
Iconic takeaway item to disappear
Straws attached to drink containers and spoons and forks attached to pre-packaged foods are also on the chopping block from September 1, along with plastic fruit stickers.
'These bans encourage reusable, recyclable or compostable alternatives,' South Australian Deputy Premier Susan Close said.
'South Australians are increasingly looking at ways to reduce their reliance on single-use plastics which devastate our environment. Plastic soy sauce fish packets will be banned in South Australia in September. Supplied Credit: Supplied
'The state government will continue to assist South Australian businesses via various programs to assist them transition.
'Many South Australian businesses have already moved away from single-use items and are embracing reusable and compostable items.'
In September 2023, the government banned plastic stemmed cotton buds, plastic pizza savers, single-use plastic plates and bowls.
Then a year later, it banned plastic bags, plastic balloon sticks, plastic balloon ties, plastic confetti, plastic bread tags and single-use plastic coffee cups and plastic lids, among other items. SA Deputy Premier Susan Close said the ban on single use plastics would help preserve the environment. NewsWire / Naomi Jellicoe Credit: News Corp Australia
Since 2021, the government credits local business with removing more than eight million single-use plastic items.
Evergreen Deli's Elliott Horner said the move away from plastics would help preserve the natural world.
'Being nestled within Adelaide Botanic Garden, environmental consciousness is our constant companion, as we care for the very place we call home,' the venue and events manager said.
Multiple states have moved to ban single use plastics, including NSW and Victoria.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
22 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Absolute priority': Bank's $130m pay bungle
A big-four bank has revealed it will pay back workers $130m due to a payroll system problem at the same time that it announced an eye-watering profit. In its latest quarterly results, NAB announced a slight increase in third-quarter profits while pointing to a jump in operating expenses due to back paying workers. According to the bank, operating expenses were up 4.5 per cent on last year as it dealt with payroll issues estimated to come in at $130m for the 2025 financial year. The bank did not say how many employees need to be back paid. 'NAB payroll review and remediation is ongoing and total costs remain uncertain,' the bank said. NAB announced it has underpaid staff a further $130m. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire The payroll review first began in 2019 and led to costs of more than $250m between 2020 and 2022. In 2020, NAB said it had underpayments to staff dating back all the way to October 2012. Moving staff to a new enterprise agreement in 2024 identified further payroll issues. As a result, NAB has initiated a broader review into payroll-related benefits. NAB group executive people and culture Sarah White said a dedicated team was continuing to investigate and resolve issues, remediate colleagues and ensure sustained future compliance. 'Paying our colleagues correctly is an absolute priority,' she said. 'We are sorry and apologise to our colleagues that this has happened and have commenced remediating those impacted.' Meanwhile, NAB reported a slight increase in third-quarter cash earnings on the back of improved margins and growth in both business and home lending. NAB's quarterly profits came in at $1.77bn. NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia NAB made $1.77bn for the three months ending June 30, up from $1.75bn this time last year. NAB said business lending grew 4 per cent and Australian home lending grew 2 per cent during the quarter. Net interest margins increased 8 basis points. Expenses were also up 3 per cent on the back of higher staff costs, investment in new technology and remediation costs. Bank deposits were largely stable over the quarter but are up 6 per cent over the nine months to June 30. The major lender also booked a credit impairment charge of $254m in the quarter, mainly related to business lending in Australia and New Zealand as well as unsecured Australian retail portfolios. NAB chief executive Andrew Irvine said focusing on key priorities led to Monday's result. 'We remain optimistic about the outlook and are well placed to manage NAB for the long term and deliver sustainable growth and returns for shareholders,' he said.


Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Qantas braced for mammoth penalty
Qantas is braced to find out how much it is expected to pay in penalties after it unlawfully sacked more than 1800 ground staff. The airline was found to have acted unlawfully three times when it fired 1820 staff in favour of outsourced contractors during the height of the Covid pandemic. While an earlier compensation hearing before Justice Michael Lee found Qantas should pay $120m to impacted workers, a further three-day hearing May sought to decide the additional penalty Qantas must pay for the 2020 decision. The maximum penalty Qantas can be ordered to pay is $121m, on top of the compensation fund that is now in the process of being administered to workers. Since Justice Lee reserved his decision in May, many sacked Qantas workers have anxiously awaited the final figure. The court will decide what Qantas must pay on top of the $120m compensation fund which is now in the process of being administered to workers. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia On Monday, he is expected to reveal the full amount, which should be well into the millions. The Federal Court earlier found that Qantas had acted against protections in the Fair Work Act in its outsourcing and was partly motivated by a desire to prevent industrial action. The airline appealed the decision to the full bench of the Federal Court and later the High Court, both of which were unsuccessful. After losing the appeal, the union and Qantas went to mediation to determine how much Qantas would have to pay the outsourced workers for economic losses linked to lost wages. TWU secretary Michael Kaine told media ahead of the hearing the airline's decision to get rid of a 'loyal workforce' was 'appalling' and the 'biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history'. 'The penalty to Qantas must reflect this and send a message to every other company in Australia that you cannot sack your workers to prevent them from using their industrial rights,' he said. Meanwhile, Noel Hutley SC told the court in May that Qantas should pay the maximum penalty given its decision was the 'largest ever instance of the contravention of the Fair Work Act'. He said Qantas was faced with an 'once-in-a-lifetime opportunity' during the pandemic to save more than $100m per year by outsourcing workers and were driven by the 'temptation of the potential to produce a massive profit'. Qantas recorded a $1.5bn in earnings for the first half of the 2025 financial year – $916m of that from its domestic operations, including its budget carrier Jetstar. Qantas/NewsWire Credit: Supplied However, Qantas barrister Justin Gleeson SC said any penalty close to the maximum would be 'manifestly unfair'. 'Qantas has accepted the seriousness of its conduct,' he said. 'The court can and should impose a significant deterrent penalty. However, it is in effect a first contravention (of the Fair Work Act).' On the first day of the hearing, Qantas people manager Catherine Walsh took the stand and issued an apology on the airline's behalf. 'I want to reinforce that we are deeply sorry, and we apologise for the impact on the workers, the TWU (Transport Workers Union), to the court for their time and to the family and friends that felt the impacts, we are deeply sorry,' she said. However, the airline was later criticised for failing to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson during the hearing, and instead calling Ms Walsh, who was not employed by Qantas at the time of the sackings. 'One would have thought if you were truly contrite, you would put someone in the witness box who was there at the relevant time,' Justice Lee said. The TWU is seeking a large majority of the penalty and also argued affected workers should receive further compensation. The funds may otherwise will go directly to the Commonwealth.

Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
This star chef's pop-up roamed Australia. Now the restaurant has a permanent home
In regards to the menu, Sapwell-Stone is reluctant to name specific dishes this far out from opening. Instead, she's looking forward to working with South Australian producers and adapting her cooking to supplies from local providers such as Michael Wohlstadt of The Dairyman in the Barossa Valley and Smoky Bay razorfish farmer James Boylan. One thing she'll be mindful of, however, is keeping the food lighter and brighter than the more-is-more cooking of previous years. 'Fine dining has changed a lot in the last five years,' she says. 'You'd go to these places and it would be fat on fat and rich and rich. It was very delicious, but you'd leave thinking, 'I can only do that on special occasions.' 'I love cooking food using nutrient-dense vegetables and having a fresh touch on things. I want customers to leave Esmay feeling good and having put something good into their bodies.'