Concern grows for safety of Afghan woman and trans friend detained by Taliban from Kabul airport
The Taliban reportedly detained at least two members of the LGBT+ community in Afghanistan after finding out that they were on their way to Iran.
Maryam Ravish, 19, and Maeve Alcina Pieescu, 23, a trans person, were taken away from the Kabul airport last Thursday as they were boarding their morning flight to Tehran, Ms Ravish's same-sex partner Parwen Hussaini told The Independent on Wednesday.
Ms Ravish and Ms Hussaini, who have been in a relationship for nearly four years, were looking to escape to Iran to live away from the Taliban's scrutiny, she said. The escape was going to be documented by their friend Maeve Alcina Pieescu.
The three of them were set to leave on a Mahan Air flight, scheduled to depart Kabul at 10.35am and land in Tehran by 1pm.
Since the Taliban government requires women to be accompanied by a male chaperone, they had to take along a travel agent. The whereabouts of the travel agent were not immediately clear.
While Ms Hussaini was able to board the flight without any trouble, Ms Ravish and Ms Pieescu were stopped by the Taliban's intelligence agents, who checked their phones and found out they were members of the queer community, said Nemat Sadat, their employer and CEO of Roshaniya, an LGBT+ community organisation in Afghanistan.
'I last heard from them when they were being taken away by Taliban's armed men inside the airport in a car,' Mr Sadat told The Independent. 'I fear that they have now been arrested by them and lodged in Taliban's custody somewhere in Kabul.'
Mr Sadat, who had been working with Ms Ravish and Ms Pieescu for over a year, said he was concerned for their welfare as the Taliban prisons were known to be 'extremely harsh' for transgender people.
'The Taliban free women from prisons with some guarantees from family members but they are likely to punish, sexually harass, and even subject members of the trans community to torture in prison,' he said. 'It is very likely that Ms Maeve is being punished in the prison by the Taliban right now.'
Mr Sadat said Roshaniya had spent more than $5,000 (£3,865) and several months of planning to safely evacuate the three LGBT+ members from Afghanistan. The NGO also planned to document their story of being in a same-sex relationship in Afghanistan.
The Independent was shown copies of the airplane tickets, passports and visas obtained for Ms Ravish, Ms Hussaini and Ms Pieescu to leave Afghanistan.
'The actual source of this problem is rooted in the Taliban's interpretation of Islamic Sharia law, which deems homosexuality forbidden and a woman's place to be in the home, which is why Afghan women are required to have a male chaperone if they wish to leave the house and travel on their own,' Mr Sadat said.
Ms Hussaini said that she and Ms Ravish fell in love in school in December 2021, shortly after the Taliban took back power in Kabul. It was difficult carrying on a same-sex relationship in the city, so they called off their relationship one year later. But they mustered the courage to get back together in 2023, Ms Hussaini told The Independent over the phone from Tehran.
They were supposed to start a fresh chapter in Iran this week as they realised their relationship would not be accepted by their families in Afghanistan.
'My agony is indescribable. I knew that if I were to leave Afghanistan, it would not be without Maryam. She knew she would leave her family because they would never support us. I am spending every waking moment alone in Iran and in guilt that my partner is in prison because of our bid to escape Afghanistan,' Ms Hussaini said.
The Independent has reached out to the Taliban for a comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
What to know about Trump's travel ban taking effect Monday
DAKAR, Senegal — President Donald Trump has banned citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States and restricted access for those from seven others, citing national security concerns in resurrecting and expanding a hallmark policy from his first term that will mostly affect people from Africa and the Middle East. The ban announced Wednesday applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The heightened restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The policy takes effect Monday at 12:01 a.m. and does not have an end date. Here's what to know about the new rules: Since returning to the White House, Trump has launched an unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement that has pushed the limits of executive power and clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. The travel ban stems from a Jan. 20 executive order Trump issued requiring the Department of State, Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to compile a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the U.S. The aim is to 'protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes,' the administration said. In a video posted on social media, Trump tied the new ban to a terrorist attack last Sunday in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. 1. Green card holders2. Dual citizens, including U.S. citizens who also have citizenship of one of the banned countries3. Some athletes: athletes and their coaches traveling to the U.S. for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting event as determined by the U.S. secretary of state4. Afghans who worked for the U.S. government or its allies in Afghanistan and are holders of Afghan special immigrant visas5. Iranians belonging to an ethnic or religious minority who are fleeing prosecution6. Certain foreign national employees of the U.S. government who have served abroad for at least 15 years, and their spouses and children7. People who were granted asylum or admitted to the U.S. as refugees before the ban took effect8. People with U.S. family members who apply for visas in connection to their spouses, children or parents9. Diplomats and foreign government officials on official visits10. Those traveling to U.N. headquarters in New York solely on official U.N. business11. Representatives of international organizations and NATO on official visits in the U.S.12. Children adopted by U.S. citizens13. People from targeted countries who already have valid visas, although the Department of Homeland Security still has the authority to deny entry, even to those with a valid visa Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban makes exceptions for Afghans on special immigrant visas, who were generally the people who worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there. The list can be changed, the administration said in a document, if authorities in the designated countries make 'material improvements' to their own rules and procedures. New countries can be added 'as threats emerge around the world.' The State Department instructed U.S. embassies and consulates on Friday not to revoke visas previously issued to people from the 12 countries listed in the ban. In a cable sent to all U.S. diplomatic missions, the department said 'no action should be taken for issued visas which have already left the consular section' and that 'no visas issued prior to the effective date should be revoked pursuant to this proclamation.' However, visa applicants from affected countries whose applications have been approved but have not yet received their visas will be denied, according to the cable, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. And, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting on Monday. Early in Trump's first term, he issued an executive order banning travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries: Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen. It was one of the most chaotic and confusing moments of his young presidency. Travelers from those nations were either barred from getting on flights to the U.S. or detained at U.S. airports after they landed. They included students and faculty, as well as businesspeople, tourists and people visiting friends and family. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban,' was retooled amid legal challenges until a version was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. That ban affected various categories of travelers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, plus North Koreans and some Venezuelan government officials and their families.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Travel ban may shut door for Afghan family to bring niece to US for a better life
IRMO, S.C. (AP) — Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees to end up less than a decade later talking about their journey on a plush love seat in the family's three-bedroom suburban American home. He and his wife dreamed of bringing her niece to the United States to share in that bounty. Maybe she could study to become a doctor and then decide her own path. But that door slams shut on Monday as America put in place a travel ban for people from Afghanistan and a dozen other countries. 'It's kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,' Mohammad Sharafoddin said, referring to the country's Taliban rulers. 'We didn't think about this travel ban.' Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021 as the Western forces were in the final phase of their withdrawal from the country, they have barred education for women and girls beyond sixth grade, most employment and many public spaces. Last August, the Taliban introduced laws that ban women's voices and bare faces outside the home. President Donald Trump signed the travel ban Wednesday. It is similar to one in place during his first administration but covers more countries. Along with Afghanistan, travel to the U.S. is banned from Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Trump said visitors who overstay visas, like the man charged in an attack that injured dozens of demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, are a danger to the country. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, which isn't included in the ban. The countries chosen for the ban have deficient screening of their citizens, often refuse to take them back and have a high percentage of people who stay in the U.S. after their visas expire, Trump said. The ban makes exceptions for people from Afghanistan on Special Immigrant Visas who generally worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there. Thousands of refugees came from Afghanistan Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. It is a path Sharafoddin took with his wife and son out of Afghanistan walking on those mountain roads in the dark then through Pakistan, Iran and into Turkey. He worked in a factory for years in Turkey, listening to YouTube videos on headphones to learn English before he was resettled in Irmo, South Carolina, a suburb of Columbia. His son is now 11, and he and his wife had a daughter in the U.S. who is now 3. There is a job at a jewelry maker that allows him to afford a two-story, three-bedroom house. Food was laid out on two tables Saturday for a celebration of the Muslim Eid al-Adha holiday. Sharafoddin's wife, Nuriya, said she is learning English and driving — two things she couldn't do in Afghanistan under Taliban rule. 'I'm very happy to be here now, because my son is very good at school and my daughter also. I think after 18 years they are going to work, and my daughter is going to be able to go to college,' she said. The family wants to help a niece It is a life she wanted for her niece too. The couple show videos from their cellphones of her drawing and painting. When the Taliban returned to power in 2021, their niece could no longer study. So they started to plan to get her to the U.S. at least to further her education. Nuriya Sharafoddin doesn't know if her niece has heard the news from America yet. She hasn't had the heart to call and tell her. 'I'm not ready to call her. This is not good news. This is very sad news because she is worried and wants to come,' Nuriya Sharafoddin said. While the couple spoke, Jim Ray came by. He has helped a number of refugee families settle in Columbia and helped the Sharafoddins navigate questions in their second language. Ray said Afghans in Columbia know the return of the Taliban changed how the U.S. deals with their native country. But while the ban allows spouses, children or parents to travel to America, other family members aren't included. Many Afghans know their extended families are starving or suffering, and suddenly a path to help is closed, Ray said. 'We'll have to wait and see how the travel ban and the specifics of it actually play out,' Ray said. 'This kind of thing that they're experiencing where family cannot be reunited is actually where it hurts the most.' The Taliban criticize the travel ban The Taliban have criticized Trump for the ban, with their top leader Hibatullah Akhundzada saying the U.S. was now the oppressor of the world. 'Citizens from 12 countries are barred from entering their land — and Afghans are not allowed either,' he said on a recording shared on social media. 'Why? Because they claim the Afghan government has no control over its people and that people are leaving the country. So, oppressor! Is this what you call friendship with humanity?' Jeffrey Collins, The Associated Press
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
I watched migrants breaking through the EU's flimsy first line of defence
As the sun sets and the mosquitoes multiply, a small group of young men quietly gathers at a cluster of abandoned stone farmhouses in the northern flatlands of Serbia, roughly a mile from the border with Hungary. Tonight, led by two facilitators, the 10 plan to reach the border on foot, then cross it by climbing over several layers of fencing fortified with barbed wire. This is the next step on their long journey to flee Taliban rule in Afghanistan, with a few hoping to make it all the way to the UK. It will require quickly scaling a ladder that will be hauled in for the purpose, avoiding detection by the many surveillance cameras that dot the border fence, and staying out of sight of police from Serbia, Hungary and Frontex – the EU's border force. This is the scenario unfolding daily, in secret, at multiple points in the north and west of Serbia along the border with Hungary, Croatia and Bosnia. These countries form part of the Western Balkans route for migrants, popular with those fleeing Syria and Afghanistan, who typically travel overland via Bulgaria and Turkey, and, in some cases, Iran. Many of them then make their way across Europe to the northern coast of France, where they board small boats and cross the English Channel before landing on the UK's shores. In 2024, Syrians and Afghans were the top two nationalities of migrants arriving via small boats, accounting for nearly a third of all recorded Channel crossings, according to government data. Russia also has a part to play in fuelling migration, with evidence pointing to Moscow physically moving people towards the EU's borders and supporting smugglers, as a way to destabilise Europe. Efforts to address the Western Balkans route have been hailed as a success, with Frontex reporting a 78 per cent drop in irregular border crossings last year. However, experts say that the decrease is not quite as dramatic as trumpeted, because much of the crossing activity is not captured in the data, with many migrants moving undetected. As The Telegraph found, the route remains active, particularly along the Serbia-Hungary border. It is happening even as Sir Keir Starmer continues to pledge to tackle illegal migration and 'smash the gangs' by funding foreign law enforcement. The Prime Minister announced greater co-operation to resolve the escalating immigration and asylum crisis during a visit to Albania in May. Some migrants choose to pay smugglers to travel on the more circuitous – and therefore less expensive – route to cross into Bosnia, then Croatia, an EU member state. Those with no funds try an even more dangerous option – to clamber across the undersides of bridges that span a river demarcating the border between Serbia and Bosnia. 'There is some decrease, definitely, but it's not in such a high percentage as presented,' said Milica Svabic, a lawyer with KlikAktiv, an NGO in Belgrade that provides services to migrants, from legal information to humanitarian aid. 'People are just not as visible as they were before,' she said. Some authorities have also pointed to a decline in the number of people staying at official migrant camps run by the Serbian government. But many migrants told The Telegraph they were deliberately choosing to stay away from state-run facilities out of fear that they would be deported by Serbia, where the government is under pressure from other European countries which have hardened their migration policies. Gone, too, are the sprawling tent cities that used to cover border areas and the hordes of migrants resting in public parks, spots that remain well-known to police and are routinely subject to checks. Migrants detained during such operations also risk being deported. Instead, migrants are sleeping in abandoned farmhouses and factories by night, and staying nomadic by day to avoid being discovered by the police. Signs of people on the move were plentiful. In Serbia's borderlands, the ground was dotted with discarded clothes, old SIM cards, and empty cans of energy drinks – a cheap, quick way to re-fuel while on the go. Darkened firepits used to cook meagre meals were also a common sight. In one migrant hideout, a toothbrush and tube of toothpaste were stashed inside an old fireplace, and a Koran was perched on a window sill. Nobody was present, but a covered pot contained recently cooked rice. Nearby, in a wooded area, The Telegraph found a trio of young men from Afghanistan sheltering under large, leafy trees. Their shoes, drenched from heavy rain the day before, were drying nearby in the sun. The eldest, a 25 year-old who had worked in the local police force under the previous Afghan government, was forced to escape after the Taliban resumed power in 2021. 'We didn't have any democracy,' said Farid, whose name has been changed at his request for fear of retribution. 'The Taliban was even controlling whether we could shave: they wanted us to grow long beards. 'My family is asking me for a better future, so I'm giving it my all, trying my best. All I think about is them.' He added: 'I have no other choice but to go: the Taliban will kill me if I'm sent back. My son is seven years old, and he begs me to move him out of Afghanistan, too.' Two years ago, Farid paid smugglers $3,000 (£2,200) to get him from Afghanistan to Iran, where he waited about half a year before then moving on to Turkey. There, he worked unofficially at a plastics factory, saving money for the next leg of his journey – $4,000 (£2,900) to travel from Turkey through Bulgaria and into Serbia. It took several months to amass the funds, as the factory boss sometimes withheld his wages. In all, it took an exhausting 17 days to move across three countries, mostly on foot and in secret, with the help of a guide. Now, with the money they had saved spent, and hiding near the border with Hungary, he and the two others, both 18, were mulling the possibility of scaling the border fence into the EU on their own. A best-case scenario would be if they could find a section of fence that had already been cut by others – the easiest way to get across quickly. If that failed, they would have no choice but to turn again to smugglers for help. Migrants, like those in Farid's group, are generally moving in much smaller numbers in an effort to evade the authorities. In previous years, it was common to encounter groups of up to 70 people walking toward the border. Now, a large group would consist of around 20 people. Meeting points along the border, designated by smugglers, begin to get busier as the sun sets – with the last hours of daylight used for preparation. The Telegraph observed a group of migrants dragging two small tree trunks to light a fire to cook and eat a final meal to fuel their night-time journey. They might make multiple attempts before a successful, undetected crossing into Hungary. Some had already tried before, getting as far as Budapest, the country's capital, before being pushed back to Serbia. In some instances, the border hinders police. For example, Hungarian forces can see smuggling activity on the Serbian side but cannot cross over to intervene. Like Farid, some of the men in the group The Telegraph shadowed – a mix of teenagers and people aged in their 20s – had worked in the military or police under the previous government. When the Taliban came to power, they faced extreme persecution or death, so decided to flee. Mustafa, 28, who declined to give his real name, carried in his backpack a prized possession: a sleeping bag. 'I hope to get to Birmingham, where my brother arrived about 10 months ago,' he said. 'We couldn't go together, because I was still working in a textile factory in Turkey.' The data cannot show the individual circumstances that affect exactly when migrants choose to travel. Many that The Telegraph met along Serbia's border, like Mustafa, had stayed for months or even years in transit countries, such as Iran and Turkey, working odd jobs in secret. Many remained the sole breadwinners for their families, and had dual goals of saving enough to get back on the road, while also supporting their relatives at home. They had to find a way to make money along the way. Crossing from Serbia into the EU was almost straightforward, in contrast to what they had endured until now: escaping the Taliban; crossing multiple borders; evading many different militaries and police forces; and dodging sophisticated surveillance like the thermal cameras on the southern and eastern borders of Turkey. As the night sky darkened, Mustafa's group quietly prepared to leave. To pass the time – nobody would attempt to cross the border until it was pitch black – Mustafa pulled out his phone to watch a short video online with the other boys. He made sure to turn the volume down in case anyone was within earshot, though the group was fairly well hidden in an expansive stretch of quiet farmland. When the time came, they shrugged on their backpacks and readied themselves to embark on another epic leg – in hopes of building a new, better life. 'Europe,' they said together, before turning around and trudging towards the border. Additional reporting by Javid Khan Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
