New insight into Texas family detention reveals adults fighting kids for clean water
Families shared their testimonies with immigrant advocates filing a lawsuit to prevent the Trump administration from terminating the Flores Settlement Agreement, a '90s-era policy that requires immigrant children detained in federal custody be held in safe and sanitary conditions.
The agreement could challenge President Donald Trump's family detention provisions in his 'big, beautiful' bill of tax breaks and spending cuts, which also seeks to made the detention time indefinite and comes as the administration ramps up arrests.
'At a time when Congress is considering funding the indefinite detention of children and families, defending the Flores Settlement is more urgent than ever,' Mishan Wroe, a senior immigration attorney at the National Center for Youth Law, said in a statement Friday.
Advocates with the center, as well as the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, RAICES and Children 's Rights contacted or visited children and their families held in two Texas family detention centers in Dilley and Karnes, which reopened earlier this year.
The conditions of the family detention facilities were undisclosed until immigration attorneys filed an opposing motion Friday night before a California federal court.
The oversight of the detention facilities was possible because of the settlement, and the visits help ensure standards compliance and transparency, said Sergio Perez, the executive director of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law. Without the settlement, those overseeing the facilities would lose access to them and could not document what is happening inside.
Out of 90 families who spoke to RAICES since March, 40 expressed medical concerns, according to the court documents. Several testimonies expressed concern over water quantity and quality.
Emails seeking comment were sent to the Office of Attorney General Pam Bondi and to CoreCivic and Geo Group, which operate the detention facilities in Dilley and Karnes, Texas, respectively. There was no response from either Bondi's office or the operators of the facilities by midday Saturday.
One mother was told she would have to use tap water for formula for her 9-month-old, who had diarrhea for three days after, and a 16-year-old girl described people scrambling over each other for water.
'We don't get enough water. They put out a little case of water, and everyone has to run for it," said the declaration from the girl held with her mother and two younger siblings at the Karnes County Immigration Processing Center. 'An adult here even pushed my little sister out of the way to get to the water first.'
Faisal Al-Juburi, chief external affairs officer for RAICES, said Friday in a statement that the conditions 'only serve to reinforce the vital need for transparent and enforceable standards and accountability measures," citing an 'unconscionable obstruction of medical care for those with acute, chronic, and terminal illnesses.'
One family with a young boy with cancer said he missed his doctor's appointment after the family was arrested following their attendance to an immigration court hearing. He is now experiencing relapse symptoms, according to the motion. Another family said their 9-month old lost over 8 pounds (3.6 kilograms) while in detention for a month.
Children spoke openly about their trauma during visits with legal monitors, including a 12-year-old boy with a blood condition. He reported his feet became too inflamed to walk, and even though he saw a doctor, he was denied further testing. Now, he stays mostly off his feet. 'It hurts when I walk,' he said in a court declaration.
Arrests have left psychological trauma. A mother of a 3-year-old boy who saw agents go inside his babysitter's home with guns started acting differently after detention. She said he now throws himself on the ground, bruises himself and refuses to eat most days.
Growing concerns as ICE ramps up operations
Many of the the families in detention were already living in the U.S. which reflects the recent shift from immigration arrests at the border to internal operations.
Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and main architect of Trump's immigration policies, said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers would target at least 3,000 arrests a day, up from about 650 a day during the first five months of Trump's second term.
Leecia Welch, the deputy legal director at Children's Rights said that as bad as facility conditions are, they will only get worse as more immigrants are brought in.
'As of early June, the census at Dilley was around 300 and only two of its five areas were open," Welch said of her visits. "With a capacity of around 2,400 – it's hard to imagine what it would be like with 2,000 more people.'
Pediatricians like Dr. Marsha Griffin with the American Academy of Pediatrics Council said they are concerned and are advocating across the country to allow pediatric monitors with child welfare experts inside the facilities.
Future of detention without Flores agreement
The Flores agreement is poised to become more relevant if Trump's legislation called the ' One Big Beautiful Bill Act ' passes with the current language allowing the indefinite detention of immigrant families, which is not allowed under the Flores agreement.
Trump's legislation approved by the House also proposes setting aside $45 billion in funding, a threefold spending increase, over the next four years to expand ICE detention of adults and families. The Senate is now considering that legislation.
Under these increased efforts to add more detention space, GeoGroup, the same corporation operating the detention facility in Karnes, will soon be opening an infamous prison — which housed gangsters Al Capone and Machine Gun Kelly — for migrant detention in Leavenworth, Kansas.
Immigration advocates argue that if the settlement were terminated, the government would need to create regulations that conform to the agreement's terms.
'Plaintiffs did not settle for policy making— they settled for rulemaking," the motion read.
The federal government will have a chance to submit a reply brief. A court hearing is later scheduled for mid-July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump officials move to sanction lawyer who tried to block client's deportation
The US Department of Justice is seeking sanctions against a lawyer who sought to block the deportation of his client, in another sign the Trump administration is ramping up its efforts to enact mass deportations. Earlier this year, Joshua Schroeder, a California-based attorney, was able to briefly delay the deportation of his client, a Hmong man from Laos, through several court filings. The Trump administration filed a sanctions motion against Schroeder, Politico reported last week, and argued that the attorney made 'myriad meritless contentions' in his filings and a 'pattern of knowing or reckless misrepresentations'. The justice department is seeking 'substantial' monetary sanctions. Schroeder's attempt to block his client's removal were ultimately unsuccessful. The motion by the justice department comes as Donald Trump has pledged to crack down on immigration attorneys and firms engaging in 'unscrupulous behavior … that undermine immigration enforcement'. The president signed a memorandum in March instructing the US attorney general to prioritize sanctions against attorneys and firms that pursue 'frivolous, unreasonable, or vexatious' lawsuits against the government. But advocates and civil rights organizers have warned the policies are meant to hamper the work of immigration lawyers, and fear Trump is weaponizing the justice department against those opposed to his agenda. Schroeder appears to be the first attorney individually targeted by the administration following the March memo. He told Politico the sanctions motion reminded him of Trump's orders targeting large law firms associated with people the US president considers enemies, and appeared to be part of a broader strategy. 'They're able to go all the way down to the very bottom, that's where I am – no offense to myself … It's top to bottom. It's not just this elite struggle,' he told the outlet. Schroeder is a solo practitioner whose firm focuses on constitutional law, intellectual property and immigration law, and a legal scholar who has previously written about how attorneys can use habeas corpus to get immigrants out of detention. Schroeder's client is a Hmong immigrant who came to the US as a child and later served time in prison for attempted murder. He lived in Oklahoma with his wife when he was taken into custody by US immigration customs and enforcement during an April check-in. The attorney was representing his client pro bono, and in May filed an emergency motion in a Texas court to prevent his removal from the US. Schroeder argued that deporting him to Laos would put him in 'direct threat to life and limb' because of the role of the Hmong aiding the US during the Vietnam war. In his filings, Schroeder highlighted the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act in its deportation efforts, and argued the government could use that to 'apply to any immigrant or disfavored U.S. citizen'. While Schroeder was able to temporarily block his client's removal, he was moved to a facility in Guam and eventually deported in June after another judge dismissed the case, ruling that the government was deporting him not under the AEA but the Immigration Nationality Act. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The Trump administration argued that Schroeder should be sanctioned for his conduct, and that he knowingly made baseless accusations against the government and acted in bad faith, 'maintaining positions without bases in fact and law'. 'Having been warned multiple times that his client had a valid removal order, Schroeder nevertheless persisted in delaying the lawful execution of that order,' the government's filing said, adding that he 'refused to give straight answers' regarding the grounds for his claims. 'That is not the conduct of a forthright but mistaken advocate. His evasiveness evidences knowledge of his guilt and an unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions.' Schroeder told Politico he was working 'under very heightened pressure' to prevent his client from being moved outside the US. He does not expect the motion to be successful, but speculated the filing was intended to punish him and could discourage other lawyers from taking on certain cases. 'I think this motion for sanctions is not going to work, but it might do what they want it to do anyway,' he said. The Department of Justice declined to offer comment outside the filing.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
No, Kemi Badenoch – housing asylum seekers in tents won't solve our immigration problem
Kemi Badenoch might say that she was 'only asking a question' when she said, at a meeting with protesters against an asylum hotel in Epping: 'Is it possible for us to set up camps and police that, rather than bringing all of this hassle into communities?' But it wouldn't be a good idea. While the answer is yes – it is technically possible to build tent villages away from population centres to house those applying for refugee status – these camps would always be close to somewhere. Badenoch's question is an example of the politics of 'far away' that has always afflicted thinking about asylum-seekers. Even Tony Blair considered a detention camp on the island of Mull, which seems empty and far away from London – but people live there, too, and in the end he decided that he was also only asking a question. He also thought about using the Falklands for an asylum processing centre, and the last Conservative government went through Ascension Island and St Helena before finally devising a scheme that was the ultimate 'far away', to deport arrivals to Rwanda without even considering their applications for asylum. And Rwanda only ever had the capacity to take a few hundred migrants, which would have been insignificant against the 50,000 that have arrived by small boat in little more than a year of the Labour government. While the cross-Channel traffic is high, putting asylum-seekers 'somewhere else' does not solve the problem. Nor would processing asylum claims more quickly – although that would end the need for hotels, because migrants accepted as refugees or granted leave to remain would be allowed to work and would be able to support themselves. But that would not solve the problem of the small boats continuing to arrive, which is what is so damaging to people's confidence that the government is in control of immigration. That is the problem that Badenoch ought to be addressing, instead of talking vaguely of 'camps'. Indeed, what is notable about the reporting of the psychologically significant 50,000-mark being passed is how little the condemnation of the Labour government for 'losing control of our borders' is matched by practical suggestions for regaining control of them. This is not surprising in Badenoch's case, because it was the previous government that lost control of the sea border in the first place – as Jacqui Smith, who was Labour's minister for the media round this morning, fairly pointed out. The Conservative case against Labour rests on two flimsy arguments. One is that Labour cancelled the Rwanda scheme, which was 'just about to work'. The other is that Badenoch is edging towards repudiating the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Neither is convincing. The Rwanda scheme was just about to work in the sense that I am just about to win the Nobel Prize for Literature. It was always too small to deter cross-Channel arrivals: if they are willing to risk their lives to get here, they would be willing to take the tiny risk of removal to Rwanda. And ditching the ECHR would not make much difference to the numbers of failed asylum-seekers who could be removed from the UK. What is more important for Keir Starmer, however, is the threat from Nigel Farage. His 'solution' to the small boats problem is no more credible than the Tories', but it is not undermined by having recently been in government and unable to do anything about it. Farage's policy is to detain and deport all illegal migrants – although his manifesto last year did not say where, how or even if the countries to which they should be sent would take them. In practice, he proposes indefinite detention in prison camps, location unknown. Meanwhile, Reform's policy is that 'migrants in small boats will be picked up and taken back to France'. What if the French retaliate by taking them off the quay and taking them to the UK? Farage has no answer. But he doesn't need one, because he hasn't failed – yet. That is why it is so important to Starmer that his plan to return migrants to France – by agreement – succeeds. Education minister Jacqui Smith was right this morning to say the Labour government had inherited a problem from the Tories that was not 'our fault', and she was honest enough to admit that it is a problem that, 'up to this point, we haven't managed to tackle in terms of the numbers who are coming here'. The Labour government has a possible solution. If it can increase the numbers on the 'one in, one out' scheme so that all or nearly all arrivals are sent back to France, the small boats will stop coming. But will take time. And time and patience are running out.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Horror moment immigration cops handcuff disabled boy sitting in car with his nan
Gut wrenching images show the moment US immigration officers armed with guns handcuff a disabled teenager outside a school as Trump's ICE officers continue their rampage Horrifying video captures the moment armed American Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers detained a 15-year-old disabled student who was sitting in a parked car with his grandma over a case of 'mistaken identity'. Immigration officers approached the car with drawn guns at the disabled teenager who was waiting to take part in a school orientation at Arleta High School in Los Angeles at 9.30am on Monday - just days after schools in LA went back to class after summer break. The special needs boy was waiting in the car with his elderly grandmother, waiting for his family member to return from registering for classes. It comes as Donald Trump recently reignited his feud with Sadiq Khan in front of Keir Starmer, with a savage jibe at the London Mayor. Insisting they were not from ICE, the officers began surrounding the vehicle before getting the innocent teenager into handcuffs. Despite their insistence, video footage reviewed by the district claims to show both police and border patrol officers at the scene. The moment of madness finally came to an end when staff from the school, along with an LA police officer, intervened. Speaking at a news conference, superintendent Alberto Carvalho stressed how serious the incident had been. He said: 'The release will not release him from what he experienced. 'The trauma will linger. It will not cease. It is unacceptable, not only in our community, but anywhere in America. As our students return to school, we are calling on every community partner to help ensure that classrooms remain places of learning and belonging, 'Children have been through enough - from the pandemic to natural disasters. They should not have to carry the added weight of fear when walking through their school gates.' After the incident, parents of non-white children in the school district are understandably concerned - with worries that ICE are targeting people regardless of their actual immigration status. Speaking to KTLA, one worried local parent, Yvonne, said: 'He fits that category. Where he's on the darker side, and I feel like that's who they're attacking… that's the main reason I tell him you better be careful and you don't go with anybody. We shouldn't be going through this.' After the incident, local mayor Karen Bass held a press conference with a pretty damning tone. She said: 'We are gathered here today to talk about protecting our children from the federal government. This is a profound moment… the fact that we even need a press conference to talk about strategies for how we protect our kids.' A LA school district board member agreed that mind-blowing scenes of 'violently detaining a child' are 'absolutely reprehensible and should have no place in our country,'. The frightening scenes come as a result of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which granted $170 billion to ICE and is rumoured to have set the department's quotas of 1,200 to 1,500 arrests every single day. Because of their outlandish tactics, LA schools have rerouted bus stops, sent 1,000 office staff to assist in school zones and even offered online learning for those fearing arrest if they go to school. Deployed 1,000 central office staff to assist in school zones and increased online learning options for those too scared to leave their houses.
