Trump adds firepower to National Guard presence in DC
Coupled with indications that the guard members may soon be carrying weapons — a reversal of their initial orders — the new deployments mark a major escalation of Trump's efforts to take over law enforcement in Washington.
The roughly 800 D.C. National Guard troops already deployed in the capital will be joined by about 200 personnel from Mississippi, between 300 and 400 from West Virginia, 150 from Ohio and 200 from South Carolina, beefing up a presence that has largely stood idle around typically low-crime, tourist-heavy areas in the city.
'Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it,' Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves said in a statement Monday, becoming the latest Republican governor to answer to a Trump administration request to send guard members to Washington.
West Virginia, Ohio and South Carolina, meanwhile, pledged their state troops over the weekend, bolstering Trump's federal crackdown on crime and homelessness in the Democratic-led city.
Still, some GOP governors are keeping their troops home, including Vermont Gov. Phil Scott (R), who 'politely declined' Trump's request to deploy Vermont National Guard soldiers.
'While public safety is a legitimate concern in cities across the country and certainly in the nation's capital, in the absence of an immediate emergency or disaster that local and regional first responders are unable to handle, the governor just does not support utilizing the guard for this purpose, and does not view the enforcement of domestic law as a proper use of the National Guard,' Scott's chief of staff, Jason Gibbs, said in a statement Friday, as reported by Vermont Public.
Gibbs said Scott might have sent a few dozen guard members if it was D.C. officials who were seeking federal assistance with an emergency situation instead.
'But in this case, because it is being hyperpoliticized, the governor doesn't feel like — and I believe the vast majority of Vermonters don't feel like — it would be an acceptable and appropriate use of the National Guard,' Gibbs said.
Trump launched the federal takeover of D.C. via an executive order that declared a 'crime emergency' in the city, grabbing control of the city's police department and sending federal agents — including some from the Drug Enforcement Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, FBI and Secret Service — to the streets despite a sharp drop in crime since 2023.
Critics say the effort is merely a photo op and a gross militarization of Washington, with D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) pushing back on Trump's characterization of the city Monday.
'We don't have any authority over the D.C. Guard or any other guards, but I think it makes the point that this is not about D.C. crime,' Bowser said of the administration and states deploying National Guard troops to the capital.
'The focus should be on violent crime,' she added. 'Nobody is against focusing on driving down any level of violence. And so if this is really about immigration enforcement, the administration should make that plain.'
So far, the guard members in Washington have assisted law enforcement with crowd control and patrolling typically low-crime areas such as landmarks, including the National Mall, Lincoln Memorial and Union Station.
It is unclear why additional troops have been requested by Trump, as the National Guard's role has been limited and many have been seen around the city standing idly next to their vehicles. But even with their seemingly uneventful patrols, guard members may soon be armed while out and about.
Initial deployment orders stipulated that the troops would wear body armor but they would not be armed or even have their weapons in their vehicles, according to an Army statement released Thursday.
Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson also told reporters Thursday that the guard members will not be conducting law enforcement activities while in D.C., but they could temporarily detain someone until law enforcement could make an arrest.
The White House said in a statement Saturday, however, that the National Guard troops 'may be armed, consistent with their mission and training, to protect federal assets, provide a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests, and deter violent crime with a visible law enforcement presence.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
5 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
The ‘death knell' of America's top public university?
University of California scientists helped create the Internet, wet suits, artificial intelligence and a lung therapy that has saved an untold number of premature newborns. UC scientists also helped save humanity from the hole in the ozone layer and harnessed the human genome to speed the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy and other diseases. America's best public university system also has enriched the world for millions of young people. The cost of my 1981 bachelor's degree from UC Berkeley was roughly $20,000. That's for four years. Including room and board. And countless slices of Blondie's pizza. But now the 10-campus university system (where annual undergraduate costs now come to about $45,000, before financial aid) is under unprecedented attack, accused by the Trump administration of condoning antisemitism in failing to head off assaults on Jewish students and allowing diversity, equity and inclusion imperatives to hold back white and Asian students. UC President James B. Milliken has said Trump administration grant suspensions at UCLA totaling $584 million would amount to a 'death knell' for medical, science and energy research. Trump's team has said it would restore the grant money, but only if the university pays a $1-billion fine. Calling that 'extortion,' Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to sue. Jaweed Kaleem of The Times has been leading the coverage of this furor, which continues as the fall quarter gets underway next month at many UC campuses. Jaweed talked to me about the crisis. Q: Did UC's troubles all begin when Trump took office in January? A: UC was already facing challenges to begin with. They were cutting back before Trump came to office. They have had tight budgets and campus-level deficits for years — from deferred state funding promises to costs associated with multiple union strikes and labor agreements, as well as inflation. Trump's actions have further hit UC's pockets. Q: How did the crisis begin? A: The origin goes back to the encampment on the UCLA campus, which lasted from April 25 to May 2 of last year. Protesters in the camp called for UCLA to divest from investments, such as in weapons companies, tied to Israel's war in Gaza. Pro-Israel demonstrators called for the release of hostages taken in the Hamas attack on Israel. While there were Jews who supported the encampment, other Jewish community members said its actions were antisemitic — complaints noticed by the White House. Q: Won't most of the public, at least Californians, rally around UC and its research? A: UCLA and other universities have acknowledged they didn't do a very good job of explaining that a big part of their mission is research. They're now undertaking a big campaign to fix that. Not surprisingly, a lot of the public has an interest in where their money goes and understanding why so much money is needed for university research. Some research can be esoteric. It can be hard to understand the long and methodical process that's involved in obtaining and using these federal grants. Q: I am guessing all those taxpayers whose kids didn't get admitted to their favorite UC aren't shedding tears for UCLA and UC Berkeley? A: There's frustration about the limited seats, and not only among conservatives. It used to be much cheaper and less cutthroat to gain admission — though it's still cheaper than other major state schools. Now, with many campuses, it can feel like a crap shoot and people are unhappy about that. Perhaps some conservatives don't mind seeing [the Trump administration] stick it to UC. Q: The war in Gaza continues and no doubt campus activists aren't satisfied, right? A: UC prides itself as the birth of the Free Speech movement and the protests of the 1960s. UCLA already cracked down on protests after the encampments and now there is a funding freeze and this $1-billion demand. I'm curious how — and if — protests will continue this upcoming school year and how they will be handled. Trump has made it clear he doesn't like protesters, on Palestinian-Israeli issues and more. What happens when students come back to campus and want to protest? And what will the response from the UC system be? Dan Saborio writes, 'I've been a big fan of Cavaretta's Italian Deli in Canoga Park for decades. Their 'Famous Italian' is my favorite, but their meatball sub, sausage and pepper sub, and peppersteak sub are also great. They also have wonderful lasagna, a very good antipasto salad, and you can't skip their cannoli.' Email us at essentialcalifornia@ and your response might appear in the newsletter this week. On Aug. 21, 1911, Leonardo da Vinci's 'Mona Lisa' painting was stolen from the Louvre by an Italian house painter named Vincenzo Peruggia, who had briefly worked on a project at the museum. It wasn't recovered until 1913. A hundred years later, the Times wrote about a century of fascination with the theft that has produced books, articles, a documentary and a number of puzzling facts. Jim Rainey, staff reporterHugo Martín, assistant editor, fast break deskKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, weekend writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the aisle
I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the political aisle. Two weeks ago in this newsletter, I wrote about how Texas House Democrats were making fools of themselves, fleeing to states like Illinois, to protest Republicans' efforts to redraw voting district maps to gain five more seats in Congress. To be clear, Republicans looked silly too. But Democrats continue to escalate the matter, and the whole thing has become a farce for Republicans, Democrats and the state. Texas Rep. Nicole Collier spent two nights on the Texas House floor after refusing to consent to a law enforcement escort. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced Aug. 18 that Democrats who fled the state to protest redistricting would be required to have a police escort to leave the floor. Collier refused to submit, saying she was the victim of 'illegal confinement.' 'This is the fight that all of us have in resisting, you know, the end of our democracy, basically,' Collier said. The whole thing is nonsense, but Texas Democrats in particular look more unhinged than ever. They're not the only ones. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office has started trolling President Donald Trump on X by posting in all caps to mimic Trump's unique communication style. In a post Aug. 19, Newsom slammed Fox News' Dana Perino – whose show I was on last week – ending with 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER,' Trump's signature sign off. The account has also mocked Vice President JD Vance's physical appearance. Real classy. Perhaps Newsom's office is trying to be witty, but their messaging falls flat. Trump posts comments on social media like a middle school kid, but he also is brokering peace between warring nations, improving trade policy and bolstering the economy. Newsom's California, meanwhile, is in rapid decline. Americans have noticed that Democratic leaders are increasingly unhinged. The Real Clear Politics polling average shows Democrats with an unfavorable rating of about 60%. Only a third of Americans have a favorable view of the Democratic Party. The party's future looks grim, and dashing out of state to avoid a legislative vote or posting obnoxious messages on social media won't help. Read more from me and my colleagues:
USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Most Americans believe that efforts to redraw U.S. House of Representatives districts to maximize partisan gains, like those under way in Texas and California, are bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found. More than half of respondents -- 57% -- said they feared that American democracy itself was in danger, a view held by eight in 10 Democrats and four in 10 in President Donald Trump's Republican Party. The six-day survey of 4,446 U.S. adults, which closed on Monday, showed deep unease with the growing political divisions in Washington -- where Republicans control both chambers of Congress -- and state capitals. The poll found that 55% of respondents, including 71% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans, agreed that ongoing redistricting plans- such as those hatched by governors in Texas and California in a process known as gerrymandering - were "bad for democracy." At Trump's urging, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a special session of the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans defend their 219-212 U.S. House majority. Incumbent presidents' parties typically lose House seats in midterms, which can block their legislative agendas and in Trump's first term led to two impeachment probes. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, a White House hopeful in 2028, has threatened to try to redraw his state's district map in response, adding five Democratic seats to offset Republicans' expected Texas gains. The practice is not new but has gained attention because it is happening mid-decade rather than following a census. It has meant that the vast majority of House races are not competitive in general elections; in recent decades about two-thirds of them were won by more than 20 percentage points. As president, Trump has flouted democratic norms with steps including directing the U.S. Justice Department to pursue his political adversaries, pressuring the independent Federal Reserve to lower rates and seizing control of Washington, D.C.'s police force. In interviews, Texas Republicans who participated in the poll largely supported the state's potential redistricting, while Democrats described it as 'cheating' but supported the idea of Democratic states trying to respond in kind. The poll had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points when describing the views of all Americans and about 3 points for the views of Republicans and Democrats. 'Shady Business' Amanda Kelley, 51, an insurance fraud investigator in Dallas, was the rare Republican to criticize the Texas effort. "I don't like it when either side tries to do that. I think that's shady business," Kelley said. "The optics of it happening in the middle of the term when you would draw district lines, that leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth." Paul Wehrmann, 57, an attorney in Dallas who described himself as an independent voter, also opposed it. "It's unfair, and it sets a bad precedent," said Wehrmann, who worries it could spiral into states redrawing maps every election cycle instead of every decade. Partisan gerrymandering "is bad all around, but I think that it is fair for Democrats to try to counterbalance what Republicans are doing. "They need to stop bringing a knife to a gunfight.' Americans of both parties have long disliked elected leaders of the rival party, but the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that they also distrust regular people who align with the opposing party. Some 55% of Democrats agreed with a statement that "people who are Republican are NOT to be trusted," while 32% disagreed. Republicans were split, with 43% agreeing that Democrats were untrustworthy and 44% saying they disagreed. The poll also showed politics weighing more on people's everyday lives than in past years, particularly among Democrats. Some 27% of Democrats said last year's presidential election has negatively affected their friendships. A Reuters/Ipsos poll in April 2017, early in Trump's first term, showed a smaller share of Democrats - 18% - reported fraying friendships because of the election. Only 10% of Republicans said this month that politics weighed on their friendships, largely unchanged from 2017. Jeffrey Larson, a 64-year-old toxicologist and Republican voter in Seabrook, Texas, said he and his wife, a Democrat, agreed not to discuss politics. 'I might not agree with what the Democrats are doing, but I don't think that they're trying to specifically destroy my life or destroy America,' Larson said. Close to half of Democrats - or 46% - said their party had lost its way, compared to 19% of Republicans who said the same of their party. Sandy Ogden, 71, a tech executive from Sunnyvale, California and self-described Democrat, said she faulted her party's leaders. 'I think the Democratic Party members are united in what we believe, but the leaders are ineffective in mounting an opposition that works,' Ogden said. Analysts said that ordinary Democrats' greater mistrust of Republicans and friction with friends suggests a reluctance among Democrats to engage with Republicans that could harm the party's chances at regaining political standing. 'Democracy involves a willingness to allow people with differing views to express those views,' said Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster. Michael Ceraso, a longtime Democratic operative, found the poll results frustrating. "The majority of Democrats believe our democracy is failing and nearly half of them don't want to talk to the opposition party," Ceraso said. "We have to be better." (Reporting by Jason Lange, Nolan D. McCaskill and James Oliphant; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia Osterman)
