logo
Fortified and hidden: Why Iran's Fordow nuclear site is critical; how could Israel try to take it out?

Fortified and hidden: Why Iran's Fordow nuclear site is critical; how could Israel try to take it out?

Time of India8 hours ago

File photo of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu showing an illustration as he described his concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions during his address to the 67th session of the United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters. (Pic credit: AP)
As tensions between Iran and Israel escalate, a chilling question arises: Could this spiral into a nuclear crisis? In the past five days, the situation has worsened, with Israel reportedly targeting nuclear sites in Tehran.
Experts warn that any further escalation could be catastrophic. At the heart of these rising tensions lies Iran's most secretive and fortified nuclear facility, Fordow.
Why is Fordow critical?
Tucked deep beneath a mountain near Qom, the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is one of Iran's most secretive and heavily fortified nuclear sites. Its underground design—80 to 90 meters below the surface—makes it virtually impenetrable to aerial strikes, even with the most advanced bunker-buster bombs in Israel's arsenal.
Originally exposed in 2009 through Western intelligence, Fordow was built in secrecy and designed for survivability, especially in the face of potential military attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
What makes Fordow particularly alarming to global powers is its capacity to enrich uranium to levels close to weapons-grade. According to the IAEA, the site now houses 2,700 centrifuges and has been enriching uranium to 60%—a short technical step away from the 90% needed for nuclear weapons.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
Fordow's nuclear threat
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), uranium enriched to 83.7% purity was found at the site in 2023, dangerously close to the 90% enrichment level needed for nuclear weapons.
Experts warn that Iran could produce enough material for multiple bombs in just weeks if it chooses to weaponize its stockpile. Fordow's strategic importance lies not only in its enrichment capabilities but in its symbolic and operational role as a hardened fallback facility, raising the stakes of any military or diplomatic attempt to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions.
Despite repeated Israeli attempts to neutralize it, Fordow remains intact. Only the US possesses the kind of ordnance—like the GBU-57 bunker-buster—that might reach its buried core, and even that would likely require multiple strikes. For Iran, Fordow is a nuclear insurance policy. For the world, it is a red line—and possibly a countdown.
"The Iranians fully understood that the Israelis would try to get inside their programs, and they built Fordo inside of a mountain a long time ago to take care of the post-Iraq problem," said Vali Nasr, an Iran expert who is a professor at Johns Hopkins University.
The one bomb that could break through
Only one known weapon could potentially take out Fordow: the US-made 30,000-pound bomb. This bomb, also called "bunker buster," is capable of burrowing through rock and steel before detonating.
Key features:
Length:
20 feet
Weight:
30,000 pounds
Carrier:
Only the American B-2 stealth bomber can carry it
Purpose:
Destroy deep, fortified bunkers like Fordow
But there's a catch: Israel doesn't have it. The United States has consistently denied Israeli requests for the bomb, citing fears that its use could provoke a full-scale regional war.
"We've had a policy for a long time of not providing those to the Israelis because we didn't want them to use them," said general Joseph Votel, former head of US central command.
What can Israel do instead?
While Israel lacks the bunker buster or a heavy bomber to deliver it, it hasn't given up on options:
Targeting power infrastructure:
One feasible strategy is to destroy power generation and transmission systems around Fordow, temporarily disabling operations.
Sealing entrances:
Strikes on the access points of the underground complex could trap equipment and personnel, rendering parts of the facility unusable.
Special forces insertion:
A bold but dangerous option involves Israeli commandos infiltrating the facility, planting explosives, and sabotaging it from within. Israel reportedly floated such plans to the Obama administration years ago.
Air supremacy tactics:
With Israel having temporarily gained air dominance over large swathes of Iran, it could loiter over Fordow and disrupt activities, although this wouldn't eliminate the facility.
"The Israelis have sprung a lot of clandestine operations lately," said general Kenneth McKenzie Jr, former commander of US central command. "But the physics of the problem remain the same."
Would the US step in?
While the US has moved aircraft and refuelling tankers into the region, there's no indication yet that US President Donald Trump is prepared to shift long-standing US policy and provide Israel with the bomb.
Officials warn that deploying it would involve complex coordination and risk significant collateral and geopolitical fallout.
"If we use the bunker buster, there could be nuclear contamination," general Votel said. "I think there would also certainly be fallout internationally over the idea that the United States joined Israel in what would be viewed as an illegal attack on the sovereignty of Iran," he added.
Why the stakes are so high
Fordow is not just a physical challenge—it is a political one.
An Israeli strike on the site, especially with US involvement, could trigger Iranian retaliation against American assets across the Middle East and plunge the region into another war.
Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and remains a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). But with enrichment levels rising and regional threats mounting, international anxiety over Fordow continues to grow.
Fordow symbolises the nuclear stalemate between Iran and its adversaries. For Israel, it represents the limits of its conventional reach. For the US, it is a geopolitical tripwire. And for Iran, it remains a testament to strategic foresight in the face of existential threats. As the Middle East teeters on the edge of a broader conflict, what happens—or does n't—at Fordow could shape the course of history.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK parliament votes to decriminalise abortion, repeal Victorian-era law
UK parliament votes to decriminalise abortion, repeal Victorian-era law

Indian Express

time13 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

UK parliament votes to decriminalise abortion, repeal Victorian-era law

Britain's parliament voted on Tuesday to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales to stop a growing number of women from being investigated by police for terminating pregnancies under legislation dating back to the mid-19th century. Abortions have been legal in England and Wales for almost 60 years but only up to 24 weeks and with the approval of two doctors. Women can face criminal charges if they decide to end a pregnancy after 24 weeks under a Victorian-era law that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. In Britain, criminal convictions for breaking this law are rare, but the number of prosecutions has increased following the Covid-19 pandemic when a change in the law allowed abortion pills to be taken at home to end pregnancies within 10 weeks of conception. In a free vote in parliament, when politicians were not ordered to vote along party lines, lawmakers gave an initial approval by 379 votes to 137 for an amendment to stop prosecutions for women who end pregnancies in all circumstances. Medical professionals who assist women in obtaining an abortion outside the 24-week limit could still face prosecution. The proposal could still be altered or even voted down as it is a part of a greater bill that is making its way through the House of Commons and the unelected upper chamber of parliament. Labour Member of Parliament Tonia Antoniazzi, who proposed the amendment, said the current law had been used to investigate 100 women in the last five years, including some who had given birth prematurely or had been forced into abortions by abusive partners. 'Each one of these cases is a travesty enabled by our outdated abortion law,' she told parliament. 'This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end.' The vote was part of a broader government criminal justice bill that if passed in its entirety would bring the abortion laws in England and Wales in line with other Western countries including France, Canada and Australia. Some politicians warned the proposed amendment was being rushed through parliament and could have unintended consequences. Rebecca Paul, a Conservative member of parliament, warned 'if this becomes law, fully developed babies up to term could be aborted by a woman with no consequences.' The amendment would revoke parts of a law passed in 1861 by a then all-male parliament that made deliberately ending a pregnancy a crime and stipulated that those who carried it out could be 'kept in penal servitude for life'. A change to the law in 1967 permitted abortions in certain circumstances, but left the 19th century criminal prohibition in place. Between 1861 and 2022, only three women in Britain were convicted of having illegal abortions, according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, which works to improve women's healthcare. But since then, six women have been charged by police, the group said. One woman has been jailed. In May, a British woman, Nicola Packer, was acquitted after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. The 45-year-old told jurors during her trial, which came after a four-year police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for so long.

AI godfather Geoffrey Hinton reveals the surprising jobs safe from automation — and the roles everybody will lose soon
AI godfather Geoffrey Hinton reveals the surprising jobs safe from automation — and the roles everybody will lose soon

Time of India

time14 minutes ago

  • Time of India

AI godfather Geoffrey Hinton reveals the surprising jobs safe from automation — and the roles everybody will lose soon

Geoffrey Hinton is called the "Godfather of AI" because of his important work on neural networks. He used to work at Google. Hinton talked about AI and jobs in an interview on the "Diary of a CEO" podcast aired on June 16, as per reports. He said AI will one day be better than humans at everything. But for now, some jobs are safer. Jobs that need physical work, like plumbing, will stay safe for a long time. Hinton said, "It will take a long time for AI to be good at physical tasks... so being a plumber is a smart choice," according to Business Insider. Which jobs will AI replace soon? Gen Z workers are increasingly choosing blue-collar jobs like plumbing because the job market is very tough. For boring or routine intellectual jobs, AI will replace almost everyone. Hinton, "For mundane intellectual labor, AI is just going to replace everybody." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brought to you by Undo Paralegals are at high risk of being replaced by AI. Working in call centers is very risky, Hinton said he'd be "terrified" if he worked there. To keep a job safe from AI, people need to be very skilled. Hinton says, "You would have to be very skilled to have an AI-proof job", as stated by Business Insider. Hinton sees mass job losses caused by AI as the biggest threat to people's happiness right now. Even if governments give universal basic income, people might still feel unhappy because they lose their sense of purpose without work. Hinton advocates UBI but worries about loss of purpose. Live Events Mass job displacement by AI is likely and is already happening in some ways. AI is starting to take over jobs that recent college graduates used to get. Some people think AI won't fully replace entry-level jobs, but will help humans do those jobs better, as mentioned by Business Insider. Hinton agrees some jobs will be done by humans working with AI assistants, but that means one person will do the work of 10 people, leading to big job cuts. Healthcare jobs might handle AI changes better because there's always high demand for healthcare. Hinton said, "A few areas, like healthcare, will be able to absorb the change." But most jobs are not like healthcare and will not be able to absorb AI disruptions well, as per the report by Business Insider. FAQs Q1. Which jobs are safe from AI? Jobs that need physical work like plumbing and healthcare are safer from AI. Q2. What kinds of jobs will AI replace soon? AI will replace many routine office jobs like paralegals and call center workers.

Trump Meets With Security Team After Demanding Iran ‘Surrender'
Trump Meets With Security Team After Demanding Iran ‘Surrender'

Mint

time14 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump Meets With Security Team After Demanding Iran ‘Surrender'

President Donald Trump was meeting with his national security team in Washington on Tuesday to discuss the escalating Middle East conflict, according to people familiar with the matter, fueling fresh speculation that the US is on the verge of joining Israel's attack on Iran. Before gathering his advisers in the White House Situation Room, Trump posted a demand for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' and warned of a possible strike against the country's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out , at least not for now,' Trump posted on social media. Israel also sought to ratchet up pressure on Iran, signaling it will intensify a campaign of air strikes that have targeted the country's nuclear facilities as well as military leaders and infrastructure. US weapons are seen as key to achieving a more complete destruction of the Islamic Republic's atomic program than anything Israel can do alone. The escalating war began with an Israeli attack late last week and has seen the sworn enemies trade missile salvos for five days. Trump departed early from the Group of Seven leaders meeting in Canada to deal with the crisis. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who's also attending that summit, told the country's public broadcaster ZDF that a US decision on whether to join the war militarily would come 'in the course of the day' and said that if Iran doesn't return to the negotiating table, then 'the complete destruction of Iran's nuclear program may be on the agenda.' Iran had been negotiating with the US for weeks over a nuclear deal before Israel launched its surprise assault. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed to step up the campaign on Tuesday, saying the military will attack 'very significant targets in Tehran' and adding that residents should evacuate. Earlier in the day, a spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces said that, while it's too early to assess the success of the current campaign in Iran, strikes on the country's nuclear facilities are 'deepening' every day. Iran's state-run Islamic Republic News Agency cited the country's armed forces chief of staff as saying that it plans a 'punitive operation' against Israel and warned Israelis to evacuate Tel Aviv and Haifa. Trump earlier Tuesday posted on social media that 'we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' crediting US military equipment for helping Israel gain air superiority. Katz didn't elaborate on what targets Israel might aim to hit and Trump hasn't spelled out his next steps. Vice President JD Vance told reporters Tuesday that Trump is 'making clear to the American people and the entire world that the US policy is that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, and part of that is that they are not allowed' to enrich uranium, adding that 'there are many different ways and different options at the president's disposal for how to accomplish that policy goal.' US stocks declined on Tuesday as Trump played down the possibility of negotiations with Iran, fueling widespread fears the war will spread to other countries in the oil- and gas-producing region. Trump's exit from the G-7 followed another 24 hours of intense bombardments, with Iran firing ballistic missiles and Israel striking targets across the Islamic Republic, including the capital of Tehran. The USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group is sailing to the Middle East ahead of schedule, marking the first significant move of American military assets to the region since Friday. Reuters reported that the US military was deploying more fighters and other warplanes to the region. New satellite images suggest Israeli strikes damaged underground uranium-enrichment facilities at Natanz, Iran's primary nuclear-fuel production site, the United Nations nuclear watchdog said in a post on X. The International Atomic Energy Agency has yet to detect damage at Iran's other underground enrichment site in Fordow, according to the statement. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a longtime advocate of war against Iran, said he '100% supports' US participation in striking Fordow. 'I'm all in for destroying their nuclear program. You can't do it without destroying Fordow,' he told reporters in Washington. 'If it takes bombs, bunker-buster bombs, so be it. If we need to fly with Israel, so be it.' Graham added that 'the window for diplomacy has passed, we're in the land of force.' Israel has sought to draw the US — which has provided defensive support against Iranian missile fire — deeper into the conflict. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told ABC News on Monday that the countries share a common enemy in Iran, and that it's in America's interest to support Israel. Trump has left open the possibility of further talks on Iran's atomic activities after five earlier rounds, but continued to hammer the idea that Tehran is at fault for not having already agreed to a deal that would have prevented Israel's attacks. He told reporters that he 'may' send a high-level official, such as special envoy Steven Witkoff or Vance, to meet with Iran. Trump is 'telling Iran you can put a stop to this,' Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley said after speaking with the president on Tuesday. Israel said it saw a drop-off in Iranian fire on Tuesday, with a military spokesperson saying 'a few dozen' missiles had been launched since midnight compared with the hundreds seen over the weekend. Still, Israel's Oil Refineries Ltd. shut down its refinery after the complex was damaged and three employees were killed, the company said Monday. The site has a peak production capacity of close to 200,000 barrels of oil per day, with 70% of products distributed in the Israeli market, according to the company's website. Israeli petrol station chain Sonol, which has 245 gasoline stations in the country, warned Tuesday that the closure of the Haifa refinery will likely cause disruptions to fuel supply to its Israeli customers, according to the Globes newspaper. Long-standing tensions between Iran and Israel erupted into open fighting last week, when Israel launched surprise attacks on Iranian military and nuclear sites and killed senior commanders and atomic scientists. Since then, it has achieved air superiority over much of Iran, allowing it to bomb major cities and infrastructure at will. For Iran's government, the showdown poses a strategic dilemma. It can't risk appearing weak, yet its retaliatory options are shrinking. Proxy forces it supports across the region have been largely degraded by Israeli wars since Oct. 2023. More than 200 people have been killed in Iran by Israel's strikes, according to the last official tally from the Iranian government. In Israel, the government has said 24 people have been killed — the same number reported the day prior — and over 600 injured. Oil prices have climbed in the past week as the conflict escalated, raising concerns about a wider hit to the global economy. Many analysts say Iran has the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a key energy trade route. Qatar on Tuesday asked liquefied natural gas vessels to wait outside the strait until they're ready to load amid the escalating tensions. Two large tankers collided and caught fire near the strait early on Tuesday. The owner of one of them said the incident was 'unrelated to the current regional conflict.' With assistance from Erik Wasson, Natalia Drozdiak, Alisa Odenheimer, Jonathan Tirone, Dan Williams and Steven T. Dennis. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store