It's time to make the polluters pay the price for climate change
Instead of finding new business models or at least warning the public and government officials, these companies conspired to wage a massive disinformation campaign to prevent regulators, investors, and consumers from understanding the risks their products were creating. And now regular people are
Advertisement
That's not fair. The companies that created this mess should help pay to clean it up. That's exactly what the
Someone will have to pay for the climate harms and extreme weather disasters our communities are already facing, and that we will continue to experience with growing regularity and lethality in the coming years.
Advertisement
Should all of that burden be borne by working families and local businesses? Or should the corporations that made
By supporting the Climate Superfund Act, Rhode Island lawmakers would ensure that at least some of the costs of climate change fall on those most responsible. Rhode Islanders have already paid too much for Big Oil's reckless conduct. It's time to make the polluters pay.
Aaron Regunberg is a former Rhode Island state representative and director of the Climate Accountability Project at Public Citizen. Cassidy DiPaola is a native Rhode Islander and director at the Make Polluters Pay campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Holding Corporations Accountable for Climate Disasters
Weeks after the deadly floods in central Texas, searches were still underway for those who were lost. The radiating effects of this disaster will be felt in our communities for decades, from the lives and homes lost to the staggering costs to repair, rebuild, and prepare for the next crisis. Devastating natural disasters and increasingly frequent floods are now our new normal, whether we're prepared for it or not. Insurance companies are raising premiums and in some cases, canceling coverage altogether. Agriculture losses are threatening people's livelihoods and raising prices at the grocery store. And the availability of federal resources in the wake of extreme weather is no longer guaranteed. This perfect storm has created a world where local governments are struggling to protect our constituents. There are no easy and simple solutions, which is why we need access to every tool in our toolbox to respond, adapt, and act. One of those tools is the ability for local governments to seek justice in court if a corporation or industry contributed to the damage in any way. Think about how communities have taken tobacco and opioid companies to court to make them pay for knowingly pushing products that harmed public health. Or how utility companies have been held legally responsible when their negligence contributed to wildfires. HUNT, TEXAS - JULY 6: Vehicles sit submerged as a search and rescue worker looks through debris for any survivors or remains of people swept up in the flash flooding on July 6, 2025 in... HUNT, TEXAS - JULY 6: Vehicles sit submerged as a search and rescue worker looks through debris for any survivors or remains of people swept up in the flash flooding on July 6, 2025 in Hunt, Texas. MoreScientists are still determining exactly how much of a role climate change played in the deadly Texas floods, but they have been clear that a warming world will fuel many similar tragedies. As state and local governments grapple with how to pay for the necessary infrastructure to protect residents from these destructive events, a growing number have turned to the courts to make polluters help pick up the tab. But in recent months, this right for officials to access courts on behalf of their communities has come under threat. Republican attorneys general, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, recently called for federal officials to create a "liability shield" for fossil fuel companies. That would mean communities could no longer access the courts to recover climate-related damages. Their recommendation appears to be part of a broader lobbying effort by Big Oil companies to get a free pass from Congress, shielding them from accountability for actions that fueled the climate crisis. But local leaders will not let polluting corporations and their paid-for politicians take away our rights without a fight. At the most recent gathering of the National Association of Counties, I sponsored a resolution that made clear where county leaders stand. We oppose any effort to limit our ability to take companies to court or grant them immunity from lawsuits over extreme weather damages. Nearly every official in that room represented constituents who had suffered from extreme weather in recent years, and the resolution passed overwhelmingly. Fossil fuel companies have known for decades that their products were fueling climate change. Exxon knew in the 1970s that using more of their fossil fuel products could cause "potentially catastrophic events." Shell predicted in 1989 that without changing course we would have "more violent weather" including "more storms, more droughts, more deluges"—a reality central Texans know all too well. But these companies opted to lie to the public about that reality, launching a disinformation campaign to protect their profits. Local governments should be able to hold these companies accountable. Shutting the courthouse doors is not only bad governance; it would also have major consequences for local governments. Imagine if communities ravaged by opioid addiction and smoking-related health issues had not been able to demand opioid producers and Big Tobacco pay for the damage they knowingly caused. Imagine if a company's negligent behavior led to a wildfire that tore through your town or poisoned your drinking water, only for the company to be given a "get out of jail free" card. Shutting down access to the courts does nothing to protect our communities and everything to protect negligence by corporations. Congress might not always agree with local governments, but they should at least protect our right to have our day in court. Brigid Shea is Commissioner of Travis County, Texas (Austin). The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Boston Globe
06-08-2025
- Boston Globe
Federal judge rules that Rhode Island's gun permit system does not violate 2nd Amendment
According to the statute, local officials are required to issue concealed-carry permits to anyone who meets the specific criteria outlined in the statute. However, it also allows the attorney general's office to issue open-carry permits 'upon a proper showing of need.' Unlike municipalities, the attorney general is not required to issue such permits. Advertisement The plaintiffs, largely led by Michael O'Neil, a lobbyist for the Rhode Island 2nd Amendment Coalition and a firearm instructor, said in their initial complaint that the attorney general's office denied all seven of their applications in 2021 for an 'unrestricted' firearm permit, allowing both open and concealed carry. Court documents show that the attorney general's office denied their permits because all of them had been granted 'restricted' permits, which only allowed concealed carry. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up Smith said in his ruling that unrestricted permits 'are a privilege and there is no constitutionally protected liberty interest in obtaining one.' The plaintiffs had hoped for a similar ruling handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022, where the justices Advertisement Similar to Rhode Island, New York's law had required residents to show an actual need to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense. Yet, notably, Smith said in his ruling that the high court's 2022 ruling did not declare that the Second Amendment 'requires open carry,' but even if it did, Rhode Island's law 'is within the Nation's historical tradition of regulation.' Frank Saccoccio, the attorney representing the gun owners, said in an email Monday that they did not believe Smith's decision was in line with the 2022 SCOTUS decision and would be appealing. Timothy Rondeau, a spokesperson for the attorney general's office, said the decision reaffirmed 'the constitutionality of Rhode Island's permitting system for the public carry of handguns.' 'The Attorney General will continue to vigorously defend Rhode Island's gun violence prevention laws to ensure the public safety of all Rhode Islanders,' he said.
Boston Globe
06-08-2025
- Boston Globe
‘A complete gutting:' RIPTA riders, advocates slam cuts proposed to bridge $10m budget gap
The bus ferries them to a Stop & Shop store, including one woman who Picillo said depends on the bus because she was unable to replace her car when it broke down. 'She has no way to go to the grocery store, and that route is getting canceled all together,' Picillo said. 'We can't walk to it.' Related : Advertisement The Flex 301 bus is one of 16 routes RIPTA is now considering eliminating, as it weighs Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up Ahead of a RIPTA board vote on the proposed rollbacks set for Thursday, riders and transit advocates are pleading for last-minute solutions they hope can stave off cuts to services they said Rhode Islanders depend on to get to school, work, and medical appointments, and to navigate everyday life. Bus service between Newport's northern end and First Beach, between the University of Rhode Island's Kingston campus and the Block Island Ferry, and three routes that serve the Community College of Rhode Island's campuses in Newport, Warwick, and Lincoln are among those up for elimination. Five Park and Ride Routes, connecting far corners of the state — including Pascoag, North Smithfield, Westerly, and Narragansett — with Providence, also may be nixed. Advertisement Other changes include reductions in trip frequency or numbers of trips on 30 routes, elimination of all weekend service on nine routes, elimination of some weekend service on eight routes, and the cancellation of some entire segments on six routes, RIPTA said. 'It's wild,' said Liza Burkin, board president of the Providence Streets Coalition. 'It's supposed to be the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority. It's going to be the Providence County and Greater Newport Transit Authority … It's a complete gutting of the system, and the worst part is that it will trigger a downward spiral.' In Pawtucket, the cuts and reductions would affect about 44 percent of the city's bus services, according to state Senator Meghan E. Kallman, a Democrat representing Pawtucket and Providence. 'Without that bus service, people are not going to be able to get to work, people are not going to be able to get to school,' Kallman said in an interview. 'But specifically, if you can't get to work, you can't pay your rent, and if you can't pay your rent or your mortgage, then you need to move, right? This is the kind of stuff that sucks the life blood out of working class communities. This is insane.' At a public hearing on the proposal in Providence on Monday, Jessica Null, senior director of philanthropy and external affairs for Thundermist Health Center, said it already takes patients and staff who rely on public transit more than an hour along several routes to make it to appointments and to work at its locations in Providence, Woonsocket, West Warwick, and South County, Null said. Advertisement 'One employee shared, 'I currently spend two to three hours a day on the bus. This will not only add time to my daily commute, but by cutting weekend service, I will have no way to get to work on weekend shifts, which are required,'' Null added. Angelina Stabile, legislative director and affiliate treasurer for the National Federation of the Blind of Rhode Island, said the proposed cuts 'are devastating.' 'They are crippling, and they will destroy the freedom and independence of blind people, disabled people, and all peoples who take public transportation,' Stabile said. At 'We are literally encouraging folks…to use public transportation to get to and from the beach,' Kennedy said. 'Likewise, the YMCA of Newport County is interested in expanding its footprint and its services — not condensing them.' Meanwhile, students and staff at the University of Rhode Island told RIPTA officials at Advertisement Scott Schnur, a Wakefield resident and a URI employee, said one of his students told him she is now looking for a new lease less than a month before the start of the school year as a result of the anticipated bus changes. 'We recognize the concerns of members of our community and will be engaging directly with RIPTA leadership to discuss these concerns,' Dawn Bergantino, a URI spokesperson, wrote in an email on Tuesday. 'Reliable transit is critical for our students, faculty, and staff, as they pursue their academic, professional, and personal goals.' Asked about possible route cuts impacting CCRI, Amy Kempe, CCRI's chief of staff, wrote in an email that 'access to reliable public transportation is critical to our students' success' and that CCRI is 'working with RIPTA to minimize disruptions to our community.' Late last week, RIPTA formally released its long-awaited 'Closing the RIPTA deficit responsibly means identifying both efficiencies and new RIPTA-generated revenue streams,' Olivia DaRocha, a spokesperson for McKee, wrote in an email on Tuesday. 'That means addressing the high-cost, low-performing routes identified in the study, while preserving service on higher-performing routes.' DaRocha wrote that drawing additional federal funding 'for eligible expenses' and 'modernizing the fare policy, with options that include fare increases, zone-based fares, and monthly passes,' could be options to enhance revenue, among others. 'Long-term stability will only come when RIPTA right-sizes operations and grows its revenue,' DaRocha added. Advertisement Still, many riders and advocates blame McKee and lawmakers for the potential cuts. McKee left the agency with a Hannah Galan, who opened Pothos Plant Shop with her husband, Homer Johnsen, in Providence's Fox Point last year, said Monday she has frequently called McKee's office about the RIPTA proposal, which would cut weekend service to the bus stop near her store on its busiest days. The potential loss of business is 'immeasurable,' Galan said. 'There's no way to measure it,' Galan said. 'And I mean, it's not even just impacting us, it's going to impact every small business on the street.' Christopher Gavin can be reached at
