Tucker Carlson Net Worth: How much does the media personality and MAGA ally earn?
Sounds like Tucker has been out of tune of late!
Sescribed as "perhaps the highest-profile proponent of Trumpism," and "the most influential voice in right-wing media, without a close second," Tucker Carlson is facing heat from the US President himself.
President Donald Trump recently took a dig at the MAGA ally, along with another public personality, Steve Bannon, over their criticism of the United States' involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict. Since the conflict began, Carlson and Bannon have been critical of Washington's involvement, although on the War Room podcast earlier on Monday, Carlson said that he actually does 'really love Trump'. Despite that, the not-so-subtle dig came as Trump had warned people in Tehran to 'evacuate immediately' as tensions between the countries increased overnight.
Who is Tucker Carlson?
Tucker Carlson is a prominent American conservative political commentator, journalist, and media personality, known for his influential role in shaping right-wing discourse in the United States. Born on May 16, 1969, in San Francisco, California, Carlson's career has spanned various media platforms, from print journalism to cable news, and more recently, digital media.
Carlson's media career began in the 1990s as a writer for The Weekly Standard, a conservative magazine.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
He transitioned into television journalism in the early 2000s, serving as a commentator for CNN from 2000 to 2005. During this time, he co-hosted the debate program Crossfire. In 2005, he moved to MSNBC, where he hosted Tucker until 2008. His tenure at these networks helped him hone his style and build a reputation as a provocative conservative voice.
In 2009, Carlson joined Fox News as a political analyst. He became the host of Tucker Carlson Tonight in 2016, a position he held until 2023.
Under his leadership, the show became the highest-rated cable news program, attracting millions of viewers nightly. Carlson's commentary often focused on issues such as immigration, political correctness, and critiques of the political establishment, resonating with a significant segment of the American populace.
However, Carlson's tenure at Fox News was marked by several controversies. His promotion of conspiracy theories and incendiary rhetoric led to advertiser boycotts and public criticism.
In April 2023, following a defamation lawsuit settlement involving Dominion Voting Systems, Carlson parted ways with Fox News.
Net worth of Tucker Carlson:
As of 2025, estimates place Tucker Carlson's net worth between $420 million and $2 billion, which reflects his multifaceted income streams and investments. His substantial earnings stem from various sources, including podcasting, streaming services, book royalties, and strategic investments.
Take a look.
Media career and earnings
Carlson's journey to financial prominence began in traditional media. At Fox News, he hosted Tucker Carlson Tonight, reportedly earning $35 million annually. His departure in 2023 opened new avenues, leading to ventures like The Tucker Carlson Show podcast and the Tucker Carlson Network (TCN), a subscription-based streaming service. These platforms generate significant revenue through subscriptions, advertising, and sponsorships.
Real estate holdings
Carlson's real estate portfolio includes over 13 properties, such as a waterfront estate on Gasparilla Island, Florida, and additional homes in Maine and Washington, D.C. These assets contribute to his wealth through appreciation and rental income.
Investment portfolio
Carlson's investment strategies encompass stocks, bonds, and alternative assets, with holdings valued at approximately $65 million. His diversified portfolio mitigates risks and enhances growth potential outside the media sector.
Luxury assets
Demonstrating his affluent lifestyle, Carlson owns a collection of luxury vehicles, including a Lamborghini Aventador and an Aston Martin DBS Superleggera. These assets reflect his personal taste and contribute to his overall wealth. However, Carlson resides in a rural home in Maine, embracing a simple lifestyle that contrasts with his on-screen persona. He is married to Susan Andrews, with whom he has four children: daughters Lillie, Hopie, and Dorothy, and son Buckley.
Beyond media, Carlson co-founded The Daily Caller, a conservative news outlet, and launched Last Country Media, focusing on independent content creation. Additionally, he introduced Alp Nicotine Pouches, catering to a niche market. These ventures diversify his income streams and expand his brand's reach. Moreover, with a reported $15 million book deal, Carlson authored bestsellers like Ship of Fools and The Long Slide.
These publications not only enhanced his public profile but also provided substantial royalties, adding to his financial portfolio.
Do you know how much Shah Rukh Khan's manager Pooja Dadlani earns annually? Her net worth will blow your mind
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fortified and hidden: Why Iran's Fordow nuclear site is critical; how could Israel try to take it out?
File photo of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu showing an illustration as he described his concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions during his address to the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters. (Pic credit: AP) As tensions between Iran and Israel escalate, a chilling question arises: Could this spiral into a nuclear crisis? In the past five days, the situation has worsened, with Israel reportedly targeting nuclear sites in Tehran. Experts warn that any further escalation could be catastrophic. At the heart of these rising tensions lies Iran's most secretive and fortified nuclear facility, Fordow. Why is Fordow critical? Tucked deep beneath a mountain near Qom, the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is one of Iran's most secretive and heavily fortified nuclear sites. Its underground design—80 to 90 meters below the surface—makes it virtually impenetrable to aerial strikes, even with the most advanced bunker-buster bombs in Israel's arsenal. Originally exposed in 2009 through Western intelligence, Fordow was built in secrecy and designed for survivability, especially in the face of potential military attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. What makes Fordow particularly alarming to global powers is its capacity to enrich uranium to levels close to weapons-grade. According to the IAEA, the site now houses 2,700 centrifuges and has been enriching uranium to 60%—a short technical step away from the 90% needed for nuclear weapons. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Fordow's nuclear threat According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), uranium enriched to 83.7% purity was found at the site in 2023, dangerously close to the 90% enrichment level needed for nuclear weapons. Experts warn that Iran could produce enough material for multiple bombs in just weeks if it chooses to weaponize its stockpile. Fordow's strategic importance lies not only in its enrichment capabilities but in its symbolic and operational role as a hardened fallback facility, raising the stakes of any military or diplomatic attempt to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. Despite repeated Israeli attempts to neutralize it, Fordow remains intact. Only the US possesses the kind of ordnance—like the GBU-57 bunker-buster—that might reach its buried core, and even that would likely require multiple strikes. For Iran, Fordow is a nuclear insurance policy. For the world, it is a red line—and possibly a countdown. "The Iranians fully understood that the Israelis would try to get inside their programs, and they built Fordo inside of a mountain a long time ago to take care of the post-Iraq problem," said Vali Nasr, an Iran expert who is a professor at Johns Hopkins University. The one bomb that could break through Only one known weapon could potentially take out Fordow: the US-made 30,000-pound bomb. This bomb, also called "bunker buster," is capable of burrowing through rock and steel before detonating. Key features: Length: 20 feet Weight: 30,000 pounds Carrier: Only the American B-2 stealth bomber can carry it Purpose: Destroy deep, fortified bunkers like Fordow But there's a catch: Israel doesn't have it. The United States has consistently denied Israeli requests for the bomb, citing fears that its use could provoke a full-scale regional war. "We've had a policy for a long time of not providing those to the Israelis because we didn't want them to use them," said general Joseph Votel, former head of US central command. What can Israel do instead? While Israel lacks the bunker buster or a heavy bomber to deliver it, it hasn't given up on options: Targeting power infrastructure: One feasible strategy is to destroy power generation and transmission systems around Fordow, temporarily disabling operations. Sealing entrances: Strikes on the access points of the underground complex could trap equipment and personnel, rendering parts of the facility unusable. Special forces insertion: A bold but dangerous option involves Israeli commandos infiltrating the facility, planting explosives, and sabotaging it from within. Israel reportedly floated such plans to the Obama administration years ago. Air supremacy tactics: With Israel having temporarily gained air dominance over large swathes of Iran, it could loiter over Fordow and disrupt activities, although this wouldn't eliminate the facility. "The Israelis have sprung a lot of clandestine operations lately," said general Kenneth McKenzie Jr, former commander of US central command. "But the physics of the problem remain the same." Would the US step in? While the US has moved aircraft and refuelling tankers into the region, there's no indication yet that US President Donald Trump is prepared to shift long-standing US policy and provide Israel with the bomb. Officials warn that deploying it would involve complex coordination and risk significant collateral and geopolitical fallout. "If we use the bunker buster, there could be nuclear contamination," general Votel said. "I think there would also certainly be fallout internationally over the idea that the United States joined Israel in what would be viewed as an illegal attack on the sovereignty of Iran," he added. Why the stakes are so high Fordow is not just a physical challenge—it is a political one. An Israeli strike on the site, especially with US involvement, could trigger Iranian retaliation against American assets across the Middle East and plunge the region into another war. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and remains a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). But with enrichment levels rising and regional threats mounting, international anxiety over Fordow continues to grow. Fordow symbolises the nuclear stalemate between Iran and its adversaries. For Israel, it represents the limits of its conventional reach. For the US, it is a geopolitical tripwire. And for Iran, it remains a testament to strategic foresight in the face of existential threats. As the Middle East teeters on the edge of a broader conflict, what happens—or does n't—at Fordow could shape the course of history.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bunker-busting bomb: Why Israel needs Donald Trump to take out Iran's nukes
As tensions between Israel and Iran escalate into open conflict, pressure is mounting on President Donald Trump to intervene militarily, particularly with one powerful weapon only the US possesses: the GBU-57 bunker-busting bomb. Israel's inability to destroy Iran's heavily fortified nuclear sites has intensified calls for American firepower, despite Trump's insistence on avoiding another Middle East war. Over the weekend, unnamed US officials told various US media that Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, suggesting ongoing coordination between the allies. "Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do, we're not even talking about going after the political leadership,' one official reportedly told Reuters . Trump, however, issued a stark warning: 'If we are attacked in any way, shape, or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Despite these threats, both CNN and the BBC confirm that Trump remains deeply reluctant to initiate direct strikes. He fears such a move would not only derail diplomatic efforts but also risk embroiling the US in an open-ended war without a clear exit, exactly the sort of entanglement his 'America First' doctrine seeks to avoid. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2 Bed Homes At ₹6999 Per Month Starting At ₹47L Shriram Properties Learn More Undo Israel wants the GBU-57 – but only the US can use it The immediate problem is technical: Israel's air force, despite its sophistication, lacks the capability to destroy Iran's underground nuclear site at Fordow. As per CNN and the BBC, only the US's GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to blast through 200 feet of reinforced concrete, stands a real chance of doing the job. The Israeli operation, codenamed 'Operation Rising Lion' has already taken out key nuclear scientists and military officials. But its ability to neutralise Iran's nuclear infrastructure remains in doubt. Former Vice President Mike Pence declared that if Israel's campaign fails to secure concessions from Tehran, 'then the United States should be prepared to join the conflict.' Distance between allies? Meanwhile, BBC reports indicate Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has privately claimed the attacks were 'fully coordinated' with the US, even as Trump publicly distances Washington from offensive involvement. Netanyahu's real goal — whether he says so openly or not, and he has come close — is degrading the Iranian state so thoroughly that the assault hastens the fall of the Islamic republic. An op-ed in the Washington Post With missile fire still raging between Israel and Iran, Trump has warned residents of Tehran to 'immediately evacuate,' even as he left the G7 summit in Canada to return to Washington. Iran has responded with waves of missile attacks, and while Trump has refrained from committing US troops to Israeli operations, officials now point to a decisive military option that could tip the balance: the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or GBU-57. 'If this ends with Fordo still enriching, then it's not a strategic gain,' said Brett McGurk, a former US national security adviser, referring to the underground Iranian nuclear facility that has long been a key concern for the West. What is the GBU-57? The GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) is the US military's most powerful non-nuclear bunker-busting bomb. Weighing 30,000 pounds, it is specifically designed to destroy deeply buried and fortified nuclear facilities, like Iran's Fordo site. Only B-2 stealth bombers are capable of carrying the MOP. It is GPS-guided for precise targeting. The bomb's casing is forged from a high-strength steel alloy to ensure it can penetrate hardened structures before detonation. This makes the MOP uniquely suited to strike targets buried deep within mountains — sites inaccessible to other conventional weapons and beyond the reach of Israel's arsenal. What has the US government said about it? A 2012 classified report from the Pentagon's Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) concluded that the MOP is capable of effectively targeting hardened underground facilities: Between 2008 and 2012, extensive testing included: Two sled tests at Holloman Air Force Base to validate weapon re-design. Five live B-2 bomber drops on representative targets at White Sands Missile Range. Three of these drops involved live warheads, with all tests confirming target destruction. The report assessed that after redesign improvements, the weapon system met operational expectations. Why it matters now With Israel's arsenal lacking both the MOP and the B-2 aircraft required to deliver it, the US remains the only country capable of deploying this weapon. If diplomatic efforts collapse and Iran continues enriching uranium at Fordo, Trump retains the option of ordering a strike using the GBU-57.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Not a ceasefire, a real end': Trump presses for total resolution in Israel-Iran conflict
President Trump has made it clear that he wants the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran to conclude with Tehran fully abandoning its pursuit of nuclear weapons, dismissing any notion that he is open to brokering a temporary ceasefire read more President Donald Trump speaks with reporters while flying aboard Air Force One en route from Calgary, Canada to Joint Base Andrews, Md., late Monday. AP US President Donald Trump has made it clear that he wants the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran to conclude with Tehran fully abandoning its pursuit of nuclear weapons, dismissing any notion that he is open to brokering a temporary ceasefire in the region. According to a Politico report, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One after unexpectedly leaving the G7 summit in Canada early on Monday, Trump expressed strong support for Israel's military actions and emphasised that Iran's nuclear programme must be eliminated entirely. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A complete give-up, it's possible,' Politico quoted Trump as saying of his preferred end to the fighting, adding he wanted 'not a ceasefire, a real end' to the conflict. 'I'm not too much in a mood to negotiate,' he said. Trump's comments came soon after he criticised French President Emmanuel Macron in a Truth Social post for implying that his early return to Washington was an effort to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. His remarks also highlighted a firm shift toward stronger backing of Israel's ongoing military campaign, marking a departure from his previous anti-war stance and drawing increasing criticism from within his own MAGA base over continued US engagement in the Middle East. 'I'm not looking for a ceasefire, we're looking at better than a ceasefire,' Trump was quoted as saying, reiterating his criticism of Macron as a 'nice guy' who 'doesn't get it right too often.' Trump offered few details on what a resolution to the Israel-Iran conflict would entail, saying his strategy would depend on how events unfold 'in the next couple days.' He confirmed plans to convene with advisers in the Situation Room early Tuesday and acknowledged considering sending Vice President JD Vance and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to engage with Iranian officials, reported Politico. Trump continued to blame Iran for failing to strike a nuclear deal in time to avoid Israel's offensive. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I hope their programme's going to be wiped out,' he said. 'They should've done the deal. Their cities have been blown to pieces and they've lost a lot of people.' Explaining his early departure from the G7 summit, Trump said he preferred 'being on the scene' to monitor the conflict and claimed he had achieved his goals at the meeting. During his brief 24-hour stay in Canada, Trump met with leaders including Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The only major outcome was a proclamation implementing a US-UK trade deal finalised last month. Trump brushed off concerns about securing additional trade agreements before his July 8 deadline for imposing new 'reciprocal' tariffs. 'We're actually finished with every deal if you think about it because all I have to do is say this is what you're going to pay,' he was quoted as saying. Despite initial hesitation, Trump ultimately signed a G7 joint statement on the Israel-Iran conflict — a rare moment of consensus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But when asked why the US backed the statement, he appeared detached. 'I haven't seen the statement yet, but I authorised them to say certain things,' he said. 'I don't know whether or not they said them correctly. But I think they probably did.' With inputs from agencies
