Barclays becomes second UK bank to quit industry's net zero group
The lender announced it would be leaving the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) on Friday after 'the departure of most of the global banks'.
HSBC became the first British institution to leave the alliance earlier this month in the wake of several major US banks.
Campaigners called Barclays' decision to step away 'incredibly disappointing' as it marks a fresh blow to international efforts to co-ordinate climate action.
Assembled in 2021 by the UN Environment Programme's finance initiative but led by banks, the NBZA commits members to align their lending, investment and capital markets activities with cutting planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050.
In a statement published online on Friday, Barclays said: 'After consideration, we have decided to withdraw from the Net Zero Banking Alliance.
'With the departure of most of the global banks, the organisation no longer has the membership to support our transition.'
The bank said it remains committed to its ambition to be a net zero bank by 2050 as well as its targets to cut financed emissions, and to mobilise 1 trillion US dollars of sustainable and transition financing.
'We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients,' the lender said.
'This is an important commercial opportunity for Barclays; in 2024, we generated approximately half a billion pounds in revenues from sustainable and transition-related activity.'
The bank made the announcement three days after it published an update to its climate transition plans, which reiterated its green commitments.
Jeanne Martin, co-director of corporate engagement at ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, said Friday's announcement has therefore sent 'mixed signals' to governments and companies around the world.
'Barclays' decision to leave the NZBA is incredibly disappointing and a step in the wrong direction at a time when the dangers of climate change are rapidly mounting,' she said.
'As the financial risks of global heating multiply and climate impacts like heatwaves, floods and extreme weather events become more intense and frequent, we cannot afford half-measures.
'Responsible investors will be watching closely and raising the pressure on the bank to protect long-term economic prosperity and the livelihoods of people everywhere.'
The corporate world's retreat from diversity policies and green commitments has accelerated since Donald Trump's return to the White House.
Six of the largest US banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all left the NZBA following his election in November.
But UK banks had stuck with the alliance until HSBC announced its departure this month.
With Barclays now leaving, British lenders listed as NBZA members as of Friday afternoon still include Lloyds, NatWest, Standard Chartered and Nationwide.
The alliance said its members have been making 'important progress' with well over 100 banks setting individual and independent science-based targets for their financed emissions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘One in four councils could lose money' under Government's funding proposals
Around a quarter of councils in England could lose money under the Government's proposed reforms to how local authorities are funded, analysis has found. A report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the changes would create big 'winners and losers' as ministers attempt to address perceived unfairness in levels of core funding across the country. Sir Keir Starmer's own council, Camden in north London, will be hit by the reforms when taking inflation into account, the IFS added. The think tank said Camden, along with other inner London boroughs including Westminster, will have less money to spend on services even if they increase council tax by the maximum amount allowed. Whitehall will provide a minimum level of funding, a so-called funding floor, for council leaders during the changes, but the IFS said overall cash for inner London town halls would be 11-12% lower in 2028-29 in real terms. The paper said: 'Around one in four councils would see real-terms falls in overall funding under the Government's proposals, with around 30 on the lowest funding floors seeing real-terms cuts of 11–12%. Conversely, another one in four councils would see real-terms increases of 12% or more.' The changes, which will come into effect from next year, are being consulted on by ministers. The Government plans to create a new methodology to assess local authority needs relatively and factor in population and deprivation. It will also assess need for adult and children's services. Overall spending will fall for 186 councils and rise by the same total sum for 161. One in 10 will see a fall in overall funding, while one in 10 will see an increase of 10% or more. The overall Government spend on local authorities will not change. The changes will be phased in across three years, from 2026/27 to 2028/29. Kate Ogden, co-author of the IFS report and a senior research economist with the think tank, said: 'England has lacked a rational system of local government funding for at least 12 years – and arguably more like 20. It is therefore welcome that the nettle of funding reform is being grasped, and some councils will benefit substantially under the new system. 'But the changes will sting for those councils that are assessed to currently receive too high a share of the overall funding pot, and so which lose out from moves to align funding with assessed spending needs.' The proposals are criticised in the report as 'not particularly redistributive to poor, urban areas of England'. It cites South Tyneside and Sunderland councils being among those to lose out from the reforms as slow population growth is accounted for. The report added: 'It is somewhat surprising that, on average, councils in the most deprived 30% of areas would see very similar changes in overall funding over the next three years to those for councils in the middle 40% of areas.' It noted that rural areas, which feared being badly hit by changes, will benefit from a 'remoteness adjustment' which will compensate areas with higher needs due to being far from large towns. London will gain the least, with a cash-terms increase in funding of 8% in the next three years. Analysis by the London Councils collective has highlighted the risk of the funding 'dramatically underestimating' needs for local services in parts of the capital. It noted the city has the highest rate of poverty in the country when housing costs are factored in. Outside the capital, the East Midlands (22%) and Yorkshire & the Humber (19%) are set to see the biggest increases in funding, with the South East set to see the smallest at 13%. However, the proposals have been criticised by youth charity the National Children's Bureau, which said it was 'significantly concerned' about the way the Government plans to work out needs for children's services. Ms Ogden added: 'The Government should consider giving highly affected councils which currently have low council tax rates greater flexibility to bring their council tax bills up to more typical levels to offset funding losses. 'More generally, reform of council funding allocations is just one part of the financial sustainability puzzle. Efforts to reduce demands on, and the cost of providing, local services through reform and the use of new technology will also be vital.' A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded means the link between funding and need for services has broken down, leaving communities left behind. 'That's why we are taking decisive action to reform the funding system so we can get councils back on their feet and improve public services, with the IFS recognising that our changes will better align funding with councils' needs.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Universities ‘keen' to offer places to students even if they miss grades
Universities will be keen to offer places on degree courses to school leavers on A-level results day even if they have narrowly missed out on grades, experts have suggested. The head of Ucas has predicted that a record number of 18-year-olds are expected to wake up on Thursday next week to the news that they have been successful in securing their first-choice university. There will be competition between universities to fill places with more UK applicants, creating a 'buyer's market' for students. The majority of institutions have courses available through clearing – which matches applicants to university places yet to be filled – in the week before A-level results day. It comes as universities have been warning of financial pressures due to uncertainty about the recruitment of overseas students as well as years of frozen tuition fees by domestic students. A sample of 129 of the UK's largest higher education providers showed more than 22,600 courses with vacancies for undergraduate students living in England were available on the Ucas clearing site as of Wednesday. Seventeen of the 24 elite Russell Group universities had vacancies on courses for English residents – a total of 3,630 courses between them. A similar analysis last year, in the week before A-level results day, showed 18 of the 24 universities had vacancies on courses for English residents – a total of 3,892 courses between them – on the clearing site. Clearing is available to students who do not meet the conditions of their offer on A-level results day, as well as those who did not receive any offers. Students who have changed their mind about what or where they wish to study, and those who have applied outside the normal application window, can also use clearing. Eight days ahead of exam results day, there was a total of 22,698 courses through clearing across 129 institutions. A similar analysis last year – carried out at the same point before A-level results day and looking at the same range of higher education institutions – showed there were 23,306 courses through clearing. Ucas figures released last month revealed that the number of offers made to prospective undergraduate students from universities and colleges has reached a record high this year. Jo Saxton, head of the university admissions service, said she expected there to be 'slightly fewer' courses with vacancies in clearing this year due to the high number of offers already made to applicants. She said: 'Whilst the system isn't capped, universities do know how many they want to accommodate in their lecture halls and facilities, and I think that a lot of that is going to have been already pinned down through applications and offer-making prior to results.' Overall, 94.5 per cent of all students who applied to higher education before the Ucas January deadline have received at least one offer, recent figures show. Speaking about A-level results day, the Ucas boss said: 'I would anticipate a record number of 18-year-olds will wake up with confirmation, quite possibly even where they are near-misses.' She added universities are increasingly 'falling back in love' with their three-year undergraduate applicants as there is more 'uncertainty' around the international market and which overseas students are going to turn up. Dr Saxton said: 'It's a really, really good year to be a UK-domiciled 18-year-old that wants to go to one of our world-class universities. 'A couple of the directors of admissions and vice-chancellors that I talked to have talked about recognising, actually, that a three-year undergraduate student is stability for your teaching and learning, for your university community, for your financial planning.' Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute think tank, said this year's cohort of school leavers are 'well placed' to get where they want to study even if they have narrowly missed their university offer grades. He said : 'The financial plight of universities makes them very keen to fill their courses and they will be falling over themselves to sign up good potential students. 'Not everything is rosy, of course, as the cost-of-living crisis has affected the student experience in deleterious ways, but ambitious school leavers are nonetheless well-placed to get where they want to be in this year's admissions round.' Mike Nicholson, director of recruitment, admissions and participation at the University of Cambridge, which does not take part in clearing, said it is 'probable' that universities will be 'looking very carefully' at near-miss students this summer. He said: 'If the student, for instance, needed three As [and] gets AAB as long as the B is not in something that's absolutely crucial for the course, I think there's a very strong possibility the student would find they'd be getting a place. 'If universities have the capacity to take near-miss students I think they'll be very keen to take them this year because those students are already in the system, they've already committed, they've possibly already even applied for accommodation. 'So, it's a much easier process to follow through on than having to go out into clearing and recruit somebody from scratch at that point in the year.' Lee Elliot Major, professor of social mobility at the University of Exeter, said: 'This year is shaping up to be a buyer's market in admissions, with many universities competing to recruit more home students. 'It's driven by basic financial necessity: institutions need to fill degree places as uncertainty grows over international student intakes and budgets tighten across the sector. 'In an increasingly volatile admissions landscape, we must ensure that the focus on financial sustainability doesn't further exacerbate educational inequalities already embedded in the system.' Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK, said: 'It's certainly competitive between universities. 'From an applicant point of view, in a sense, that's a really good thing as it means you've got lots of choice. 'Clearing has changed, certainly compared to far back in the midst of time when I went to university when it used to be the kind of last-chance saloon, it's not that any more. 'Clearing is a much more widely-used tool for people to apply for the first time. 'It's also an opportunity if people want to change their minds they can use clearing to do that.' A Department for Education (DfE) spokeswoman said: 'While universities are independent from government and responsible for their own admissions decisions, it is essential that quality is maintained and that the students they admit are likely to succeed. 'Students deserve high-quality teaching, fair admissions and a clear path to good jobs, whether through a degree or technical route. 'Apprenticeship starts, participation and achievements are all on the rise, helping more people gain the skills they need.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Novo Nordisk Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold Before Q2 Earnings?
Danish pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) is facing serious headwinds. After enjoying a strong run fueled by demand for its obesity treatments, the obesity drug pioneer is now under pressure from rising competition, particularly from Eli Lilly's (LLY) weight-loss drugs, as well as trial setbacks for its next-generation therapies. In fact, things took a sharp turn on July 29, when the company cut its full-year sales growth guidance for the second time in just three months and named a new CEO. The market response was swift and brutal, with NVO shares plunging over 21% in a single day. Now, with second-quarter earnings just around the corner on Aug. 6, does Novo Nordisk's recent plunge present a golden buying opportunity, or is it a clear signal to keep your distance? More News from Barchart Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 27 Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? Tesla Gains on Elon Musk's New Pay Package. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! About Novo Nordisk Stock Best known for its blockbuster weight-loss drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, Novo Nordisk is a global healthcare leader with a long-standing focus on chronic disease. Founded in 1923 and headquartered in Denmark, the company has built a strong foundation in diabetes care while expanding its reach into obesity and other severe health conditions. The company commands a market capitalization of about $217.9 billion. While Novo Nordisk has been a trailblazer in the obesity drug market, its stock has hit a rough patch. Softer demand for its blockbuster drugs, combined with intensifying competition in the weight-loss space, has taken a toll on investor sentiment. The stock has tumbled a staggering 66% from its 52-week high of $139.74 reached in August 2024, and it's currently down 44.7% year-to-date (YTD). In stark contrast, the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has managed to notch a gain of approximately 7.1% over the same period, while its rival Eli Lilly has seen only a marginal drop so far this year, highlighting just how far Novo has fallen out of favor with the market. Given its underwhelming price action, Novo Nordisk stock is starting to look like a value play. Currently trading at just 12.5 times forward earnings, it's priced well below the sector median of 16.87x, and dramatically lower than its own five-year average of 30.92x. Novo Nordisk's Q1 Earnings Snapshot In early May, Novo Nordisk posted a solid first-quarter earnings report for fiscal 2025, but the shine was dulled by a cautious outlook. Total revenue climbed 19% year-over-year (YOY) to 78.1 billion Danish kroner, powered by a massive 85% surge in Wegovy sales, which hit 17.4 billion Danish kroner. Ozempic also continued to perform, with sales rising 18% to 32.7 billion Danish kroner. Profits also impressed, with net profit climbing 14% to 29 billion Danish kroner, while operating profit increased 22% to 38.8 billion Danish kroner. But despite these promising numbers, Novo trimmed its full-year sales growth and operating profit growth guidance, citing 'lower-than-planned penetration of branded GLP-1 treatments in the US.' The company pointed to the growing presence of U.S. compounding pharmacies, which have been legally producing copycat versions of Wegovy and Ozempic under an FDA-approved exemption for addressing drug shortages. That growing parallel market has begun to chip away at Novo's momentum. On a more promising note, the company completed its REDEFINE 2 trial during the quarter, with its next-generation drug CagriSema delivering an impressive 15.7% weight loss in patients with obesity or overweight conditions and type 2 diabetes. Novo plans to file for its first regulatory approval in early 2026, potentially marking the next significant chapter in its obesity pipeline. Novo Nordisk Slashes Guidance Again and Names New CEO On July 29, Novo Nordisk held a conference call that left investors rattled, as it unveiled major leadership changes and another sharp downgrade to its 2025 financial outlook. The company slashed its full-year sales growth guidance to 8%-14%, down from the previously expected 13%-21%. Operating profit growth was also revised lower, now projected at 10%-16% compared to May's forecast of 16%-24%. The revised outlook sent a strong signal that Novo is bracing for a more challenging year ahead. A big part of the pressure comes from its obesity blockbuster, Wegovy. In its update, Novo pointed to several headwinds weighing on U.S. sales, including the continued rise of compounded GLP-1 knockoffs, slower-than-expected market expansion, and increasing competition. These challenges have clouded the outlook for one of Novo's key growth drivers, sparking concerns about whether the company can maintain its dominance in the rapidly growing weight-loss market. Adding to the uncertainty, Novo also announced a leadership shake-up. Maziar Mike Doustdar, the current EVP of international operations, will take over as CEO on Aug. 7, succeeding Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen, whose surprise resignation was announced in May. The transition comes at a pivotal moment, with the company under pressure to protect market share and reignite growth amid shifting dynamics in the obesity drug landscape. What Do Analysts Think About Novo Nordisk Stock? Despite all the swirling uncertainty, there's still a hint of optimism in the air. With Novo Nordisk set to unveil its Q2 earnings on Aug. 6 and a new CEO stepping in shortly after, Wall Street hasn't lost faith, with analysts leaning cautiously bullish, giving the stock a consensus rating of 'Moderate Buy' overall. Of the 19 analysts offering recommendations, seven advise a 'Strong Buy,' nine suggest a 'Hold,' one advocates a 'Moderate Sell,' and the remaining two maintain a 'Strong Sell.' NVO's average analyst price target of $71.75 suggests 47% potential upside from current levels. However, the Street-high target of $112 implies that shares can rally as much as 129.5% from current price levels. On the date of publication, Anushka Mukherji did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
