logo
Uncertainty, protectionism, and resilience

Uncertainty, protectionism, and resilience

In the wake of the pandemic, and the fast-unfolding of the climate change crisis has basically brought into focus the cracks in the supply chains globally. Such cracks have been created at the back of neoliberal policy, which made a comeback over the last four decades or so. Previously, similar policies were being practiced before the Bretton Woods system, and the New Deal policies, as so-called 'sound economics'. Under both 'sound economics' and neoliberal policies, division of labour, and comparative advantage have been practiced by the powerful countries to unduly gain the advantage of trade in their favour.
In doing so, they have made the world firstly divided into the 'first world', and the rest, not to mention the particular coming into being of the 'third world', which was non-existent before the era of colonization, since countries in terms of per capita income were not significantly different from each other as such. To maintain this order after colonization, neoliberal policies were introduced, although after some delay caused by New Deal policies. Hence, policies were sugar-coated in a way that efficiency was increasing in global trade, while lack of regulation of markets under neoliberal policies meant rising inequalities, since higher living standards were only for the rich few. That stoked uncertainty over the years, especially under largely free movement of capital that played havoc with any long-term planning for increasing resilience, as it mostly worked on the principle of short-term profit signals.
Moreover, lack of any deep domestic industrial base, including import substituting industry in developing countries in particular, meant that increasing frequency of financial crises – which was a rarity before the perpetuation of the neoliberal-minded globalization, and domestic policy, which favoured largely unregulated capital – and the existential threat of climate change crisis, and the associated 'Pandemicene' phenomenon lay bare the fragility of global supply chains in a world of polycrisis and highly sub-optimal preparedness of countries during these times, as was highlighted amply during the Covid pandemic.
From agricultural commodities to medical equipment to vaccines, the neoliberal model of globalization came down crashing, especially as the application of 'disaster capitalism' saw price gouging. Hence, neoliberalism has increased uncertainty, both on account of lack of market creation that had a lot more profit fairness, and one that internalized the need for creating resilience, and not just mainly follow profit signals.
In addition, practice of ultra-nationalism, for instance, as evidenced from deep practice of 'vaccine nationalism', has exposed the underlying fragile nature of globalization that propounded division of labour, and comparative advantage as the most important principle to be upheld. Hence, practice of neoliberal policies as a miscalculation at best – although economic history of the last few centuries glaringly brings out intentional practice of these so called 'sound economics' policies to make a few countries, and some vested groups within countries rich while the rest were pushed to sub-optimal economic development – has continued to perpetuate uncertainty.
While it is important as a sufficient condition to shift domestic policy focus away from Neoliberalism, it is necessary to create some reasonable level of protectionism by countries to bring down uncertainty, especially in these times of polycrisis, and also to safeguard against the lopsided practice of globalization that makes it difficult for the 'third world' to decrease the distance between countries in terms of per capita income on one hand, and also to create much-needed greater sustainable macroeconomic stability, and economic growth, by reducing the impact of external shocks.
Hence, the recent drastic steps of US President Donald Trump with regard to increasing tariffs could have been taken in terms of nuanced, and much more focused policy, which were more in line with the tariff enhancement related policies of the Biden administration. Barring the pace and scope of application of greater tariffs to build local industry this, in turn, highlights a virtual across-the-board consensus in US political parties – that is both on the left, and right – for the need to have more protectionist policies.
An April 10, 'The Boston Globe' published article 'Tariffs are dumb… right?' pointed out in this regard the following: 'One of the most important developments in American politics over the last decade – easy to forget amid all the outrage over Trump's trade war – is the bipartisan turn to protectionism.The last president, Democrat Joe Biden, made substantial use of tariffs. And while he wasn't out to remake the global economic order – his levies were far more targeted than what we're seeing now – he did share Trump's desire to revive American industry.It's a desire that animates much of Washington. And it would be a mistake to discount its staying power.'
Moreover, the same article rightly pointed out a much-needed case in favour of practice of carefully planned, well-targeted protectionism, which should all the more be a reference point of the developing countries, given the colonizers, the developed world of today, has already drawn a lot of advantage in terms of economic development by protectionism on steroids, and lopsidedness by mainly unilaterally adopting protectionism for themselves, and principles of so-called 'sound economics' for the colonizers. There is a need to bring in sensible level of protectionism, one that allows creating a much more sustainable environment for domestic production, labour conditions, and reaping the advantages of trade for everyone globally.
The article highlighted in this regard: 'Tariffs may look ill-advised today. But they could very well be with us tomorrow.The question is: Can they be deployed intelligently – or are they always a bad idea?…First, you levy tariffs on imports from the Americans and the Brits in a bid to carve out a domestic market for your own burgeoning automakers and steel mills. Then you subsidize these up-and-coming firms in the hope of turning them into genuine competitors on the world stage.To American policy makers, this sort of meddling in the free market long felt unfair — artificial support, they said, for foreign competitors aiming to grab some of our global market share.But in recent years, they've started to see a place for industrial policy right here in the United States. …The pandemic demonstrated how fragile global supply chains can be. And with climate change upon us, large-scale disruptions will only be more frequent. Building up some industrial muscle is an important hedge against instability.'
Also, there is a lot more hue and cry being raised at the negative consequences of tariffs on trade volumes and economic growth, which are not well-founded, as it is important to correct the basis for trade and growth, by putting them on more resilient, and equality creating tendencies for the world, especially in a world of polycrisis. This, in turn, will lower the level of uncertainty, which apart from addressing economic issues in both developing and developed world, will also help check the rising tendency of 'economic migrants' in developed countries, and not by whipping up Xenophobia by ultra-nationalist parties in developed countries, which leads to hate mongering, and also wrongly mainstreams fringe political parties, lowering, in turn, the overall level of democracy.
Yet, all the above seems to have been missed by multilateral institution like International Monetary Fund (IMF), when in its most recent April edition of its flagship report 'World Economic Outlook' (WEO), its economic counsellor, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas in the foreword to the Report – although same message overall flows throughout the Report –apparently does not see on one hand the positive role a focused level of protectionism can play in reducing uncertainty and in enhancing resilience in countries, and, on the other hand, that the neoliberal-minded economic context has been unravelled by sub-optimal outcomes it has produced in creating frequent boom-bust cycles in developing countries in particular, and justified disgruntlement of labour almost everywhere, more specifically.
Also missed is the likely positive impact of focused practice of protectionism in reducing inequality, both within and among countries, and the further advantageous consequence it can have in reducing economic migration, and Xenophobia, and in overall strengthening democracy. Sadly, the thought process of the economic counsellor is something which is in line with the thinking of the multilateral institutions in general, including the IMF, not to mention the 'Chicago boys'-styled policymakers in many countries, who also uphold the same thinking.
In this regard, the economic counsellor indicated in the foreword to the Report that 'Shortly after the January 2025 WEO Update, the United States announced multiple waves of tariffs on major trading partners and critical sectors, culminating on April 2 with a set of nearly universal tariffs. While many of the scheduled tariff increases are on hold for now, the combination of measures and countermeasures has hiked US and global tariff rates to centennial highs. However, the context for such increases is very different. Unlike in the previous century, the global economy is now characterized by a high degree of economic and financial integration, with supply chains and financial flows crisscrossing the world, whose potential unwinding could constitute a major source of economic upheaval.The common denominator, however, is that tariffs are a negative supply shock for the economy imposing them, as resources are reallocated toward the production of noncompetitive goods, with a resulting loss of aggregate productivity, lower activity, and higher production costs and prices. Moreover, in the medium term, by reducing competition, tariffs increase the market power of domestic producers, decrease incentives to innovate, and create multiple opportunities for rent seeking. For trading partners, tariffs constitute mostly a negative external demand shock, driving foreign customers away from their products, even if some countries could benefit from the rerouting of trade flows. These effects are magnified in the presence of modern complex global supply chains. Most traded goods are intermediate inputs that traverse countries multiple times before their transformation into final products. Sectoral disruptions could propagate up and down the global input-output network in ways with potentially large multiplier effects, just as we saw during the pandemic.'
Hence, it can be seen that the thinking above is virtually reflective of that of an ostrich mentality – head in the sand, as for instance can be seen through the poor and rigid contextualization, and very limited understanding of protectionism, not to mention lack of internalization of an otherwise increasingly negative fallout of neoliberal policies during the last few decades, especially in the wake of Global Financial Crisis 2007-08, and the Covid pandemic.
This is because instead of increasing competition, upholding principles of comparative advantage, division of labour, efficiency, and market fundamentalism have virtually out-competed developing countries, and not allowed them to close the gap of economic development with developed countries, and has kept supply chains fragile, suffering also from sub-optimal allocation efficiencies; for instance, more investments went into face creams and the likes, instead of needed investments going into making vaccines during the last two decades before the pandemic, during which time coronavirus reappeared a number of times as an epidemic.
Also, frequent balance of payments issues – at the back of mainly developing countries suffering from an environment of increasing external shocks due to practice of neoliberal economics that upheld market fundamentalism, and unwarranted extent of neoliberal-minded globalization – have been witnessed by developing countries, which has also contributed to significantly increasing global debt, along with greater economic migration from developing countries to developed countries in search of better working conditions. All this has increased uncertainty and diminished resilience, not to mention stoking ultra-nationalism in developed countries in particular.
Also, what good is the rule-based system of world trade when it is not creating a balanced environment, since the underlying rules are sub-optimal to start with, favouring supply chains for instance, which are very fragile in the shape of highly spread out production process globally, is not much mindful of working conditions, and is not ready for a world of polycrisis, especially given such crises include existential threats of climate change, and related 'Pandemicene' phenomenon.
Moreover, it needs to be understood by developed countries and multilateral institutions that relying on developing countries to continue to produce labour-intensive intermediaries for developed countries primarily – to overall achieve so-called efficiency but at the cost of paying labour cheaply, and in getting production for low-level labour working conditions, especially as the existential threat of climate change crisis continues to unfold rather quickly in a dramatic sense in terms of more frequency and greater intensity of climate disasters – is increasingly becoming unreliable. This is because, developing countries having a low share in overall global trade, and being stuck with neoliberal policies – under the influence of 'Chicago boys'-styled domestic policymakers, and brow-beating multilateral institutions through their loan/programme conditionalities – their economies are becoming all the more vulnerable, given their low level of economic institutional quality traditionally, overall low level of climate financing, and neoliberal-minded global trade policy.
Also, this has further lowered the overall working conditions of labour, and which has become one of the main reasons behind increase in 'economic migrants' in developed countries, as more and more of the labour force heads for developed countries for better working conditions. While they bridge the gaps in the labour force of developed countries, where domestic labour is mostly into service sectors, this nonetheless creates disgruntlement among domestic labour, which generally are crowded out in the face of more efficient migrating labour.
There is no fault of the migrating labour, but rather it has to do with the neoliberal institutional design, being perpetuated by the already rich and powerful that have oriented domestic, and global economy only for greater profits. In that sense, shifting away from neoliberal policies, including bringing back reasonable level of protectionism is needed for reducing uncertainty, for instance by creating greater manufacturing at home that absorbs local labour in both developed and developing countries and, in turn, also helps create greater resilience in the face of external shocks, especially in a world of polycrisis.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poverty spike
Poverty spike

Express Tribune

time6 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Poverty spike

Listen to article The World Bank's recalibration of global poverty lines has cast a harsh spotlight on Pakistan, estimating that 44.7% of the population, or over 107 million people, live below the lower-middle-income threshold of $4.20/day. Extreme poverty has surged to 16.5% under the revised $3/day line. While blind nationalists may deflect by blaming the worsening statistic on updated benchmarks and revised global calculations, the truth is that the numbers are actually an understatement. The 44.7% figure relies on outdated survey data from 2018-19, before the catastrophic impact of events such as the Covid-19 pandemic, record inflation and economic disarray for the past few years and the 2022 super-floods that submerged a third of the country and displaced millions. You need not be an economist to recognise that, in light of these events, the actual current poverty rate based on the World Bank's metrics is much higher. And even this outdated data tells a story that is relevant today. The restive province of Balochistan, for example, had a poverty rate of almost 70%. Pakistan has also been one of the world's worst performers in combating poverty. India managed to shrink its extreme poverty rate from over 16% in 2012-2013 to under 6% in 2022-2023, despite the increase in the nominal dollar value. Pakistan, on the other hand, saw at least 27 million more people falling under the poverty line. The first step to addressing the problem is getting more reliable data, so that the picture, no matter how brutal, is more accurate. The next step is transformative action, rather than theatrics and name-calling to divert blame for a national failure onto any one party. One of the best ways to address extreme poverty is by strengthening social services, including through cash transfers via BISP, and bolstering human capital via investment in health, nutrition and education. Tax policy reforms are also critical because a social safety net is pointless if it is financed through indirect taxes that squeeze the working poor, rather than the millionaires and billionaires who don't pay their fair share.

US inflation edges up as Trump tariffs flow through economy
US inflation edges up as Trump tariffs flow through economy

Business Recorder

time13 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

US inflation edges up as Trump tariffs flow through economy

WASHINGTON: US consumer inflation ticked up in May, in line with analyst expectations, government data showed Wednesday as President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs began to ripple through the world's biggest economy. The consumer price index (CPI) came in at 2.4 percent from a year ago after a 2.3 percent reading in April, the Labor Department said, with headline figures cooled by energy prices. All eyes were on US inflation data after Trump imposed a blanket 10 percent levy on imports from almost all trading partners in early April. He also unveiled higher rates on dozens of economies including India and the European Union, although these have been suspended until early July. Trump engaged in a tit-for-tat tariff escalation with China as well, with both sides temporarily lowering high levies on each other's products in May. Despite the wide-ranging duties, analysts said it will take months to gauge the impact on consumer inflation. This is partly because businesses rushed to stockpile goods before Trump's new tariffs kicked in – and they are now still working their way through existing inventory. US tariffs may hamper efforts to cool inflation: Fed official 'As that inventory level gets worked down, we'll see a larger and larger pass-through of the tariffs,' Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic told AFP. Between April and May, CPI was up 0.1 percent, cooling from a 0.2 percent increase from March to April. While housing prices climbed alongside food costs, energy prices edged down over the month, the report added. The energy index fell 1.0 percent in May from a month ago, as the gasoline index declined over the month. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, so-called core CPI was up 2.8 percent from a year ago, the Labor Department said. 'Early signs' 'Many Americans are enjoying cheaper gas prices this summer,' said Navy Federal Credit Union chief economist Heather Long. 'But there are early signs of what is coming for Main Street: grocery store prices and appliance costs rose in May,' she added in a note. Samuel Tombs, chief US economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, estimates that retailers usually take at least three months to pass on cost increases to customers. He expects price increases for 'core goods' to gain momentum in June and peak in July, while remaining elevated for the rest of the year – assuming current tariff policies remain in place. But Bostjancic said she did not expect the latest inflation report to significantly impact the US central bank's interest rate decision next week. 'The guidance remains that there's such a great degree of uncertainty of how the increased tariffs will affect prices and ultimately the economy,' she said. 'They need to wait and see, to see how this plays out over the coming months. And we should learn a lot more from the data through the summer and early fall,' she added. The Federal Reserve has begun cutting interest rates after the Covid-19 pandemic as officials monitor progress in lowering inflation sustainably. But Fed policymakers have been cautious in recent months as they monitor how the Trump administration's policies affect the economy.

World Bank slashes global growth forecast as trade tensions bite
World Bank slashes global growth forecast as trade tensions bite

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

World Bank slashes global growth forecast as trade tensions bite

WASHINGTON: The World Bank on Tuesday slashed its global growth forecast for 2025 by 0.4 percentage point to 2.3%, saying that higher tariffs and heightened uncertainty posed a 'significant headwind' for nearly all economies. In its twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, the bank lowered its forecasts for nearly 70% of all economies - including the United States, China and Europe, as well as six emerging market regions - from the levels it projected just six months ago before U.S. President Donald Trump took office. Trump has upended global trade with a series of on-again, off-again tariff hikes that have increased the effective U.S. tariff rate from below 3% to the mid-teens - its highest level in almost a century - and triggered retaliation by China and other countries. The World Bank is the latest body to cut its growth forecast as a result of Trump's erratic trade policies, although U.S. officials insist the negative consequences will be offset by a surge in investment and still-to-be approved tax cuts. The bank stopped short of forecasting a recession, but said global economic growth this year would be its weakest outside of a recession since 2008. By 2027, global gross domestic product growth was expected to average just 2.5%, the slowest pace of any decade since the 1960s. World Bank warns that US tariffs could reduce global growth outlook The report forecast that global trade would grow by 1.8% in 2025, down from 3.4% in 2024 and roughly a third of its 5.9% level in the 2000s. The forecast is based on tariffs in effect as of late May, including a 10% U.S. tariff on imports from most countries. It excludes increases announced by Trump in April and then postponed until July 9 to allow for negotiations. The bank said global inflation was expected to reach 2.9% in 2025, remaining above pre-COVID levels, given tariff increases and tight labor markets. 'Risks to the global outlook remain tilted decidedly to the downside,' the bank wrote. It said its models showed that a further 10-percentage point increase in average U.S. tariffs, on top of the 10% rate already implemented, and proportional retaliation by other countries, could shave another 0.5 percentage point off the outlook for 2025. Such an escalation in trade barriers would result 'in global trade seizing up in the second half of this year … accompanied by a widespread collapse in confidence, surging uncertainty and turmoil in financial markets,' the report said. Nonetheless, it said the risk of a global recession was less than 10%. World Bank cuts Pakistan growth projection to 2.7% 'Fog on a runway' Top officials from the United States and China are meeting in London this week to try to defuse a trade dispute that has widened from tariffs to restrictions over rare earth minerals, threatening a global supply chain shock and slower growth. 'Uncertainty remains a powerful drag, like fog on a runway. It slows investment and clouds the outlook,' World Bank Deputy Chief Economist Ayhan Kose told Reuters in an interview. But he said there were signs of increased dialogue on trade that could help dispel uncertainty, and supply chains were adapting to a new global trade map, not collapsing. Global trade growth could see a modest rebound in 2026 to 2.4%, and developments in artificial intelligence could also boost growth, he said. 'We think that eventually the uncertainty will decline,' he said. 'Once the type of fog we have lifts, the trade engine may start running again, but at a slower pace.' Kose said while things could get worse, trade was continuing and China, India and others were still delivering robust growth. Many countries were also discussing new trade partnerships that could pay dividends later, he said. IMF lowers Pakistan's FY25 GDP growth forecast to 2.6% US growth forecast cut sharply The World Bank said the global outlook had 'deteriorated substantially' since January, mainly due to advanced economies, now seen growing by just 1.2%, down half a point, after expanding 1.7% in 2024. The U.S. forecast was slashed by 0.9 percentage point from its January forecast to 1.4%, and the 2026 outlook was lowered by 0.4 percentage point to 1.6%. Rising trade barriers, 'record-high uncertainty' and a spike in financial market volatility were expected to weigh on private consumption, trade and investment, it said. Growth estimates in the euro area were cut by 0.3 percentage point to 0.7% and in Japan by 0.5 percentage point to 0.7%. It said emerging markets and developing economies were expected to grow by 3.8% in 2025 versus 4.1% in January's forecast. Poor countries would suffer the most, the report said. By 2027 developing economies' per capita GDP would be 6% below pre-pandemic levels, and it could take these countries – minus China - two decades to recoup the economic losses of the 2020s. Mexico, heavily dependent on trade with the U.S., saw its growth forecast cut by 1.3 percentage points to 0.2% in 2025. The World Bank left its forecast for China unchanged at 4.5% from January, saying Beijing still had monetary and fiscal space to support its economy and stimulate growth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store