Court to rule on appeal of challenge to Saskatchewan pronoun law
A judge ruled last year that the court challenge could continue, despite the government's use of the notwithstanding clause.
The law, which came into force in 2023, requires parental consent if children under 16 want to change their names or pronouns at school.
Lawyers for the LGBTQ+ group UR Pride brought forward the challenge, arguing the law causes irreparable harm to gender diverse youth and its case should move ahead.
The government has argued its use of the notwithstanding clause to bring the law into force should end the court challenge.
Nearly a dozen groups intervened in the appeal, including the government of Alberta, which argued in favour of Saskatchewan.
Alberta passed a law last year requiring students 15 and younger have parental consent to change their names or pronouns. Students 16 and 17 don't need consent but their parents have to be notified.
New Brunswick also had a pronoun policy but Premier Susan Holt revised it after she was elected in 2024.
UR Pride amended its challenge and argues Saskatchewan's law violates Section 12 of the Charter, which is the right to be free from cruel and unusual treatment. The province cited other sections when it invoked the notwithstanding clause.
Former Justice Minister Bronwyn Eyre said last year the Saskatchewan Party government wouldn't hesitate to use the notwithstanding clause again.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
7 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canada's first-past-the-post voting system is constitutional, Ontario appeal court rules
OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting BC and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting BC and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but amongst the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting BC and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
'A gross, disgusting feeling': Denare Beach wildfire survivor slams Sask. gov't response
A Denare Beach man who lost his home to a wildfire is calling out Premier Scott Moe and the Saskatchewan government for abandoning northern communities when they needed help most. 'It's a gross, disgusting feeling that nobody's there for us at the Sask. Party. I'm ashamed to even be part of Saskatchewan some days,' said Dustin Trumbley. Trumbley and his fiancée were left homeless after flames tore through Denare Beach. He says his faith in leadership has been shattered. 'We need answers, we want some accountability from the Premier,' Trumbley said. 'That's his job, he's a leader. I voted for him. I wish I didn't, but I did. And I thought he would give some accountability by now. But he hasn't.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy NDP northern affairs critic Jordan McPhail, speaking alongside Trumbley, criticized the provincial government for failing to support evacuees, overlooking critical resources, delaying federal assistance, and not visiting hard-hit northern communities. Story continues below advertisement 'The same Scott Moe, who has yet to tour the northern communities devastated by wildfires, Denare Beach, East Trout Lake and Sucker River, and hear firsthand from residents,' McPhail said. Premier Scott Moe visited the northern communities of La Loche and Beauval on Monday, ahead of a Saskatchewan Party golf fundraiser at Elk Ridge Resort on Tuesday. Critics say this move shows misplaced priorities. 'Scott Moe's actions in all of this remind me a lot of how his buddy Donald Trump acts. He plays golf while everything around him burns,' said Brittney Senger, the NDP's ethics and democracy critic. The NDP is demanding that Moe cancel the fundraiser for his party's political campaigns and instead meet directly with evacuees. 'The Saskatchewan Party caucus has certainly abandoned northern Saskatchewan this wildfire season,' McPhail said. 'They need to cancel this political golf fundraiser and get their asses up into northern Saskatchewan and start talking to people that have lost so much.' Trumbley said that he isn't seeking government funds or any handouts for evacuees, but instead wants to action, true leadership and accountability. 'I don't want financial assistance. I said this right from the start. I just don't want it to happen to anybody else.' Global News reached out to the Saskatchewan government for comment but did not hear back before deadline.
Vancouver Sun
9 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. group loses bid to overturn Canada's federal voting system
OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting B.C. and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting B.C. and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but among the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting B.C. and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote.
