energy credits were universally applied, 'The indications are – and we haven't entered budget discussions in earnest yet as we're engaged in the national development plan at the moment which obviously will have a significant uplift in MOST READ ON THE IRISH SUN 'So all of us in any walk of life have to play the hands we're dealt. Taoiseach Simon Harris speaks about Budget 2025 cost-of-living measures "If I don't have a cost of living package then I can't do those type of measures that we're talking about from last year.' Asked to clarify, the Minister said: 'The once-off supports – and they were phrased very clearly as once-off supports – are not being provided for as it stands because there is no cost of living package being made available. 'That may change coming into the budget. It's a matter for the Finance Minister more so than myself but that is what's coming. MAJOR SETBACK Senator Harmon said any such move would be a major setback for college affordability and a further burden on students and their families. She said: 'This Government is planning to roll back the clock when it comes to making college affordable. "Reversing the student fee reduction sends a clear signal that access to third-level education is not a priority for this administration. 'At a time when the cost of living remains sky-high and when rents in college areas are completely unaffordable this move would hit families where it hurts. It's completely out of touch. 'Last week, the Minister for Housing added insult to injury by rowing back on protections for student renters. Now, Minister Lawless wants to add financial pressure on top. "It's clear that this Government has no coherent strategy when it comes to supporting students." 'WHERE IS THAT AMBITION?' Labour is now calling for the Minister to urgently reconsider this regressive proposal. Senator Harmon added: "We have to ask – was last year's modest reduction in fees just a cynical vote-buying exercise ahead of the local and European elections? 'And what of the promises from Simon Harris, who made all the right noises about reducing fees to zero? Where is that ambition now? "Instead, students are being told to tighten their belts again while this Government boasts about budget surpluses." She continued: 'We need long-term thinking when it comes to education – not short-term accounting. College should not be a luxury. "If the Government goes ahead with this hike, it will be a deeply unpopular move from an increasingly unpopular Government." 3 As part of a cost of living package in last year's budget, college fees were temporarily cut by €1,000 Credit: Getty - Contributor
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Minister indicates universal college fee cuts of €1000 won't be replicated in next budget
MINISTER FOR FURTHER and Higher Education James Lawless has indicated that a universal cut to college fees for all undergraduate students in Ireland will not be replicated in this year's budget. This would mean that many third-level undergraduate students whose fees have been cut from €3,000 to €2,000 will see the fees revert to what they were previously. Speaking on This Week with Justin McCarthy, Lawless said that the previous fee cuts were linked to a cost of living package that was included within the last budget. The package is no longer looking to be a feature in the upcoming budget, meaning that there is no longer the supports to facilitate such a cut. Energy credits would also be affected, Lawless said. He outlined a number of other measures that are in place to help families and students with the cost of fees, although these measures are not universal. 'The once off supports, and they were phrased and very clearly described as once off at the time, are not being provided for as it stands, because there's no cost of living package being made available. Advertisement 'That may change coming into the budget. That's a matter for the finance ministers more so than myself. But you know, that is what's coming,' he said. 'Fees will reset, as with energy costs, as with the welfare system, as with every other means test,that payment across government will revert to what it was before cost of living packages.' He added that the programme for government has committed to reducing the student contribution fee, reducing the financial burden one families and students, and to do both in a financially stable way. 'I absolutely intend to do that over the lifetime of the government,' he said. Labour's Further and Higher Education Spokesperson Senator Laura Harmon criticised the Minister's plans to reverse the reduction in fees, saying that it would be a major setback for college affordability and a further burden on students and their families. 'At a time when the cost of living remains sky-high and when rents in college areas are completely unaffordable this move would hit families where it hurts,' Harmon said. 'It's completely out of touch.' She called on Lawless to reconsider the proposal. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
