Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing
Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller, chairwoman of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Infant Feeding, has said new parents face inflated prices and unfounded health claims on packaging.
Firms are also 'exploiting a legal loophole' to circumvent rules about the advertising of formula, she added, and offering their product to hospitals at discounted rates, giving parents the impression of an NHS recommendation.
The Chichester MP is raising concerns after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a formula market study report earlier this year highlighting a number of issues, including misleading marketing, information gaps and cost impacts on low-income families.
Formula manufacturers increased prices by an average of 25% in the two years up to November 2023 and they remain at near record highs.
Parents often believe that a higher price tag means a more nutritious formula for their baby, despite regulations requiring all formula on the market to be nutritionally equivalent.
Ms Brown-Fuller told the PA news agency: 'There are parents who believe that by buying the more expensive formula, they are supporting their child's feeding or growth or potential more when actually all of those milks are nutritionally equivalent.'
There are even reports of parents buying more expensive formula but using fewer scoops per bottle to try and make it last longer, which Ms Brown-Fuller branded 'dangerous'.
These parents are doing what they think is best for their children, she said, when in reality there is 'no difference' between the £14 tub and £7 tub of formula.
The Liberal Democrat noted that companies will use their packaging to 'imply a nutritional superiority', with phrases like 'nutritionally complete' or 'supports a healthy immune system'.
She asked: 'Where is the evidence that suggests that that formula is in any way a boost to an infant's immune system above any others?'
Meanwhile, other formulas will write 'with added…' and name ingredients like Omega 3, certain vitamins, or iron.
Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'It has to have a certain number of nutrients in it anyway. And anything that is additional potentially shouldn't be in there because they are working around a very strict compliance code.'
She explained: 'They wouldn't be able to make these bold claims if they were a medication but, because it's a food, it's a source of nutrition, they're not held to the same standards.'
Meanwhile, it is illegal to advertise newborn formula in the UK but firms are allowed to advertise follow-on milk for babies that are six months and older.
This is because World Health Organisation (WHO) guidance is that breast milk should be the main source of nutrition for all infants until they are six months old, and a lack of advertising regulation is linked to lower breastfeeding rates.
Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'There is a direct correlation between countries that have no regulation around formula marketing and drastic reductions in breastfeeding.
'So that is why the Government did introduce regulation around advertising of formula milk because the numbers of breastfeeding mothers was dramatically reducing.'
The UK scores just 48 out of 100 overall on a range of infant-feeding metrics, according to the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative.
However, to get around these regulations, formula companies advertise for their follow-on milk and 'make all their packaging look exactly the same to anybody that was just perusing the shelves'.
The Chichester MP said: 'They're exploiting a legal loophole, because it is a legal loophole, but they've totally blurred the lines through similar branding.'
Another form of 'exploitative' marketing, she argued, is that formula companies will sell their formula into healthcare professional environments like maternity units or neonatal units for a hugely reduced price.
Purchase habits show strong brand loyalty when it comes to formula, with parents rarely switching brands once they have introduced a particular one to their baby.
It is also argued that brand presence in a healthcare setting gives the 'fake impression of an NHS endorsement'.
Ms Brown-Fuller told PA: 'They know that if they get the parents to use that in a hospital setting, the likelihood is that that is the formula they will then use when they go home.'
The CMA has put forward 11 recommendations to address these issues, aiming to strengthen labelling and advertising rules, better inform parents to make choices in retail environments and to eliminate brand influence in healthcare settings with standardised packaging.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we're determined to ensure every child has the best start to life.
'There are many benefits of breastfeeding but for those mothers that cannot or choose not to breastfeed, it is vital parents can access infant formula that is affordable and high quality. Families should not be paying over the odds to feed their babies.
'We are working closely with the devolved governments to carefully consider the CMA's recommendations and will respond fully in due course.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Palestine Action supporters ‘will feel full force of law', justice minister says
Supporters of the banned group Palestine Action will 'feel the full force of the law', a justice minister said, as police work to secure charges following hundreds of arrests at a demonstration in London over the weekend. The protest was held at Parliament Square on Saturday, organised by Defend Our Juries, with the Metropolitan Police warning it would detain anyone expressing support for Palestine Action. The force confirmed on Sunday that 522 people were held for displaying an item in support of a proscribed organisation, out of the total 532 arrests made during the policing operation. Over the coming weeks, officers from the Met's Counter Terrorism Command will work to put together case files and secure charges against those arrested, the force added. Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones told BBC Breakfast on Monday: 'I want to thank the police for their bravery and their courage in carrying out their diligent duties in the line of public protection, and I want to state that the right to peacefully protest in this country is a cornerstone of our democracy, and of course, we respect that. 'But with regards to Palestine Action, they are a proscribed terrorist organisation and their actions have not been peaceful. 'They have violently carried out criminal damage to RAF aircraft. 'We have credible reports of them targeting Jewish-owned businesses here in the United Kingdom, and there are other reasons, which we can't disclose because of national security. 'But they are a prescribed terrorist organisation and anyone showing support for that terrorist organisation will feel the full force of the law.' The Met said they were aware of online photos and footage suggesting some people returned to Parliament Square after being released on bail, adding it would be 'entirely unrealistic' for officers to recognise these individuals. One of the bail conditions was not to attend future demonstrations related to Palestine Action, police said. 'Given the numbers of people arrested (on Saturday) it would have been entirely unrealistic for officers to recognise individuals who returned to the area,' a spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said. 'Their focus was rightly on those continuing to commit offences who were still to be arrested. 'We are as confident as we can be that none of those who returned to Parliament Square re-joined the protesters who were holding placards.' Securing a charge for an offence under the Terrorism Act will, in some instances, require approval by both the Crown Prosecution Service and Attorney General Lord Hermer, police said. The majority of those arrested, 348, were aged 50 or over, according to a breakdown published by the Met on Sunday. Detained protesters were taken to prisoner processing points in the Westminster area. Those whose details could be confirmed were released on bail to appear at a police station at a future date. There were a further 10 arrests, six for assaults on officers, two for breaching Public Order Act conditions, one arrest for obstructing a constable in the execution of their duty, and one for a racially aggravated public order offence, the force said. Last week, the Met confirmed the first three charges in England and Wales for offences against Section 13 of the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action. The three people charged were arrested at a protest in Parliament Square on July 5. 'A further 26 case files relating to arrests on the same day are due to be submitted to the CPS imminently, with more to follow in relation to later protests,' a spokesperson for the Met added.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's pensions overhaul ‘risks fresh wave of unemployment'
Liz Kendall's plans to force employers to pay more into retirement pots risk sparking a 'counterproductive' wave of unemployment, a leading pension consultant has warned. Paul Cuff, co-head of Britain's biggest independent pension consultant XPS Pensions, cautioned the Work and Pensions Minister that rushing an increase in the level of employer pension contributions could fuel further job losses in the fragile labour market. 'Raising minimum levels of required contributions is another cost burden for employers that are under a lot of pressure. We all know that, especially following something like the National Insurance increase,' he said. 'It could have actually quite negative effects on the economy if it puts more financial pressure on companies and reduces their ability to invest or hire. It could be counterproductive.' Mr Cuff added said it was 'quite possible' the move would trigger a surge in unemployment and that the Government and employers are in 'quite a difficult place' on the issue. The warning comes after Ms Kendall launched a new pensions commission last month to tackle the fact that 'tomorrow's retirees are on track to be poorer than today's'. Employers must typically contribute a minimum 3pc to their automatically enrolled workers' pensions, while employees put in a minimum of 5pc of their pre-tax salary – 8pc in total. But auto-enrolment savings rate needs to be around twice as high – somewhere in the mid-teens – to offer adequate savings in addition to the state pension, Mr Cuff said. This means employers would face a significantly higher burden. 'We have to find a way of getting there somehow, otherwise we're kicking it down the road for another 20 years, but it will come back to haunt us one day. It's a very difficult problem,' he said. Job market under strain The Government has warned that almost half of working age adults are still not saving at all for their pension. This is despite the auto-enrolment policy boosting savings rates for eligible employees to 88pc, from 55pc in 2012. Britain's job market is already under strain, with Ms Reeves' £25bn tax raid on employers and another inflation-busting minimum wage rise blamed for slowing hiring. Unemployment is at a four-year high of 4.7pc, while hiring has been in decline for three year – the longest period on record in the last two decades. Mr Cuff urged the Government to set out a plan and very gradually increase mandatory saving rates over several years. It comes amid growing speculation that Ms Reeves will hit pensioners with National Insurance contributions for the first time as she seeks to plug a gap of as much as £50bn ahead of the autumn Budget. Currently, anyone working past the state pension age of 66 is exempt from the levy. Ending this tax break for pensioners would raise £1.1bn a year by the end of the decade, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Steve Webb, the former pensions minister, said: 'Because it affects people over pension age, you could just about say 'well, it's not working families, it's not the manifesto pledge, it's pensioners who just happen to be working'. You could imagine that happening.' Gordon Brown, the former prime minister, also suggested this week that it was a potential revenue raiser the Chancellor could explore. However, Baroness Ros Altmann warned the Chancellor would likely pay the price through lower employment rates for pensioners. 'What we need and want is to encourage more older people to keep working,' she said.
The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
My son, 5, died after a milk mix-up at school – we want to make sure it never happens again
THE sister of five-year-old Benedict Blythe, who died after an allergic reaction at school, has delivered a petition to Downing Street calling for new laws for schools. Etta Blythe, 6, was joined by five other primary school students who took placards and the letter to Whitehall. 8 8 They called for Benedict's Law to be implemented across the country to end the "postcode lottery" of allergy safeguards in schools. Benedict died after accidental exposure to cow's milk protein at Barnack Primary School, between Stamford and Peterborough, in December 2021. Etta and friends joined other children affected by allergies to stand in front of No 10 and knocked on the door to hand over the petition signed by more than 13,000 people. It comes following last month's jury inquest into Benedict's death at Peterborough Town Hall, which found that the school did not follow all the measures in place to prevent the fatal anaphylactic reaction. It also found there were risks of contamination and delays in administering the adrenaline pen. Benedict's mother, Helen Blythe, 38, said: "I think it's important that today it's the children that are bringing this to Downing Street. "It's their lives that we're talking about and it feels like a really proud moment that we can bring them here and give them the opportunity to have their voices heard. "We started the campaign almost three years ago. "Benedict's Law calls for greater safeguards and protection for children with allergies, specifically for there to be an allergy policy in every school, allergy training for all school staff and spare allergy pens in every school. "And it's something that we'd like to see implemented as soon as possible." Allergist explains the difference between allergies and anaphylaxis Benedict had asthma and several allergies, including eggs, nuts, kiwi fruit and milk. His parents had worked with the school to put together an allergy action plan in case of a reaction. The school was responsible for storing oat milk in the staff fridge, which was labelled with the child's name, and pouring it into Benedict's cup in the classroom before handing it directly to him. However, the jury inquest found that, on the day of his death, that process was not followed because his milk had been poured in the staff room rather than the classroom. Mrs Blythe said: "A month ago we had my son's inquest where the findings showed that had the measures that we're calling for now been in place, he almost certainly would have survived. "So I think that's a big change in terms of what we've learned through this process and a real reason why the Government should implement these measures. "Benedict was incredibly bright. He was curious as well, and incredibly kind. 8 8 8 "So one of the things that we see in terms of the legacy is how fitting it would be to have legislation that protects other children, because he really looked out for others. "And so to find something that keeps other children safe, that would be really fitting. "It's a really big, momentous moment being able to take this through after all the work that we've done and also the huge amount of support that we've had." Mrs Blythe says she has been in touch with a whole host of children and families who have different experiences in relation to their allergies. 'We are hopeful' Among those are both positive testimonies and "heartbreaking" incidents. She said: "We hear stories every day about children who are experiencing all types of reactions at school, of teachers who are left without support or any training, and it's heartbreaking to hear all of these coming through to us. "We should say that there's also stories that are really positive, where schools are having really good initiatives that keep children with allergies safe, but there shouldn't be a postcode lottery, and that's why these measures are so important. "The reception has been really good recently, we met with the Department of Education twice in the last couple of weeks and it does feel like there's a bit of a change in terms of their appetite for making this legislation happen. "So we are hopeful, I think at this point that there will be measures in place to protect children right across the country." In response to the petition, the Department for Education told the BBC: "We do not believe the School Allergy Safety Bill is necessary because in the autumn we plan to bring forward proposals for supporting pupils with medical conditions, including allergies. "The measures to support children with allergies envisioned in the Schools (Allergy Safety) Bill could be achieved without requiring primary legislation. "We will consider how we might take them forward as part of this consultation. "The proposal for all schools to hold in-date Adrenaline Auto-Injectors would have important implications for the NHS. We will work with DHSC and NHS England to consider this further." 8 8 8 The signs of an allergic reaction and anaphylaxis + what to do SYMPTOMS of an allergy usually occur within minutes of contact with the offending food or trigger, but they can also come on up to one hour later. Most allergic reactions are mild but they can also be moderate or severe. Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of allergic reaction which can be life threatening. In some cases, anaphylaxis symptoms lead to collapse and unconsciousness and, on rare occasions, can be fatal so it's important to know how to recognise them and act quickly. Mild to moderate symptoms include: Itchy mouth, tongue and throat Swelling of lips, around the eyes or face Red raised itchy rash (often called nettle rash, hives or urticaria) Vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhoea Runny nose and sneezing Severe symptoms of anaphylaxis include: Swelling of your throat and tongue Difficulty breathing or breathing very fast Difficulty swallowing, tightness in your throat or a hoarse voice Wheezing, coughing or noisy breathing Feeling tired or confused Feeling faint, dizzy or fainting Skin that feels cold to the touch Blue, grey or pale skin, lips or tongue – if you have brown or black skin, this may be easier to see on the palms of your hands or soles of your feet Anaphylaxis and its symptoms should be treated as a medical emergency. Follow these steps if you think you or someone you're with is having an anaphylactic reaction: Use an adrenaline auto-injector (such as an EpiPen) if you have one – instructions are included on the side of the injector. Call 999 for an ambulance and say that you think you're having an anaphylactic reaction. Lie down – you can raise your legs, and if you're struggling to breathe, raise your shoulders or sit up slowly (if you're pregnant, lie on your left side). If you have been stung by an insect, try to remove the sting if it's still in the skin. If your symptoms have not improved after 5 minutes, use a second adrenaline auto-injector. Do not stand or walk at any time, even if you feel better. Sources: Allergy UK, NHS
