logo
Hobbs vetoes Republican bill that would have brought ICE agents into Arizona schools

Hobbs vetoes Republican bill that would have brought ICE agents into Arizona schools

Yahoo19-04-2025

An opponent of the Arizona ICE Act displays a poster referencing the message welcoming refugees inscribed on the Statue of Liberty at the Arizona Capitol on Feb. 10, 2025. Republican lawmakers have moved to require cooperation between ICE officials and every law enforcement agency in the state, which critics say could help facilitate President Donald Trump's mass deportation plans. Photo by Gloria Gomez | Arizona Mirror
A Republican effort to boost President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign in Arizona and force schools to open their doors to ICE agents was shut down by Gov. Katie Hobbs, who wielded her veto pen to reject the plan on Friday.
'Arizonans, not Washington, DC politicians, must decide what's best for Arizona,' the Democrat wrote in her veto letter of the Arizona ICE Act.
Senate Bill 1164, named the Arizona Immigration Cooperation and Enforcement Act, would have mandated that every police department and sheriff's office in the state comply when ICE asks them to hold onto a prisoner.
Such detainers, also called ICE holds, are written requests to law enforcement officials to keep an arrested person in custody for 48 hours after that person is scheduled to be released — even if they haven't been convicted of a crime — to give immigration agents time to determine deportation eligibility.
The requests don't require probable cause and it is currently optional for law enforcement agencies to comply with them.
Some cities, in light of lawsuits following erroneously issued ICE detainers, have approved ordinances forbidding compliance with them. Just this week, a U.S. citizen was forced to spend the night in a Florida jail on an ICE hold, even after his mother showed a judge his birth certificate. Law enforcement agencies in Florida are required by state law to comply with ICE detainers.
The measure would also have prohibited the state, cities and even school boards from passing policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. In light of Trump's executive order that restored the ability of ICE agents to carry out immigration enforcement actions in previously protected spaces, like churches and schools, multiple school boards across the country have moved to bar ICE agents from school grounds without judicial warrants.
In January, Phoenix Union High School District's governing board adopted a policy that declared its schools are safe zones from immigration enforcement and prohibited letting people who would disrupt an educational setting onto any of its campuses.
In her veto explanation, Hobbs said she disagrees with the Trump administration's approach to immigration enforcement and touted her own initiatives addressing fentanyl at the ports of entry and targeting cartel operations. The Democrat has long favored solutions that center on partnering with local law enforcement agencies and increasing funding instead of criminalizing people and issuing mandates.
'I will continue to work with the federal government on true border security, but we should not force state and local officials to take marching orders from Washington, DC,' Hobbs wrote.
The legislation sparked weekly protests from Latino and immigrant rights organizations, who denounced it as a new iteration of SB1070, the state's notorious 'show me your papers law' from 2010 that gave police officers the power to question a person's immigration status during routine traffic stops and critics say resulted in rampant racial profiling.
Alejandra Gomez, the executive director for Living United for Change in Arizona, a progressive organization that led the protests against the Arizona ICE Act, celebrated the veto in a written statement.
'Governor Hobbs' veto of the Arizona ICE Act is a critical victory for our communities and a powerful rejection of Trump's mass deportation agenda,' she said. 'Today, the Governor sent a clear message: Arizona will not be bullied into becoming a tool of federal overreach and extremist politics. We thank her for standing with immigrant families, defending local control, and showing the courage this moment demands.'
The Arizona ICE Act was a top priority for the Republican legislative majority, which has focused its efforts this session on supporting the White House's anti-immigrant agenda.
Whether this is the end of the road for the Arizona ICE Act remains to be seen. The last time Hobbs killed a GOP priority bill focused on immigration enforcement, Republicans responded by packaging it into a ballot referral. That referral, titled the Secure Border Act, made it a state crime for migrants to cross the southern border anywhere but at an official port of entry — and nearly 63% of Arizonans cast their ballots in favor of it last year.
The veto drew criticism from the Republican Governors Association, which works to ensure GOP candidates are elected to lead states across the country.
'Katie Hobbs' veto is no surprise — her record on the border is pitiful. Hobbs tried to fool Arizonans into thinking she was a border hawk, but this veto shows she is unserious about addressing the border and protecting Arizonans from the violence and drugs coming into the state,' RGA Director Kollin Crompton said in a written statement.
Hobbs faces reelection in 2026, and Republicans have sought to frame her as weak on border security to mobilize voters against her.
Concern over the southern border ranked at the top of voter priorities in the last election. The Democrat has tried to straddle the line by supporting harsh immigration policies at the federal level and opposing anti-immigrant proposals at the state level. Congress' approval of the Laken Riley Act, which broadened the scope of ICE detainers for even nonviolent crimes, including shoplifting, prompted Hobbs' strong praise via social media.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks
Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Diplomatic win for UK hosting US-China trade talks

Sky News understands that the Trump administration approached the UK government to ask if it would host round two of the US-China trade talks. This is a useful 'diplo-win' for the UK. The first round was held in Geneva last month. News of that happening came as a surprise. The Chinese and the Americans were in the midst of a Trump-instigated trade war. President Trump was en route to Saudi Arabia and suddenly we got word of talks in Switzerland. They went surprisingly well. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent and his Chinese counterpart He Lifeng, met face-to-face and agreed to suspend most tariffs for 90 days. But two weeks later, the Trump administration accused Beijing of breaking the agreements reached in Geneva. Beijing threw the blame back at Washington. On Wednesday, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spoke by phone. The Chinese claimed this call was at the Americans' request. Either way, the consequence was that the talks were back on track. "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal," President Trump said this week. From that call came the impetus for a second round of talks. A venue was needed. In stepped the UK at short notice. Beyond being geographically convenient, UK government sources suggest that Britain is geopolitically in the right place right now to act as this bridge and facilitator. The UK-China relationship is in the process of a "reset". Other locations, like Brussels or other EU capitals, would have been less workable. Crucially too, for the UK, this is also potentially advantageous as it seeks to get its own UK-US trade agreement, to eliminate or massively reduce tariffs, over the line. Talks on reaching the "implementation phase" have been near-continuous since the announcement last month, but having the American principals in London is a plus. Sideline talks are possible, but even the presence of the US team in the UK is helpful. Read more from Sky News:Man wrongly deported from US to El Salvador has been returned to face criminal chargesMore than 40 'narco-boat' drug smugglers arrested in major police sting For all the chaos that President Trump is causing with his tariffs, he has instigated face-to-face conversations as he seeks resets. Key players are sitting down around tables - yes, to untangle the trade knots which Trump tied, but this whole episode has pulled foes together around the same table; it has forced relationships and maybe mutual understanding. That's useful. And for this next round, between superpowers, the UK is the host. Also useful.

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants
Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Boston Globe

time21 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Healey touts state tuition savings, criticizes federal cuts to Pell Grants

Overall, MASSGrant Plus Expansion program saved more than 34,000 Massachusetts students an estimated $110 million in the 2023-2024 academic year, the statement said. More than 7,730 middle income students saved an average of $3,856 each, according to data from the state Department of Higher Education, the statement said. Advertisement In the same statement, Healey urged the US Senate to reject Pell Grant cuts included in the federal budget reconciliation bill recently passed by Republicans in the U.S. House and supported by President Trump. The proposed cuts and eligibility restrictions would results in 42,000 Massachusetts students at public institutions losing $57 million in funding each year, according to Healey's statement said. 'Massachusetts is home to the best schools in the country, but we need to make sure that they are affordable for all of our students,' Healey's statement said. 'That's why I took action to increase financial aid at our public colleges and universities, which has already lowered costs for tens of thousands of students.' The drastic cuts proposed to the Pell Grant program would 'roll back the progress we have made and increase costs,' Healey said. Advertisement 'This is bad for our students and bad for our economy, as it would hold back our next generation of workers from being able to afford to go to school,' she said. Healey announced $62 million in new state funding to expand the MASSGrant program during a ceremony at Salem State University in November 2023. The new funding covered the full costs of tuition and mandatory instructional fees for Pell Grant-eligible students, and as much as half for middle-income students. Middle-income students are those whose families earn between $73,000 and $100,000 annually in adjusted gross income. The program was retroactive to the start of the fall 2023 semester for Massachusetts students at the states public institutions, including its 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and four University of Massachusetts undergraduate campuses. Funding for the expansion of the program also drew on $84 million Healey and the legislature had set earmarked for financial aid expansion in the FY24 budget, Healey's office said at the time. 'The dramatic enrollment increases our community colleges have seen over the last two years make it clear that free community college and expanded financial aid is a game changer for students in Massachusetts,' Luis Pedraja, chair of the Community College Council of Presidents, and president of Quinsigamond Community College said in the statement. 'The proposed Pell eligibility changes would be devastating to our students' ability to afford higher education and the community college presidents in Massachusetts urge the Senate to reject this ill-advised change,' Pedraja said. Education Secretary Patrick Tutwiler said he feared the impacts proposed cuts could have on students who struggle to afford college. Advertisement 'Low-income students deserve to go to college just as much as their higher income peers, and these changes are going to take us backwards – increasing dropout rates and leaving students saddled with more debt and no degree," Tutwiler said in the statement. Tonya Alanez can be reached at

17 News' political analysts break down Trump and Musk feud
17 News' political analysts break down Trump and Musk feud

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

17 News' political analysts break down Trump and Musk feud

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KGET) — Some Democrats are calling the online feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk a messy breakup…coining it, 'the Real Housewives of Pennsylvania Ave.' 17 News political analysts, Neel Sannappa and Cathy Abernathy, joined 17 News at 5 to discuss the jabber between Musk and Trump. Watch the full interview in the player above for the full 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store