Why this brand new multi-million dollar home complete with a pool, spa and cinema room is set to be demolished
A multi-million dollar mansion will be demolished after a local council won a five-year court battle with the owners who built the home without seeking permission.
Sydney plumber Rabi Malass and his 34-year-old wife, Sarah, bought a coveted block of land in Strathfield, in Sydney's inner west, for $2.8mllion in 2017.
The home on Boden Avenue was already DA approved for a knock-down and rebuild but the couple wished to make alterations to the existing plans.
They hired an architect to redesign the layout and the façade of the home who they believed had engaged with the Strathfield Council to seek approval.
But as Sydney was plunged into lockdown amid the spread of Covid-19 in 2020, the couple were still yet to receive approval for the redesign.
Mr Malass made an ill-fated decision to push on with construction so his workers could remain employed as council became 'uncontactable' despite multiple calls.
He told the Land and Environment Court in 2023 that his architect had assured him council would not object to the minor changes, the Sydney Morning Herald reports.
But, his architect had also urged Mr Malass to wait for approval as he might need a building information certificate (BIC) to protect the unauthorised works.
Mr Malass told the court he was later shocked to discover his architect had never applied for approval for the modified development.
In September 2020, council issued a stop-work order following a slew of complaints from frustrated neighbours.
The issue escalated to the Land and Environment Court after a council inspector observed evidence building works were continuing.
Fed-up neighbours claimed they saw workers in high-vis on a daily basis, heard drilling and even saw dust and smoke coming from the home.
But, construction still didn't stop.
Council inspected the property 10 times between June 2021 and September 2022 and observed 'significant building activity' at the home.
A number of new features had been added without approval including a spa room, parking space, gym, playroom and a cool room.
Meanwhile, Mrs Malass - who bought the property - has pleaded guilty to multiple contempt of court charges including continuing with unlawful construction work.
Council told the court the contempt resulted in the Malass' putting the finishing touches on the new build and then unlawfully moving in.
Mrs Malass was fined $20,000 for contempt in November, 2022.
In 2024, Justice Nicola Pain issued an order for the family to vacate the property, demolish the unlawful work and comply with the original building plans.
Despite the demolition order, the home is still standing as the Malass' make a last-ditch bid to salvage parts of the home.
The family has since lodged a new development application and made a formal request for a BCI.
The application would allow the family to remain in the existing home while partially demolishing the first floor and completing some construction work.
Strathfield Local Planning Panel rejected the applications, which are now under appeal before the Land and Environment Court.
Mr Malass told the court he has spent $700,000 in legal fees and that his plumbing business was in voluntary administration due to the ongoing legal battle.
Mrs Malass was ordered to pay council's costs of more than $157,000 in addition to hundreds of thousands of dollars it is seeking in legal fees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump to review Aukus nuclear submarine pact with Australia and UK
The US is reviewing the Aukus nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to assess whether it aligns with Donald Trump 's 'America First' agenda, casting doubt on the trilateral agreement aimed at countering China. A Pentagon official said the 2021 deal was being reviewed to ensure it 'aligned with the president's America First agenda' ahead of his talks with Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese at the upcoming G7 summit in Canada. The £176bn Aukus agreement involving Australia, the US and the UK is a strategic security partnership aimed primarily at helping Australia acquire nuclear submarines using American and British technology, marking a major advancement in the country's military capabilities. Australian defence minister Richard Marles said on Thursday Canberra was confident the pact would proceed and that their government would closely work with the Trump administration. 'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he told ABC News, adding that Aukus was in the strategic interests of all three countries. He claimed that a review of the deal signed under former US president Joe Biden was not a surprise. 'This is a multi-decade plan,' he said. 'There will be governments that come and go, and I think whenever we see a new government a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken.' The statement came after media reports said the US was reviewing its commitment to the pact. It was first reported by the Financial Times, citing six people familiar with the matter. 'The department is reviewing Aukus as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president's 'America first' agenda,' a Pentagon official was quoted as saying. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs.' The Pentagon's top policy adviser, Elbridge Colby, who has previously raised concerns that the US could lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Mr Marles confirmed. Australia and the UK have both faced pressure from the White House to increase their military spending. While the UK has heeded the demand, Australia has resisted it. Mr Albanese is expected to meet Mr Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting. They are likely to discuss Washington's demand that Australia increase its defence spending from 2 to 3.5 per cent of its GDP. Mr Albanese has said Australia's defence spending will rise to 2.3 per cent but has declined to commit to America's target. The possibility of the deal collapsing has caused anxiety in London and Canberra but has been met with cheers in Beijing, experts said. John Lee, an Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was 'primarily an audit of American capability' and whether it could afford to sell up to five nuclear submarines when it wasn't meeting its own production targets. 'Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor,' Mr Lee said. John Hamre, president of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies and a former senior Pentagon official, told a Lowy Institute seminar in Sydney on Thursday there was a perception in Washington that 'the Albanese government has been supportive of Aukus but not really leaning in on Aukus ', with defence spending being part of this.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US review of Aukus submarine deal ‘understandable'
The Government has played down suggestions the US could scrap a major defence deal with the UK and Australia, saying it was 'understandable' for America to review the project. The US is reported to have launched a review of the Aukus pact, raising fears Donald Trump's administration could pull out if it concluded the deal did not meet its 'America first' agenda. The review is headed by Elbridge Colby, an official at the US defence department who has previously described himself as 'sceptical' of the Aukus partnership. But a UK Government spokesperson sought to play down the prospect of an American withdrawal, saying Aukus was 'one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades'. They added: 'It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year. 'The UK will continue to work closely with the US and Australia at all levels to maximise the benefits and opportunities which Aukus presents for our three nations.' Announced in 2021, Aukus involves the three nations building a new generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines and cooperating in other areas of advanced defence technology. The deal will also see Australia buy three Virginia-class submarines from the US ahead of the new vessels being built. That provision has led some in Washington, including Mr Colby, to question the deal on the grounds that the US may need those submarines if it finds itself in a war with China over Taiwan. But last month, the new US ambassador to London used his first major speech in the job to back Aukus. Warren Stephens told an audience in Parliament, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, that the US was 'proud to stand alongside Britain and Australia, two of our closest allies, as we deepen our collaboration to respond to a changing world'. The Liberal Democrats said the US' decision to launch a review of Aukus had 'thrown another grenade into our security partnership' and urged Sir Keir to meet the Australian prime minister to 'develop contingency plans' should America withdraw from the partnership. Helen Maguire, the party's defence spokeswoman, said: 'Even in the face of an imperial Putin and the rising threat posed by China, this White House simply can't be relied upon to support our collective defence. 'Our national security demands that we ramp up talks with our Commonwealth friends and work to plug the gap that the US is threatening to leave in European and global security.'
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Construction of Leinster House bike shed was halted after manhole discovered on site
Construction on Leinster House's controversial €336,000 bicycle shelter had to be halted after a large manhole was 'discovered' on site that was not spotted when drawing up site plans. The OPW told contractors to halt work in the vicinity after 'the uncovering of a significant piece of below ground drainage infrastructure' along with the two-foot-wide manhole. Advertisement A note of a site visit in August 2023 said the discovery meant the OPW would need to reexamine the structure of the bicycle shelter and whether any changes were needed. It said: 'Please now fully cordon off the area around manhole with barriers and place hazard warning signage to note associated risks. Please also notify all site operatives of this site exclusion zone.' The delay caused angst within the Office of Public Works who said the entire summer recess of the Dáil had 'now been missed' for carrying out works on the bicycle shelter. An email said: 'For context - in the past OPW were not permitted to work outside these recess periods and the flexibility on site has been hard won over the years by tight management and actively delivering projects. Advertisement 'With increased security concerns and the visibility of these projects – this flexibility can be rescinded at any time by Leinster House.' The message, sent in September 2023, said delivery of the bicycle shelter was now critical and sought urgent updates on progress. They asked that contractors 'confirm without further delay' how to deal with issues around the foundations and whether it would affect an adjoining wall. The email said: 'This needs to be fully resolved and instruction to start for Friday with the approved option so that ground works can start on Saturday.' Advertisement They also asked for an update on when granite would be delivered for the site and a final date for delivery of the bicycle shelter. It said: 'Fully completed bicycle shelter must be returned to Leinster House on 14th January [2024].' Delays on the project continued however, and the bike shed was not available for use until several months later. The records were only released following an appeal to the Information Commissioner under Freedom of Information laws. Ireland Rent pressure zones: What are they and what change... Read More The OPW had claimed they held no documents that dealt with either delays or cost overruns on the project but were told to reconsider that decision. In an information note, they said the €336,000 project was covered under the 'Maintenance and Minor Works Framework' for delivery of certain projects. The note said: '[The framework] has the flexibility to accommodate stopping and starting of works based on (a) discovery of unknown issues on site and (b) operations of the Houses of the Oireachtas. 'The [framework] allows for closure of site at short notice without incurring delay claims and costs for stoppages, which would be part of the standard public works contract.'
