S'pore's 15th Parliament to open on Sept 5; President's Address to set out Govt's priorities
The sitting will start with the election of the Speaker of Parliament and swearing-in of MPs, said Leader of the House Indranee Rajah in a statement on June 13.
Mr Seah Kian Peng, an MP for Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC, is the current Speaker.
At the session, President Tharman Shanmugaratnam will deliver an opening address to outline the Government's priorities, policies and programmes. This will be followed by a debate on his address from Sept 22 to 26.
The President's Address is important as it will set out strategies and key policies to steer Singapore through the current challenging geopolitical climate and economic uncertainties, said Ms Indranee in a Facebook post on June 13.
This address is delivered by the President on behalf of the Government whenever Parliament reopens.
At the opening of the 14th Parliament after the 2020 General Election, then president Halimah Yacob said Singapore stood at a time of great change, and that the country had to rethink its problems and evolve its social models and policies to suit the new circumstances.
This included taking a fresh look at crucial pillars of society, such as its concept of meritocracy, multiracialism, and the way it conducted its politics, she said then.
In her Facebook post, Ms Indranee noted that while MPs are already on the ground doing constituency work, parliamentary work begins only after its official opening.
The 14th Parliament last sat in early April before dissolving on April 15 ahead of the general election on May 3.
In total, 99 MPs will be sworn in, up from 95 in the 14th Parliament.
Of the 99, 97 were elected at the polls while another two – Mr Andre Low and Ms Eileen Chong from the WP – were elected as Non-Constituency MPs (NCMPs).
The pair were elected as the best-performing losers at the polls as part of the NCMP scheme that provides for opposition representation in Parliament.
Overall, the ruling PAP will have 87 seats, with the rest filled by the WP.
There will be a total of 29 first-time MPs sworn in – 24 from the PAP and five from the WP.
Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction
Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
16 hours ago
- Bloomberg
A Trader's Guide to President Prabowo's First Indonesian Budget
As Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto presents his 2026 budget to parliament Friday, the market will be watching how he intends to promote his populist agenda while maintaining fiscal discipline. Prabowo's first State of the Nation address will outline his plans to raise economic growth toward 8% while also increasing handouts and boosting Indonesia's self-sufficiency. Specific announcements may lift shares of foodmakers, retailers, banks and commodities firms.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Role of Indonesian military in counter-terrorism under Prabowo administration
In March 2025, Indonesia's parliament amended the country's military law to allow military personnel to hold more civilian posts. The move was criticised by rights groups, who feared it could once again reaffirm military impunity, reminiscent of former President Suharto's New Order era when the military permeated national politics and many spheres of domestic affairs. After Suharto's fall in May 1998, largely for political rather than operational-security reasons, the Indonesian military (Tentara Nasional Indonesia – TNI) was denied a role in counter-terrorism, as reflected in the 2004 Military Law. This stemmed from widespread backlash against the military's abuse of power at the time and the belief that in a democratising Indonesia, counter-terrorism should be the domain of the police, while the military focused on external security. Government officials now argue that the 2004 law is outdated and ill-suited to the country's present-day challenges. These include tackling a complex security environment in which competing cost pressures on law enforcement and other government agencies mean the military could play a larger role in assisting the police to protect the country from terrorism. Indonesian military's residual counter-terrorism role In recent years, the military has already played a part in domestic security affairs. This began with the establishment of the National Anti-Terrorism Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme – BNPT) in September 2010, which formally brought the military into a counter-terrorism role. In September 2013, the military and BNPT signed a Memorandum of Understanding, allowing the former to gather information on terrorist activities domestically. Following an agreement in March 2015, the police began training young military personnel in counter-terrorism. On June 9, the military's Joint Special Operations Command (Koopsusgab) was formally launched, extending the military's reach into a field that had been the police's preserve since 2002. Police-dominated counter-terrorism Since the October 2002 Bali bombings, counter-terrorism has largely been the responsibility of the police. Indonesia established various police-led counter-terrorism agencies such as Densus 88 and the BNPT to deal with terrorist threats. The police have largely succeeded in containing terrorism and dismantling networks, killing more than 200 terrorists and detaining over 1,500. Pressure for larger military role in counter-terrorism Although post-Suharto political conditions relegated the military's role in domestic security, pressures have grown for the TNI to take on a larger counter-terrorism role. First, some observers argue that police operations have not always been effective. The ability of terrorists such as Abu Dujana to return to Indonesia undetected from the Philippines, and the killing of nearly 40 police personnel by terrorists by 2015, highlighted gaps in police capabilities. Despite Densus 88's significant successes, its operational tactics have also become increasingly controversial, with criticism that it was more inclined to kill terrorists than capture them. Second, as Indonesian terrorists are largely home-grown and target domestic objectives – the so-called 'near enemy' – some argue the military is well-placed to assist the police. This is due to its territorial presence throughout the country, down to the village-level command or Babinsa (village sergeants), which provide invaluable local intelligence. Finally, the military is well-resourced to support the police in counter-terrorism. In addition to its historical experience, it has highly trained Special Forces that can be deployed to neutralise armed terrorists. Recent counter-terrorism operations involving the military The TNI has recently featured in counter-terrorism operations. The first notable example is Operation Madago Raya, previously known as Operation Tinombala. Launched in 2016, it was a joint military-police operation to neutralise members of the East Indonesia Mujahideen (MIT) terrorist group in Poso, Sulawesi. The operation was successful, with all known members of the group killed. In West Papua province, the military has taken a proactive role since 2019 in countering insurgents linked to the Free Papua Movement (OPM), which was designated a terrorist group in 2021. As Indonesia's population grows, with new provinces formed amid emerging security challenges, the TNI has also expanded its territorial command. Plans are in place to add 22 new regional military commands (Kodam), up from the current 15. This expansion is driven by factors such as the ongoing separatist challenge in Papua, tensions in the South China Sea involving the Indonesian Natuna Islands, and the persistent threat of extremism and terrorism. Critics of the military's counter-terrorism role The military's involvement in counter-terrorism is not without its critics. The TNI's past human rights abuses in domestic operations, and concerns over its lack of familiarity with the current terrorist landscape, are significant objections. Despite shortcomings, many argue that the police have performed relatively well in a democratising Indonesia, where terrorists have been comprehensively eliminated, apprehended, or prosecuted. As terrorism is considered a crime rather than an external threat, the police are seen as better placed to manage it. There are also concerns that military involvement could lead to inter-service competition for resources and jurisdictional disputes, undermining Indonesia's counter-terrorism effectiveness. Some allege that the military is motivated by access to the large financial resources allocated for counter-terrorism, previously controlled by the police. Despite these concerns, the government does not appear to be replacing the police's role in counter-terrorism. Rather, amid a rapidly evolving security environment and cost constraints, it seeks a larger military role in neutralising armed terrorists. This is most evident in the continued military-police cooperation since Operation Tinombala. Since the 2002 Bali bombings, Indonesia has recognised the need for a whole-of-government approach, including addressing the root causes of terrorism and violent radicalism. This involves oversight of educational institutions, ideological deradicalisation, management of religious institutions, monitoring of mass and social media, tackling socio-economic issues such as poverty, and preventing prison radicalisation – all beyond the military's remit. A combined military-police approach is thus the most viable way to contain terrorism, particularly given the evolving threat from pro-IS groups in the country. Jasminder Singh is an Associate Research Fellow with the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR) at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the writer and do not necessarily represent that of Twentytwo13. Main image by TNI.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
China slaps temporary duties on Canadian canola
By Ella Cao, Lewis Jackson and Naveen Thukral BEIJING/SINGAPORE (Reuters) -China on Tuesday announced preliminary anti-dumping duties on Canadian canola imports, a fresh escalation in the year-long trade dispute that began with Ottawa's imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle imports last August. The provisional rate will be set at 75.8%, effective from Thursday, the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement. ICE November canola futures fell 4% to a three-month low after the announcement. China, the world's largest importer of canola - also known as rapeseed - sources nearly all of its supplies of the product from Canada. The steep duties would likely all but end imports if they are maintained. "This is huge. Who will pay a 75% deposit to bring Canadian canola to China? It is like telling Canada that we don't need your canola, thank you very much," said one Singapore-based oilseed trader. China's Ministry of Commerce said on Tuesday an anti-dumping probe launched in September 2024 had found Canada's agricultural sector and particularly the canola industry had benefited from "substantial" government subsidies and preferential policies. China has until September, when the investigation formally ends, to make a final decision on the duties, though it has the option of extending that deadline by six months. A final ruling could result in a different rate, or overturn Tuesday's decision. The decision marks a shift from the conciliatory tone struck in June when China's Premier Li Qiang said there were no deep-seated conflicts of interest between the countries during a phone call with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. "This move... will put additional pressure on Canada's government to sort through trade frictions with China," said Trivium China agriculture analyst Even Rogers Pay. The Canadian embassy in Beijing did not respond to Reuters' request for comment. Separately, China also launched an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian pea starch and imposed provisional duties on imports of halogenated butyl rubber, according to ministry statements. NO EASY REPLACEMENT Replacing millions of tons of Canadian canola is likely to be difficult at short notice, say analysts. China primarily uses imported canola to make animal feed for its aquaculture sector. A separate duty on Canadian canola meal imports in March has already put these supplies at risk. The move provides an opportunity for Australia, which looks set to regain access to the Chinese market with a few test cargoes this year after a years-long freeze in the trade, Pay said. Australia, the second-largest canola exporter, has been shut out of the Chinese market since 2020 due mainly to Chinese rules to stop the spread of fungal plant disease. However, even if Australian imports increase, "fully replacing Canadian canola will be very difficult unless import demand drops sharply," said Donatas Jankauskas, an analyst with commodity data firm CM Navigator. ($1 = 1.3789 Canadian dollars) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
